dear all, are you available at 16:00? please can anybody provide a phc bridge? ciao, stefano 2013/3/15 Clara M Pezuela Robles <clara.pezuela at atosresearch.eu> > Stefano, I have another confcall on Tuesday at 17:00, so I could only > attend half an hour unless you shift it a bit earlier**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Clara Pezuela**** > > Head of IT Sector**** > > Research and Innovation Group**** > > Atos Spain SA**** > > Clara.pezuela at atos.net **** > > +34 91 214 8609**** > > +34 675 62 9974**** > > [image: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo_signature]**** > > ** ** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* viernes, 15 de marzo de 2013 15:16 > *To:* Miguel Carrillo > *Cc:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] Deliverable 10.5.1 rejected (was: FW: > [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review > report)**** > > ** ** > > dear miguel and all,**** > > i think first we have to analyse between ourselves and than put at the > attention of wpl/wpa weekly phc.**** > > there are detials that most of the other wpl wont understand while we > need, of course their help. so it is much better to get there with a clear > proposal.**** > > as a first comment, btw, i do not agree with reviewers comments. i think > we were not able to communicate that the questionnaire had been produced in > agreemnt with the uc projects, so is fi-ppp common effort not just fi-ware. > **** > > certainly we should link the comments with the current epics, but this > will be our work.**** > > for this purpose being holiday in spain on next monday, i suggest to > postpone our wp10 phc on tuesday at 16:30. > > the problem is that i do not have access to phc bridges with local for > numbers to provide you all. can anyone of you provide one?**** > > otherwise we go for pownow.**** > > ciao, > stefano**** > > ** ** > > 2013/3/13 Miguel Carrillo <mcp at tid.es>**** > > Dear all, > > Thorsten is right in asking what to do. Resubmission is not needed but we > either way there is a new issue for April where we should have it clear how > to handle it. They actually do not ask to resubmit because they expect to > find a suitable new version with something more convincing. > > Thorsten did a good job or at least this is what I think, at least taking > into account the situation. But the reviewers basically complain that the > document does not serve its purpose. It is strongly related to Task 10.5 in > the DoW if I am right and it is clear that the process did not reach the > heights that we expected. The document clearly reflects it and this is why > they object. Now we need to think what to do (if we can do anything at > all). We need to discuss this maybe in the weekly call at WPL/WPA level > (next week it will happen on Tuesday, due to a holiday on Monday in Spain) > > Best regards, > > Miguel**** > > El 12/03/2013 15:48, BISSON Pascal escribió:**** > > Hi Thorsten,**** > > **** > > For me D10.5.1 even if rejected doesn’t require resubmission simply > because as stated in the review report: “the next iterative version is due > in the next review period. **** > > **** > > See the way things are stated on page 5 of the Review 4 report.**** > > **** > > ===============================================**** > > The following deliverables are rejected:**** > > · D2.4.1b (being a re-submission)**** > > · D4.1.1b (being a re-submission)**** > > · D4.5.1**** > > · D5.1.1b (being a re-submission)**** > > · D10.4.1**** > > · D10.5.1**** > > · D10.5.1**** > > None of the above deliverables requires resubmission, as the next > iterative version is due in**** > > the next review period. As this is an interim review, no cost assessments > are given.**** > > ======================================================**** > > **** > > Best Regards,**** > > Pascal**** > > *De :* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ > mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>] > *De la part de* Sandfuchs, Thorsten > *Envoyé :* mardi 12 mars 2013 13:21 > *À :* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Objet :* [Fiware-testbed] Deliverable 10.5.1 rejected (was: FW: > [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review > report)**** > > **** > > Dear colleagues,**** > > Can you please help me to understand what the reject of the Deliverable > 10.5.1 “means”? Reviewers do reject our deliverable, but do not want any > resubmissions, without giving clear guidance on how to mitigate the > situation (relevant text attached below). They clearly see the discrepancy > between the DoW and the work carried out, but as this was agreed on the AB > level, I do not think that we have a major clinch here – or do we? At least > the reviewers leave it open L**** > > **** > > So what do YOU think we should do?**** > > **** > > I would be happy if we can setup a dedicated call on this review-report > for WP10 in due time.**** > > **** > > Best regards,**** > > **** > > /Thorsten* > *** > > **** > > *D10.5.1 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case > projects***** > > This deliverable outlines the designed and recommended validation process > for the use cases**** > > to follow. Additionally the initial feedback survey, which was initiate > and send to the use**** > > case projects and the main findings are outlined.**** > > The validation process described in the document is generally well thought > and detailed;**** > > however, it has been devised without sufficient consideration of the > FI-WARE project and**** > > FI-WARE Releases.**** > > The validation approach is also considered insufficient, in view of what > is envisaged in the**** > > DoW in supporting Use Case projects on deployment, execution and > validation of the**** > > conceptual prototypes in respect of the available GEs. According to the > deliverable, the**** > > design phase of FI-WARE incorporates requirements that have been > successfully**** > > communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters. As the > link between**** > > Use Case requirements and the actual content of the individual chapters is > not readily**** > > traceable, this has a significant impact on the validation, and the extent > to which the Agile**** > > best practices have been embraced. As explained in the document, there is > no tight linkage**** > > between the defined requirements and the features provided by the GE > providers. Hence, the**** > > validation and requirements evaluation will not be based on a requirements > matrix, but will**** > > follow an open questionnaire approach. The available questionnaire is > presently basic, and is**** > > a long way off from providing the validation required to enrich the > characterisation of Use**** > > Case scenarios (as a contribution towards Phase 2 trials) and generally > boost GE uptake.**** > > Additionally, how testing and evaluation would be conducted in relation to > the non-functional**** > > capabilities that are listed for the first releases in the Technical > Roadmap is yet to be**** > > described.**** > > Deliverable D10.5.1 is rejected. No re-submission is required,**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ > mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>] > *On Behalf Of *Juanjo Hierro > *Sent:* Dienstag, 12. März 2013 12:14 > *To:* fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & > Review report**** > > **** > > Dear partners, > > I forward to you without even reading it yet to avoid any delay. > > I'll come to this after I read it carefully. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo**** > > > > **** > > -------------**** > > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital**** > > website: www.tid.es**** > > email: jhierro at tid.es**** > > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro**** > > **** > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator **** > > and Chief Architect**** > > **** > > You can follow FI-WARE at:**** > > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu**** > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242**** > > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware**** > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932**** > > > > -------- Original Message -------- **** > > *Subject: ***** > > FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review report**** > > *Date: ***** > > Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:43:05 +0000**** > > *From: ***** > > <Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu> <Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu>**** > > *To: ***** > > <jhierro at tid.es> <jhierro at tid.es>**** > > *CC: ***** > > <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu> <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>, > <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>, <mcp at tid.es><mcp at tid.es>, > <subsidies at tid.es> <subsidies at tid.es>, <msli at icfocus.co.uk><msli at icfocus.co.uk>, > <irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com> <irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com>, > <dgr at whitestein.com> <dgr at whitestein.com>, <rdifrancesco at ymail.com><rdifrancesco at ymail.com> > **** > > **** > > Dear Mr Hierro,**** > > **** > > Please find attached a scanned copy of the outcome letter and review > report of project 285248 FI-WARE.**** > > **** > > Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.**** > > **** > > Many thanks in advance**** > > **** > > Best regards,**** > > **** > > Vanessa Vanhumbeeck**** > > *European Commission***** > > DG CONNECT**** > > Unit E3 – Net Innovation**** > > **** > > Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 > Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________**** > > Fiware-testbed mailing list**** > > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu**** > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed**** > > > > **** > > -- **** > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------**** > > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco**** > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telefónica Distrito Telefónica **** > > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigación y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 **** > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicación S/N **** > > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) **** > > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 **** > > ** ** > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es**** > > ** ** > > Follow FI-WARE on the net**** > > ** ** > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu**** > > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242**** > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware**** > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932**** > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx**** > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed**** > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130315/e5e95406/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 11614 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130315/e5e95406/attachment.png>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy