From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 2 12:13:40 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:13:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 Message-ID: dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc ------------------------------------- Dial-in numbers: +33 1 6993 7006 (France) +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) +34 91339 4300 (Spain) +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) Passcode: 8122 500 Let Marika (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com) know if you need to dial in from another country. International number is +46 10 7120000, works from everywhere. Ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 2 15:07:07 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:07:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F79A47B.6070706@tid.es> Stefano, today I am sick, I will not be able to join the confcall. My apologies Miguel El 02/04/2012 12:13, stefano de panfilis escribi?: dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc ------------------------------------- Dial-in numbers: +33 1 6993 7006 (France) +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) +34 91339 4300 (Spain) +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) Passcode: 8122 500 Let Marika (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com) know if you need to dial in from another country. International number is +46 10 7120000, works from everywhere. Ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 2 15:54:04 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:54:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: dear all, i have a problem with the phone, apologises, just asking you to postpone of 15 minutes or start without me. ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 stefano de panfilis > dear all, > > this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc > > ------------------------------------- > Dial-in numbers: > +33 1 6993 7006 (France) > +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) > +34 91339 4300 (Spain) > +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) > > Passcode: 8122 500 > > Let Marika (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com) know if you need to dial in > from another country. > International number is +46 10 7120000, works from everywhere. > > Ciao, > stefano > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Mon Apr 2 16:09:33 2012 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:09:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F79B31D.1060703@nsn.com> Hi, I have to participate another meeting, which did not end by 16:00 it seems. I'll try to join once it ends, if the meeting is still on. Br, Loci On 04/02/2012 03:54 PM, ext stefano de panfilis wrote: > dear all, > > i have a problem with the phone, apologises, just asking you to > postpone of 15 minutes or start without me. > > ciao, > stefano > > 2012/4/2 stefano de panfilis > > > dear all, > > this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc > > ------------------------------------- > Dial-in numbers: > +33 1 6993 7006 (France) > +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) > +34 91339 4300 (Spain) > +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) > > Passcode: 8122 500 > > Let Marika (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com ) > know if you need to dial in from another country. > International number is +46 10 7120000 , > works from everywhere. > > Ciao, > stefano > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- L?r?nt N?meth R&D Team Leader Koztelek str. 6 1092, Budapest, HUNGARY Tel.: +36209849340 Fax: +3612154766 lorant.nemeth at nsn.com http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/ This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. Local registered entity information: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Mon Apr 2 16:16:06 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:16:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000216E6B0E1@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> I ve got another meeting at 16h30... --- Sent from my Blackberry, sorry for the.typos (et desole pour les accents!) De : stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Envoy? : Monday, April 02, 2012 03:54 PM ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 dear all, i have a problem with the phone, apologises, just asking you to postpone of 15 minutes or start without me. ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 stefano de panfilis > dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc ------------------------------------- Dial-in numbers: +33 1 6993 7006 (France) +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) +34 91339 4300 (Spain) +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) Passcode: 8122 500 Let Marika (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com) know if you need to dial in from another country. International number is +46 10 7120000, works from everywhere. Ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com Mon Apr 2 16:16:55 2012 From: antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com (antonio cimmino) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:16:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 weekly phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F79B4D7.3010606@alcatel-lucent.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon Apr 2 17:32:42 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:32:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] composition editor link to ADD Message-ID: Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 4 13:26:48 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:26:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Message-ID: dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GEs_Check_20120327.doc Type: application/msword Size: 165888 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Apr 4 14:45:31 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:45:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] TR: URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Message-ID: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> FYI De : BISSON Pascal Envoy? : mercredi 4 avril 2012 14:31 ? : stefano de panfilis Cc : GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal Objet : RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Importance : Haute Dear Stefano, First thanks the check you performed. I confirm that up to date information related to Security GEs release are the ones in D2.4a (Technology Roadmap). Information we provided for D10.1a was information we were available to provide at the time you requested these information (GA in Madrid). In the meantime D10.1a was supposed to be released before D2.4a (that's also why D2.4a as updated information). As such I confirm that: Privacy GE also Malware Detection System were decided to be moved to second Major Release. The Secure Storage Service one optional security service would be part of the First Major Release. BTW it was already identified since part of the excel file we discuss in Madrid and on which we exchange emails. In the meantime it is also true that at the time of the GA in Madrid I had no information regarding HW & SW requirements for that GE. But I asked for them and provided them to you and the mailing list in my email of ven. 10/02/2012 14:52. For your convenience here are the reqts for the Secure Storage Service: - Linux - Apache 2 - Tomcat 6 - Java So if you manage please use this information to update accordingly D10.1 and align it to was as been stated it D2.4a Hope I have answered your demand please confirm. Hearing from you Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mercredi 4 avril 2012 13:27 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 4 17:44:44 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:44:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] TR: URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check In-Reply-To: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> References: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Message-ID: dear pascal and pier, thank you very much for your valuable answers! i hope you understood my email was not a complain, not at all, as i completely understand and agree that things evolve, and must evolve i'd say. it was only to fix, at least for this moment as much as possible, the info we do have in order to plan the testbed set-up and integration. with this respect i do suggest to juanjo to put in all deliverbales a disclaimer statement that says that the deliverable provides information as is and valid at the moment of publication and that more accurate and up-to-date info can be found in the project portal. ciao, stefano 2012/4/4 BISSON Pascal > FYI**** > > ** ** > > *De :* BISSON Pascal > *Envoy? :* mercredi 4 avril 2012 14:31 > *? :* stefano de panfilis > *Cc :* GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal > *Objet :* RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check > *Importance :* Haute**** > > ** ** > > Dear Stefano,**** > > ** ** > > First thanks the check you performed. **** > > ** ** > > I confirm that up to date information related to Security GEs release are > the ones in D2.4a (Technology Roadmap).**** > > ** ** > > Information we provided for D10.1a was information we were available to > provide at the time you requested these information (GA in Madrid). In the > meantime D10.1a was supposed to be released before D2.4a (that?s also why > D2.4a as updated information).**** > > ** ** > > As such I confirm that:**** > > Privacy GE also Malware Detection System were decided to be moved to > second Major Release. **** > > The Secure Storage Service one optional security service would be part of > the First Major Release. BTW it was already identified since part of the > excel file we discuss in Madrid and on which we exchange emails. In the > meantime it is also true that at the time of the GA in Madrid I had no > information regarding HW & SW requirements for that GE. But I asked for > them and provided them to you and the mailing list in my email of ven. > 10/02/2012 14:52.**** > > ** ** > > For your convenience here are the reqts for the Secure Storage Service:*** > * > > - Linux **** > > - Apache 2**** > > - Tomcat 6**** > > - Java**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > So if you manage please use this information to update accordingly D10.1 > and align it to was as been stated it D2.4a **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Hope I have answered your demand please confirm.**** > > ** ** > > Hearing from you**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Pascal**** > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *De :* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* stefano de > panfilis > > *Envoy? :* mercredi 4 avril 2012 13:27 > *? :* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc :* Juanjo Hierro; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Objet :* [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check**** > > ** ** > > dear all,**** > > ** ** > > in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge > implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our > d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on > (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the > "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we > should have the same ge ....**** > > ** ** > > actually it is not completely the case!**** > > ** ** > > i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us > which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which > will be deplyed M12.**** > > ** ** > > In particular i need:**** > > ** ** > > 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) > and "Composition & Mashups"**** > > ** ** > > 2. cloud - mistmaches identified:**** > > 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements > **** > > 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security > chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements **** > > ** ** > > 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you > please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info?**** > > ** ** > > 4. Data - mistmatches identified:**** > > 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is > the same, correct?**** > > 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the > same, correct?**** > > 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW > requirements**** > > ** ** > > 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. > correct?**** > > ** ** > > 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new > one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements**** > > ** ** > > I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-)**** > > ** ** > > in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!!**** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > ** ** > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 4 22:09:45 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:09:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Message-ID: dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" < fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu> actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano,**** > > I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the > software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don?t > know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we > should drive for a ?testbed software specification? subheading, where we > incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network > requirements. **** > > ** ** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor > **** > > ** ** > > General list of open specifications (for app & services):**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework > **** > > (part of the architecture: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture > )**** > > ** ** > > **1. **Network-specification should incorporate:**** > > **- **List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, > 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ?)**** > > **- **Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, > Mail, NTP, ?)**** > > **- **Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed > ports INPUT/OUTPUT)**** > > **- **Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific > routes to other GEs)**** > > ** ** > > **2. **?Testbed software specification? should incorporate:**** > > **A) ** Virtual appliance delivery ** ** > > **o **Virtual machine container name**** > > **o **Guest-OS**** > > **o **Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit)**** > > **o **Number of CPUs**** > > **o **RAM (Min and Max)**** > > **o **Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements**** > > **B) **Software delivery**** > > **o **Depending software packages (Java / **** > > **o **Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ?) > **** > > **o **Depending hardware requirements (if any)**** > > **o **Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ?)**** > > **o **Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ?) > **** > > **C) **Software as a service delivery**** > > **o **Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a > service**** > > **o **User/password (if any for integration testing)**** > > ** ** > > I compiled these two lists just out of my head ? perhaps we should > reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed > something. **** > > ** ** > > I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open > specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above > information is: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1Or should I incorporate this list in > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan? > **** > > Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address > Juanjo with the request?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks and best regards,**** > > ** ** > > /Thorsten** > ** > > ** ** > > -- ** ** > > ** ** > > Thorsten Sandfuchs**** > > ** ** > > SAP AG ** ** > > ** ** > > SAP Research Center Karlsruhe **** > > ** ** > > Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 **** > > D - 76131 Karlsruhe **** > > ** ** > > www.sap.com **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx **** > > ** ** > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. **** > > ** ** > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > ** ** > > Please consider the environment before printing this mail!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 5 10:52:21 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:52:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Thu Apr 5 11:05:21 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:05:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] GE dependencies and Test Cases Message-ID: <46B09265701A4B5093F28872C97C944D@FSC461216100407> Dear all, in order to finalize the D10.3a delivery it is important each chapter starts asap analyzing the document[1] in order to fill the corresponding pages with: - information on GEs dependencies. - information about TestCases which will be exploited to test the selected dependencies. In each chapter page I have provided example tables showing (i) how to present the dependencies (ii) how to gather test cases. For you convenience I have also put there the dependencies already provided in D10.1a. So at the end, please start taking confidence with this pages and let us know your feedback about so that, in these days and even during the next Phc, we can agree on the concrete next steps to finalize the work. Thanks and best regards Paolo [1] https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_In tegration_Plan#Integration_Testing_Plan:_Preparation Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Apr 5 11:13:52 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:13:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, **** > > ** ** > > may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? **** > > ** ** > > Thanks. **** > > ** ** > > BR, > B**** > > ** ** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM > *To:* Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages**** > > ** ** > > dear thorsten and all,**** > > ** ** > > combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for > d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. > **** > > ** ** > > you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > **** > > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... > ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. > **** > > ** ** > > anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments > and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, > paolo and thorsten.**** > > ** ** > > I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, > pier, boris) to my email of this morning.**** > > ** ** > > my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!!**** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > ** ** > > 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten **** > > Hi stefano,**** > > I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the > software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don?t > know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we > should drive for a ?testbed software specification? subheading, where we > incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network > requirements. **** > > **** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor > **** > > **** > > General list of open specifications (for app & services):**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework > **** > > (part of the architecture: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture > )**** > > **** > > 1. Network-specification should incorporate:**** > > - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, > 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ?)**** > > - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, > Mail, NTP, ?)**** > > - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed > ports INPUT/OUTPUT)**** > > - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific > routes to other GEs)**** > > **** > > 2. ?Testbed software specification? should incorporate:**** > > A) Virtual appliance delivery **** > > o Virtual machine container name**** > > o Guest-OS**** > > o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit)**** > > o Number of CPUs**** > > o RAM (Min and Max)**** > > o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements**** > > B) Software delivery**** > > o Depending software packages (Java / **** > > o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ?)**** > > o Depending hardware requirements (if any)**** > > o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ?)**** > > o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ?)**** > > C) Software as a service delivery**** > > o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a > service**** > > o User/password (if any for integration testing)**** > > **** > > I compiled these two lists just out of my head ? perhaps we should > reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed > something. **** > > **** > > I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open > specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above > information is: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1Or should I incorporate this list in > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan? > **** > > Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address > Juanjo with the request?**** > > **** > > Thanks and best regards,**** > > **** > > /Thorsten** > ** > > **** > > -- **** > > **** > > Thorsten Sandfuchs**** > > **** > > SAP AG **** > > **** > > SAP Research Center Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 **** > > D - 76131 Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > www.sap.com **** > > **** > > **** > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx **** > > **** > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. **** > > **** > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > **** > > Please consider the environment before printing this mail!**** > > **** > > **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente > alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di > provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > *This e-mail and any attachments** is **confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, > copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and > advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.* > *[image: rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa > mail se non ? necessario.* > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 5 11:29:55 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:29:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Thu Apr 5 12:19:50 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:19:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 5 12:25:32 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:25:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: Right, it should be also indicated in that testbed snapshot map including a sort of sw repository with its relative instructions for those components, which are used locally on their "customer" (UCP) side, additionally to the components hosted in the testbed, thus "remote" for UCP. BR, B From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:20 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 5 12:56:33 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:56:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: <728596403-1333623094-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-609166445-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <728596403-1333623094-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-609166445-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: Dear Stafano, well, the existing of this view as you presented in wiki + with the addition of the text field beside the percentual progress, where we may put the links, is already a progress. Let's stop the thread on this now and proceed with the rest of FI-WARE effort. I believe that table is alive and we will have time to improve it adding or changing the info there making it as useful as possible. Thanks for your time and effort. Best Regards, Boris From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:53 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; Stefano De Panfilis Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Dear boris, But a graphic representation, i think most of the things you indicate are in the page linked to each gei. Did you checked them (at the moment 3: sap, tid and ibm)? I suggest to improve the list of data there. For the progress i, in case suggest, an additional text cell. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! ________________________________ From: Moltchanov Boris Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:29:55 +0200 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Apr 5 13:17:32 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:17:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: Then it probably makes sense to add to my list of requested attributes another section: We had already "Virtual appliance delivery", "software as a service delivery" and "software delivery" (for all of them I would add a 'to the testbed'). Then we could introduce a forth delivery channel: D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) As this is as well needed for the Tools Chapter I think it will be highly beneficial to enable this delivery channel formally. Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 12:26 To: Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Right, it should be also indicated in that testbed snapshot map including a sort of sw repository with its relative instructions for those components, which are used locally on their "customer" (UCP) side, additionally to the components hosted in the testbed, thus "remote" for UCP. BR, B From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:20 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Thu Apr 5 13:32:53 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:32:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000217079C49@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Dear all, I believe we must take into account products that are not virtualizable, that run on specific dedicated HW (for example, the Cloud Proxy GE which runs on dedicated HW) or that directly impact the network itself (for example, what ALU brings to T7.3) or that deals with terminals (IoT devices / gateway). I don't think we can characterize these kind of devices with the list you provide. Also, for this "non virtual-machines-hosted-stuff", we need to explain what will be shown (testbed 1, 2, 3) and what kind of integration will be done with the cloud-based applications (example: for TestBed1, the cloud proxy will not interface with the cloud but with a PC that simulates the cloud). We need to know how many instantiations of these bricks will be needed and where they will be tested and to whom (and when) they will be demonstrated ??? Regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD1330.9A84E110] [cid:image002.png at 01CD1330.9A84E110] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: jeudi 5 avril 2012 13:18 To: Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Then it probably makes sense to add to my list of requested attributes another section: We had already "Virtual appliance delivery", "software as a service delivery" and "software delivery" (for all of them I would add a 'to the testbed'). Then we could introduce a forth delivery channel: D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) As this is as well needed for the Tools Chapter I think it will be highly beneficial to enable this delivery channel formally. Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 12:26 To: Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Right, it should be also indicated in that testbed snapshot map including a sort of sw repository with its relative instructions for those components, which are used locally on their "customer" (UCP) side, additionally to the components hosted in the testbed, thus "remote" for UCP. BR, B From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:20 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Apr 5 14:19:20 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:19:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000217079C49@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000217079C49@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: Hi Henk, I tried to incorporate the provisioning of GE via own Hardware into account with my 4 delivery channels, outlined below. Depending on whether you need to install the specific hardware on the testbed or locally on client side, you would either fill out B-"specific hardware"- or D-"specific hardware"-requirements. As the tabular is very flexible as it is not strongly typed, any text pointing the testbed to special deployment scenarios can be inserted in these categories - other information then becomes optional (meaning: the OS of the terminal is not relevant if it is completed provided to the "client"- landscape or the "testbed"-landscape as an appliance). Perhaps we can make it more explicit which information to gather in these columns (I only could come up with an example of needed "usb-ports" - but if you know more possible examples, please just add them). If you think we need a separate delivery channel, then don't hesitate to address and gather the needed information in a new section E). I'm not a domain expert in the hardware provision you are mentioning. For the provisioning of GEs in the testbed itself I think it is not needed at first to explain which kind of demonstrations one would envision. For this information we need a separate UC or trial-specific questionnaire, which gathers the information you were outlining (when to test what to whom, what traffic to plan for, distribution channels, etc pp). I think we should really establish a separate second questionnaires, as this information can only be provided by the users of the testbed and not the GE providers themselves. This will not only help to plan the trials, it will as well help in setup the testbeds 1 2 3... Just for reference, the complete list of requirement/specifications I yet came up with. As already outlined in my first posting: anybody is free to add or delete requirements, as I don't think I got all relevant data already in these lists. Happy Easter to all of you /Thorsten 1. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery in testbed o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery in testbed o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery in testbed o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) From: Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 13:33 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Dear all, I believe we must take into account products that are not virtualizable, that run on specific dedicated HW (for example, the Cloud Proxy GE which runs on dedicated HW) or that directly impact the network itself (for example, what ALU brings to T7.3) or that deals with terminals (IoT devices / gateway). I don't think we can characterize these kind of devices with the list you provide. Also, for this "non virtual-machines-hosted-stuff", we need to explain what will be shown (testbed 1, 2, 3) and what kind of integration will be done with the cloud-based applications (example: for TestBed1, the cloud proxy will not interface with the cloud but with a PC that simulates the cloud). We need to know how many instantiations of these bricks will be needed and where they will be tested and to whom (and when) they will be demonstrated ??? Regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD1336.A4C04C40] [cid:image002.png at 01CD1336.A4C04C40] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: jeudi 5 avril 2012 13:18 To: Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Then it probably makes sense to add to my list of requested attributes another section: We had already "Virtual appliance delivery", "software as a service delivery" and "software delivery" (for all of them I would add a 'to the testbed'). Then we could introduce a forth delivery channel: D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) As this is as well needed for the Tools Chapter I think it will be highly beneficial to enable this delivery channel formally. Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 12:26 To: Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Right, it should be also indicated in that testbed snapshot map including a sort of sw repository with its relative instructions for those components, which are used locally on their "customer" (UCP) side, additionally to the components hosted in the testbed, thus "remote" for UCP. BR, B From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:20 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Thu Apr 5 14:52:41 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:52:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000217079C49@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000217079E00@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> I must admit I'm confused I take your list to comment it. I take the example of the cloud proxy: 1. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery in testbed [HH] -> There is no virtual appliance at all o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery in testbed [HH] -> The cloud proxy comes with its own pre-installed firmware. BUT it also can execute applications in a more or less IaaS way. How do you answer to these questions? o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) [HH] -> The CP comes with its HW o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery in testbed [HH ] -> nor relevant o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) [HH] -> it will be Linux but it's not relevant here o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) [HH] -> not relevant o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) [HH] -> funny but, no dependencies ... Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD133B.BFFE88A0] [cid:image002.png at 01CD133B.BFFE88A0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jeudi 5 avril 2012 14:19 To: Heijnen Henk; Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi Henk, I tried to incorporate the provisioning of GE via own Hardware into account with my 4 delivery channels, outlined below. Depending on whether you need to install the specific hardware on the testbed or locally on client side, you would either fill out B-"specific hardware"- or D-"specific hardware"-requirements. As the tabular is very flexible as it is not strongly typed, any text pointing the testbed to special deployment scenarios can be inserted in these categories - other information then becomes optional (meaning: the OS of the terminal is not relevant if it is completed provided to the "client"- landscape or the "testbed"-landscape as an appliance). Perhaps we can make it more explicit which information to gather in these columns (I only could come up with an example of needed "usb-ports" - but if you know more possible examples, please just add them). If you think we need a separate delivery channel, then don't hesitate to address and gather the needed information in a new section E). I'm not a domain expert in the hardware provision you are mentioning. For the provisioning of GEs in the testbed itself I think it is not needed at first to explain which kind of demonstrations one would envision. For this information we need a separate UC or trial-specific questionnaire, which gathers the information you were outlining (when to test what to whom, what traffic to plan for, distribution channels, etc pp). I think we should really establish a separate second questionnaires, as this information can only be provided by the users of the testbed and not the GE providers themselves. This will not only help to plan the trials, it will as well help in setup the testbeds 1 2 3... Just for reference, the complete list of requirement/specifications I yet came up with. As already outlined in my first posting: anybody is free to add or delete requirements, as I don't think I got all relevant data already in these lists. Happy Easter to all of you /Thorsten 1. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery in testbed o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery in testbed o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery in testbed o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) From: Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 13:33 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Dear all, I believe we must take into account products that are not virtualizable, that run on specific dedicated HW (for example, the Cloud Proxy GE which runs on dedicated HW) or that directly impact the network itself (for example, what ALU brings to T7.3) or that deals with terminals (IoT devices / gateway). I don't think we can characterize these kind of devices with the list you provide. Also, for this "non virtual-machines-hosted-stuff", we need to explain what will be shown (testbed 1, 2, 3) and what kind of integration will be done with the cloud-based applications (example: for TestBed1, the cloud proxy will not interface with the cloud but with a PC that simulates the cloud). We need to know how many instantiations of these bricks will be needed and where they will be tested and to whom (and when) they will be demonstrated ??? Regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD133B.BFFE88A0] [cid:image002.png at 01CD133B.BFFE88A0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: jeudi 5 avril 2012 13:18 To: Moltchanov Boris; Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Then it probably makes sense to add to my list of requested attributes another section: We had already "Virtual appliance delivery", "software as a service delivery" and "software delivery" (for all of them I would add a 'to the testbed'). Then we could introduce a forth delivery channel: D) "software installation delivery for local clients" o Supported client operating system and archictecture (WIN/OSX/Linux 64/32bit) o Software-Download-reference (Link to installation package) o Installation Description (Link to configuration and installation guide) o Estimated hardware requirements (PC/RAM/Install-size) o Depending software packages (Java / ...)) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, special hardware...) As this is as well needed for the Tools Chapter I think it will be highly beneficial to enable this delivery channel formally. Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 12:26 To: Marika St?lnacke; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Right, it should be also indicated in that testbed snapshot map including a sort of sw repository with its relative instructions for those components, which are used locally on their "customer" (UCP) side, additionally to the components hosted in the testbed, thus "remote" for UCP. BR, B From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:20 PM To: Moltchanov Boris; stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? Happy Easter everyone! /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Apr 6 13:11:23 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:11:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: dear marika, answers in line: > Hi > reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform > that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each > UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. > They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation > instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship > ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. > Hope you understand what I mean. > very good point, that till now i completely misunderstood. till now, at least for me locally means on some gei provider machines and the gei offered as a service. of course this is completely different and we have to document and monitor this aspect as well. good that you explain again > > Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now > expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding > page? > yes and no. i mean for what concerns v1 info this must be in the gei specific pages, while for the other info and the overl picture the fact finding page should be up-to-date. indeed, i already updated it with the new info i gor from the check doc sent to wpp/wpa list few days ago. > > Happy Easter everyone! > Happy Easeter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano > > /Marika > > ------------------------------ > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Moltchanov Boris > *Sent:* den 5 april 2012 11:30 > *To:* stefano de panfilis > *Cc:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages > > Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and > be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be > the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and > synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure > Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation > and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the > overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. > + Progress shall not be percentage ? for my ?technical? as stated in my > initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, > state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by > a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is > running and what its ?under construction? status, - a sort of board diary > where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to > use/access it.**** > > ** ** > > BR,**** > > B**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] *On > Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM > *To:* Moltchanov Boris > *Cc:* Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages**** > > ** ** > > oooops!!!**** > > ** ** > > here it is**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit > **** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris **** > > Dear Stefano, **** > > **** > > may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? **** > > **** > > Thanks. **** > > **** > > BR, > B**** > > **** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM > *To:* Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages**** > > **** > > dear thorsten and all,**** > > **** > > combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for > d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. > **** > > **** > > you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > **** > > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... > ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. > **** > > **** > > anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments > and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, > paolo and thorsten.**** > > **** > > I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, > pier, boris) to my email of this morning.**** > > **** > > my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!!**** > > **** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > **** > > 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten **** > > Hi stefano,**** > > I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the > software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don?t > know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we > should drive for a ?testbed software specification? subheading, where we > incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network > requirements. **** > > **** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor > **** > > **** > > General list of open specifications (for app & services):**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework > **** > > (part of the architecture: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture > )**** > > **** > > 1. Network-specification should incorporate:**** > > - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, > 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ?)**** > > - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, > Mail, NTP, ?)**** > > - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed > ports INPUT/OUTPUT)**** > > - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific > routes to other GEs)**** > > **** > > 2. ?Testbed software specification? should incorporate:**** > > A) Virtual appliance delivery **** > > o Virtual machine container name**** > > o Guest-OS**** > > o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit)**** > > o Number of CPUs**** > > o RAM (Min and Max)**** > > o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements**** > > B) Software delivery**** > > o Depending software packages (Java / **** > > o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ?)**** > > o Depending hardware requirements (if any)**** > > o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ?)**** > > o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ?)**** > > C) Software as a service delivery**** > > o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a > service**** > > o User/password (if any for integration testing)**** > > **** > > I compiled these two lists just out of my head ? perhaps we should > reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed > something. **** > > **** > > I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open > specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above > information is: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1Or should I incorporate this list in > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan? > **** > > Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address > Juanjo with the request?**** > > **** > > Thanks and best regards,**** > > **** > > /Thorsten** > ** > > **** > > -- **** > > **** > > Thorsten Sandfuchs**** > > **** > > SAP AG **** > > **** > > SAP Research Center Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 **** > > D - 76131 Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > www.sap.com **** > > **** > > **** > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx **** > > **** > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. **** > > **** > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > **** > > Please consider the environment before printing this mail!**** > > **** > > **** > > > > **** > > **** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle > persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante > dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora > abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di > darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua > distruzione, Grazie. **** > > *This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, > copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and > advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.* **** > > *Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario.* **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Tue Apr 10 07:48:59 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:48:59 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB974F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3EB9C7F@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Hi well, not sure you misunderstood, both options are possible. I found the "local" one missing in our descriptions, but we still need to keep the "as a service"-solution too. regards Marika ________________________________ From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: den 6 april 2012 13:11 To: Marika St?lnacke Cc: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear marika, answers in line: Hi reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. Hope you understand what I mean. very good point, that till now i completely misunderstood. till now, at least for me locally means on some gei provider machines and the gei offered as a service. of course this is completely different and we have to document and monitor this aspect as well. good that you explain again Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding page? yes and no. i mean for what concerns v1 info this must be in the gei specific pages, while for the other info and the overl picture the fact finding page should be up-to-date. indeed, i already updated it with the new info i gor from the check doc sent to wpp/wpa list few days ago. Happy Easter everyone! Happy Easeter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano /Marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 5 april 2012 11:30 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Tue Apr 10 16:08:17 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:08:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc Message-ID: <326B322D377E47B78C85C322526A0C27@FSC461216100407> dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc ------------------------------------- Dial-in numbers: +33 1 6993 7006 (France) +49 211 534 3355 (Germany) +34 91339 4300 (Spain) +39 06 7258 9880 (Italy) Passcode: 8122 500 Ciao Paolo Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Tue Apr 10 18:06:16 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:06:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Minutes-WP10-10_04_2012 Message-ID: Dear all, find attached the minutes of the today Phc for your review. Please let me know your comments before I formally release them on the forge. Cheers, Paolo Zampognaro Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_10_04_2012.doc Type: application/msword Size: 220160 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Apr 4 14:41:02 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:41:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Stefano, concerning I2ND I confirm that the first release will include the Cloud Edge GE only. The list we provided earlier for completion of the testbed deliverable has been revised, according to the agreement with Juanjo to limit the GEs in this release to those strictly able to be integrated in the testbed. As some of the I2ND ones, although available in their preliminary implementation, would be stand-alone only, then they were not inserted in the technical roadmap. Happy Easter to you all too! BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di stefano de panfilis Inviato: mercoled? 4 aprile 2012 13:27 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Thu Apr 5 12:53:07 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:53:07 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: RE: URGENT: GEI technical pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <728596403-1333623094-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-609166445-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear boris, But a graphic representation, i think most of the things you indicate are in the page linked to each gei. Did you checked them (at the moment 3: sap, tid and ibm)? I suggest to improve the list of data there. For the progress i, in case suggest, an additional text cell. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Moltchanov Boris Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:29:55 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. + Progress shall not be percentage - for my "technical" as stated in my initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is running and what its "under construction" status, - a sort of board diary where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to use/access it. BR, B From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages oooops!!! here it is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ciao, stefano 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? Thanks. BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages dear thorsten and all, combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, paolo and thorsten. I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, pier, boris) to my email of this morning. my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Hi stefano, I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don't know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we should drive for a "testbed software specification" subheading, where we incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network requirements. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor General list of open specifications (for app & services): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework (part of the architecture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture) 1. Network-specification should incorporate: - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, 22/SSH, 21/FTP, ...) - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, Mail, NTP, ...) - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed ports INPUT/OUTPUT) - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific routes to other GEs) 2. "Testbed software specification" should incorporate: A) Virtual appliance delivery o Virtual machine container name o Guest-OS o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit) o Number of CPUs o RAM (Min and Max) o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements B) Software delivery o Depending software packages (Java / o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / ...) o Depending hardware requirements (if any) o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, ...) o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, ...) C) Software as a service delivery o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a service o User/password (if any for integration testing) I compiled these two lists just out of my head - perhaps we should reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed something. I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above information is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 Or should I incorporate this list in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan ? Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address Juanjo with the request? Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Tue Apr 10 12:35:12 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:35:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT REMINDER: Joint WPLs/WPAs confcall today In-Reply-To: <4F83BDD6.9010307@tid.es> References: <4F83BDD6.9010307@tid.es> Message-ID: <2143223728-1334054012-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1912843405-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo, Unfortunately i was and am not able to attend such important phc. Nevertheless i have an important issue: on 1st may the deplyment of gei should start. At the moment i do not have any info about the status of red.es if their infrastructure is available or even when it will be available. Can you please let us know? The issus is starting to be rather hot! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:57:58 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT REMINDER: Joint WPLs/WPAs confcall today Hi all, I hope you had enjoined nice Eastern holidays ! This is a reminder that today we will have our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall starting at 11:00am. Bridge details are as always. I'll pass you a link to Webex and shared minutes before the confcall. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From mcp at tid.es Wed Apr 11 09:10:25 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:10:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Minutes-WP10-10_04_2012 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F852E61.5050507@tid.es> Dear Paolo My comments. "the first testbed release by month 19 (end of October) in place of month 15 (end of July)." I said that this could well be end of Sept. It is not clearly defined now. Deliverable D10.3 status. "Paolo informs all that the deliverable D10.3 is basically in a good shape and that, excerpt that a still missing section concerning the sanity check - Miguel will provide as soon as possible - " . This is mixed up. I said that there will be a section with an integration backlog (related to task2). I will organize a tracker (this means defining customized fields and a workflow). And this will be a section in the doc, that will describe it. If you think about it, the doc is in between Task 2 and 3 (and the current draft has elements from Task 3 only ) The TOC for the sanity check and the diagnosis guide will go to the install & admin guides of the chapters and it is something that we will explicitly request from them . This will be placed in a the private wiki as a guideline (all install and admin guides have a more or less free TOC, but not for this sections). This is a commitment from the WPA/WPL meeting so I will have to do it. This is however properly reflected in section 3 of the minutes. Best regards, Miguel El 10/04/2012 18:06, Paolo Zampognaro escribi?: Dear all, find attached the minutes of the today Phc for your review. Please let me know your comments before I formally release them on the forge. Cheers, Paolo Zampognaro Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Apr 11 11:30:40 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:30:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] I: Minutes-WP10-10_04_2012 Message-ID: <7FB3F3843C6B49BFB25A2D77C0074164@FSC461216100407> Hi Miguel, thanks for your feedbacks. My answers inline. The minute is now available on WP10 forge (1) (1) https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=18 Cheers, Paolo _____ Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Miguel Carrillo Inviato: mercoled? 11 aprile 2012 9.10 A: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Minutes-WP10-10_04_2012 Dear Paolo My comments. "the first testbed release by month 19 (end of October) in place of month 15 (end of July)." I said that this could well be end of Sept. It is not clearly defined now. --> I have updated the minute by putting there both the possibilities declared in the WPL\WPLA minute i.e. ?month 19 (end of October) or at least by month 18 (end of September)? highlighting that such possibilities are, anyway, only hypothesis since a check, from PO, was not yet arrived. Deliverable D10.3 status. "Paolo informs all that the deliverable D10.3 is basically in a good shape and that, excerpt that a still missing section concerning the sanity check - Miguel will provide as soon as possible - " . This is mixed up. I said that there will be a section with an integration backlog (related to task2). I will organize a tracker (this means defining customized fields and a workflow). And this will be a section in the doc, that will describe it. If you think about it, the doc is in between Task 2 and 3 (and the current draft has elements from Task 3 only ) The TOC for the sanity check and the diagnosis guide will go to the install & admin guides of the chapters and it is something that we will explicitly request from them . This will be placed in a the private wiki as a guideline (all install and admin guides have a more or less free TOC, but not for this sections). This is a commitment from the WPA/WPL meeting so I will have to do it. This is however properly reflected in section 3 of the minutes. --> Ok I have re-written this part so now it should be fine. Best regards, Miguel El 10/04/2012 18:06, Paolo Zampognaro escribi?: Dear all, find attached the minutes of the today Phc for your review. Please let me know your comments before I formally release them on the forge. Cheers, Paolo Zampognaro Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _____ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Apr 12 16:07:21 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:07:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc Message-ID: dear all, due to a personal issue, apologises for the inconvenience, i kindly ask you to move our weekly phc either at 14:30 lasting one hour, or at 17:00 lasting as much as we need. please let me know your preferences. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Thu Apr 12 16:12:15 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:12:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E6BE3FC607B@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> 17 works for me. 14:30 is not good. /marika ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: den 12 april 2012 16:07 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc dear all, due to a personal issue, apologises for the inconvenience, i kindly ask you to move our weekly phc either at 14:30 lasting one hour, or at 17:00 lasting as much as we need. please let me know your preferences. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Apr 12 16:19:16 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:19:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F86E464.7060508@tid.es> either options are suitable in my case. El 12/04/2012 16:07, stefano de panfilis escribi?: > dear all, > > due to a personal issue, apologises for the inconvenience, i kindly > ask you to move our weekly phc either at 14:30 lasting one hour, or at > 17:00 lasting as much as we need. > > please let me know your preferences. > > ciao, > stefano > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 12 16:34:45 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:34:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Both are ok with me. B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:07 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc dear all, due to a personal issue, apologises for the inconvenience, i kindly ask you to move our weekly phc either at 14:30 lasting one hour, or at 17:00 lasting as much as we need. please let me know your preferences. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu Thu Apr 12 17:56:09 2012 From: Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu (Salvatore Longo) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:56:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A508A817BA@Polydeuces.office.hd> I prefer 14.30 if it's possible. Regards, - Salvatore From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:35 PM To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc Both are ok with me. B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 4:07 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 april) phc dear all, due to a personal issue, apologises for the inconvenience, i kindly ask you to move our weekly phc either at 14:30 lasting one hour, or at 17:00 lasting as much as we need. please let me know your preferences. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Apr 13 10:15:15 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:15:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE replanning proposal In-Reply-To: <4F87B3B9.9010107@tid.es> References: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> <4F87B3B9.9010107@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, as testbed team coordinator, i'd like from you a bit more elaboration on the matter. on one side i think this mixed approach (from a complete delay to a trialed delay) is much better than to announce a delay of three months impacting on the whole fi-ppp programme, on the other, however, as testbed team we have to replan again our work. at the last phc you said that red.es is not able to provide the infrastructure in the due time for many very well understandable reasons. which is now the plan? at least the three following main questions, but many other are there as well, need to be addressed: 1. shall we engineering ingegneria informatica provide a trial infrastructure, as i suggested many times, for the time being, i.e. till when red.es had made the promised investments and set-up a reliable fi-ware dedicated infrastructure? 2. how to select the first set of "ready" ge implementations? as you well know several of them are mutual dependent. is this aspect well taken into account? 3. which uc projct has planned to use the testbed? under which conditions and scenarios? i guess answers to the above questions are now extremely important as time is passing and end of july is quickly coming. thank you for your view on the matter. ciao, stefano 2012/4/13 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, > > Yesterday, a virtual meeting of the FI-PPP AB took place and I took the > opportunity to explain the UC projects that we have proposed our PO to > perform an adjustment of the planning of several of the short-term > milestones linked to FI-WARE. My intention was to gain their support in > approval of this re-planning so it can be seen as something that would go > for the sake of the programme (exactly as I see it). Gaining the support > from the UC projects was a target goal in this movement as highlighted > during our last joint WPLs/WPAs confcall. > > Despite I explained this to them during the virtual meeting, we agreed > that I was going to send them an email elaborating on the matter. Below, > you will find that email. Please devote the necessary time read it > carefully. > > Also, as per agreement in our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall, I have modified > our proposal for re-planning so that we keep the target goal of delivering > a first take of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. We would just split > the first release into one first deployment to be delivered by end of July > and then an upgrade to happen by end of September. > > Personally, I rather doubt that UC projects are going to work hard in > the FI-WARE testbed during August-September due to the summer holidays and > the fact that they will be pretty much devoted to development of their > proposals to phase 2. However, I can live with keeping the milestone end > of July and, of course, this should be helpful in selling the re-planning > because, overall, UC projects are not affected (they will receive the > FI-WARE API specifications and will be able to play with the FI-WARE > Testbed more or less on the initially planned dates). I have also > informed Arian that we would keep the milestone for delivery of the FI-WARE > Testbed by end of July. > > Note that, besides the educational sessions programmed in May 21st and > June 4th, I have proposed to setup a dedicated team that will be devoted to > follow-up and push progress on tickets issued by UC projects. Note that > they will issue tickets regarding doubts/questions/clarifications on the > FI-WARE Architecture, Roadmap or Open Specifications deliverables using the > "FI-WARE General Support" tracker that was setup in the FI-WARE project in > FusionForge. It's true that devoting time to handle interaction with UC > projects around the trackers means devoting the necessary resources, so > that is another good argument to ask for the re-planning. > > Comments, feedback are welcome. Be aware that I'm trying to move fast > in getting a final decision on the re-planning and the implementation of > the action points to improve overall communication with the UC projects. > > In order to sync and be able to discuss/resolve further questions, I > suggest we schedule a joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall on Monday, > starting at 11:00am. > > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE replanning proposal Date: > Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:08:29 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: > ab at fi-ppp.eu > > Hi all, > > In this mail, I will try to summarize what I explained to you during our > confcall yesterday. > > Within FI-WARE, we feel that is rather important to improve > communication with UC projects, leading to a better overall understanding > of FI-WARE by UC projects. In order to achieve this goal, we have > identified two first action points: > > - Improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects (both > regarding the "FI-WARE Theme/Feature/Epic Request" and the "FI-WARE General > Support" trackers) by means of setting up a dedicated team to follow-up and > push progress on tickets. > - Setting up two full-week f2f "educational sessions" where UC > projects' and FI-WARE's teams can meet together so that: > - Architects and potentially members of the different FI-WARE > Chapter development teams will have the opportunity to meet developers from > the UC projects, elaborate on the architecture and functionality of the > different FI-WARE GEs and answer their technical questions > - UC project architects can present the architecture of use case > scenarios, elaborating on how they plan to use FI-WARE, as to collect > feedback from FI-WARE members. > > > Despite we have put in place a well defined process, supported by tools, > to handle the interaction between UC projects and FI-WARE, the usefulness > of them has been limited, leading to a sentiment of frustration both on the > side of UC projects and FI-WARE. This in my view is a consequence of > starting the UC projects at the same time as FI-WARE, which has been proven > not to be the best idea. Actually, UC projects have produced a lot of > tickets, but they are too much generic or high-level so it takes too much > time to interact until being able to provide accurate answers. On the > other hand, UC projects can argue that they couldn't be more concrete until > there is no more detailed information about FI-WARE. We have the > opportunity to recover from this situation because we are now able to > discuss about more concrete stuff, namely the FI-WARE Architecture > description (already available now) and the FI-WARE API specifications (to > be delivered soon.) The above mentioned action points would help to make > sure that the communication between UC projects and FI-WARE around this > more concrete stuff is put at the right level. > > > > However, despite we see this is a the right thing to do at this moment, > it is also a fact that implementing the above mentioned action points would > keep architects and development teams in FI-WARE apart from their current > development activities at a critical point in the development, very close > to a number of relevant milestones according to the FI-WARE DoW. > > > Because of that, FI-WARE has made a proposal to its PO about a > re-planning of some of its short-term milestones. This would allow > FI-WARE to allocate the necessary resources that would be demanded by the > action points mentioned above and ensure success of that action points. > This re-planning, however, has been designed in order to minimize overall > impact on UC projects. It is also worth noticing that it would lead to > adjustment of dates for deliverables due in month 12 and 15, but the rest > of dates can be kept so dates linked to delivery of the FI-WARE second > release would not be affected. The proposed re-planning can be summarized > as follows: > > - Keep delivery of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (i.e., REST API > specifications) due in month 12 since they seem to be in the critical path > of UC projects and there shouldn't be so much problems delivering them on > that date. Some of them may arrive sometime mid May but not later and, > in any case, would be available for the educational sessions. > - Delay those M12 deliverables dealing with delivery of FI-WARE GE > software, accompanying guides and unit testing plan 2 months, so they are > delivered on month 14 (end of June). This would also apply to > deliverables linked to FI-WARE Development Support Tools also due in month > 12. > - Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but > split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a > first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of > GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end > of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three > months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE > Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July > instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap ( > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). > Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If > no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means > that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be > available by end of July. > - Delay or drop some deliverables due in month 12 whose delivery is > not so critical for the programme at this moment from FI-WARE's point of > view: > - Drop deliverable on "System/software Engineering Method for > FI-WARE" due by month 12, since the FI-WARE consortia considers that > working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release > of FI-WARE has been delivered. We have proposed to drop the first release > of this deliverable, (keeping just two releases on months 24 and 33) > - Delay deliverables about "Third party innovation enablement in > FI-WARE" and "State of the Art Analysis" due by month 12 so they are > post-poned to month 21 or at least month 18. > > > Hope this helps to explain the point. As you see, the two points that > may impact UC projects are the first and third and, there, we essentially > don't change what we initially planned. The other points may be > considered indeed internal to FI-WARE. However, our understanding is > that our PO, Arian Zwegers, wants to verify whether UC projects agree that > the measurements we intend to put in place to improve communication with UC > projects, mostly preparing and carrying out the educational sessions, are > rather important and would benefit the programme. In other words, he > wants to see whether delaying deliverables in FI-WARE can be justified for > the sake of the programme. > > From my point of view, approval of this re-planning is required to be > able to support the educational sessions and also push management of the > interaction with the UC projects at the right level. So the right thing > to do would be to tell the EC that "yes, we need to have these educational > sessions and to improve the management of the interaction through the > tracker systems". > > If you agree that this is actually the right thing to do, our request > would be that you inform your PO ASAP that this proposal is on the table > and give them a positive feedback. It may happen that they were planning > to contact you soon, because our PO was going to ask them. That was also > why I wanted you to be informed. > > As per agreement in our confcall yesterday, let's have a continuation > confcall on Monday afternoon to wrap up on this important matter. In the > meantime, don't hesitate to ask any question you may have so that I can > answer over the email. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Apr 13 15:39:58 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:39:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] next monday (16 apr) phc Message-ID: dear all, many thanks to your availability. the next testbed team phc will be monday at 17:00 (usual connection details). i kindly ask participation of all as there are quite important replanning issues to be discussed as perhaps you spot from my email to juanjo of this morning. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 16 15:27:19 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:27:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc reminder: today exceptionally at 17:00! Message-ID: ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 16 23:37:21 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:37:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc Message-ID: dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_16_04_2012.doc Type: application/msword Size: 216576 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Tue Apr 17 11:07:10 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:07:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Stefano and All, especially Decisive People, Looking at the composition of the PHC members I wish to suggest that we make it official the next two points: - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its FI-WARE WP (e.g. WP6 in my case); - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its Company (e.g. Telecom Italia in my case). I believe this will create a benefit for the project organization making it clear who and about what to ask to. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:37 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Tue Apr 17 11:07:42 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:07:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500021737ABE8@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> I do agree In my case, I could represent both WP7 & Technicolor Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD1C8A.4F6DE880] [cid:image002.png at 01CD1C8A.4F6DE880] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: mardi 17 avril 2012 11:07 To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Juanjo Hierro (jhierro at tid.es) Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc Dear Stefano and All, especially Decisive People, Looking at the composition of the PHC members I wish to suggest that we make it official the next two points: - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its FI-WARE WP (e.g. WP6 in my case); - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its Company (e.g. Telecom Italia in my case). I believe this will create a benefit for the project organization making it clear who and about what to ask to. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:37 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image003.gif at 01CD1C8A.4F6DE880]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image003.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Apr 17 17:14:11 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:14:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] [Suspected Spam] Re: minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F8D88C3.50709@tid.es> Dear Stefano Ok on my side. I just wanted to point out that, as Juanjo expressed, the agreement with the PPP AB is that "we have modified our proposal for re-planning so that we keep the target goal of delivering a first take of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. We would just split the first release into one first deployment to be delivered by end of July and then an upgrade to happen by end of September." This means that there are actually two waves of integrations and this could give us some degree of flexibility. I do not imply that the situation isn't still challenging ... Best regards, Miguel El 16/04/2012 23:37, stefano de panfilis escribi?: dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Apr 17 17:53:54 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:53:54 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F8D9212.50709@tid.es> Dear Boris As far as I am aware, all the partners are represented in WP10 but the WPs are not represented as such. In practice, we see that most of the partners do not take the trouble to attend the conf calls but this is how it is organized. I do not object to asking for volunteers to represent each WP, but I suspect most of them will remain vacant. Best regards, Miguel El 17/04/2012 11:07, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Stefano and All, especially Decisive People, Looking at the composition of the PHC members I wish to suggest that we make it official the next two points: - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its FI-WARE WP (e.g. WP6 in my case); - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its Company (e.g. Telecom Italia in my case). I believe this will create a benefit for the project organization making it clear who and about what to ask to. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:37 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Tue Apr 17 18:24:41 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:24:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: <4F8D9212.50709@tid.es> References: <4F8D9212.50709@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Miguel, yes, the partners are there, however, in order just to leverage the FI-WARE organization and timing "enclosed and walled" within the realms of WPs reigned by their respective WPLs and "populated" often by *different* teams, even if from the same Companies (I see always example of TI and also debates between WP6 and IoT wrt NGSI as we would be isolated islands :)), probably such a cross-referencing ending, in a simplest case, with an immediate phc's minutes mail forwarding, as useful for an eventual technical WPL enforcement (deadlines, timing, to-do APs) would be not excessive :). (sorry for a long phrase) BR, B From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 5:54 PM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc Dear Boris As far as I am aware, all the partners are represented in WP10 but the WPs are not represented as such. In practice, we see that most of the partners do not take the trouble to attend the conf calls but this is how it is organized. I do not object to asking for volunteers to represent each WP, but I suspect most of them will remain vacant. Best regards, Miguel El 17/04/2012 11:07, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Stefano and All, especially Decisive People, Looking at the composition of the PHC members I wish to suggest that we make it official the next two points: - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its FI-WARE WP (e.g. WP6 in my case); - The partner representative within the PHC becomes a sort of rapporteur or what is happening in the test bed into its Company (e.g. Telecom Italia in my case). I believe this will create a benefit for the project organization making it clear who and about what to ask to. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:37 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc dear colleagues please find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image001.gif at 01CD1CC5.ED566690]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 17 19:14:19 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:14:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Testbed Team (WP10) responsibilities Message-ID: dear all, thank you all for the thread of emails coming from my email of yesterday evening with the minutes of our last weekly phc. the thread gives me the opportunity to clarify once again (hopefully the last time ...???) that wp10 and in particular t10.2 has been designed, at proposal writing and confirmed at dow production, in such a way that all the generic enabler implementation (gei) owners must be operational in wp10 and, in particular, in the t10.2. the reason is simple: no integration can be done without who really knows the "piece of software" that is going to be integrated. for this reason for each organisation in the project developing geis a 10% of development effort has been budgeted for this task. so, for me, there are not "wp responsible" and each organisation is responsible for providing promptly reliable information and contributions concerning their own geis. of course i understand that some specific chapters migth organise themselves with persons acting as reference contact (and this is apparently the case of wp6 and wp7), still, i believe, having the specific gei responsibility left to the gei owner. i clarified this an additional time becouse we are coming to the most critical days where we are going to set-up the testbed, and i clearly felt the need to provide such clarification! in this context i have again to emphasise that the participation to the activities of wp10 is scarse in terms of organisations (about half of whom should attend). nevertheless we are taking day-by-day decisions which will affect the work of everybody and which of course will not be discussed again and again. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 23 12:48:00 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:48:00 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] remider: today phc at 16:00 Message-ID: ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Apr 23 12:54:05 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:54:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] remider: today phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <14100_1335178447_4F9534CF_14100_5579_1_cc7dbf02-d7b4-4e88-a845-5390f5e0a6b3@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Dear Stefano, Thanks for the reminder. Unfortunately I would not be able to make it since at that time I would be travelling to Berlin. As such I would have to catch up on the minutes. Apologize for the inconvenience. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : lundi 23 avril 2012 12:48 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] remider: today phc at 16:00 ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Mon Apr 23 16:07:24 2012 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:07:24 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] remider: today phc at 16:00 In-Reply-To: <14100_1335178447_4F9534CF_14100_5579_1_cc7dbf02-d7b4-4e88-a845-5390f5e0a6b3@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> References: <14100_1335178447_4F9534CF_14100_5579_1_cc7dbf02-d7b4-4e88-a845-5390f5e0a6b3@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Message-ID: <4F95621C.9020809@nsn.com> Hi, is there anybody on the conf call? Br, Loci On 04/23/2012 12:54 PM, ext BISSON Pascal wrote: > > Dear Stefano, > > Thanks for the reminder. > > Unfortunately I would not be able to make it since at that time I > would be travelling to Berlin. > > As such I would have to catch up on the minutes. > > Apologize for the inconvenience. > > Best Regards, > > Pascal > > *De :*fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* > stefano de panfilis > *Envoy? :* lundi 23 avril 2012 12:48 > *? :* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Objet :* [Fiware-testbed] remider: today phc at 16:00 > > ciao, > > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 23 18:09:45 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:09:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Message-ID: dear all, timely with our discussion of this afternoon here is the agenda for the training session. as you can see the agenda spans four days starting lunch time of monday and lasting lunch time of thursday. monday and thursday there are three parallel sessions, while tuesday and wednesday there four parallel session. my request is that we will be there in 3 and 4 people accordingly in order to fill the questionnaire that thorsetn will prepare for the testbed validation. of course the best would be if the colleagues with some responsibility on the concerned chapters will be there on the relevant days. by the way i can be there the 4 days, but i definitively need at least other three names. volunteers??? ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Date: 2012/4/23 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Dear Colleagues, Find hereby enclosed a link to the Agenda of these sessions as discussed in our conference call this morning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 File is attached too, in case you are not able to access this googledoc resources. For its preparation we have considered each chapter requested slots (#days), your preferences regarding the dates as much as possible and the number of attendees as communicated by the use-case projects so far. Please, share this link with your teams (GE owners) and let us know before tomorrow EoB any issue regarding your specific chapter sessions. In the absence of issues, this file will be shared with the use-case projects at the end of the day tomorrow. Ps. I will be subscribing WPl and WPa to the 'fiware-training' list before today EoB. Please, **be aware use-case project members are also members of that list** Thanks for your cooperation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Educational_Sessions.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 20788 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 23 18:31:21 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:31:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Stefano, are the places of both events already decided? BR, B From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 6:10 PM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) dear all, timely with our discussion of this afternoon here is the agenda for the training session. as you can see the agenda spans four days starting lunch time of monday and lasting lunch time of thursday. monday and thursday there are three parallel sessions, while tuesday and wednesday there four parallel session. my request is that we will be there in 3 and 4 people accordingly in order to fill the questionnaire that thorsetn will prepare for the testbed validation. of course the best would be if the colleagues with some responsibility on the concerned chapters will be there on the relevant days. by the way i can be there the 4 days, but i definitively need at least other three names. volunteers??? ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > Date: 2012/4/23 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" >, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" > Dear Colleagues, Find hereby enclosed a link to the Agenda of these sessions as discussed in our conference call this morning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 File is attached too, in case you are not able to access this googledoc resources. For its preparation we have considered each chapter requested slots (#days), your preferences regarding the dates as much as possible and the number of attendees as communicated by the use-case projects so far. Please, share this link with your teams (GE owners) and let us know before tomorrow EoB any issue regarding your specific chapter sessions. In the absence of issues, this file will be shared with the use-case projects at the end of the day tomorrow. Ps. I will be subscribing WPl and WPa to the 'fiware-training' list before today EoB. Please, **be aware use-case project members are also members of that list** Thanks for your cooperation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 23 18:33:14 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:33:14 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Message-ID: dear boris and all, the first one is zurich, the second one most likely madrid, but not confirmed yet. ciao, stefano 2012/4/23 Moltchanov Boris > Dear Stefano, **** > > ** ** > > are the places of both events already decided? **** > > ** ** > > BR,**** > > B**** > > ** ** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 6:10 PM > *To:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE > Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th)**** > > ** ** > > dear all,**** > > ** ** > > timely with our discussion of this afternoon here is the agenda for the > training session.**** > > as you can see the agenda spans four days starting lunch time of monday > and lasting lunch time of thursday.**** > > ** ** > > monday and thursday there are three parallel sessions, while tuesday and > wednesday there four parallel session.**** > > ** ** > > my request is that we will be there in 3 and 4 people accordingly in order > to fill the questionnaire that thorsetn will prepare for the testbed > validation.**** > > ** ** > > of course the best would be if the colleagues with some responsibility on > the concerned chapters will be there on the relevant days.**** > > ** ** > > by the way i can be there the 4 days, but i definitively need at least > other three names.**** > > volunteers???**** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *CARLOS RALLI UCENDO* > Date: 2012/4/23 > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May > 21st & June 4th) > To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" > > > Dear Colleagues, > > Find hereby enclosed a link to the Agenda of these sessions as discussed > in our conference call this morning: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 > > File is attached too, in case you are not able to access this googledoc > resources. > > For its preparation we have considered each chapter requested slots > (#days), your preferences regarding the dates as much as possible and the > number of attendees as communicated by the use-case projects so far. > > Please, share this link with your teams (GE owners) and let us know before > tomorrow EoB any issue regarding your specific chapter sessions. > > In the absence of issues, this file will be shared with the use-case > projects at the end of the day tomorrow. > > Ps. I will be subscribing WPl and WPa to the 'fiware-training' list before > today EoB. > Please, **be aware use-case project members are also members of that > list** > > Thanks for your cooperation. > Best regards, > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) > Cell: +34696923588 > Twitter: @carlosralli > Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) > Telef?nica I+D SAU > Madrid, Spain > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: @fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente > alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di > provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > *This e-mail and any attachments** is **confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, > copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and > advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.* > *[image: rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa > mail se non ? necessario.* > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 23 20:42:53 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:42:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the minutes of the today phc. please note that the schedule of the next tow weekly phcs have been changed. please let me know your comments before i upload them in the wiki. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_23_04_2012.doc Type: application/msword Size: 221696 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Tue Apr 24 11:56:09 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:56:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] I: GE dependencies and Test Cases Message-ID: <2E5AAC0804F64BB683E51048DC6514F8@FSC461216100407> Dear all, I would like to prod you into starting as soon as possible the needed activities (already highlighted in my mail of April 5) to finalize D10.3 deliverable. For details about please see the enclosed mail below. I?m at your disposal for any clarifications in order to foster such activity. Best regards, Paolo _____ Da: Paolo Zampognaro [mailto:paolo.zampognaro at eng.it] Inviato: gioved? 5 aprile 2012 11.05 A: 'fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu' Oggetto: GE dependencies and Test Cases Dear all, in order to finalize the D10.3a delivery it is important each chapter starts asap analyzing the document[1] in order to fill the corresponding pages with: - information on GEs dependencies. - information about TestCases which will be exploited to test the selected dependencies. In each chapter page I have provided example tables showing (i) how to present the dependencies (ii) how to gather test cases. For you convenience I have also put there the dependencies already provided in D10.1a. So at the end, please start taking confidence with this pages and let us know your feedback about so that, in these days and even during the next Phc, we can agree on the concrete next steps to finalize the work. Thanks and best regards Paolo [1] https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_In tegration_Plan#Integration_Testing_Plan:_Preparation Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Tue Apr 24 18:44:17 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:44:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] I: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Message-ID: <1606049709-1335285733-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-372754106-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Fyi!!! Ciao Stefano -------------- next part -------------- Dear WPl/WPa, Please, do not forget to share today this e-mail with your chapter teams. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef=F3nica Digital) Telef=F3nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > Fecha: 24 de abril de 2012 17:47:32 GMT+02:00 Para: "fiware-training at lists.fi-ware.eu" > Asunto: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear colleagues, Find enclosed a proposal for the above mentioned event based on all FI-PPP = Use-case projects plus FI-WARE team inputs. The same event will be repeated in two different weeks or editions: May 21s= t-24th & June 4th-7th. The event actually comprises two threads: 'FI-WARE Architecture Educational= Sessions' and 'Use-case projects Selected Scenarios'. The first edition (May 21st- 24th) will be kindly hosted by the Zurich Univ= ersity of Applied Sciences (ZHAW, http://www.zhaw.ch/en/zurich-university-o= f-applied-sciences.html). - The host is providing 3 rooms with 30 people capacity and 1 room for 45 p= eople. - We are currently negotiating with the host a reduced attendance-fee (less= than 200 euro) covering 7 Coffee-breaks service, 3 (Tue+Wed+Thu) lunches a= nd Wifi access. Tentative agendas for both weekly events are available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEU= kdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=3D0 (The excel file is also attached to this mail for your convenience). The agenda shows FI-WARE chapters to be presented and, at the end of each d= ay, there are 1.5/2h slots available for use-case projects presentations to= the FI-WARE team. Requested feedback at this point: 1) All attendees are expected to add an entry to the following registration= form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEU= kdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=3D2 (Sheet 'Attendees_1st Week' in the same excel file). Deadline for registration is end of next week (May 4th). 2) Each UC project available in the first week edition is expected to send = an e-mail back to me with their availability for the Scenarios presentation= slot. For instance, "use-case project XX is able to make its presentation at sl= ot UC1 or UC2 etc.". I believe Envirofi, Finseny, Instant Mobility, Outsmart and SmartAgriFood= UC projects will be available for both the first and second weeks edition. On the other hand, Ficontent, Finest and Safecity projects will only be a= vailable in the second edition, AFAIK. Deadline for each UC project to communicate this is end of the present we= ek (April 27th). The second edition (June 4th - 7th) will be most probably held in Madrid (T= BC). Further details are still to be confirmed and will be posted here duri= ng the present week. Thanks for your participation. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation Telef=F3nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nu= estra pol=EDtica de env=EDo y recepci=F3n de correo electr=F3nico en el enl= ace situado m=E1s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and re= ceive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:00:36 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-PPP_Software_Architects_Week_20120424_v1.xls Type: application/octet-stream Size: 34304 bytes Desc: FI-PPP_Software_Architects_Week_20120424_v1.xls URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Apr 24 18:50:32 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:50:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F96D9D8.5040207@tid.es> Hi Stefano, My comments (just 2) * Point 2 - "Some issues appears for those GEI which will not be installed on a VM. " - I would say it has to do more with installations on private infrastuctures (outside the testbed). Having VM or physical resources shouldn't be an issue as the Testbed should be able to cater for both scenarios. * Fine with the 2 forthcoming WP10 meetings. Monday, 14th I will be on holidays. Best regards, Miguel El 23/04/2012 20:42, stefano de panfilis escribi?: dear all, please find attached the minutes of the today phc. please note that the schedule of the next tow weekly phcs have been changed. please let me know your comments before i upload them in the wiki. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Apr 26 11:50:03 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:50:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Integration process in "D10.3 Message-ID: <4F991A4B.403@tid.es> Dear all, At last I could manage to spare a morning and put my bit on the Integration Plan. You can find it here: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Integration_Plan Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: