[Fiware-security] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation

[BISSON Pascal]

Dear Manuel,

First thanks for the spreadsheet you created !

Second here are my comments regarding Security Chapter:


1.    Identity Management GCP (DT) Criteria 1: I was told that DT would leave on M36 so you have to correct & replace M40 by M36.

2.    There is no planned release for R3 of Android Flow Monitoring from (INRIA). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2.

3.    There is no planned release for R3 of Secure Storage Service (TCS). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2.

As for the rest I'm assuming that when Criteria 2 is marked unknown  and Criterai 3 is set (R3.3). Criteria 3 applies. Please confirm or clarify ...
Best Regards,

Pascal

PS: I put Security team in cc for their information also in case I would have missed something.



[@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@]

De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Envoyé : lundi 10 février 2014 17:28
À : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation

Dear Partners,

In order to try applying the criteria to identify when GEI's are finishing their activities, I've created this spreadsheet with the evidence collected.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing

Since I may well have made mistakes on collecting and organising the evidence or when interpreting the criteria given, before going step forward to concluding when, I'd appreciate having feedback to consolidate evidence and interpretation.

At first I appreciated three criteria to be relevant, although from last email by Juanjo, I'd say criteria 2 and 3 are the key ones. However, I share all three bellow:

Criteria #1: Vote on project extension.

==> There're a few partners who marked option 1 and 2, since prevalence is unknown to me - they are marked as unknown. Fraunhofer and Siemens's enablers have "unknown" entries for that reason

Criteria #2: Open Source

==> I've collected the input from Column O in the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E&usp=drive_web#gid=8. Then, I understood from Juanjo's email that Proprietary GEI's finish their development and packaging on R3.2, except Thales.  Additionally,  GEIs to be delivered as Open Source can finish their contribution on R3.3; Be aware that there're some differences on the kind of activities GEI's can do according to whether they were declared already as Open Source by the end of November 2013 or just they were planned to be Open Source.

Criteria #3 : EC directions

==> Applies to Thales whose developments continue.

Then, as an example, applying the evidence collected on Summary sheet to Apps chapter, it seems to me that Mediator, Service Mashup, Business Calculator and Business Modeler should have finished their activities on R3.2

I hope it's useful.

Kind regards,
Manuel

----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telefónica Digital
Parque Tecnológico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/>


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20140212/83dca27b/attachment.html>