[Fiware-testbed] wp10 phc postponing it again ....

[Salvatore Longo]

Hi Stefano,
For me schedule the next phc on 18 feb it is ok. For any important issues we can exchange e-mails.

BR,

-          Salvatore Longo

________________________________

Salvatore Longo
Software Engineer
NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfürsten-Anlage 36
D-69115 Heidelberg

Tel.  +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246
Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115
E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu

NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office: NEC House,
1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
Registered in England 2832014

________________________________

From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis
Sent: Freitag, 8. Februar 2013 13:34
To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-testbed] wp10 phc postponing it again ....

dear all,
as some of you already know, juanjo has fixed a quite important wpl/wpa phc on this monday (11 feb) lasting the whole day so clashing with our weekly phc.
so tow main options in fron of us: postponing or skipping.
main duties in this period we have in front of us are:
1. reallocation of eab budget
2. uc projects validation support
3. testbed architecture deliverable
point 1.
on this issue i got the appruval from the pcc about the following:
"- 90k left by eab
- proposal:
-- deployment tool (initial discussion between eng and ibm this to enhance the cloud portal functionalities) and in general additional support to task t10.2
-- more support to validation task t10.5
-- The new DoW should include a clearer definition and allocation of activities of the Open Innovation Lab. A new task will be created."
honestly on my desk i received only a proposal from miguel about the creation of a new task (t10.6) for the support to the open innovation lab (oil its horrible acronym at the moment). i think this his proposal is a good one, but certainly we need to work on it a bit more (@miguel i'll send to you in the next hours some ideas from us). on the other approved directions i did not receive so far any proposals.
point 2.
at the last ab fi-ppp i gave a presentation on the results from "first impression survey" and a tutorial on the validation questionnaire (attached the two answers - smartagrifood and instantmobility - i received at the moment still in their draft form). i offer in behalf of the fi-ware testbed team any kind of support on the matter. let's see if any request comes ....
point 3.
i still missing or lost may be the final requirements to the procurement red.es<http://red.es> will launch (i saw some emails on the matter).
given all the above my suggestion is to skip again our weekly phc. this means in the next coming days i have to receive concrete proposals on eab budget reallocation are provided as at the next phc we must formalise a proposal to the pcc.
pleas let me know if you agree or see the need to have a phc before next monday (18 feb).

--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130208/77d27fe5/attachment.html>