From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Wed Aug 1 09:22:04 2012 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:22:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5018D91C.20007@nsn.com> Hi, sorry for the late notice, but due to an overlapping meeting I will not be able to participate today. If all goes well and we finish the meeting earlier, I'll try to connect late. As our GE will be delivered only in the next phase as most of WP7 GEs, I hope my absence won't cause much trouble. Br, Loci On 07/31/2012 09:21 PM, ext stefano de panfilis wrote: > dear all, > > thsi is to remind you all the weekly phc (wednesday 10:00) > it is important the attendance of everybody. > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- L?r?nt N?meth R&D Team Leader Nokia Siemens Networks Kft. H-1092 Budapest, K?ztelek u. 6. Mobile: +36209849340 Fax: +3612154766 lorant.nemeth at nsn.com http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/ This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. Local registered entity information: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Aug 1 12:53:36 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:53:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Catalogue and Testbed: the public face of the project In-Reply-To: References: <5017C79F.9010909@eng.it> Message-ID: <50190AB0.9070706@eng.it> Dear Stefano, I'm turning your suggestions in concrete tickets to works asap. some comments in line. ciao D On 31/07/2012 19:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: > > 1. instead of just "catalogue", i'd call it "generic enabler > implementations catalogue". this is a bit more precise, as the users > do not find there the catalogue of the "generic enablers" but that of > their implementations! I agree, in principle, but we have to decide if we want to keep the door open to the publication of Specific Enablers that may be deployed, in the future, in a FI-WARE Instance. > in this context, i do not think it is strictly important that the > names here correspond to what is in the fi-ware project deliverables. > what i mean is that what is in the catalogue is the "implementation" > of the ge which correspond to precise marketing policies. as an > example think about the "wirecloud mashup platform". as such it is the > implementation of the ge "compopsition editor" and NOT that ge, so > perfectly legitimate in this catalogue it has a more "attractive" > name. think how much this will important to smes that want to set-up a > business selling geis!!! > so as a solution i stronly suggest in the overview page of each gei to > have a mandatory field with the link to the related ge open > specification. this is critical becouse at the end of the day this > what qualifies the gei!!! here i have a doubt (mostly for juanjo): are > we sure all the gei share exactly the same apis??? i have honestly my > doubts ... already considered and the ticket is already created. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2242&group_id=15&atid=202 > > 2. i'd suggest to add a tongue menu, or whatever mean you think > better, under the option "enablers" containg the chapter names, so the > users can browse the gei through chapters in a more coherent way and > not in an uncoherent (meaningless?) alphabetical order. once you selected "Enablers" from the main menu you can find the list of the chapters on the right column. They act like a filter for the published GEIs ... I think that filter is not particularly visible, and I think it can be improved when the new look & feel will be implemented. > > 3. in the "instances" page i'd add a mandatory field with the url from > where the ge apis are accessible. yes, indication included in the template circulated > > 4. the catalogue should run on the testbed already from this testbed > v1. i think this is a strong message not only for the fi-ppp community > as a whole, but also for po and reviewers. agree 100% ... is it ok to have it by September? > > 5. for users outside fi-ware i think the distinction between what they > can find under the "instances" page and "downloads" page is rather > unclear. i'm sorry, but i do not have a suggestion here. perhaps, > after changing the overal name from "catalogue" to "generic enabler > implamentations catalogue" solves automatically this ambiguity. right ... we're searching for something better for replacing "Instances" label > > for further releases of the catalogue i'd suggest: > > 1. to have the overview page of each gei structured the same way > > 2. may be in the same overview page to have also marketing, commercial > and legal info, of course we can also have an ad-hoc page. > > my two cents... > > congratulations, > stefano thanx a lot! Davide > > > > 2012/7/31 Matteo Melideo > > > Dear Juanjo and Stefano, > as a follow up of the discussion just had during the phc, please > visit the catalogue as if you were a potential stakeholder > (http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/) and let me know what do > you think of the current GE published and the quality of this. > Would you buy them? Is it clear where they are and what they are? > > I would like to open the catalogue to the UC projects, the P.O. > and reviewers (early September) in order to enable them to see > what the partners are really doing to advertise and publish their > GEs. In addition to this, there will be also a ranking tools to > allow the UC projects and whoever else will visit the catalogue to > rate the GE quality. > > I think that if you also publicly provide your view on this I > think helps a lot. > > My two cents, > > M. > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Aug 8 09:48:42 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:48:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today Message-ID: dear all, i do apologise, but i need to postpone our weekly phc of 30 min. so let start it at 10:30. any way i think it will be short so not to end after 11:00 ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk Wed Aug 8 15:11:44 2012 From: p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk (p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:11:44 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] University of Surrey's Cloud Platfrom In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stefano, Miguel, all, At the University of Surrey we have recently deployed a new Cloud Platform with high computing and bandwidth resources. The cloud platform also provides user friendly interfaces (Web and remote desktop) that can be used by external users. We are already working to host and deploy our GE components in FI-Ware IoT on this cloud. My colleagues are happy to extend this to other FI-WARE partners and to share our computing and software facilities over the cloud; the cloud environment runs VMwareESX that allows creating computing, storage and network resources and supports different OS Platforms; If this is something that other FI-WARE testbed partners are interested, please let us know. I have included my colleague Adetola Oredope in CC. Please contact Adetola if you are interested. Best, Payam ------------------------------------------------ Dr. Payam Barnaghi Lecturer, Centre for Communication Systems Research University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, UK Phone: +44 1483 68 3460 Fax: +44 1483 68 6011 Email: p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/P.Barnaghi/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Aug 9 12:00:30 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:00:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] status before the announcements Message-ID: dear henar and miguel, as told to everybody many times and as agreed, before to announce any ge, it must be properly described in the catalogue ( http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/). what is the minimum mandatory is: 1. the link to the open spec in the overview page 2. url and access policy in the instances page 3. the links to the programmer guidelines and manuals in the documentation page i made a check for you and this is in the attached file. the situation is rather incomplete ............ please contact all those missing the info, otherwise no announcement can be made for their ge! this is a strict rule valid for everybody!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Testbed_status_20120808.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 20756 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Aug 9 12:16:58 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:16:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation In-Reply-To: <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> References: <50238243.7020708@eng.it> <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> Message-ID: Davide, thanks. I've updated it to the correct name "Semantic Annotation". I have two things more: [Opening this topic to entire test-bed list, maybe I'm not alone with this...] 1. any time I'm logging into the catalogue I've the screen reported below, with two errors. Is it critical? May you fix it? Just to avoid that It will provoke more serious damage further. 2. I suggest that a part of the public vote available per each GE we have also: a. how many times people accessed (number of hits) that GE page (level of the interest); b. how many times people are downloaded from that GE (level of attempts of trying to use that GW). I believe there is nothing wrong to do it (counters) visible to anyone (public). I mean some marketplace classic solutions... :-) we're "selling" the FI-WARE platform, no? Best Regards, Boris -----Original Message----- From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:03 PM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Mondin Fabio Luciano; Carlos Ralli Ucendo; Matteo Melideo Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation Boris, well done! I've approved the GE implementation and now it's up to you and Chapter leader to publish it once the content is ready. if you need support on the Catalogue, please, refer to the contact persons reported together with the instructions for the Catalogue. ciao, Davide On 09/08/2012 11:54, Moltchanov Boris wrote: > Davide, > > If I'm not wrong the current insertion I've maid in unpublished therefore not public. I have just reserved a slot of the site and of my time to insert it in advance. Is my understanding wrong and shall I eliminate it from there? > > Then probably Fabio when will be back from the holidays will improve it an Carlos as wok publish in the Catalogue. > > It should be Semantic Annotation. I apologize for the mistake, will review it ASAP. > > Best regards, > > Boris > > 09/ago/2012, ? 11:26, "Davide Dalle Carbonare" ???????(?): > >> Ciao Boris, >> >> I remind you to follow the instructions on what information to >> publish before make the GE instance public. >> >> cheers, >> Davide >> >> ps ... is it Semantic or Semantica (as from the Catalogue entry)? > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > > From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Aug 9 12:18:01 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:18:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation References: <50238243.7020708@eng.it> <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> Message-ID: [cid:image001.png at 01CD7629.04F404D0] -----Original Message----- From: Moltchanov Boris Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:17 PM To: 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'; Marika St?lnacke (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com) Cc: stefano de panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation Davide, thanks. I've updated it to the correct name "Semantic Annotation". I have two things more: [Opening this topic to entire test-bed list, maybe I'm not alone with this...] 1. any time I'm logging into the catalogue I've the screen reported below, with two errors. Is it critical? May you fix it? Just to avoid that It will provoke more serious damage further. 2. I suggest that a part of the public vote available per each GE we have also: a. how many times people accessed (number of hits) that GE page (level of the interest); b. how many times people are downloaded from that GE (level of attempts of trying to use that GW). I believe there is nothing wrong to do it (counters) visible to anyone (public). I mean some marketplace classic solutions... :-) we're "selling" the FI-WARE platform, no? Best Regards, Boris -----Original Message----- From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:03 PM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: Mondin Fabio Luciano; Carlos Ralli Ucendo; Matteo Melideo Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation Boris, well done! I've approved the GE implementation and now it's up to you and Chapter leader to publish it once the content is ready. if you need support on the Catalogue, please, refer to the contact persons reported together with the instructions for the Catalogue. ciao, Davide On 09/08/2012 11:54, Moltchanov Boris wrote: > Davide, > > If I'm not wrong the current insertion I've maid in unpublished therefore not public. I have just reserved a slot of the site and of my time to insert it in advance. Is my understanding wrong and shall I eliminate it from there? > > Then probably Fabio when will be back from the holidays will improve it an Carlos as wok publish in the Catalogue. > > It should be Semantic Annotation. I apologize for the mistake, will review it ASAP. > > Best regards, > > Boris > > 09/ago/2012, ? 11:26, "Davide Dalle Carbonare" > ???????(?): > >> Ciao Boris, >> >> I remind you to follow the instructions on what information to >> publish before make the GE instance public. >> >> cheers, >> Davide >> >> ps ... is it Semantic or Semantica (as from the Catalogue entry)? > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 42576 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Aug 9 12:27:52 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:27:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation In-Reply-To: References: <50238243.7020708@eng.it> <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> Message-ID: <502390A8.7090500@eng.it> Boris, thank you for the valuable comments, Marika and Mattias can take care of them. anyway ... with the Catalogue we're not selling the FI-WARE products directly but the possibility to use the instances of those products ... that's slightly different. BR Davide On 09/08/2012 12:16, Moltchanov Boris wrote: > Davide, > thanks. > > I've updated it to the correct name "Semantic Annotation". > > I have two things more: > [Opening this topic to entire test-bed list, maybe I'm not alone with this...] > 1. any time I'm logging into the catalogue I've the screen reported below, with two errors. Is it critical? May you fix it? Just to avoid that It will provoke more serious damage further. > > 2. I suggest that a part of the public vote available per each GE we have also: > a. how many times people accessed (number of hits) that GE page (level of the interest); > b. how many times people are downloaded from that GE (level of attempts of trying to use that GW). > I believe there is nothing wrong to do it (counters) visible to anyone (public). > I mean some marketplace classic solutions... :-) we're "selling" the FI-WARE platform, no? > > Best Regards, > Boris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:03 PM > To: Moltchanov Boris > Cc: Mondin Fabio Luciano; Carlos Ralli Ucendo; Matteo Melideo > Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation > > Boris, > well done! > I've approved the GE implementation and now it's up to you and Chapter leader to publish it once the content is ready. > > if you need support on the Catalogue, please, refer to the contact persons reported together with the instructions for the Catalogue. > > ciao, > Davide > > > On 09/08/2012 11:54, Moltchanov Boris wrote: >> Davide, >> >> If I'm not wrong the current insertion I've maid in unpublished therefore not public. I have just reserved a slot of the site and of my time to insert it in advance. Is my understanding wrong and shall I eliminate it from there? >> >> Then probably Fabio when will be back from the holidays will improve it an Carlos as wok publish in the Catalogue. >> >> It should be Semantic Annotation. I apologize for the mistake, will review it ASAP. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Boris >> >> 09/ago/2012, ? 11:26, "Davide Dalle Carbonare" ???????(?): >> >>> Ciao Boris, >>> >>> I remind you to follow the instructions on what information to >>> publish before make the GE instance public. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Davide >>> >>> ps ... is it Semantic or Semantica (as from the Catalogue entry)? >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >> >> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. >> >> >> From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Aug 9 12:33:12 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:33:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation In-Reply-To: <502390A8.7090500@eng.it> References: <50238243.7020708@eng.it> <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> <502390A8.7090500@eng.it> Message-ID: That is why I place it in " ("sell") we're selling not the GE as products, we're selling the FI-WARE results! Boris as member of FI-WARE and NOT TI. -----Original Message----- From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:28 PM To: Moltchanov Boris Cc: "Marika St?lnacke (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com)"; stefano de panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Mattias Wallenberg; Matteo Melideo Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation Boris, thank you for the valuable comments, Marika and Mattias can take care of them. anyway ... with the Catalogue we're not selling the FI-WARE products directly but the possibility to use the instances of those products ... that's slightly different. BR Davide On 09/08/2012 12:16, Moltchanov Boris wrote: > Davide, > thanks. > > I've updated it to the correct name "Semantic Annotation". > > I have two things more: > [Opening this topic to entire test-bed list, maybe I'm not alone with > this...] 1. any time I'm logging into the catalogue I've the screen reported below, with two errors. Is it critical? May you fix it? Just to avoid that It will provoke more serious damage further. > > 2. I suggest that a part of the public vote available per each GE we have also: > a. how many times people accessed (number of hits) that GE page (level > of the interest); b. how many times people are downloaded from that GE (level of attempts of trying to use that GW). > I believe there is nothing wrong to do it (counters) visible to anyone (public). > I mean some marketplace classic solutions... :-) we're "selling" the FI-WARE platform, no? > > Best Regards, > Boris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:03 PM > To: Moltchanov Boris > Cc: Mondin Fabio Luciano; Carlos Ralli Ucendo; Matteo Melideo > Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation > > Boris, > well done! > I've approved the GE implementation and now it's up to you and Chapter leader to publish it once the content is ready. > > if you need support on the Catalogue, please, refer to the contact persons reported together with the instructions for the Catalogue. > > ciao, > Davide > > > On 09/08/2012 11:54, Moltchanov Boris wrote: >> Davide, >> >> If I'm not wrong the current insertion I've maid in unpublished therefore not public. I have just reserved a slot of the site and of my time to insert it in advance. Is my understanding wrong and shall I eliminate it from there? >> >> Then probably Fabio when will be back from the holidays will improve it an Carlos as wok publish in the Catalogue. >> >> It should be Semantic Annotation. I apologize for the mistake, will review it ASAP. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Boris >> >> 09/ago/2012, ? 11:26, "Davide Dalle Carbonare" ???????(?): >> >>> Ciao Boris, >>> >>> I remind you to follow the instructions on what information to >>> publish before make the GE instance public. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Davide >>> >>> ps ... is it Semantic or Semantica (as from the Catalogue entry)? >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >> >> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. >> >> >> From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Aug 9 12:43:06 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:43:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation In-Reply-To: References: <50238243.7020708@eng.it> <50238ABF.5080000@eng.it> <502390A8.7090500@eng.it> Message-ID: <5023943A.8060400@eng.it> yes, right! my note was only to underline that our first "customers" are who want to use already available GE instances and as a second step who want to build their own FI-WARE platform instance. BR Davide On 09/08/2012 12:33, Moltchanov Boris wrote: > That is why I place it in " ("sell") we're selling not the GE as products, we're selling the FI-WARE results! > > Boris as member of FI-WARE and NOT TI. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:28 PM > To: Moltchanov Boris > Cc: "Marika St?lnacke (marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com)"; stefano de panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Mattias Wallenberg; Matteo Melideo > Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation > > Boris, > thank you for the valuable comments, Marika and Mattias can take care of them. > > anyway ... with the Catalogue we're not selling the FI-WARE products directly but the possibility to use the instances of those products ... that's slightly different. > > BR > Davide > > On 09/08/2012 12:16, Moltchanov Boris wrote: >> Davide, >> thanks. >> >> I've updated it to the correct name "Semantic Annotation". >> >> I have two things more: >> [Opening this topic to entire test-bed list, maybe I'm not alone with >> this...] 1. any time I'm logging into the catalogue I've the screen reported below, with two errors. Is it critical? May you fix it? Just to avoid that It will provoke more serious damage further. >> >> 2. I suggest that a part of the public vote available per each GE we have also: >> a. how many times people accessed (number of hits) that GE page (level >> of the interest); b. how many times people are downloaded from that GE (level of attempts of trying to use that GW). >> I believe there is nothing wrong to do it (counters) visible to anyone (public). >> I mean some marketplace classic solutions... :-) we're "selling" the FI-WARE platform, no? >> >> Best Regards, >> Boris >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] >> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:03 PM >> To: Moltchanov Boris >> Cc: Mondin Fabio Luciano; Carlos Ralli Ucendo; Matteo Melideo >> Subject: Re: Pubblicazione del Semantic Annotation >> >> Boris, >> well done! >> I've approved the GE implementation and now it's up to you and Chapter leader to publish it once the content is ready. >> >> if you need support on the Catalogue, please, refer to the contact persons reported together with the instructions for the Catalogue. >> >> ciao, >> Davide >> >> >> On 09/08/2012 11:54, Moltchanov Boris wrote: >>> Davide, >>> >>> If I'm not wrong the current insertion I've maid in unpublished therefore not public. I have just reserved a slot of the site and of my time to insert it in advance. Is my understanding wrong and shall I eliminate it from there? >>> >>> Then probably Fabio when will be back from the holidays will improve it an Carlos as wok publish in the Catalogue. >>> >>> It should be Semantic Annotation. I apologize for the mistake, will review it ASAP. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Boris >>> >>> 09/ago/2012, ? 11:26, "Davide Dalle Carbonare" ???????(?): >>> >>>> Ciao Boris, >>>> >>>> I remind you to follow the instructions on what information to >>>> publish before make the GE instance public. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Davide >>>> >>>> ps ... is it Semantic or Semantica (as from the Catalogue entry)? >>> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >>> >>> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. >>> >>> >>> From jhierro at tid.es Fri Aug 10 07:57:11 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:57:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] University of Surrey's Cloud Platfrom In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5024A2B7.1060302@tid.es> Dear Payam, Thanks for your offering, but a couple of remarks here: * It has already been discussed many times and it has been decided that FI-WARE GEs are going to be hosted in the datacenter facilities linked to the FI-WARE Testbed. Using a set of dedicated VMs for the First Release of FI-WARE, deployed on the FI-WARE Cloud that will be available as part of the FI-WARE Testbed for the Second Release of FI-WARE. This is not just because it is always nice to eat our own dog food, but because we are also asked to go beyond that and demonstrate that a particular player, who wants to play the role of FI-WARE Instance Provider, is able to create an integrated FI-WARE Instance by means of picking and bundle together a number of products implementing FI-WARE GEs. The FI-WARE Testbed, besides providing an environment for UC projects to test their Proof of Concepts and provide feedback to FI-WARE Developments and Specifications, is there to prove the feasibility of integrating FI-WARE GEs to build a FI-WARE Instance that can be deployed on a number of concrete facilities operated by a given operator, as a single platform. Delivering a given FI-WARE GE only as a Service raises a lot of questions about the feasibility to build and operate FI-WARE Instances and, therefore, the ability to exploit results of the project. Bottom line: * All FI-WARE GEs have to be made available on the FI-WARE Testbed and offered "as a Service" from there to the UC projects. * The FI-WARE GEs hosted on the FI-WARE Testbed will be the only ones offered to UC projects for experimentation unless explicitly agreed. * We will not accept justification of any PMs devoted to deploy and host a FI-WARE GE on any infrastructure different than the one linked to the FI-WARE Testbed unless explicitly agreed. * Of course, all the rest of partners are advised NOT to use your facilities as a mean to host their GE implementations and offer them to the UC projects. Indeed, I have to confess that I find it a bit inappropriate that a partner encourages the rest of partners to use a Cloud Hosting service different than the one we are going to build and offer in FI-WARE. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 08/08/12 15:11, p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk wrote: Hi Stefano, Miguel, all, At the University of Surrey we have recently deployed a new Cloud Platform with high computing and bandwidth resources. The cloud platform also provides user friendly interfaces (Web and remote desktop) that can be used by external users. We are already working to host and deploy our GE components in FI-Ware IoT on this cloud. My colleagues are happy to extend this to other FI-WARE partners and to share our computing and software facilities over the cloud; the cloud environment runs VMwareESX that allows creating computing, storage and network resources and supports different OS Platforms; If this is something that other FI-WARE testbed partners are interested, please let us know. I have included my colleague Adetola Oredope in CC. Please contact Adetola if you are interested. Best, Payam ------------------------------------------------ Dr. Payam Barnaghi Lecturer, Centre for Communication Systems Research University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, UK Phone: +44 1483 68 3460 Fax: +44 1483 68 6011 Email: p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/P.Barnaghi/ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk Fri Aug 10 14:55:29 2012 From: p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk (p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:55:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] University of Surrey's Cloud Platfrom In-Reply-To: <5024A2B7.1060302@tid.es> References: , <5024A2B7.1060302@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, Thank you for the clarification. I didn't mean it as an alternative Cloud Hosting service different than the one that is going to be built and offered in FI-WARE; we meant it more as a complimentary and connected solution to FI-WARe cloud; and in fact, our cloud can't offer the capabilities that FI-WARE is going to build after all. Thanks again and sorry if my suggestion wasn't appropriate; I did it with good intention and tried to help... Thanks, Payam ________________________________ From: Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Sent: 10 August 2012 06:57 To: Barnaghi P Dr (Electronic Eng) Cc: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it; mcp at tid.es; Oredope A Dr (Electronic Eng); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu; Tafazolli R Prof (CCSR); Evans BG Prof (CCSR); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] University of Surrey's Cloud Platfrom Dear Payam, Thanks for your offering, but a couple of remarks here: * It has already been discussed many times and it has been decided that FI-WARE GEs are going to be hosted in the datacenter facilities linked to the FI-WARE Testbed. Using a set of dedicated VMs for the First Release of FI-WARE, deployed on the FI-WARE Cloud that will be available as part of the FI-WARE Testbed for the Second Release of FI-WARE. This is not just because it is always nice to eat our own dog food, but because we are also asked to go beyond that and demonstrate that a particular player, who wants to play the role of FI-WARE Instance Provider, is able to create an integrated FI-WARE Instance by means of picking and bundle together a number of products implementing FI-WARE GEs. The FI-WARE Testbed, besides providing an environment for UC projects to test their Proof of Concepts and provide feedback to FI-WARE Developments and Specifications, is there to prove the feasibility of integrating FI-WARE GEs to build a FI-WARE Instance that can be deployed on a number of concrete facilities operated by a given operator, as a single platform. Delivering a given FI-WARE GE only as a Service raises a lot of questions about the feasibility to build and operate FI-WARE Instances and, therefore, the ability to exploit results of the project. Bottom line: * All FI-WARE GEs have to be made available on the FI-WARE Testbed and offered "as a Service" from there to the UC projects. * The FI-WARE GEs hosted on the FI-WARE Testbed will be the only ones offered to UC projects for experimentation unless explicitly agreed. * We will not accept justification of any PMs devoted to deploy and host a FI-WARE GE on any infrastructure different than the one linked to the FI-WARE Testbed unless explicitly agreed. * Of course, all the rest of partners are advised NOT to use your facilities as a mean to host their GE implementations and offer them to the UC projects. Indeed, I have to confess that I find it a bit inappropriate that a partner encourages the rest of partners to use a Cloud Hosting service different than the one we are going to build and offer in FI-WARE. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 08/08/12 15:11, p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk wrote: Hi Stefano, Miguel, all, At the University of Surrey we have recently deployed a new Cloud Platform with high computing and bandwidth resources. The cloud platform also provides user friendly interfaces (Web and remote desktop) that can be used by external users. We are already working to host and deploy our GE components in FI-Ware IoT on this cloud. My colleagues are happy to extend this to other FI-WARE partners and to share our computing and software facilities over the cloud; the cloud environment runs VMwareESX that allows creating computing, storage and network resources and supports different OS Platforms; If this is something that other FI-WARE testbed partners are interested, please let us know. I have included my colleague Adetola Oredope in CC. Please contact Adetola if you are interested. Best, Payam ------------------------------------------------ Dr. Payam Barnaghi Lecturer, Centre for Communication Systems Research University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey, UK Phone: +44 1483 68 3460 Fax: +44 1483 68 6011 Email: p.barnaghi at surrey.ac.uk http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/P.Barnaghi/ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Wed Aug 15 09:51:06 2012 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:51:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <502B54EA.8010004@nsn.com> Hi, sorry, but due to an urgent (and sudden) meeting I'll not be able to participate today. Br, Loci From mcp at tid.es Thu Aug 16 09:56:49 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:56:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today In-Reply-To: <502B54EA.8010004@nsn.com> References: <502B54EA.8010004@nsn.com> Message-ID: <502CA7C1.7010708@tid.es> Hi Sorry that I could not attend. Yesterday was a holiday in Spain and I could not be present. I guess this did not take place, I think that all the people from Engineering are on holidays. Best regards, Miguel El 15/08/2012 9:51, Lorant Nemeth escribi?: > Hi, > > sorry, but due to an urgent (and sudden) meeting I'll not be able to > participate today. > > Br, > Loci > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Thu Aug 16 11:02:04 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:02:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today In-Reply-To: <502CA7C1.7010708@tid.es> References: <502B54EA.8010004@nsn.com> <502CA7C1.7010708@tid.es> Message-ID: The same with me - yesterday we had the ferragosto holiday in Italy. Sorry. Boris -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:57 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today Hi Sorry that I could not attend. Yesterday was a holiday in Spain and I could not be present. I guess this did not take place, I think that all the people from Engineering are on holidays. Best regards, Miguel El 15/08/2012 9:51, Lorant Nemeth escribi?: > Hi, > > sorry, but due to an urgent (and sudden) meeting I'll not be able to > participate today. > > Br, > Loci > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Thu Aug 16 14:40:06 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:40:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today In-Reply-To: References: <502B54EA.8010004@nsn.com> <502CA7C1.7010708@tid.es> Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E7460ECEC00@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Hehe, I was the only one there. Asked myself a question, answered it, and then closed the meeting :-D -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Moltchanov Boris Sent: den 16 augusti 2012 11:02 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today The same with me - yesterday we had the ferragosto holiday in Italy. Sorry. Boris -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:57 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] phc of today Hi Sorry that I could not attend. Yesterday was a holiday in Spain and I could not be present. I guess this did not take place, I think that all the people from Engineering are on holidays. Best regards, Miguel El 15/08/2012 9:51, Lorant Nemeth escribi?: > Hi, > > sorry, but due to an urgent (and sudden) meeting I'll not be able to > participate today. > > Br, > Loci > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Wed Aug 22 09:46:37 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:46:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500024E4288C8@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500024E4288C8@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002544AED46@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Hello, I will probably join the call a little bit late (~10h30 probably), I hope it?ll not be a problem (anyway, nothing new or special about our GE). Regards Henk Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CAA361.71C82DE0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: mercredi 27 juin 2012 11:25 To: Marika St?lnacke; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercredi 22 ao?t 2012 10:00-11:00 (GMT+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT94085 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2324 bytes Desc: ATT94085 1.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT15590 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1167 bytes Desc: ATT15590 2.jpg URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Aug 22 09:49:54 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:49:54 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Message-ID: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> Dear all, In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not know to what extent this confcall makes sense. We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any doubts can be resolved by email... Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Wed Aug 22 10:06:17 2012 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:06:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? In-Reply-To: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> References: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> Message-ID: <503492F9.8010807@nsn.com> Hi, I agree. Let's skip the call. Br, Loci On 08/22/2012 09:49 AM, ext Miguel Carrillo wrote: > Dear all, > > In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not > know to what extent this confcall makes sense. > > We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any > doubts can be resolved by email... > > Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- L?r?nt N?meth R&D Team Leader Nokia Siemens Networks Kft. H-1092 Budapest, K?ztelek u. 6. Mobile: +36209849340 Fax: +3612154766 lorant.nemeth at nsn.com http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/ This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. Local registered entity information: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Aug 22 10:10:07 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:10:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? In-Reply-To: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> References: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi colleauges, My points would be: Firstly Concerning Task 10.5 it would be interesting to discuss on how we proceed with the validation planning and execution of the UC projects. - When should we release the general guidance on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan to the UC projects? - Who (which UC) is already interested in the testbed and responded to our announcement? Secondly - Only by hearsay I got aware that the testbed team itself is not doing the "integration testing", but the chapters and chapter leads will do this. Somehow. This has not been discussed on the mailinglist and currently the WPs lack guidance: - What process to follow _exactly_ while doing the test? (Which tracker to update to which state). Obviously the "Integration Plan" and the subsequent tracker is not current as it lacks "integration testing" as a state and only provides "installed". - When is the deadline for the integration testing? Although I'm active in WP10, I was able to comment on these points, which is somehow not "good". If we keep on skipping con-calls and have no traffic on the mailinglist, this won't change and basically I can't contribute much. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 09:50 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Dear all, In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not know to what extent this confcall makes sense. We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any doubts can be resolved by email... Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From mcp at tid.es Wed Aug 22 10:29:11 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:29:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? In-Reply-To: References: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> Message-ID: <50349857.1070706@tid.es> Hi Thorsten Inline El 22/08/2012 10:10, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: > Hi colleauges, > My points would be: > Firstly > Concerning Task 10.5 it would be interesting to discuss on how we proceed with the validation planning and execution of the UC projects. > - When should we release the general guidance on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan to the UC projects? > - Who (which UC) is already interested in the testbed and responded to our announcement? In my opinion, this is something that needs Stefano to discuss it. Also, I personally do not have any info from UCs approaching us after the announcements, maybe he does. There is an online spreadsheet where the UCs express interest in GEs, that's all I know. > > Secondly > - Only by hearsay I got aware that the testbed team itself is not doing the "integration testing", but the chapters and chapter leads will do this. Somehow. This has not been discussed on the mailinglist and currently the WPs lack guidance: It seemed obvious to me and it was said from the beginning (possibly not in the context of WP10) that each WP would conduct their experiments on the testbed. But this is useful, if you say this, it is obvious that the message has not reached the people. I put it to Juanjo's consideration in case he wants to raise it in the next WPL/WLA coordination confcall > - What process to follow _exactly_ while doing the test? (Which tracker to update to which state). Obviously the "Integration Plan" and the subsequent tracker is not current as it lacks "integration testing" as a state and only provides "installed". The tracker is for the installation exclusively. The target is to trace the installation process, not testing. In a lax approach, the Sanity Check is part of the installation process as it is the last step to take it as good and accept it. I would not object to creating a dedicated tracker for integration testing. > - When is the deadline for the integration testing? I am not aware of one, Good question, we should have this. > > Although I'm active in WP10, I was able to comment on these points, which is somehow not "good". If we keep on skipping con-calls and have no traffic on the mailinglist, this won't change and basically I can't contribute much. My point was that if we have an empty confcall with few people and limited capacity to decide, we will not be efficient. We will surely talk for one hour but we will come to nothing! Let us be practical. > > Best, > > /Thorsten > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 09:50 > To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? > > Dear all, > > In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not > know to what extent this confcall makes sense. > > We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any > doubts can be resolved by email... > > Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > . > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Aug 22 13:17:55 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:17:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? In-Reply-To: <50349857.1070706@tid.es> References: <50348F22.3050406@tid.es> <50349857.1070706@tid.es> Message-ID: Mi Miguel. At 1: Agreed, we should take validation planning on the topic for the next concall. At2: Thanks for clarifying. If you need further support, just let us know. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 10:29 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Hi Thorsten Inline El 22/08/2012 10:10, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: > Hi colleauges, > My points would be: > Firstly > Concerning Task 10.5 it would be interesting to discuss on how we proceed with the validation planning and execution of the UC projects. > - When should we release the general guidance on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan to the UC projects? > - Who (which UC) is already interested in the testbed and responded to our announcement? In my opinion, this is something that needs Stefano to discuss it. Also, I personally do not have any info from UCs approaching us after the announcements, maybe he does. There is an online spreadsheet where the UCs express interest in GEs, that's all I know. > > Secondly > - Only by hearsay I got aware that the testbed team itself is not doing the "integration testing", but the chapters and chapter leads will do this. Somehow. This has not been discussed on the mailinglist and currently the WPs lack guidance: It seemed obvious to me and it was said from the beginning (possibly not in the context of WP10) that each WP would conduct their experiments on the testbed. But this is useful, if you say this, it is obvious that the message has not reached the people. I put it to Juanjo's consideration in case he wants to raise it in the next WPL/WLA coordination confcall > - What process to follow _exactly_ while doing the test? (Which tracker to update to which state). Obviously the "Integration Plan" and the subsequent tracker is not current as it lacks "integration testing" as a state and only provides "installed". The tracker is for the installation exclusively. The target is to trace the installation process, not testing. In a lax approach, the Sanity Check is part of the installation process as it is the last step to take it as good and accept it. I would not object to creating a dedicated tracker for integration testing. > - When is the deadline for the integration testing? I am not aware of one, Good question, we should have this. > > Although I'm active in WP10, I was able to comment on these points, which is somehow not "good". If we keep on skipping con-calls and have no traffic on the mailinglist, this won't change and basically I can't contribute much. My point was that if we have an empty confcall with few people and limited capacity to decide, we will not be efficient. We will surely talk for one hour but we will come to nothing! Let us be practical. > > Best, > > /Thorsten > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 09:50 > To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? > > Dear all, > > In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not > know to what extent this confcall makes sense. > > We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any > doubts can be resolved by email... > > Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > . > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Wed Aug 22 13:27:39 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:27:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Integration testing Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E74626F6151@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Hi In reponse to Thorsten's second issue below, I checked briefly with Ericsson people in the other WPs. WP3 have stated in their discussions that partners/GE responsibles should do this. No feedback specifically on any lack of instructions. WP5 have not had many meetings since NSN pulled out, so this has not been discussed. All GE owners have not been given access to the testbed servers yet. WP7 has not had any discussions about this, at least not involving Ericsson representatives. This info does not really provide much guidance, I guess. /Marika -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: den 22 augusti 2012 10:10 To: Miguel Carrillo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Hi colleauges, My points would be: Firstly Concerning Task 10.5 it would be interesting to discuss on how we proceed with the validation planning and execution of the UC projects. - When should we release the general guidance on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan to the UC projects? - Who (which UC) is already interested in the testbed and responded to our announcement? Secondly - Only by hearsay I got aware that the testbed team itself is not doing the "integration testing", but the chapters and chapter leads will do this. Somehow. This has not been discussed on the mailinglist and currently the WPs lack guidance: - What process to follow _exactly_ while doing the test? (Which tracker to update to which state). Obviously the "Integration Plan" and the subsequent tracker is not current as it lacks "integration testing" as a state and only provides "installed". - When is the deadline for the integration testing? Although I'm active in WP10, I was able to comment on these points, which is somehow not "good". If we keep on skipping con-calls and have no traffic on the mailinglist, this won't change and basically I can't contribute much. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 09:50 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Dear all, In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not know to what extent this confcall makes sense. We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any doubts can be resolved by email... Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Wed Aug 22 13:46:18 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:46:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Integration testing In-Reply-To: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E74626F6151@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> References: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E74626F6151@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002544AEFB9@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Dear all, Just one comment about WP7 (Technicolor is also in this WP): for release #1 (now), the only GE WP7 is delivering is the "Cloud Proxy" (Technicolor's GE) and you all know (I hope) this GE is very special because it is not using and it is not linked to the existing testbed (the Cloud Proxy is a SW to be run on a "terminal" (a PC actually) at the edge between the WAN and a home network). Therefore, there is no involvement of WP7 on "tesbed-related" activities such as integration (and it is normal!) I copy the WP7 WP-leader (Pier) for his information Regards Henk Henk? HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: ?+33 2 99 27 33 08?- GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Marika St?lnacke Sent: mercredi 22 ao?t 2012 13:28 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; Miguel Carrillo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Integration testing Hi In reponse to Thorsten's second issue below, I checked briefly with Ericsson people in the other WPs. WP3 have stated in their discussions that partners/GE responsibles should do this. No feedback specifically on any lack of instructions. WP5 have not had many meetings since NSN pulled out, so this has not been discussed. All GE owners have not been given access to the testbed servers yet. WP7 has not had any discussions about this, at least not involving Ericsson representatives. This info does not really provide much guidance, I guess. /Marika -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: den 22 augusti 2012 10:10 To: Miguel Carrillo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Hi colleauges, My points would be: Firstly Concerning Task 10.5 it would be interesting to discuss on how we proceed with the validation planning and execution of the UC projects. - When should we release the general guidance on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan to the UC projects? - Who (which UC) is already interested in the testbed and responded to our announcement? Secondly - Only by hearsay I got aware that the testbed team itself is not doing the "integration testing", but the chapters and chapter leads will do this. Somehow. This has not been discussed on the mailinglist and currently the WPs lack guidance: - What process to follow _exactly_ while doing the test? (Which tracker to update to which state). Obviously the "Integration Plan" and the subsequent tracker is not current as it lacks "integration testing" as a state and only provides "installed". - When is the deadline for the integration testing? Although I'm active in WP10, I was able to comment on these points, which is somehow not "good". If we keep on skipping con-calls and have no traffic on the mailinglist, this won't change and basically I can't contribute much. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 09:50 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Cancellation of today's call? Dear all, In the absence of our coordinator and not having too many news I do not know to what extent this confcall makes sense. We have the status on the wiki, the tracker and the catalogue and any doubts can be resolved by email... Unless someone opposes this, I would skip/cancel it for this week. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From mcp at tid.es Fri Aug 24 11:37:51 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:37:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] IP for FI-WARE GE testing In-Reply-To: References: <50365411.4000904@tid.es> Message-ID: <50374B6F.3010807@tid.es> Dear all, Please be aware that we are starting to give the UCs access to the Testbed. They will start using our GEs and also asking questions , requesting support, etc. The support must be provided by the GE owner directly, in principle by he/she who is on the catalogue as primary contact for the GE. Best regards, Miguel El 24/08/2012 11:14, HENAR MU?OZ FRUTOS escribi?: > Hi Tim > > You should have access to the following GEs from the IP 82.198.197.188. > > -Apps: > * UPM_composition_editor_execution (Wirecloud Mashup Platform) > * DT_composition_editor_execution (Mashup Factory) > * Mediator > * Marketplace > * Respository > > - Data > * Bigdata > * Location Server > * Complex event processing > > - Security > * DB anonymizer > * Data handling > > Tell me if you have any problem and if you have any question about the GE you can contact the GE owner. > > Regards, > Henar > ________________________________________ > De: MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO > Enviado el: jueves, 23 de agosto de 2012 18:02 > Para: Verwaart, Tim > CC: HENAR MU?OZ FRUTOS; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; Carlos Maestre Terol (carlos.maestre at atosresearch.eu); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' > Asunto: Re: IP for FI-WARE GE testing > > Dear tim, > > It is good to have news from the UCs. Please try to send all IPs in one go, there many UC project and attending hundreds of emails would be a nightmare (and error prone) > > Anyway, we will try to grant you access to the testbed asap. > > Thank you for your comments, I answer inline. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > > El 23/08/2012 14:45, Verwaart, Tim escribi?: > Dear Henar and Miguel, > > Congratulations with the availability of the first GE instances on the testbed. > > I agreed with Carlos Maestre Terol of ATOS that I will communicate the IP adresses to you on behalf of the FI-PPP SmartAgriFood project, following Stefano?s e-mail (below). > > We would be happy play with and test the new GE instances. > > The first IP address which we will use to access the testbed (more are to follow) is 82.198.197.188 > We would like to have access to all available GEs > > On top of that we have some Questions: > > ? There are some links within the download-tab of GEs (e.g. http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/node/98) which require a login and password. How do we access these resources? > > They are private and therefore they shouldn't be mentiones here. We will delete this. Thanks for noticing. > > ? Same holds for some links within the documentation tab (e.g. http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/node/213). > > ? There are some links to a private-wiki (e.g. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Location_Platform_-_User_and_Programmer_Guide). > > This is a mistake, it points to an internal draft. I amended it and now it points to the final one, that is public. Thanks for noticing and helping us to refine the info on the catalogue. > > Please let me know as soon as we can access the GE?s on the testbed.? > We definitely will. > > With kind regards, > Tim Verwaart > (FI-PPP SmartAgriFood) > > On 09/08/12 22:05, stefano de panfilis wrote: > Dear members of the FI-PPP and particularly of the Use Case projects, > > i'm glad to announce the availability of a first set generic enabler implementations (gei). they are: > * Mediator > * Marketplace > * BigData > * Location Server > * DB anonymizer > > as already announced in a previoius email by browsing the fi-ware catalogue (http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/) > you'll get all the info on how to acces them, how to use them, and also their specifications. > > of course the access and use of such implelemtations is restricted to use case projects only. > in order to get access you (i.e. ONLY the person member of the fi-ppp ab to avoid confusion and thousands of email circulating ...) have to answer to this email indicating to my colleague henar and miguel (please keep also me in the loop) the ip address(es) from where you'll use to access the gei(s). > > in return you'll receive from henar the green ligth to use the ge(s) you are interested in. > this procedure not only will protect the gei owners, but also will allow us to make ready the machines according to the requested gei usage. > > if you find any problem in using the gei you have not to contact henar or miguel or me, but you have to contact directly the person responsible for the specific gei as indicated in the fi-ware catalogue relevant page (normally on the rigth side of each page concerning the gei). upon this, if it is the case, a proper ticket will be issued. > > as said earlier this is just a first set. > please stay tuned as in the very next days several other geis will be made available! > > i hope you will enjoy > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > . > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Aug 28 17:05:34 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:05:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] weekly phc reminder Message-ID: dear all, this is to remind about our weekly phc that will be tomorrow morning at 10:00 lasting approx 1h. items to discuss are: 1. geis deployment progress 2. integration test 3. uc project matrix interests on ge 4. testbed web page 5. a.o.b. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Aug 29 10:12:11 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:12:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 P Message-ID: Hi, just to inform I'll join the Phc in 10 minutes due to connection problems. BR Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Aug 29 10:50:34 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:50:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: FI-WARE Testbed simple spreadsheet reflecting availability of GEs and planned usage In-Reply-To: <503DB9D8.2080504@tid.es> References: <503DB9D8.2080504@tid.es> Message-ID: ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: 2012/8/29 Subject: FI-WARE Testbed simple spreadsheet reflecting availability of GEs and planned usage To: Stefano De Panfilis Cc: "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Stefano, Please find at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E The shared spreadsheet I would like to use. Please add anything you believe it is missed but, please take into account this spreadsheet is to be shared with UC projects and the reviewers and Arian. Therefore, should not be used for internal management, for example. In my honest opinion, it is complete and comprises all information I would like to see in a simple shot, but of course your comments are welcome. I have added two columns regarding description of the availability in the FI-WARE Testbed: - The first column correspond to the target/actual date at which a given GE was planned to have its 1st deployment, therefore available to UC projects for the first time - the date, when in the past, matches the date when availability of the GE was announced - the date, when in the future, matches the date when availability of the GE in the Testbed is announced - green means actually deployed, yellow means planned - The second column correspond to dates for an upgrade of the given GE in the Testbed (some GEs are going to be updgraded in September) I'm currently filling the values in the first column and the second column (this column will be only meaningful for some GEs, depends on what was declared in the Technical Roadmap) One thing that I would like to double-check: We didn't announce the availability of the Service Repository by SAP ... However, my understanding is that it should be ready (otherwise, it doesn't make sense to me) Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: