Hi Stefano and colleagues my comments for the "D/U/E" statistics and some more comments down below - sorry there are a lot of screenshots in this mail but it I hope it's easier to understand what I mean. - The D/U/E ratings are more duly reflected on the current "usage" lists on google docs - the list that you analyzed (and was part of the submission by the use case project) is "outdated"!! I copied the google-docs on a particular date (e.g. January 2013 as a snapshot) and the use cases were only asked to update their "D/U/E" ratings on the google doc (in the web) => Therefore I would always only use the total numbers provided from the google-docs - see this screenshot! [cid:image003.jpg at 01CE6213.C6A1DB80] Second problem with your aggregation is: SMARTAGRIFOOD just provided more answers to e.g. Complex event processing (CEP) - you now count all of their Answers as "D" for CEP and get a lot of Ds, while in general SMARTAGRIFOOD only provided "one" D in the original matrix - overall the CEP component has only "3" times D in the original doc but provided by SMARTAGRIFOOD, FINEST and SAFECITY but as you can see FINEST is "U" in the table you analized..... - so if anybody would crosscheck your table, this would be a problem. [cid:image006.png at 01CE6213.66E2BFC0] Thirdly perhaps and as addition to your summaries the report I compiled a chapter-based statistics might help and be an addition (find it linked here in the deliverable: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/The_Validation_Report#Baseline_assets_for_Validation_results_processing and the picture: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/images/7/7a/Ge_planned_usage_statistics_phase_one.png there you can see sums for the chapters - e.g. Cloud having 3 D and 5 U or Apps having 9 D and 8 U and so on... This can be use to come up with certain subsuming statements (which I as well printed in the final deliverable): Overall the impact generated in FI-WARE is quite remarkable with almost 100 experimentations, 60 of the GEs got taken into consideration for the design of PoC and almost 20 were part of one of the PoC demos. As some use cases of phase one have subsequent experiments ongoing these numbers are still increasing and can be tracked within the original document. [cid:image008.jpg at 01CE6213.C6A1DB80] Actually the graphics you provide in relation to the questions take for me some strange axis description - how would you read them? IoT has for QGE1 "E" 4.0? what would that mean? [cid:image009.jpg at 01CE6213.C6A1DB80] => I came up with these new pivot tables for the chapters - see new xls attached and the picture printed below: These one would be readable with something like: - The security chapter was in general well received from FINEST, FINSENY, INSTANT MOBILITY - SMARTAGRIFOOD found the documentation related questions not convincing, but overall acceptance was high for the Identity Management GE. - OUTSMART only validated the Identity management component, but would recommend it overall and rated the open spec with 4 out of 6 stars - FINSENY did not judge the acceptance level for the validated GEs ð Overall one would need to validate these assumptions drawn from this graph with the actual provided answers (see validation scenario description and the related tabs in the "monster") [cid:image011.jpg at 01CE6213.C6A1DB80] From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 17:03 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] first analysis on validation questionnaire dear all, i did some very simple analyses on the validation questionnaire at the overall levell (attached the file). with respect to the file from thorsten i: - cleaned the rows with no values although expected (so in the end only 55 answers) - added a new sheet (alle chapter ordered) where i comupted some average statistics - added a new sheet (graphics) where i created few first glance histograms in the graphics page if you go in the last histo (i.e. that referring to q.11) you'll get a nice surprise!!!! left to the reader as an excercise ;-) ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 11029 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 103134 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image008.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 141617 bytes Desc: image008.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment-0001.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image009.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 37342 bytes Desc: image009.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment-0002.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image011.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 74443 bytes Desc: image011.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment-0003.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2013-04-26-validation-answers-to-validation-questionnaire-phase-one.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 120275 bytes Desc: 2013-04-26-validation-answers-to-validation-questionnaire-phase-one.xlsx URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130605/d958eb9c/attachment.xlsx>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy