dear marika, answers in line: > Hi > reservations for misunderstandings on my part: I miss somewhere to inform > that a GE needs to be run "locally". As an example: the IoT Gateway. Each > UseCase project needs a local machine that meets the listed requirements. > They then need access to download gateway SW and any necessary installation > instructions. Optionally of course the Testbed could offer to ship > ready-installed machines, but I don't think we should do that. > Hope you understand what I mean. > very good point, that till now i completely misunderstood. till now, at least for me locally means on some gei provider machines and the gei offered as a service. of course this is completely different and we have to document and monitor this aspect as well. good that you explain again > > Other than that I think this table is a good thing. I assume we will now > expect GE providers to update the new table, and not the "old" fact finding > page? > yes and no. i mean for what concerns v1 info this must be in the gei specific pages, while for the other info and the overl picture the fact finding page should be up-to-date. indeed, i already updated it with the new info i gor from the check doc sent to wpp/wpa list few days ago. > > Happy Easter everyone! > Happy Easeter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano > > /Marika > > ------------------------------ > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Moltchanov Boris > *Sent:* den 5 april 2012 11:30 > *To:* stefano de panfilis > *Cc:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages > > Well, not exactly what I was suggestion, but in order to remediate and > be ok then, I agree (a green card ;-) on my side) if the milestones will be > the hyperlink to the short documents or web-pages with the very short and > synthetic view on its respective topic, e.g. Testbed Basic Infrastructure > Available -> IP addresses, port numbers, access credentials for creation > and administration of the VMs, the infrastructural diagram showing the > overall testbed with the nodes, VMs, connections and another service nodes. > + Progress shall not be percentage – for my “technical” as stated in my > initial proposal it is useless, and I wish to know the technical issues, > state, aspects and not % number (not management) I wish prefer to know (by > a link or a short description + link) what and where is installed is > running and what its “under construction” status, - a sort of board diary > where me or anyone else may see what is going on on the testbad and how to > use/access it.**** > > ** ** > > BR,**** > > B**** > > ** ** > > *From:* ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] *On > Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:14 AM > *To:* Moltchanov Boris > *Cc:* Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages**** > > ** ** > > oooops!!!**** > > ** ** > > here it is**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit > **** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > 2012/4/5 Moltchanov Boris <boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it>**** > > Dear Stefano, **** > > **** > > may you please provide the correct link to the cockpit? **** > > **** > > Thanks. **** > > **** > > BR, > B**** > > **** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:10 PM > *To:* Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: GEI technical pages**** > > **** > > dear thorsten and all,**** > > **** > > combing the suggestions from boris, thorsten and the table paolo built for > d10.1.a i now we do have for each gei a specific "testbed technical" page. > **** > > **** > > you can access it from the v1 cockpit at "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" > <fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu>**** > > actually only three pages have been created (you can easily find them ... > ;-) ) to see how the result looks like. indeed, i think it is a good work. > **** > > **** > > anyway, before to go ahead i need the green card (or additional comments > and suggestions) from all of you, but in particular from boris, henke, > paolo and thorsten.**** > > **** > > I have also updated the "facts finding" page with the answers (pascal, > pier, boris) to my email of this morning.**** > > **** > > my best wishes for an happy easter to you and your beloved!!!**** > > **** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > **** > > 2012/4/2 Sandfuchs, Thorsten <thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com>**** > > Hi stefano,**** > > I send you a link to an example specification which does not include the > software requirements we gathered in the fact-finding. As I said, I don’t > know who did define the general set of headlines in these articles, but we > should drive for a “testbed software specification” subheading, where we > incorporate the fact-finding information on software and network > requirements. **** > > **** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor > **** > > **** > > General list of open specifications (for app & services):**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework > **** > > (part of the architecture: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture > )**** > > **** > > 1. Network-specification should incorporate:**** > > - List of open network ports and protocols (80/HTTP, 443/HTTPS, > 22/SSH, 21/FTP, …)**** > > - Expected depending available internet services (e.g. DNS, > Mail, NTP, …)**** > > - Specific firewall requirements (explicitly open or closed > ports INPUT/OUTPUT)**** > > - Specific routing requirements (default routes and specific > routes to other GEs)**** > > **** > > 2. “Testbed software specification” should incorporate:**** > > A) Virtual appliance delivery **** > > o Virtual machine container name**** > > o Guest-OS**** > > o Guest-Architecture (64bit/32bit)**** > > o Number of CPUs**** > > o RAM (Min and Max)**** > > o Expected file-system sizes and storage requirements**** > > B) Software delivery**** > > o Depending software packages (Java / **** > > o Depending software services (J2EE server / tomcat / webserver / …)**** > > o Depending hardware requirements (if any)**** > > o Specific hardware dependencies (# USB ports, …)**** > > o Depending system requirements (architecture, OS, # of CPU, RAM, …)**** > > C) Software as a service delivery**** > > o Hostname, port and protocol to reach the software provided as a > service**** > > o User/password (if any for integration testing)**** > > **** > > I compiled these two lists just out of my head – perhaps we should > reiterate the list in the team, as it is highly likely that I missed > something. **** > > **** > > I just got a note that Juanjo is preparing new templates for the open > specifications - perhaps the right place for the gathering of the above > information is: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1Or should I incorporate this list in > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/FI-WARE_Integration_Plan#The_Integration_Testing_Plan? > **** > > Stefano: would please decide which option to take and respectively address > Juanjo with the request?**** > > **** > > Thanks and best regards,**** > > **** > > /Thorsten** > ** > > **** > > -- **** > > **** > > Thorsten Sandfuchs**** > > **** > > SAP AG **** > > **** > > SAP Research Center Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 **** > > D - 76131 Karlsruhe **** > > **** > > www.sap.com **** > > **** > > **** > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx **** > > **** > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. **** > > **** > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > **** > > Please consider the environment before printing this mail!**** > > **** > > **** > > > > **** > > **** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle > persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante > dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora > abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di > darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua > distruzione, Grazie. **** > > *This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, > copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and > advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.* **** > > *Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.* **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120406/5a1cdf3f/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy