From marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com Wed Jul 4 09:48:20 2012 From: marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Marika_St=E5lnacke?=) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:48:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: <97A12757B7F76944842F0070E46EB7890365364D@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> References: <97A12757B7F76944842F0070E46EB7890365364D@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E745B8D70D1@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Hi I can't join the call today. due to an emergency meeting. /Marika -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 4 09:53:48 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:53:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc Message-ID: <186A8C3D0D304DBBAC06BE160A34F4D5@FSC461216100407> Dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc Main agenda topics: - templates definition status - service network status - IPs collection status Cheers, Paolo +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International PIN 8159 510 Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 4 11:26:45 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:26:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Administrative IPs Range Specification Message-ID: <6B70AA768BE8401A97D960FC93568A13@FSC461216100407> Hi All, this mail to inform all chapter representatives, inside WP10, about a pending action for them. They should ask each GE owner, inside their specific chapter, to provide the IPs address range they want to exploit to access the Testbed (the VM which will contain the GE) for administrative purposes (installation/managing etc.) How to Each GE owner has to put such information by (i) accessing the cockpit implementation page [1] and (ii) by filling the "IP range for administrative access (please specify company network W.X.Y.Z/32, .)" field of the form associated to its GE. Deadline It is needed to complete such activity by the end of this week at most. Please don't hesitate to contact the Testbed team for clarification about this really critical action. Cheers, Paolo [1] https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1 _Implementation_Cockpit Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 4 15:49:12 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:49:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10_minute_04_07_2012 Message-ID: <5D6B3AA165F6415EAD41B70632DA52E5@FSC461216100407> Hi all, find attached the minutes of the today phc for your review. Please send your amendments if any by tomorrow eob. ciao, Paolo Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_04_07_2012.doc Type: application/msword Size: 261120 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Wed Jul 4 17:52:25 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:52:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Administrative IPs Range Specification In-Reply-To: <6B70AA768BE8401A97D960FC93568A13@FSC461216100407> References: <6B70AA768BE8401A97D960FC93568A13@FSC461216100407> Message-ID: Hi Paolo, it seems that we, owners of our respective GEs, have insufficient access rights to that forge area to do what you've requested. I suggest we collect this information by emails and then someone admin will do it on our behalf, if we don't wish to do it publicly. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Paolo Zampognaro Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:27 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Administrative IPs Range Specification Importance: High Hi All, this mail to inform all chapter representatives, inside WP10, about a pending action for them. They should ask each GE owner, inside their specific chapter, to provide the IPs address range they want to exploit to access the Testbed (the VM which will contain the GE) for administrative purposes (installation/managing etc...) How to Each GE owner has to put such information by (i) accessing the cockpit implementation page [1] and (ii) by filling the "IP range for administrative access (please specify company network W.X.Y.Z/32, ...)" field of the form associated to its GE. Deadline It is needed to complete such activity by the end of this week at most. Please don't hesitate to contact the Testbed team for clarification about this really critical action. Cheers, Paolo [1] https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Wed Jul 4 17:54:09 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:54:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E745B8D70D1@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> References: <97A12757B7F76944842F0070E46EB7890365364D@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> <3A0AB0A0766BF24BA910799EB5C31C5E745B8D70D1@ESESSCMS0355.eemea.ericsson.se> Message-ID: The same with me for today, I've missed the call due to another engagement. Sorry. Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Marika Stalnacke Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 9:48 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Hi I can't join the call today. due to an emergency meeting. /Marika Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 4 18:08:49 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:08:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Administrative IPs Range Specification In-Reply-To: References: <6B70AA768BE8401A97D960FC93568A13@FSC461216100407> Message-ID: <4FF46A91.3000307@tid.es> Dear Boris, You personally have the necessary rights. And if you refer to someone else who needs to access this, he/she can apply for access to the testbed project following the usual procedure: * https://wiki.fi-ware.eu/How_to_join_a_FI-WARE_project_in_FusionForge The ones who have to input this info should have access to the testbed, all companies (and therefore all GE owners) are represented in the WP to take active part in it and they should not delegate this work. The testbed wiki is not public so "publicly" does not apply here. BR Miguel El 04/07/2012 17:52, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Hi Paolo, it seems that we, owners of our respective GEs, have insufficient access rights to that forge area to do what you?ve requested. I suggest we collect this information by emails and then someone admin will do it on our behalf, if we don?t wish to do it publicly. Best Regards, Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Paolo Zampognaro Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:27 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Administrative IPs Range Specification Importance: High Hi All, this mail to inform all chapter representatives, inside WP10, about a pending action for them. They should ask each GE owner, inside their specific chapter, to provide the IPs address range they want to exploit to access the Testbed (the VM which will contain the GE) for administrative purposes (installation/managing etc?) How to Each GE owner has to put such information by (i) accessing the cockpit implementation page [1] and (ii) by filling the ?IP range for administrative access (please specify company network W.X.Y.Z/32, ?)? field of the form associated to its GE. Deadline It is needed to complete such activity by the end of this week at most. Please don?t hesitate to contact the Testbed team for clarification about this really critical action. Cheers, Paolo [1] https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Wed Jul 11 10:04:10 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Message-ID: Dear Marika, it seemst that we should have a FI-WARE WP10 audio-conference and the PIN provided (8159510) is not recognized by powwonow. Any support? Thanks. Best Regards, Boris -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:25 AM To: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercoled? 11 luglio 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+1.00) Amsterdam, Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 11 10:03:31 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:03:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4FFD3353.5030900@tid.es> Dear Boris 8159510 worked for me! I am on hold, waiting for the confcall to start. BR Miguel El 11/07/2012 10:04, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Marika, it seemst that we should have a FI-WARE WP10 audio-conference and the PIN provided (8159510) is not recognized by powwonow. Any support? Thanks. Best Regards, Boris -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:25 AM To: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercoled? 11 luglio 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+1.00) Amsterdam, Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 11 10:04:27 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4FFD338B.1020702@tid.es> Just in case, I must point out that it is NOT powwonow :) Try the phone numbers below BR Miguel El 11/07/2012 10:04, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Marika, it seemst that we should have a FI-WARE WP10 audio-conference and the PIN provided (8159510) is not recognized by powwonow. Any support? Thanks. Best Regards, Boris -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:25 AM To: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercoled? 11 luglio 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+1.00) Amsterdam, Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Jul 11 10:04:41 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: <4FFD3353.5030900@tid.es> References: <4FFD3353.5030900@tid.es> Message-ID: <13334_1341993887_4FFD339F_13334_8361_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D33ECC2E@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Same for me. De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : mercredi 11 juillet 2012 10:04 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Dear Boris 8159510 worked for me! I am on hold, waiting for the confcall to start. BR Miguel El 11/07/2012 10:04, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Marika, it seemst that we should have a FI-WARE WP10 audio-conference and the PIN provided (8159510) is not recognized by powwonow. Any support? Thanks. Best Regards, Boris -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:25 AM To: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercoled? 11 luglio 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+1.00) Amsterdam, Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image001.gif at 01CD5F4C.96CA83A0]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Jul 11 10:06:25 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:06:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] our weekly phc on! Message-ID: dear all there should be our weekly phc, but nobody on! please join ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it Wed Jul 11 10:10:46 2012 From: boris.moltchanov at telecomitalia.it (Moltchanov Boris) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:10:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: <4FFD338B.1020702@tid.es> References: <4FFD338B.1020702@tid.es> Message-ID: That?s right! Too much powwownow usage? Thanks! And sorry for the confuse. I?m here as well in the conference, but the moderator (maybe Marika? She is on vacation) has not yet joined, therefore the conf cannot start ?. Boris From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:04 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Just in case, I must point out that it is NOT powwonow :) Try the phone numbers below BR Miguel El 11/07/2012 10:04, Moltchanov Boris escribi?: Dear Marika, it seemst that we should have a FI-WARE WP10 audio-conference and the PIN provided (8159510) is not recognized by powwonow. Any support? Thanks. Best Regards, Boris -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:25 AM To: Moltchanov Boris; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: mercoled? 11 luglio 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+1.00) Amsterdam, Berlino, Berna, Roma, Stoccolma, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image001.gif at 01CD5F4D.700308E0]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Jul 17 10:24:34 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:24:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] today phc Message-ID: dear all, i'm at the contionuation of the pcc phc. please have our weekly phc without me. please paolo manage the meeting. apologises, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Jul 17 10:33:40 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:33:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50052364.9070204@tid.es> Hi Isn't it tomorrow at 10:00? Thanks Miguel El 17/07/2012 10:24, stefano de panfilis escribi?: > dear all, > > i'm at the contionuation of the pcc phc. > please have our weekly phc without me. please paolo manage the meeting. > > apologises, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Jul 17 10:52:55 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:52:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] today phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <25787_1342515178_500527EA_25787_961_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D352BCF8@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Same for me. Apologize not being with you. Will catch up with the minutes BR Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mardi 17 juillet 2012 10:25 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] today phc dear all, i'm at the contionuation of the pcc phc. please have our weekly phc without me. please paolo manage the meeting. apologises, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Jul 17 10:55:08 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:55:08 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] today phc In-Reply-To: <50052364.9070204@tid.es> References: <50052364.9070204@tid.es> Message-ID: oooops .... of course! ciao, stefano 2012/7/17 Miguel Carrillo > Hi > > Isn't it tomorrow at 10:00? > > Thanks > > Miguel > El 17/07/2012 10:24, stefano de panfilis escribi?: > > dear all, >> >> i'm at the contionuation of the pcc phc. >> please have our weekly phc without me. please paolo manage the meeting. >> >> apologises, >> stefano >> >> -- >> Stefano De Panfilis >> Chief Innovation Officer >> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. >> via Riccardo Morandi 32 >> 00148 Roma >> Italy >> >> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 >> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 >> fax: +39-068307-4200 >> cell: +39-335-7542-567 >> >> > -- > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/**FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/**groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------- > > > > > ______________________________**__ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/**disclaimer.aspx > ______________________________**_________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.**eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/**listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Tue Jul 17 13:20:02 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:20:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] today phc In-Reply-To: <25787_1342515178_500527EA_25787_961_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D352BCF8@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500024FDA9321@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Same 4 me 2 ... --- Sent from my Blackberry, sorry for the.typos (et desole pour les accents!) De : BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Envoy? : Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:52 AM ? : stefano de panfilis ; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] today phc Same for me. Apologize not being with you. Will catch up with the minutes BR Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mardi 17 juillet 2012 10:25 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] today phc dear all, i'm at the contionuation of the pcc phc. please have our weekly phc without me. please paolo manage the meeting. apologises, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Jul 17 22:58:21 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:58:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Monitoring FI-WARE Tesbed V1 deployment Message-ID: dear all, the following days and weeks will be very hot for us and not only for the summer, but because we have to deploy the fi-ware testbed v1. as you know we foreseen two major deplyments: v1.1 on 31 july and v1.2 on 30 september. we, in particular henar (gracias!!!), already prepared some vm for some of the ge to be installed and the ge instance repsonsibles, also recepients in this email, have been emailed on how to go ahead. in the next coming days and weeks more vms, where necessary, will be ready in order to have all the ge instance for v1.1 to be installed. in this context what we need is: 1. ge instance responsibles and testbed team to fill the doodle with their holidays period so that we can better synchronise the activity http://www.doodle.com/8isz9atgcgdukiek 2. for ge instance responsibles, to fill the doodle telling when they will install their ge instance http://www.doodle.com/bymgm9h9gnbfms8k 3. for ge instance responsibles and wpl leaders/architects to declare if their ge instance is multi-tenant or not (you can do that by accessing the form of your ge instance from the implemantation cockpit page at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit#Testbed_V1_Cockpitand than following the link of the ge instance box). this info is of critical importance!!! in fact, if your ge instance is not multi tenant, or you suspect it not to be so for the version to be deployed in testbed v1, we have to prepare different vms one for each of the uc project interested .... as you can recognise all of the above is of great importance as we have to syncronise not only the work of the testbed deplyoment, but also the access of it from the uc projects which, in fact, are already asking access.....!!! for your convenience, please find attached the current testbed status. if you spot any error please let me know immediately please react promptly on all of the above! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Testbed_status_20120716.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 19874 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 18 09:51:16 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:51:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc - 10:00 Message-ID: Dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc Main agenda topics: - VMs installation status - GEs installation status/monitoring strategy/timeline - Testbed team holiday plan Cheers, Paolo +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International PIN 8159 510 Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Jul 18 10:04:33 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:04:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc - 10:00 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <10161_1342598674_50066E12_10161_13871_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D355B982@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> I'm now connected and awaiting ... De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Paolo Zampognaro Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 09:51 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc - 10:00 Dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc Main agenda topics: - VMs installation status - GEs installation status/monitoring strategy/timeline - Testbed team holiday plan Cheers, Paolo +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International PIN 8159 510 Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 18 10:15:41 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:15:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc - 10:00 Message-ID: <8wevpeamqq21su2ei5mancxd.1342599370377@email.android.com> Same here Sent from Samsung Mobile BISSON Pascal escribi?: I?m now connected and awaiting ? De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Paolo Zampognaro Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 09:51 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly Phc - 10:00 Dear all, this is a reminder of our weekly wp10 phc Main agenda topics: - VMs installation status - GEs installation status/monitoring strategy/timeline - Testbed team holiday plan Cheers, Paolo +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International PIN 8159 510 Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 18 10:16:57 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:16:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] moderator problem Message-ID: <5A0A97B99AB8400491275B38696F2FD7@FSC461216100407> Hi all, I'm having problem to start the Phc since I'm using the usual PIN 8159 510 but no moderator (Marika) is there. I'm trying to contact her in order to receive a PIN to start the Phc as moderator. Apologies for the inconvenience. I'll coming back to you as soon as possible Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Jul 18 10:24:20 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:24:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] moderator problem In-Reply-To: <5A0A97B99AB8400491275B38696F2FD7@FSC461216100407> References: <5A0A97B99AB8400491275B38696F2FD7@FSC461216100407> Message-ID: <6075_1342599862_500672B6_6075_2466_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D355BA3B@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> You may also consider to switch to another audio conf number if you have one to propose. If not I can also propose for this time my bridge. Hope it helps. Hearing from you. BR Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Paolo Zampognaro Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 10:17 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] moderator problem Hi all, I'm having problem to start the Phc since I'm using the usual PIN 8159 510 but no moderator (Marika) is there. I'm trying to contact her in order to receive a PIN to start the Phc as moderator. Apologies for the inconvenience. I'll coming back to you as soon as possible Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Wed Jul 18 10:25:29 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:25:29 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] I: moderator problem Message-ID: <888A9ADBF4D94579A550BD93C1C50EEF@FSC461216100407> Marika is out of Office so for this time we will use the following POW NOW connection details: PIN: 463545 Dial Up numbers: Austria 0820 4000 1502 Belgium 070 35 98 66 France 0821 230 749 Germany 01803 001 177 Ireland 0818 270 007 Italy 848 391 819 Netherlands 0870 001 909 Poland 0801 003 533 South Africa 027 875 500375 Spain 902 885 318 Sweden 0939 2066 300 Switzerland 0848 560 347 United States 1 712 432 2888 Skype +99 03 769 4422 Worldwide +44 87 0223 3333 Cheers, Paolo _____ Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Paolo Zampognaro Inviato: mercoled? 18 luglio 2012 10.17 A: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-testbed] moderator problem Hi all, I?m having problem to start the Phc since I?m using the usual PIN 8159 510 but no moderator (Marika) is there. I?m trying to contact her in order to receive a PIN to start the Phc as moderator. Apologies for the inconvenience. I?ll coming back to you as soon as possible Paolo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 18 12:32:26 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:32:26 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Message-ID: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> Dear all, I will provide a quick answer to the request to update you, coming from Engineering. CPD ===== As this is going to take longer than expected, UPM are kindly providing extra servers. We will do this: * Red.es - WP3 GEs * UPM - IoT and Data GEs * Cloud will wait until we have the definite infrastructure We are studying how to handle both environments and also considering if there is a way to connect them directly. INSTALLATION OF ENABLERS ============================= * As far as I am aware, we are sending emails to the GE owners of WP3 giving them instructions to deploy on the VMs that we have deployed. I believe that not all of them have received such emails (but most of them have) * We do not have any news - we have not been notified of anyone installing * We will set up the tracker to follow up integration of enablers. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Jul 18 13:23:15 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:23:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update In-Reply-To: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> References: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> Message-ID: <6075_1342610600_50069CA8_6075_10583_1_38fd36c7-4d3d-4b4d-86b5-a004644ee6e0@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Hi Miguel, Thanks for the update. One question. Being said they were not state, what are the plans for what concerns Security GEs ? Hearing from you on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 12:32 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Dear all, I will provide a quick answer to the request to update you, coming from Engineering. CPD ===== As this is going to take longer than expected, UPM are kindly providing extra servers. We will do this: * Red.es - WP3 GEs * UPM - IoT and Data GEs * Cloud will wait until we have the definite infrastructure We are studying how to handle both environments and also considering if there is a way to connect them directly. INSTALLATION OF ENABLERS ============================= * As far as I am aware, we are sending emails to the GE owners of WP3 giving them instructions to deploy on the VMs that we have deployed. I believe that not all of them have received such emails (but most of them have) * We do not have any news - we have not been notified of anyone installing * We will set up the tracker to follow up integration of enablers. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Jul 18 18:11:09 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:11:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Monitoring FI-WARE Tesbed V1 deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: dear all, for the avoidance of misunderstaing please fill the doodle poll as follows:1. > ge instance responsibles and testbed team to fill the doodle with their > holidays period so that we can better synchronise the activity > http://www.doodle.com/8isz9atgcgdukiek > put "yes" when you are avilable and "no" when you are in holidays. "may be" can be used if you do not know yet, or if you are partially available that week. > > 2. > for ge instance responsibles, to fill the doodle telling when they will > install their ge instance > http://www.doodle.com/bymgm9h9gnbfms8k > put "yes" when you plan to install your ge. please can you check you filled according the above? ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Jul 18 18:35:32 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:35:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Integration tracker Message-ID: <5006E5D4.2030007@tid.es> Dear Stefano, dear Paolo, The tracker is ready now: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?atid=224&group_id=18&func=browse Please proceed to enter the items for the 1st release as planned. Do not forget to: * 1) Follow the instructions (particularly the naming convention): [cid:part1.08070800.07030506 at tid.es] * 2) Read the descriptions of the tracker and workflow to make sure that you handle it properly. * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Integration_Plan#Integration_Process BR Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: hahdgegb.png Type: image/png Size: 13226 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Fri Jul 20 11:37:21 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:37:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Recommended Process for Validation going live Message-ID: Dear colleagues, As agreed in the last call, I'm putting this "public" in the testbed wiki - the URL is currently not linked on the main page, waiting for your comments and feedback. Once agreed, we can link it from the main page. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Validation_Plan I think what is missing is a concrete example how a use case can time their validation for validation-execution Additionally some templates (to be used by the UC project for each validation) should be jointly conducted within the team: - Validation plan template - Traceability matrix - Validation execution cockpit (I'm imagining something like our implementation cockpit, where we can track for each UC the status of validation execution) Who would be able to contribute and make the first drafts? Best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2012 10:42 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Recommended Process for Validation Dear colleagues, as the review is now over I'm hoping that we can continue with the discussion on the process, outlined below. See open questions down below: Do you have any idea on how to smoothen and lean-up the process? Where did I miss something? I think after our next phc, I will copy the information into the testbed-wiki. Best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Freitag, 1. Juni 2012 10:02 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Recommended Process for Validation Dear colleagues, concerning our ongoing validation planning I think it might make sense to at least draft an initial (possible) validation plan as blueprint for the UC projects for them to adapt. As this is hopefully pretty straight forward and can be already done even without much dependencies on the current (delayed) activities, I think we should start the discussion now. This would as well contribute to our deliverable M10.5.a (due in M18) - but can be exploited already in mid June or July, once we approach the UC projects and jointly do the concrete validation planning. Reference: p 191/DoW "The first of this set of documents is the description of the process the Use Cases Projects will be recommended to follow in order to validate their applications on the FI-WARE testbed." I would like to input the following rough process description which might fulfill this "recommended" validation planning, for your review and feedback. Once initially reviewed and commented, we should jointly setup a wiki page accordingly. Recommended Validation Planning Process This document outlines time relevant tasks and potential major milestones for FIWARE platform validation planning. It can be used as a blueprint for your validation planning. Roles involved: o Testbed coordinator: should be assigned on a case by case bases for each and every validation phase. Direct contact and o UC validation coordinator: should be assigned as coordinator of validation activities and distribution of information. o Validation user group: (potential) users carrying out the validation execution o GE provider: can be addressed for presentation and walk-through of their components and for 1st and 2nd level questions in relation to the involved GEs. -1. Validation Preparation phase (to be carried out before validation execution) Duration: ~1-2 month - Purpose: Plan validation (concrete timing, scope and initial scenario) - DoW: "The validation plan will be defined with the support of FI-WARE partners participating in this task and should contain the technology requirements as well as the functional and non-functional requirements to be validated. Such test plans will be mapped versus the functionality offered by the FI-WARE instance under test in order to establish a coverage matrix." - A separate template for the validation plan will be provided by the Testbed team - Send validation plan to testbed coordinator Recommendation: bi-weekly call with testbed coordinator, get formal green-light by testbed team for platform readiness & scenario suitability 1. Introduction to FIWARE platform and testbed phase (optional) Duration: 1-2 weeks - Schedule meeting with Testbed coordinator and complete validation team - Testbed gives system endpoints and needed access information to the team and gives general introduction to the infrastructure - During second validation phase, this phase might be optional Recommendation: UC to schedule Kick-off meeting with all FIWARE WPL/WPA for this validation phase, outlining the envisioned scenario 2. Platform exploration phase Duration: 1-3 month - Mainly read-only usage of components and guided tours by GE providers and/or WP-leads - WP wise run-through - mainly presentation of capabilities and initial discussion on how the scenario can be validated on the platform - Validation team to refine scenario, based on first insights. Paper Mock-ups. Findings to persist in validation report first draft. - Validation scenario should be fixed after this phase - Identification of main contacts & individual touch-points for domain experts on UC and - Especially if a larger "Adoption & integration" phase is planned, this needs to be known as early as possible Recommendation: Schedule interims presentation to UC-WPL and FIWARE-WPL/WPA teams with refined validation plan & scenario adaption at the end of this phase Recommendation: Agreement (UC & FIWRE) of which further phases the validation will touch upon at the end of this phase 3. Adaptation phase (optional) Duration: 2-3 month - Introduction of use case (scenario) specific content and data on the platform - Further refinement of scenario and first draft of traceability matrix - Changes and customization of GEs within the designed scope and functionality - Tasks: configuration, customization, introduction of new content, driven by the scenario - In parallel: planning of adoption & integration phase (if applicable) Recommendation: Capture findings 4. Adoption & integration phase (optional) Duration: 2-3 month - Introduction of use case specific enablers to the testbed - Integration of specific components in testbed infrastructure - Subsequent refinements of components based on integration requirements 5. Feedback phase & Definition of potential next steps Duration: 1-2 weeks - Gather subsequent scenario & further development opportunities - Finalize definition of gaps and address missing functionality on GE/WP level in the FIWARE trackers - Selection and prioritization of defined gaps - Complete traceability matrix - Complete final report and recommended next steps Open Questions: - Is the overall approach "agile" enough? We could further recommend: ? Short cycles: plan do check act ? Direct customer feedback? - Will have provide a dedicated validation plan template? The validation plan will have to state "scenario description", sizing information, functional & non-functional requierements - basically the things we already capture in our questionnaire, should we as well define a formal "Template" for this? - What do you think - is this approach too time consuming and/or does it post too much effort? - How to use the existing trackers best for validation? Should we push already early in the process to use a testbed-tracker? - How formal should be go? o Currently I didn't outline major milestones as "gates". If we would do so, there would be formal sign-off and gap analysis on each gate - and more effort on both sides. o Closed and open validation phases formally - with or without sign-off by testbed team? AB? Steering boards? - Legal topics: Iff UC would introduce testers which are outside of the FI-PPP - do we need to take care and mention the needed contracting with external parties in this process? Thanks for any comment and additions & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Jul 20 14:18:48 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:18:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update In-Reply-To: <6075_1342610600_50069CA8_6075_10583_1_38fd36c7-4d3d-4b4d-86b5-a004644ee6e0@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> References: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> <6075_1342610600_50069CA8_6075_10583_1_38fd36c7-4d3d-4b4d-86b5-a004644ee6e0@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: <50094CA8.4050003@tid.es> Hello, We are currently finishing the planning of the testbed that , as all we know, in this 1st stage will be distributed between machines in Red.es and UPM. We will have limited capacity because this is a contingency solution while we wait for the definite infrastructure. In this context, we will fit Security in on of them and we expect that it will be easy since Security do not seem to be particularly demanding in terms of hw resources needed. >From what I read in the Implementation Cockpit (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit): * Identity Management GE (NSN) - As a service - not on the testbed * Identity Management GE (DT) - As a service - not on the testbed * Data Handling GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * DB Anonymizer - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Storage Service - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Monitoring GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this. BTW, we see that the cockpit shows that it is for September, I had the idea that it was for July. What's the situation with this? Can you please address this so that we have time to plan and prepare the infrastructure for your chapter? Tell them to take into account that we have contingency infrastructure that is very limited. Therefore, we would apprecite it if you could take the memory requirements down to a minimum (ideally 1Gb - 2Gb at most if you really need it) Please make sure that any changes are communicated by adding them to the pages linked from the cockpit, not by email. Each GE owner has to maintain his own page to ensure that the info is up to date and trustworthy. Best regards & have a nice weekend, Miguel El 18/07/2012 13:23, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Hi Miguel, Thanks for the update. One question. Being said they were not state, what are the plans for what concerns Security GEs ? Hearing from you on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 12:32 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Dear all, I will provide a quick answer to the request to update you, coming from Engineering. CPD ===== As this is going to take longer than expected, UPM are kindly providing extra servers. We will do this: * Red.es - WP3 GEs * UPM - IoT and Data GEs * Cloud will wait until we have the definite infrastructure We are studying how to handle both environments and also considering if there is a way to connect them directly. INSTALLATION OF ENABLERS ============================= * As far as I am aware, we are sending emails to the GE owners of WP3 giving them instructions to deploy on the VMs that we have deployed. I believe that not all of them have received such emails (but most of them have) * We do not have any news - we have not been notified of anyone installing * We will set up the tracker to follow up integration of enablers. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Tue Jul 24 07:09:09 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 05:09:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] I: [Fiware-wpl] Report on conversation with our PO on status of the FI-WARE project Message-ID: <245810216-1343106240-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-607470795-@b26.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear all, Fyi! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:14:00 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Report on conversation with our PO on status of the FI-WARE project Hi all, I have had a confcall with our PO where we have addressed a number of important issues and have discussed about general status of the project and the program. This email is trying to share with you information about what has been discussed. Don't hesitate to share this information with members of your respective chapter/WP teams. As I have already reported in a previous mail, the first thing we discussed had to do with how to manage deliverables linked to software and Installation/Administration Guides marked as PP. I hope this solves major concerns raised by some of the partners. Second point that was addressed had to do with measurements defined to avoid further delays in meeting defined deadlines. PO is backing us on the decision taken and welcome them. Even in the case that TID were not legally able to reject submission of financial/cost statements (something he doubts because he believes it can), he believes that TID not only can but must identify financial/costs reports TID believes are not in line with what is the actual work carried out and the EC would take decisions accordingly. Nevertheless, I shared with the PO that we believe that all partners will do their best to comply with the defined milestones not just to avoid implementation of the defined measurements but for the sake of the project. I believe that the PO feels confident about the status but let's try not to let him down. I reported about the status of the Testbed and the contingency plan that we put in place. He seemed to be fine with that. I asked him about the 1st year FI-WARE Review Report and he told me that we shouldn't expect this earlier than mid August. I explained Arian our plans regarding resubmission of the Technical Roadmap (in line with what we proposed during the 1st year FI-WARE Review meeting) and he seemed to be fine with them. He confirmed the relevance of the white paper describing the encompassing usage of GEs. I already announced him that it would be rather difficult to get it finished by the end of July because we are all so busy. It seemed that his major concern was to to make sure it be ready before an Information Day regarding the phase 2 of the FI-PPP that the EC has planned by August 30 in Brussels. I reported also that we were working hard on the deliverable regarding 3rd party innovation enablement and trying to get it ready by end of July or, if not, just a few days later. He seemed to be happy with that. Regarding results of the 1st Open Call, Arian expects that the next step will be that we elaborate an amendment of the DoW which incorporates the new partners and their description of work. However, we agreed that such DoW amendment should try to go after the one where we will try to incorporate all pending changes which were summarized and agreed during the last PCC meetings. He was ok with the planning of the second Open Call but would like to see the third Open Call later than what we proposed (January next year instead of end of October) in order to allow incorporation of topics that may be demanded by UC trials selected in phase 2 (hearings are planned to end beginning of December this year). I proposed him the possibility to formulate the 2nd Open Call so that it may consider topics with different closing dates for final publication of Epics and different submission deadlines. This would allow to incorporate topics like Security in this 2nd Open Call. Arian believes this may be feasible. Definitively, I will propose discussing this during the confcall of the FI-PPP AB that will take place this week. I think this was all. I'm happy to respond any question that you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Jul 25 10:06:35 2012 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:06:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Message-ID: Dear colleagues, Does anybody know by any chance, if this telco is on? Thanks for letting me know & best regards, /Thorsten -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 11:25 To: Marika St?lnacke; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Wed Jul 25 10:09:31 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:09:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C5000250446C25@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> I?m connected but the moderator has not joined (yet?) ? Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD6A4D.44BC7580] [cid:image002.png at 01CD6A4D.44BC7580] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 1, Avenue de Belle Fontaine - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: mercredi 25 juillet 2012 10:07 To: Paolo Zampognaro (paolo.zampognaro at eng.it); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; stefano de panfilis Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Dear colleagues, Does anybody know by any chance, if this telco is on? Thanks for letting me know & best regards, /Thorsten -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 11:25 To: Marika St?lnacke; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Wed Jul 25 10:31:53 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:31:53 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: RE: Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1310766850-1343204803-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-471755830-@b26.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear all, I hope the phc is going and is going to be fruitful as always. Unfortunately with this change in timeslot for me is often difficult to join. This is on of that times .... Apologises for the inconvenience! Sure that paolo and you all able to manage! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: "Sandfuchs, Thorsten" Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:06:35 To: Paolo Zampognaro (paolo.zampognaro at eng.it); fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; stefano de panfilis Subject: RE: Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call Dear colleagues, Does anybody know by any chance, if this telco is on? Thanks for letting me know & best regards, /Thorsten -----Original Appointment----- From: Marika St?lnacke [mailto:marika.stalnacke at ericsson.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 11:25 To: Marika St?lnacke; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fi-Ware WP10 weekly conf call When: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 10:00-11:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below When: Occurs every onsdag effective 2012-06-27 until 2012-09-12 from 10:00 to 11:00 (GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: Phone PIN 8159 510 - numbers, see below *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please let me know if you need numbers for other countries. +32 2745 1555 Belgium +358 9 29989920 Finland +33 1 6993 7006 France +49 211 534 3355 Germany +36 1 439 5300 Hungary fixed line +36 30 808 5300 Hungary mobile 03-9006555 Israel +39 06 7258 9880 Italy +31 161 24 9991 Netherlands +34 91339 4300 Spain +44 (0) 20 3364 5990 UK +46 10 71 20000 International << File: ATT00001.txt >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Jul 27 09:31:42 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:31:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Installation on the Testbed and procedures Message-ID: <501243DE.3010807@tid.es> Dear all, As leader of the task D10.2 "FI-WARE Integration" and also from the coordination I'd like to make some clarifications of general interest. As you know, WP10 (Experimentation Support, Integrated Testing and Validation) has as main task the set-up and running of the FI-WARE Testbed. Given the importance of this goal, WP10 has a representative of each partner. This representative (not the WPL) should make sure that all people within his/her company are well informed of the situation and what we expect from them in the Testbed and the experimentation stage. Several partners are not doing this work (in same cases never attended the WP10 phc) and the project coordination is receiving complaints as many people don't seem to be well informed. We sometimes resort to the WPL to help here, but this is not the "official" channel. I will try to recap to give all the consortium an overview of the situation and what we need from you. GENERAL INFO * The Testbed Team is starting to send the details on how to install the testbed to the GE owners who declared that they are going to install their GE in July * Theoretically you should install your GE yourselves but we can give a hand deploying a KVM image for those who prefer this method (other hypervisors are not supported) * The GE owner is the one who administrates and maintains the GE, not the testbed team. If something goes wrong, he/she has to put it up and running again, the WP10 will only monitor the situation and will prompt about abnormal behaviour of the GE . * We have two tools to follow this up: * Implementation cockpit: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit * Integration Tracker : https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?atid=224&group_id=18&func=browse * Each release of each GE is represented by a ticket * The use of this is explained here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Integration_Plan#Integration_Process * If you do not have access to the testbed project and cannot reach this wiki and the tracker, request access following the standard procedure REQUESTS FOR GE OWNERS * We have an installation calendar. Please fill in the responsible person per GE and state the dates when you could install * http://www.doodle.com/bymgm9h9gnbfms8k * Fill the GE template in the Testbed Cockpit (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit ) declaring if the GE is multi-tenant or not (this deeply affects the GE usage by different Use case projects at the same time) * The access to the Testbed is limited per IP. Make sure that the IPs from which you are going to access the Testbed are listed here (if not, you will not be able to enter the testbed): * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit (click on your enabler and see the wiki page with the details per enabler) * Alternatively, there is also a page that has company wide IPs (not particular to an enabler): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Operations_Cockpit * Make sure that when you install your GE, you update the corresponding ticket on the Integration tracker and also the Implementation cockpit. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Fri Jul 27 18:37:00 2012 From: paolo.zampognaro at eng.it (Paolo Zampognaro) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:37:00 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Validation Activity: contribution Message-ID: <16F242406E654CBD86B999F88DA0FA76@FSC461216100407> Hi Thorsten, as anticipated in Phc I have tried to reason about the Validation activity inside our WP. In order to gather ideas in a coherent way I have put all in a document (see attachment) exclusively because this helps me to have a logical thread. Basically I have tried to: - Give an overview about the evaluation process in FI-WARE with respect our validation must be placed. - Identify the metrics in order to produce the validation results - Define a template each Use Case should fill in order to produce its validation results - Foresee a section where to aggregate the validation data and execute further analysis I will continue to readjust it in the next days because I'm sure there are still a lot of things to modify but this draft could be a starting point to improve the discussion. Cheers, Paolo Ing. Paolo Zampognaro Software Engineer Direzione Centrale Ricerca & Innovazione paolo.zampognaro at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Gianturco, 15 - 80146 Napoli Tel. +39-081.6103524 Mob. +39-3451227587 Fax. +39-081.6103200 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: validation_paolo.doc Type: application/msword Size: 128512 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Jul 30 13:07:06 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:07:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FI-WARE: extract executive summary draft review report In-Reply-To: <50164D19.1080207@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D07CB70@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50164CB7.1060804@tid.es> <50164D19.1080207@tid.es> Message-ID: dear all, please find forwarded the extract from the executive summary review report. there is a looooot to do for the whole project to be on a safe a nd succesfull track, but this well know by everybody involved in the project. concerning wp10 our deliverables have been all accepted despite the very late submission. now we ALL, not only taks t10.2 (!!!), are at the core of the next weeks a dn project success, so i do expect maximum committemnt for the next coming weeks and few months (month 18 = 31st cotober 2012)!!! concerning the report as such we have two "check points" to fully satifsy (of course in addition to what is in the dow): - "2. Public availability matrix of use cases using the GEs; continuous update of the matrix, month 15 & thereafter" - "5. Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the testbed, month 17" there is also this "check point", which is shared by the whole project: - "9. live demonstration fo the fi-ware testbed with develoyed ge software, next review meeting" talk to you this wednesday! ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: 2012/7/30 Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FI-WARE: extract executive summary draft review report To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" Hi, Just wanted to add the fiware-pcc, in order to make the dissemination more complete. Don't hesitate to use this as a tool to demonstrate members of your team the need that they take things seriously and deliver. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 30/07/12 10:58, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear colleagues, We have just received the following extract of the executive summary draft review report. We haven't had time to review it. But certainly the review report is not as positive as we thought after the first year review meeting. Overall, it is worth to highlight that the project's assestment is: - Unsatisfactory progress (The project has failed to achieve key objectives and/or is not at all on schedule)" This, among other things, confirms us that the recent measurements put in place were required. Now, it's critical to demonstrate that we are going to deliver what was due and that the testbed will not get delayed. We'll come with additional comments later. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: extract executive summary draft review report Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:42:05 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , Dear all, Below is an extract from the draft executive summary of the draft M12 review report. The extract may deviate from the executive summary in the final version of the review report. It is sent since it contains some information, e.g. about deliverable acceptance, that you may want to know asap. Best regards, Arian. ====================== The objectives of the project during this period remain unchanged, but are brought into sharp focus due to the delay of two months plus now apparent, and the critical need to release the complete and comprehensive Generic Enabler (GE) Open Specifications and accompanying reference code as soon as possible in order to not risk destabilizing the entire FI PPP. Many primary technical deliverables expected at M12 are not yet available, which is extremely poor progress given that they are some of the main achievements planned for Month 12 and create the first useable foundation for Use Cases projects to build upon. Compounding this failure is the poor quality and incompleteness of various technical deliverables; a quite astounding result given the resources available to the project. According to the Description of Work (DoW), the main achievements for this period should be the first version of the GE open specifications, software prototypes and related guidance material and test plan. Only the specifications were delivered so far. However, they are inadequate for communication and unified understanding with the Use Case projects, are not of the required quality to serve the needs of those projects, and do not provide sufficient basis for practical implementation by software developers - all of which are fundamental to the rationale for and objectives of FI-WARE. It is unclear in many of the GE specifications which are the reusable and commonly shared functions, and which usage areas across various sectors would utilize these GEs. There are also no details on the protocols that support interoperability with other GEs or third party products or how this interoperability would be achieved. Moreover, a consolidated and consistent presentation of the specifications is still missing. There is a lot of confusion about what the GEs really are, or meant to be, within the FI-WARE consortium, and most probably the UC projects, not to mention the world at large. They are a mixed bag, including functional descriptions, specifications of (not necessarily well-defined) technical functions, specification of access and other operational protocols, specification of access to other existing ?modules?/?components?/?devices? and so on, specifications to enable interfaces between existing protocols, specifications to enable deployment of other collection of protocols as ?engines?, etc. As mentioned in the DoW, "GE Open Specifications will contain all the information required in order to build compliant products which can work as alternative implementations of GEs developed in FI-WARE and therefore may replace a GE implementation developed in FI-WARE within a particular FI-WARE Instance." However, given the current state of the GE deliverables, there are severe doubts about how a FI-WARE instance (?platform?) could be built from the GEs without a massive amount of ?imagination? and tweaking to make them work together. There are also severe doubts about how a ?Future Internet Application? could be portable across different FI-WARE Instances that implement the (same set of?) GEs that the Future Internet Application relies on. The GEs as currently defined are not, by themselves, implementable in the sense of delivering a practical software solution (?platform?). This is compounded by the difficulty of understanding what is really meant by a ?coherent? set of GEs. Some GEs seem to have closer inter-relationships than others. Notwithstanding the (useful) clarifications and information orally provided at the review meeting, the inadequate and indeed scarce information within these specifications and the discrepancies between the Technical Roadmap and the available GE contents lead the reviewers to cast doubts on the project achievement so far, and its prospect. *FI-WARE failed to meet its milestones for Month 12. * Given the above, *technical progress of the project for the first year is unacceptable*. Moreover, any further delay is likely to significantly risk integrity of the entire FI-PPP and the smooth transition to Phase 2. The consortium made a generally positive and concerted effort so far as the review meeting is concerned. It presented itself as a credible team. The verbal presentations made at the meeting were typically more informative and explanatory than the written deliverables would lead readers to expect (some material within the presentation, such as the matrix of use cases using GEs, is highly appreciated by the reviewers). With evident technical capability, but lack of timely and quality delivery, *managerial action is an absolute and urgent must for an accelerated FI-WARE recovery, and to ensure that the FI-PPP programme will deliver meaningful innovations*. Collaboration with Use Case projects appears to be improving markedly thanks to key face-to-face training weeks, and enhancements to the way the Fusion Forge system is managed. However, there are still significant issues concerning the processing and documentation of the requirements/backlogs. *A main conclusion from the review is that the Use Cases requirements are still not considered as high priority by FI-WARE*. Feedback from Use Case projects, including implications for the technology perspective and choices made by FI-WARE, should be (more visibly) taken into account and demonstrated as such. Traceability is crucial for the credibility of the FI-WARE technical deliverables and uptake beyond the consortium; and accountability is required to justify financing from the public purse. The recently conducted architecture training weeks should be used as a stepping stone towards building an FI-PPP ?culture? between all Programme participants. More such sessions should be planned, particularly around the test-bed integration deployment and use of the DevComE toolset. For its own part, DevComE is presently a positive highlight of the project. Integration planning for the test-bed is sound and detailed. The testing and the integration activities are among the project highlights. Both are carefully planned and well specified. As the development of the GEs is delayed, the integration activities still lack concreteness in terms of specific scenarios in which several of the GEs will be involved, which is a pity. Work undertaken regarding communication and dissemination is showing significant advancement, albeit with still substantial opportunity for improvement. Given the overall delay in the work plan, the postponement of many key deliverables, and the insufficient quality (and quantity) of the technical specifications, the reviewers consider that the resources were not utilized effectively within the first project year. The consortium has put reasonable effort into analysing and positioning FI-WARE in the current market context. The exploitation within the scope of ?Smart Cities? is promising and welcome, but the Use Cases projects should be targeted as prime users. The business strategy is however absent, in so far that no credible and preliminary quantified business case has been presented yet. The consortium?s position that the business case will arrive in the second year of the project is a matter of serious concerns; for example, the reviewers have the strong impression that nobody in the consortium has any notion of the overall amount of investment required to take FI-WARE results to the market, and the work presented is clearly (still) lacking substantive input from the business departments of the industrial partners. Despite the extensive comments in the Month 6 Review Report and notwithstanding the voluminous deliverable D11.2.1, there is still no unified or compelling marketing message, including no compelling unique selling proposition, of the FI-WARE results. The individual exploitation plans of the partners are timid. There is inadequate consideration of third party development and SME exploitation at the business level. The globalisation dimension of the exploitation plan is unconvincing. The consortium is reminded that the success of FI-WARE depends on the delivery of a genuine global solution, exploitable by partners inside and outside the consortium and beyond Europe. In summary, *there is a glaring and alarming discrepancy between the high ambitions of FI-WARE given in the DoW and the very limited perspective of exploitation offered so far.* The reviewers are disappointed that many of the recommendations made ? dating back to the Month 6 review or even earlier - have not been sufficiently considered. Additionally, the reviewers are frustrated by the pattern of (extremely) late submission of the majority of the deliverables, and hastily communicated rescheduling of other deliverables with debatable arguments. Such behaviour is not acceptable in the business world; it is equally unacceptable in the context of European collaborative activity, especially in view of the public funding involved. b. Recommendations concerning the period under review The following deliverables require re-submission: ? D2.3.1 by Month 15 (from Month 9 review) ? D2.4.1 by Month 15 (from Month 9 review) ? D2.1.2 by Month 18 ? D3.1.1 by Month 18 ? D4.1.1 by Month 18 ? D5.1.1 by Month 18 ? D6.1.1 by Month 18 ? D7.1.1 by Month 18 ? D8.1.1 by Month 18 ? D11.1.1 by Month 18 ? D11.2.1 by Month 18 ? D11.3.1 by Month 18 The following recommendations are reiterated from the Month 6 review report (with the timeframe for R[1][2]1 adjusted in light of the Month 9 review) and were expected to be addressed in a satisfactory manner by the Month 12 review (original recommendations re-produced in italics): *R [1-3]1. Given FI-WARE?s intent to remain domain neutral, a comprehensive technology map must be created that clearly and unambiguously illustrates the relationships between all Generic Enablers to be produced by FI-WARE. This was expected to be documented in deliverable D2.3.1 originally due Month 9, for which re-submission is now due Month 15. * Still to be addressed in the forthcoming resubmission of D2.3.1 due Month 15. *As regards the ?transparent encompassing architecture? for FI-WARE as a whole also asked for already in the first recommendation of the review report at M3, we advise the consortium to keep in mind and log this recommendation, and re-visit it in 2013, after the projects selected under Phase 2 have joined the FI PPP.* *R [1-3]3. Ensure meaningful interaction with standards bodies including Internet-related standards groups such as the IETF, the W3C, the IEEE, the ITU-T, the OMA, and the 3GPP/2. This is expected to be reported in deliverable D12.3.2 due Month 12 and/or deliverable D11.4.1 due Month 9.* Still to be addressed in the forthcoming D11.4.2 due Month 15. *R [1-3]6. Ensure there is a focus on attracting a development community for FI-WARE, and not only within the FI-PPP, but where possible within the partner organisations and the open community of potential users. This is expected to be considered in relation to deliverable D2.5.1 and reported in deliverable D12.2.2.* Still to be addressed in the forthcoming D2.5.1. *R [1-3]7. As there is substantial reliance on external technology sources, e.g., other FP7 projects and open source projects, contingencies should be prepared which address what actions to take should those projects fail to deliver, or are delayed with planned delivery upon which FI-WARE depends. This is expected to be documented in deliverable D1.1.2 due Month 12.* The sourcing of technology is still not sufficiently clear. Contingency planning is still not adequately provided for or documented in D1.1.2. Please provide an adequate plan in the online version of the Project Management Handbook asap. *R [1-3]8. There is a reasonable likelihood that FI-WARE chapters will be unable to achieve all that they would like to. A risk mitigation strategy should be put in place for this, with thought given in advance on how the project plans to prioritise resources if insufficient resources are available to cope with all planned work. This is expected to be documented in deliverable D1.1.2. The consortium is reminded that effort and funding allocations in the DoW are indicative and not sacrosanct.* A robust risk management strategy is still missing from D1.1.2. Please provide such a strategy in the online version of the Project Management Handbook asap. *R [1-3]9. Make sustained effort to enrol the support of stakeholders from the business and marketing departments of all major commercial partners in the project. External to the consortium, dissemination should go considerably beyond the ?traditional groups? that are usually targeted for dissemination in FP7 projects. This concerns both the RTD communities and the business communities at large, within as well as outside Europe. Consumer organisations should also be considered and inputs be sought, to make sure that the FI-PPP results will be successfully adopted by the mass market. This is expected to be reported in deliverable D12.2.2.* Progress has been made in relation to dissemination. The active involvement and support of the business and marketing personnel from the industrial project partners is still largely absent. *R [1-3]10. Ensure that planning of the Open Calls starts early and the Open Calls are inclusive enough to attract any prospective submitters including specialist SMEs (without making a priori assumptions about who might be interested in the calls). The Open Calls should be used as a strategic opportunity for disseminating FI-WARE to FI stakeholders and engaging their interest in FI-WARE outputs. The Open Call processes and experience, including lessons learnt, should be documented and assimilated by the consortium for subsequent calls, and included in the relevant editions of deliverable D1.2.x for reporting and auditing purposes. Please take into full account our remarks on the management and administration of the Open Calls in Section 1a of the previous (M6) Review Report, and clarify the rationale for the selection of the topic(s) for the forthcoming first Open Call and to what extent the use case projects have a voice in the topic selection in the first and subsequent calls.* The reviewers are still awaiting the reporting of the first Open Call. Progress to be re-assessed in relation to the planning/reporting of the next Open Call in the forthcoming D1.3.2. *R [1-3]11. The reviewers cannot over-emphasise the importance of exploitation planning, including detailed documentation of IPR management. In our view, this is also intimately linked to enablement of third party exploitation. Please refer to our remarks in Sections 1a and 1b of the previous (M6) Review Report. It is obvious that high expectations are placed by the reviewers on deliverables D11.2.1 and D2.5.1 due Month 12. Please do not treat this as a paper exercise for satisfying the reviewers. Instead, they should be treated as initial blueprints for realistic business models backed by genuine commitment from especially the industrial partners.* Unsatisfactory addressed. Exploitation planning lacks credibility and market traction. To be addressed in the resubmission of D11.2.1 due M18. *R [1-3]12. All future deliverables should continue to be made available to the reviewers in pdf format. They should also be submitted on time. The consortium should investigate whether posting such files on its website or wiki might provide value for potential users, in addition to the wiki pages (at least those files relating to key deliverables). Please report the findings of the investigation at the next review.* Unsatisfactory addressed. Large numbers of deliverables not submitted on time, yet again. Others have been rescheduled in a hasty manner. The reviewers strongly recommend corrective actions. Additionally, the reviewers request that project deliverables be made available as a consolidated file for future reviews. The consortium has no inclination to make deliverables available in a file format, other than to the EC and reviewers for pure compliance purposes, after evident resistance. The need to investigate the usefulness of such files to would-be users was dismissed. *R [1-3]13. Improve the usefulness and attractiveness of the project website: make the information (even) more easy to find, bearing in mind that users might not be familiar with the FI-PPP; enhance the website as a marketing tool to would-be third parties and ?customers? of FI-WARE results (make the website answer the question to companies not involved in EU funded activities: why should I be interested in what FI-WARE is doing, and what is in it for me?). Consider the use of creditable Search Engine Optimization techniques.* Unsatisfactorily addressed ? no evidence of website improvement as a marketing tool. Significant improvement required for Month 17. The consortium is also encouraged to bring forward the implementation of the FI-WARE GE portal (not in DoW, but highly welcome) currently planned for Year 3. *R [1-3]14. Put in place contingencies for loss of key people from the project. This is expected to be documented in deliverable D1.1.2.* Recommendation addressed to some degree, for example by involving WP leaders in the management of backlog. Please provide a clear update in the online version of the Project Management Handbook asap. Recommendations still outstanding from the initial review of D2.2.1: *? R2: the relationship between GEs and the Specific Enablers needs to be clarified and documented, bearing in mind that the former are potential candidates for standardisation in due course, and the latter are critical from the view point of making business out of FI-WARE results. Documentation is now expected at Month 9 with deliverable D2.3.1.* Still to be addressed in the resubmitted version of the D2.3.1 due Month 15. *? R9: The requested delivery schedule for the GEs, or at a minimum indication of prioritisation, has not been presented. This is now expected for deliverable D2.4.1 at Month 9. The information should be made visibly available in the public domain.* Still not addressed, with mismatches between the Backlog, the Technical Roadmap and the Open Specifications delivered; To be addressed in the resubmitted version of the D2.4.1 due Month 15. c. Recommendations concerning future work R[3]15. Ensure that the quality of the GE specifications is high and consistent. Use GE specification for WP8 as a template for all other WPs. R[3]16. Clean up the backlog, and keep it up to date at all times. Specific resources must be dedicated to this. R[3]17. Focus on delivery of critical-path, high-priority (for the Use Cases) GEs. R[3]18. GE code releases must be synchronized with GE priorities indicated by Use Case projects. R[3]19. Ensure that architectural documentation clearly and unambiguously indicates the trace of source requirements and justification. R[3]20. Transparency and visibility in what was delivered and what is going to be delivered by the consortium in all future FI-WARE Releases. R[3]21. Meeting the ?check points? set by the reviewers. For the next period leading up to the M18 review, the reviewers will be monitoring and assessing project progress against the following key ?check points?, in addition to DoW compliance and assessment of the project deliverables due: 1. Technical Paper including common usage scenarios for the GEs for wide dissemination (incl. to Use Case projects and third parties), month 15 2. Public availability matrix of use cases using the GEs; continuous update of the matrix, month 15 & thereafter 3. FI-WARE software release, month 15 4. Public availability of the SAP GEs in WP3, month 15 (done) 5. Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the testbed, month 17 6. Enhancement/re-design of the current website for impact creation, month 17 7. Hold additional architectural weeks, develop training plan for use of the DevComE framework, consider inviting 3rd party developers, month 18 8. Develop and publish a plan for fostering developer communities, month 18 9. Live demonstration of the FI-WARE test-bed with deployed GE software, Next review meeting 10. Presentation by senior business personnel from the main commercial partners of the consortium (at a minimum: TID, SAP, TI, Orange/FT) on corporate plans to bring the FI-WARE key results to the market, Next review meeting R[3]22. For the next period overall project resource allocation should be reviewed to identify the specific weaknesses leading to the failings identified in this review project; resources should be re-planned and re-allocated to rectify the failings where necessary. d. Assessment Unsatisfactory progress (The project has failed to achieve key objectives and/or is not at all on schedule) ============================== Some other considerations: After one year in the project, one may want to evaluate what has been achieved, esp taking into account that 12 MEuro has been spent. A specific feature of the first reporting period, and a direct result of the delays, is that efforts have been spent on tasks that did not result in submitted deliverables. The economy, effectiveness and efficiency of these efforts can therefore not be evaluated. More importantly, after one year in the project, one may want to evaluate what can be realistically achieved at the end of the project: - The status and maturity of single GEs differ a lot. More consistency and maturity in the specification of GEs needs to be achieved. The litmus test is that these specifications need to be sufficiently mature and complete so that independent software developers can use them to develop implementations that are interchangeable. Prospect: good. - It is not clear to what extent the GE Open Specifications satisfy the requirements from use cases, FI-WARE organisations, or otherwise. There is a risk that at the end of the project the GE Open Specifications do not satisfy the requirements of the use cases. - The baseline assets of each individual GE are not clear. Partly because of this, the roadmap is not clear. At the end of the project, there will be reference implementations, no doubt, but it is not clear to what extent the GE Open Specifications follow the existing baseline assets or v.v. There is a risk that the reference implementations do not satisfy the requirements of the use cases. - The IPR protection of the reference implementations is unclear. At the end of the project, the use cases need clarity on this. It is essential that this information becomes available as soon as possible. - Likewise, the exploitation plans of the owners of the reference implementations are unclear. At the end of the project, the use cases need clarity on this. It is essential that this information becomes available as soon as possible. - The division of budgets in FI-WARE is (largely) based on the existence of baseline assets. The more baseline assets a partner brought into the project, the larger its budget in FI-WARE. The advantage is that the work does not start from scratch. It is likely that these baseline assets are typically proprietary solutions. It can be expected that partners will give priority to their baseline assets, further developing these assets, and give less priority to fulfilling use case requirements. Although access to these assets by use case projects after the end of the FI-WARE project is addressed by clause 41, the exact conditions for access, the availability of the assets, and their maturity are unknown. This leaves use cases, possible FI-WARE Instance providers, and third party application developers in an uncertain situation, and clarity is necessary. - There is a high risk that current developments on GE reference implementations do not fulfil the requirements of the use cases. This could be accepted to some extent if these reference implementations would be based on clear requirements from the business departments of the technology providers, and if there were clear exploitation plans for these reference implementations. In such situation, usefulness to use cases would be offset by wide availability and accessibility. However, at the moment there is a high risk that at the end of the FI-WARE project the reference implementations will not fulfil the requirements from the use cases AND will not be accessible. The month 18 review and the Call 2 evaluation will provide an opportunity to analyse the situation with respect to a) the FI-WARE GEs and their reference implementations, b) the priorities of the phase 2 use cases, and c) the commitments of the FI-WARE beneficiaries. Regarding the FI-WARE GEs and their reference implementations, information is needed a.o. concerning: - The final list of GEs for which Open Specifications will be written - The extent to which these GEs fulfil requirements (from all sources), providing justification and accountability - For each GE: the reference implementation(s) of the GE - For each GE reference implementation: the baseline asset(s) upon which the reference implementation will be based, the current status, the owner, the relation to other GE (reference implementations) Regarding the phase 2 use cases: - The list of GEs the phase 2 use cases plan to use, and their priority - The list of GE reference implementations the phase 2 use cases plan to use, and their priority Regarding the commitment of the FI-WARE beneficiaries: - For each GE reference implementation: the conditions under which it will be available for FI-PPP programme participants and third parties beyond the lifetime of FI-WARE With respect to the last point, stated intentions in confidential exploitation plans are not sufficient. True commitment and therefore true assurance of the use cases and third parties of the sustainability of their efforts building on FI-WARE can be shown via e.g. a public statement by the GE reference implementation IPR holders. Such a public statement could follow lines as sketched below: - "Our developments in FI-WARE/FI-PPP will be made available as open-source, and/or - Our developments in FI-WARE will be proprietary, conforming to the GE Open Specifications, and we guarantee that they will be available on the market as of [date] under FRAND conditions and will be available for at least [y] years. The exact conditions will be specified within [x] months. In case our companies determine the product will no longer be commercially offered, the source code will be made available as open source and donated to [xyz], and/or - Company X is developing an implementation of a certain GE. Within FI-WARE, an open source reference implementation of the same GE is being developed. Company X builds a proprietary implementation, outside the FI-WARE project, using own funds, and/or - Our companies encourage the development of multiple implementations of a certain GE, will develop a reference implementation for each of the specified GEs within the context of the FI-WARE project, using public money, and will develop additional proprietary implementations [for GEs g,h,k] using own funds - We commit to safeguard the evolution and nature of the GEs for at least [x] years after the FI-PPP programme. - Etc" ------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Jul 31 13:48:57 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:48:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update In-Reply-To: <50094CA8.4050003@tid.es> References: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> <6075_1342610600_50069CA8_6075_10583_1_38fd36c7-4d3d-4b4d-86b5-a004644ee6e0@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <50094CA8.4050003@tid.es> Message-ID: <12792_1343735341_5017C62D_12792_13776_1_d7b49866-5ec3-43b8-986f-30daa59c7188@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Hi Miguel, Back to you regarding your previous email on the topic. Being said we provided by now the information you requested to dimension the infrastructure accordingly to have the concerned GEs for First Major Release could you please update me on the plans have them installed ? Hearing from you. Best Regards, De : Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 20 juillet 2012 14:19 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Hello, We are currently finishing the planning of the testbed that , as all we know, in this 1st stage will be distributed between machines in Red.es and UPM. We will have limited capacity because this is a contingency solution while we wait for the definite infrastructure. In this context, we will fit Security in on of them and we expect that it will be easy since Security do not seem to be particularly demanding in terms of hw resources needed. >From what I read in the Implementation Cockpit (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit): * Identity Management GE (NSN) - As a service - not on the testbed * Identity Management GE (DT) - As a service - not on the testbed * Data Handling GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * DB Anonymizer - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Storage Service - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Monitoring GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this. BTW, we see that the cockpit shows that it is for September, I had the idea that it was for July. What's the situation with this? Can you please address this so that we have time to plan and prepare the infrastructure for your chapter? Tell them to take into account that we have contingency infrastructure that is very limited. Therefore, we would apprecite it if you could take the memory requirements down to a minimum (ideally 1Gb - 2Gb at most if you really need it) Please make sure that any changes are communicated by adding them to the pages linked from the cockpit, not by email. Each GE owner has to maintain his own page to ensure that the info is up to date and trustworthy. Best regards & have a nice weekend, Miguel El 18/07/2012 13:23, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Hi Miguel, Thanks for the update. One question. Being said they were not state, what are the plans for what concerns Security GEs ? Hearing from you on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 12:32 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Dear all, I will provide a quick answer to the request to update you, coming from Engineering. CPD ===== As this is going to take longer than expected, UPM are kindly providing extra servers. We will do this: * Red.es - WP3 GEs * UPM - IoT and Data GEs * Cloud will wait until we have the definite infrastructure We are studying how to handle both environments and also considering if there is a way to connect them directly. INSTALLATION OF ENABLERS ============================= * As far as I am aware, we are sending emails to the GE owners of WP3 giving them instructions to deploy on the VMs that we have deployed. I believe that not all of them have received such emails (but most of them have) * We do not have any news - we have not been notified of anyone installing * We will set up the tracker to follow up integration of enablers. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Jul 31 17:59:02 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:59:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update In-Reply-To: <12792_1343735341_5017C62D_12792_13776_1_d7b49866-5ec3-43b8-986f-30daa59c7188@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> References: <500690BA.2040901@tid.es> <6075_1342610600_50069CA8_6075_10583_1_38fd36c7-4d3d-4b4d-86b5-a004644ee6e0@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <50094CA8.4050003@tid.es> <12792_1343735341_5017C62D_12792_13776_1_d7b49866-5ec3-43b8-986f-30daa59c7188@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Message-ID: <501800C6.8020801@tid.es> Here we go... * Data Handling GE - you are asking for windows, this is an issue as we do not provide licenses from the testbed. We can provide a raw VM and then SAP can install windows.on top of it with their licenses. * DB Anonymizer - will be provided shortly, possibly tomorrow * Security Storage Service - provided as a service, if I am right - it does not apply to the testbed * Security Monitoring GE - September - it does not apply now Best regards, Miguel El 31/07/2012 13:48, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Hi Miguel, Back to you regarding your previous email on the topic. Being said we provided by now the information you requested to dimension the infrastructure accordingly to have the concerned GEs for First Major Release could you please update me on the plans have them installed ? Hearing from you. Best Regards, De : Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 20 juillet 2012 14:19 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Hello, We are currently finishing the planning of the testbed that , as all we know, in this 1st stage will be distributed between machines in Red.es and UPM. We will have limited capacity because this is a contingency solution while we wait for the definite infrastructure. In this context, we will fit Security in on of them and we expect that it will be easy since Security do not seem to be particularly demanding in terms of hw resources needed. >From what I read in the Implementation Cockpit (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V1_Implementation_Cockpit): * Identity Management GE (NSN) - As a service - not on the testbed * Identity Management GE (DT) - As a service - not on the testbed * Data Handling GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * DB Anonymizer - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Storage Service - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this * Security Monitoring GE - not acceptable, it does not provide detailed requirements and we cannot dimension the infra with this. BTW, we see that the cockpit shows that it is for September, I had the idea that it was for July. What's the situation with this? Can you please address this so that we have time to plan and prepare the infrastructure for your chapter? Tell them to take into account that we have contingency infrastructure that is very limited. Therefore, we would apprecite it if you could take the memory requirements down to a minimum (ideally 1Gb - 2Gb at most if you really need it) Please make sure that any changes are communicated by adding them to the pages linked from the cockpit, not by email. Each GE owner has to maintain his own page to ensure that the info is up to date and trustworthy. Best regards & have a nice weekend, Miguel El 18/07/2012 13:23, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Hi Miguel, Thanks for the update. One question. Being said they were not state, what are the plans for what concerns Security GEs ? Hearing from you on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : mercredi 18 juillet 2012 12:32 ? : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] Quick update Dear all, I will provide a quick answer to the request to update you, coming from Engineering. CPD ===== As this is going to take longer than expected, UPM are kindly providing extra servers. We will do this: * Red.es - WP3 GEs * UPM - IoT and Data GEs * Cloud will wait until we have the definite infrastructure We are studying how to handle both environments and also considering if there is a way to connect them directly. INSTALLATION OF ENABLERS ============================= * As far as I am aware, we are sending emails to the GE owners of WP3 giving them instructions to deploy on the VMs that we have deployed. I believe that not all of them have received such emails (but most of them have) * We do not have any news - we have not been notified of anyone installing * We will set up the tracker to follow up integration of enablers. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Jul 31 19:06:52 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:06:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Catalogue and Testbed: the public face of the project In-Reply-To: <5017C79F.9010909@eng.it> References: <5017C79F.9010909@eng.it> Message-ID: dear matteo, thank you for having shared the link of the catalogue. it allowed me, but i hope also other colleagues, to feel the first breath of fi-ware!!! however, having reviewed it i have some main suggestions which should be ready now, certainly before the fi-ppp ab september meeting (12-13 sept): 1. instead of just "catalogue", i'd call it "generic enabler implementations catalogue". this is a bit more precise, as the users do not find there the catalogue of the "generic enablers" but that of their implementations! in this context, i do not think it is strictly important that the names here correspond to what is in the fi-ware project deliverables. what i mean is that what is in the catalogue is the "implementation" of the ge which correspond to precise marketing policies. as an example think about the "wirecloud mashup platform". as such it is the implementation of the ge "compopsition editor" and NOT that ge, so perfectly legitimate in this catalogue it has a more "attractive" name. think how much this will important to smes that want to set-up a business selling geis!!! so as a solution i stronly suggest in the overview page of each gei to have a mandatory field with the link to the related ge open specification. this is critical becouse at the end of the day this what qualifies the gei!!! here i have a doubt (mostly for juanjo): are we sure all the gei share exactly the same apis??? i have honestly my doubts ... 2. i'd suggest to add a tongue menu, or whatever mean you think better, under the option "enablers" containg the chapter names, so the users can browse the gei through chapters in a more coherent way and not in an uncoherent (meaningless?) alphabetical order. 3. in the "instances" page i'd add a mandatory field with the url from where the ge apis are accessible. 4. the catalogue should run on the testbed already from this testbed v1. i think this is a strong message not only for the fi-ppp community as a whole, but also for po and reviewers. 5. for users outside fi-ware i think the distinction between what they can find under the "instances" page and "downloads" page is rather unclear. i'm sorry, but i do not have a suggestion here. perhaps, after changing the overal name from "catalogue" to "generic enabler implamentations catalogue" solves automatically this ambiguity. for further releases of the catalogue i'd suggest: 1. to have the overview page of each gei structured the same way 2. may be in the same overview page to have also marketing, commercial and legal info, of course we can also have an ad-hoc page. my two cents... congratulations, stefano 2012/7/31 Matteo Melideo > Dear Juanjo and Stefano, > as a follow up of the discussion just had during the phc, please visit the > catalogue as if you were a potential stakeholder ( > http://fi-ware.cloud.labs.ericsson.net/) and let me know what do you > think of the current GE published and the quality of this. Would you buy > them? Is it clear where they are and what they are? > > I would like to open the catalogue to the UC projects, the P.O. and > reviewers (early September) in order to enable them to see what the > partners are really doing to advertise and publish their GEs. In addition > to this, there will be also a ranking tools to allow the UC projects and > whoever else will visit the catalogue to rate the GE quality. > > I think that if you also publicly provide your view on this I think helps > a lot. > > My two cents, > > M. > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Jul 31 21:21:52 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:21:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 phc Message-ID: dear all, thsi is to remind you all the weekly phc (wednesday 10:00) it is important the attendance of everybody. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Jul 31 21:33:42 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:33:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 phc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50183316.5070609@tid.es> Stefano, Given the situation (struggling to release 16 deliverables!) I may not be able to be present. Henar will be there. Best regards, Miguel El 31/07/2012 21:21, stefano de panfilis escribi?: > dear all, > > thsi is to remind you all the weekly phc (wednesday 10:00) > it is important the attendance of everybody. > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Tue Jul 31 21:43:55 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:43:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: Re: reminder: wp10 phc In-Reply-To: <50183316.5070609@tid.es> References: <50183316.5070609@tid.es> Message-ID: <904613933-1343763515-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1214186538-@b26.c14.bise7.blackberry> Perfectly understandable and acceptable! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Miguel Carrillo Sender: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:33:42 To: Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] reminder: wp10 phc Stefano, Given the situation (struggling to release 16 deliverables!) I may not be able to be present. Henar will be there. Best regards, Miguel El 31/07/2012 21:21, stefano de panfilis escribi?: > dear all, > > thsi is to remind you all the weekly phc (wednesday 10:00) > it is important the attendance of everybody. > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed