[Fiware-testbed] R: Status and potential next steps towards validation planning with use case projects

[Paolo Zampognaro]

Hi All,

 

as attached you can find a reviewed version of the circulated document on
validation activity. 

Basically I have used a new template for the feature coverage matrix (as
attached the excel sheet as well) (i) by introducing the new feature
description as reported in the roadmap wiki page and (ii) by putting in the
same sheet all involved Use Case Projects. Furthermore I have gathered the
features by categories in order to offer to the Use Case Projects a more
intuitive search criteria.

Finally, in the last section of the document, I have put an example about
how to aggregate judgements from each single Use Case Project in order to
extract global and high level conclusions. 

 

Cheers,

 

Paolo      

 

  _____  

Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
[mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs,
Thorsten
Inviato: lunedì 3 settembre 2012 12.59
A: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Status and potential next steps towards
validation planning with use case projects

 

Hi,

Sorry there was a misplacement of layout information on my previous mail –
corrected.

 

Best,

                                  ; & bsp;                         /Thorsten

 

From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
[mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs,
Thorsten
Sent: Montag, 3. September 2012 10:43
To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Status and potential next steps towards validation
planning with use case projects

 

< 0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Dear colleagues,

In order to prepare the topic of “validation planning and execution” for our
next PHC on Wednesday, I would like to take the time to subsume the status
and the potential next steps.

 

Find attached the commented version of Paolos “FI-WARE evaluation approach”
the document outlines not only the process given on the wiki page
(https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V
1_Validation_Plan
<https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/test%0d%0aValidation_Plan>
) it as well introduces potenti x and further documentation for the use case
projects in order to document validation.

 

If you have further comments and suggestions, please contribute directly in
the document or comment via email.

 

As we want to have first validation results by M18, I think we have to
approach the use case projects rather sooner than later.

 

Potential next steps would be (as outlined in the wiki & the document) to
firstly approach the WPA/WPL meeting and introduce the overall plan. Then
subsequently the use case projects and start with the first phases of the
validation process:

 

1.  Validation Preparation phase (to be carried out before validation
execution)

Duration: ~1-2 month

Purpose: Plan validation (concrete timin g, scope p>

DoW: “ be defined with the support of FI-WARE partners participating in this
task and should contain the technology requirements as well as the
functional and non-functional requirements to be validated. Such test plans
will be mapped versus the functionality offered by the FI-WARE instance
under test in order to establish a coverage matrix.”

A separate template for the validation plan will be provided by the Testbed
team 

Send validation plan to testbed coordinator

Recommendation: bi-weekly call with testbed coordinator, get formal
green-light by te stbed te & scenario suitability

2. Introduction to FIWARE platform and testbed phase (optional)

Duration: 1-2 weeks

Schedule meeting with Testbed coordinator and complete va lang=EN-GB>

Testbed gives system endpoints and needed access information to the team and
gives g e infrastructure

During second validation phase, this phase might be optional

Recommendation: UC to schedule Kick-off meeting with all FIWARE WPL/WPA for
this validation phase, outlining the envisioned scenario

 

Any questions, don’t hesitate to ask.

 

 
/Thorsten

 

From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
<mailto:%5bmailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.%0d%0a%20fi-ware.%0d%0aed-bou
nces at lists.fi-ware.eu%5d%3c/a%3e%20%3cb%3eOn%20Behalf%20Of%20%3c/b%3ePaolo%2
0Zampognaro%3cbr%3e%3cb%3eSent:%3c/b%3e%20Freitag,%2027.%20Juli%202012%2018:
37%3cbr%3e%3cb%3eTo:%3c/b%3e%20%3ca%20href=> 

 
<mailto:%5bmailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.%0d%0a%20fi-ware.%0d%0aed-bou
nces at lists.fi-ware.eu%5d%3c/a%3e%20%3cb%3eOn%20Behalf%20Of%20%3c/b%3ePaolo%2
0Zampognaro%3cbr%3e%3cb%3eSent:%3c/b%3e%20Freitag,%2027.%20Juli%202012%2018:
37%3cbr%3e%3cb%3eTo:%3c/b%3e%20%3ca%20href=>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120904/c2a3dcb3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Coveragematrix.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 24064 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120904/c2a3dcb3/attachment.xls>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: M15_validation_general_remarks.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 193024 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120904/c2a3dcb3/attachment.doc>