Dear Robert, Dear Wolfgang, Dear Pascal, Dear all, >> As for other partners to get involved in the peer review I suggested already NSN and DT colleagues to get involved. >> Please contact them and organize the work with them in a timely manner since we are already beyond schedule and >> SAP is awaiting for this peer review. as Anja already wrote: given the large amount of the document with 369/404 pages - measured with OpenOffice/LibreOffice - we suggest to use the same approach as last year, namely assigning different reviewers per Section. In particular, we propose the following chapter distribution (according to OpenOffice page numbers) for review of the Apps OpenSpecs. ============================================================= GEs from 1st Wave Deadline: as soon as possible ============================================================= IBM (81 pages): Marketplace, 62 pages (pp.30-91) Mediator/SETHA2, 19 pages (pp.110-128) DT (40 pages): Registry, 18 pages (pp.92-109) Repository, 22 pages (pp.8-29) NSN (44 pages): Service Mashup, 16 pages (pp.129-144) Business Calculator, 16 pages (pp. 352-367) Business Modeler, 12 pages (pp. 340-351) ============================================================= GEs from 2nd Wave Deadline: end of March according to Review Cockpit ============================================================= IBM (?? pages): Mediator/Mediator, ???? pages (not available yet) Revenue Settlement and Sharing System, 20 pages (pp.320-339) DT (91 pages): Application Mashup, 69 pages (pp.145-213) Light Semantic Composition Editor, 22 pages (pp.240-261) NSN (74 pages): Service Composition, 26 pages (pp.214-239) Store, 58 pages (pp.262-319) ============================================================= So, Robert and Wolfgang, would you be available to support us in the review? For now, 1st Wave seems to be important. Possibly, the second wave might also be done by a different set of partners... Let's discuss tomorrow in the FI-WARE call. Best Regards, Franz-Stefan From: BISSON Pascal <pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com> To: Anja Lehmann <anj at zurich.ibm.com>, "'Franz-Stefan Preiss'" <FRP at zurich.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Osborne <osb at zurich.ibm.com>, GIDOIN Daniel <daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com>, "Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de" <Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de>, "Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich) (gerald.meyer at nsn.com)" <gerald.meyer at nsn.com>, "DI CERBO, Francesco" <francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com>, "'TRABELSI, Slim'" <slim.trabelsi at sap.com>, "pascal.bisson at noos.fr" <pascal.bisson at noos.fr>, BISSON Pascal <pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com> Date: 26.02.2014 12:34 Subject: RE: Your peer review of WP3 D313 (Open Specs) Dear Anja, Thanks for your email. Meanwhile, I'm a bit surprised to hear that the peer review has not started yet since I let you and Franz-Stefan known once week ago ... (in fact at last audio conf 14/02/2014 - See minutes/AP on IBM on this). Now in view of the situation I would appreciate if you could perform this review the sooner the better. As for what to review, you have to review the document indicated in my previous email. This document is the one generated by WP3 and encompasses all GEs that need to be peer-reviewed. As for other partners to get involved in the peer review I suggested already NSN and DT colleagues to get involved. Please contact them and organize the work with them in a timely manner since we are already beyond schedule and SAP is awaiting for this peer review. Hope I have answered. Best Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] -----Message d'origine----- De : Anja Lehmann [mailto:anj at zurich.ibm.com] Envoyé : mercredi 26 février 2014 11:07 À : BISSON Pascal; 'Franz-Stefan Preiss' Cc : Michael Osborne; GIDOIN Daniel; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich) (gerald.meyer at nsn.com); DI CERBO, Francesco; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; pascal.bisson at noos.fr Objet : Re: Your peer review of WP3 D313 (Open Specs) Dear Pascal, thanks for letting us know that the deliverable is ready for the internal review now. Given the large amount of almost 400 pages we would suggest to use the same approach as last year, namely assigning different reviewers per Section. Could you please suggest such a work split among the partners of WP8? Also, can you confirm that the review should only cover those GEs/Sections which are part of the 1st Wave as indicated in the peer-review cockpit [1]? This would be the following sections: Marketplace Mediator Registry Repository Service Composition? (unclear, no wave assigned) Service Mashup Business Calculator Business Modeler We will be able to provide a review of 1-2 sections by mid next week, as Franz-Stefan is currently not in the office. Best regards, Anja [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing#gid=0 Am 2/25/2014 12:53 PM, schrieb BISSON Pascal: > Dear Franz-Stefan, > > I've just checked the Peer review cockpit > (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VF > ZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing#gid=0) > for GE Open Specs R3 of Apps Chapter (aka: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated > .docx) > > Unfortunately I couldn't find there your peer review. So could you > please upload it asap. > > In case it would not be complete please upload what you have reviewed > already and inform me regarding what remains. In case you need support > to complete this review please contact NSN/DT) colleagues in cc to > give you an hand on this. This not to delay too much your review to > reach WP3 Lead (SAP/Markus) who is awaiting for it. > > Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support. > > Hearing from you. > > Regards, > > Pascal > > [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] > -- Dr. Anja Lehmann IBM Research Zurich www.zurich.ibm.com/~anj tel: +41 44 724 8351 fax: +41 44 724 8953 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20140227/4acc458a/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy