Dear Thierry, the installation cycle should be executed entirely for a specific GE release. -If we change anything on the testbed after the 1st sanity check, do we have to ask for another one, or under which conditions do we need another one? --> If you have changed the GE after the sanity check execution then you have to re-install it. Then you have to put the cockpit progress value to 40% (if no new requirements are need) from which you, and testbed team, can continue with the next steps. The state value must be changed as well also in the traker naturally. -If we add new features we should have to provide a new version of all guides and manuals and of course a new Unit Test Plan so a new sanity check --> If you add new feature you are updating the GE (probably you are working on anew GE version). Then you have to repeat the entire installation cycle. Again, also in this case, if no new requirements are needed, you can start from the 40% value in the cockpit wiki page and proceed with the next ones. Again the state value must be changed as well also in the traker naturally. I hope this can provide some clarifications, Cheers, Paolo Paolo Zampognaro R & D Laboratory paolo.zampognaro at eng.it ________________________________________ Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.a. via Emanuele Gianturco, 15 - 80142 Napoli (IT) tel.: (+39) 0816103524 mobile.: (+39) 3451227587 www.eng.it -----Messaggio originale----- Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di thierry.nagellen at orange.com Inviato: mercoledì 17 ottobre 2012 11.55 A: Miguel Carrillo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Juanjo Hierro Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Overwriting GEs in the testbed Dear all, I have a more general question regarding the process to update code, running softwares but also documentations. We discuss this point during the IoT weekly meeting this morning and it is not clear for me if we have clear guidelines for that. For example some open questions: -If we change anything on the testbed after the 1st sanity check, do we have to ask for another one, or under which conditions do we need another one? -If we add new features we should have to provide a new version of all guides and manuals and of course a new Unit Test Plan so a new sanity check I know that we have many things to do but because of the changes on the testbed and of course new releases we need some guidelines because the UC projects (or external people) could find a Unit Test Plan which would not be compliant with the running software version on the testbed. Thanks for your comments BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoyé : mercredi 17 octobre 2012 10:06 À : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] Overwriting GEs in the testbed Dear all, Now that the 2nd delivery of the 1st Release is coming, we have to see what to do with the GEs that are going to be resubmitted. As far as I can see, all the GEs are new to the Testbed apart from those in IoT. We do not see the need to keep to separate arrays of VM (one for R1.1 and another one for R1.2) so we will just overwrite the old GEs with the new ones. This will be announced to the UCs to avoid any possible misunderstandings. Best regards Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telefónica Distrito Telefónica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigación y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicación S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20121017/7c1c54cf/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy