From laura.pucci at eng.it Thu May 2 10:08:31 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 10:08:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] REMIND: FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M24 (WP10) - missing contributions Message-ID: Dear all, This is to remind, only to those who didn?t contribute, to please send me your contributions for the Project Periodic Report related to WP10 activities. Up to now I received only input from ALU-D, Deut. Telekom, UPM, SAP, TID and INTEL. The deadline was last Friday, now I kindly ask you to send me the missing contributions within today (PLS use the attached template), since tomorrow the WP10 Report must be completed and sent to the coordinator. Many thanks for your attention. With regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Stefano.DePanfilis at eng.it Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:09 PM Subject: FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M24 (WP10) - call for contribution Dear WP10 partners, This is to kindly ask your contribution to the D1.2.4, the Project Periodic Report we have to deliver before the next Review at M24. As WP leader ENG is responsible to ensure that all activities performed in WP10 are fully described in this PPR, that will cover the 2nd year of the project, from M13 to M24. We ask to each partner involved in WP10 to use the attached template and describe activities done, progresses towards objectives and main achievements from May 2012 to April 2013. Please consider that we will have to integrate your contributions before sending the part related to WP9 to the coordinator, so I kindly ask you to send the document back within the end of this week, in order to have enough time to review the full document. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Please feel free to contact me any doubts you may have. My best regards, Laura -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laura Pucci Research and Innovation Directorate laura.pucci at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Terragneta, 90 - 80058 Torre Annunziata (NA) Tel. +39-081.8626884 Fax +39-081.8626819 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.4-FI-WARE_Periodic_Peport-M13-M24_WP10.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 255678 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu May 2 15:34:36 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 13:34:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FW: Observationsdraft for 10.5.1 report on validation process References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646101768A@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646106E7B5@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear WPL/WPA-colleagues, Following up on the review report, find down below my draft of four observations given to the review report conserning the rejection of D.10.5.1 - it was decided to deliver this on a WP level - nonetheless every WPL/WPA should have a look at it - in the end there are some "assumptions" mentioned in relation to how the "agil" methodology was applied, which may save life of WP10 but might bring other WPs into trouble - therefore: PLEASE review the rational given to the EC. TID clarified with the Project Officer: The EC will not put into question the assessment of suitably qualified experts. Yes-no discussions about opinions are not very meaningful, and we would not enter into such discussions. Only factual statements (and not opinions dressed up as factual statements, as is often the case) would be considered Please excuse the "german" style, potentially having to many lengthy sentences down below and feel free to break things up or change them at your will :) Please provide your input and corrections as soon as possible. In order to join the discussion and to cater for a shorter "release"-cycle I will add the chief architect directly to this discussion. Best, /Thorsten PS: find the original reviewer comments at the bottom of this mail Observation towards "D10.5.1 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects" - Deliverable D10.5.1 is rejected. No re-submission is required. 1. "The validation process described in the document is generally well thought and detailed; however, it has been devised without sufficient consideration of the FI-WARE project and FI-WARE Releases." Observation by FI-WARE: - The validation process was initially proposed by FI-WARE to the Use-Case projects. This approach was discussed and agreed by representatives of the Use-Case projects within the Architecture Board. - The architecture board recognized the reviewers comments in M6 and FI-WARE proposed a subsequent "initial feedback survey" to cater for short-term feedback cycle and to allow feedback on the first Testbed instances (therefore being closely aligned with the FI-WARE project and FI-WARE release - major fi-ware release end of M17/30.09.2012 - survey send out: Di 02.10.2012 01:03). - Subsequent and proposed validation schedules are by definition of the process to be aligned within the involved stakeholders: FI-WARE and use case projects. There is no defined schedule by the validation process, therefore alignment towards subsequent FI-WARE Release is part of the involved partners and not of the process. The process allows maximum flexibility. 2. "The validation approach is also considered insufficient, in view of what is envisaged in the DoW in supporting Use Case projects on deployment, execution and validation of the conceptual prototypes in respect of the available GEs. " Observation by FI-WARE: - FI-WARE agrees with the reviewers comments that the validation process as outlined and executed within the FI-WARE project within Task 10.5 does not completely follow the description of the task in the DoW - but again as this was decided and discussed within the highest possible technology board (the FI-WARE architecture board) this deviation from the DoW is in line with all related parties and the deviation in general should be acceptable. As changes to the DoW take time, these changes in the process could only be reflected as part of the upcoming amendment 4 to the DoW. 3. "According to the deliverable, the design phase of FI-WARE incorporates requirements that have been successfully communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters. As the link between Use Case requirements and the actual content of the individual chapters is not readily traceable, this has a significant impact on the validation, and the extent to which the Agile best practices have been embraced. [..]The available questionnaire is presently basic, and is a long way off from providing the validation required to enrich the characterisation of Use Case scenarios (as a contribution towards Phase 2 trials) and generally boost GE uptake. Observation by FI-WARE - The D.10.5.1 deliverables states: "The design phase occurs taking care also requirements that have been successfully communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters." - which does not imply a given fact that requirements actually were successfully communicated and does not imply that these requirements can be tracked throughout the whole process in the current way, agile is implemented and "lived". The deliverable in this point may have wrongly lead to the assumption that there were successfully communicated requirements, which the validation team itself couldn't really judge or imply. As the deliverable outlined later there is no tight linkage between defined requirements and the features provided. - Secondly the decision taken by the Architecture board reached was bond to the fact that validation based on all relevant features/epics provided by the FI-WARE project was not reasonable for the given amount of time and expected efforts - As of today FI-WARE features do comprise of more than 900 features (please bear in mind that only limited resources were foreseen in the DoW to actually execute on the validation task towards the core platform). - Finally it was decided by the Architecture board that a "validation questionnaire" to be provided by FI-WARE has to cater for validation and mainly will be based upon questions related to "validation context" and "generic enablers" and not based on features and requirements. The use case projects therefore were only bound to give the scenarios and their descriptions to FI-WARE and not their requirements. - Enrichment of the characterization of use case scenarios and boost of GE uptake was not in scope of the validation approach as implied in the reviewer statement. - As the amendment 4 foresees there will be again a reiteration of the validation process towards the phase 2 projects and their trials, where further changes in the process are currently being considered by the architecture board, potentially leading to a tighter linkage between requirements and GEs which might lead to a better validation. E.g. it is foreseen that use case projects will input their requirements to GE-based trackers and not to a common fi-ware tracker any more. One of the feedbacks received by the use case projects almost speaks for itself: As a general impression, the validation questions were quite helpful to provide feedback. The only issue we faced in our case was due to the fact that we evaluated the GEs per prototype component and not for specific scenarios. 4. Additionally, how testing and evaluation would be conducted in relation to the non-functional capabilities that are listed for the first releases in the Technical Roadmap is yet to be described. Observation by FI-WARE - Checking non-functional capabilities was again reiterated within the architecture board and no common consensus could be found towards the validation process. This recommendation will be taken into the next discussion which will redefine the process for FIWARE v2 (but will not be part of the D.10.5.2 deliverable as for time constraints: phase 2 projects did not start to redefine the validation process and potentially won't do so for the next two month ) Here is again the complete text from the Review Report (only broken up with some newlines): D10.5.1 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects This deliverable outlines the designed and recommended validation process for the use cases to follow. Additionally the initial feedback survey, which was initiate and send to the use case projects and the main findings are outlined. The validation process described in the document is generally well thought and detailed; however, it has been devised without sufficient consideration of the FI-WARE project and FI-WARE Releases. The validation approach is also considered insufficient, in view of what is envisaged in the DoW in supporting Use Case projects on deployment, execution and validation of the conceptual prototypes in respect of the available GEs. According to the deliverable, the design phase of FI-WARE incorporates requirements that have been successfully communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters. As the link between Use Case requirements and the actual content of the individual chapters is not readily traceable, this has a significant impact on the validation, and the extent to which the Agile best practices have been embraced. As explained in the document, there is no tight linkage between the defined requirements and the features provided by the GE providers. Hence, the validation and requirements evaluation will not be based on a requirements matrix, but will follow an open questionnaire approach. The available questionnaire is presently basic, and is a long way off from providing the validation required to enrich the characterisation of Use Case scenarios (as a contribution towards Phase 2 trials) and generally boost GE uptake. Additionally, how testing and evaluation would be conducted in relation to the non-functional capabilities that are listed for the first releases in the Technical Roadmap is yet to be described. -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu May 2 15:34:40 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 13:34:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FW: Initial version of 10.5.2 validation report In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646106365A@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646106365A@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646106E7C0@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, On Monday the WPL/WPA decided that we should submit the deliverable to the EC, despite we have some missing deep analysis, but to keep the time line. I would like you to do a review on the content an get back to me if you think we can and should submit this without major changes. Thanks in advance, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Montag, 29. April 2013 15:59 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] FW: Initial version of 10.5.2 validation report Dear colleagues, find attached the doc version of the D.10.5.2 deliverable which is due in M24. You can enter comments and text in the doc-version and I will integrate it later to the wiki and the final deliverable. I would say, the document currently provides the mere basis of this report - e.g. in chapter 6 there is a really really small initial analysis more touching on how the general process of analysis and provisioning of answers did work and not providing a deep analysis of the answers given by the use case projects. The reviewers might expect that this deliverable really assesses the complete validation process and summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs. introduced. As discussed in the WPL/WPA meeting, we will target to submit it - with your corrections - in time, and not doing a deep analysis. It might be needed that we have the rationale behind this in-time-submission in the executive summary - so that reviewers can touch on this. Rational I heard were (not phrasing it like this, just a summary for further : - Timing problems (rather go for development, than more papers) - Feedback from the UC projects was not very verbose, therefore there is not much to comment on - Feedback and all of the answers provided until "today" could be part of the review (in plain) - delaying the deliverable might lead to non of the answers being there "in time". I'm as well attaching the excel table, which allows a more deeper analysis of the answers (With the help of "pivot"-tables there are quite nice things to do in order to analyse the resuts). You can play around with these tables on your own. Our discussion was as well to have another relevant/potential chapter that - Every WPL gives a statement on "his" evaluation touching on o What got validated o Summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs o Major actions the WP take o General assumption about the validation in relation to each of the use cases - Another chapter: e.g. could explain to a given reader of the document how to use these pivot tables in order to enable somebody to do this kind of "analysis" on his own. Thanks for your support in any case & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052_WP10_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1795982 bytes Desc: D1052_WP10_generated.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 93706 bytes Desc: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.txt URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri May 3 13:24:57 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 13:24:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] **** URGENT ****: M13-M24 periodic report Message-ID: dear all, the status of the report is absolutely critical due to the lack of contributions by too many of you, namely: *NO NEWS from*: IBM ISRAEL IBM Switzerland THALES TELECOM ITALIA FRANCE TELECOM NSNG NOKIA SIEMENS Finland ERICSSON ALCATEL ITALIA SIEMENS Fraunhofer INRIA RED.es ZHAW (Switzerland) DFKI (Germany) USAAR-CISPA (Univ. Saarlandes) EPROS (Spain) of course this cannot be accepted. my colleague laura pucci in charge of daily management of wp10 sent you already several reminders i have to remind you that the due date is this monday (6th may) so the status is very critical. can you please be so kind to send your contributions(to me and laura, in cc) by monday 12:00 at the very latest. the missing contributions at that time will not be considered further for their inclusion in the deliverable submission, unless the project coordinator will allow so. have a nice weekend! stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 6 15:21:57 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 15:21:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] REMINDER: WP10 weekly phc today at 17:00 Message-ID: dear all, this is to remind you that today at 17:00, as agreed, we have our weekly phc. the forwarded email from loci has the needed details to join. ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lorant Nemeth Date: 2013/3/21 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: (Forward to attendees) Meeting invitation: FI-WARE WP10 PhC To: "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" Hi, I created a permanent reservation for Webex and phone conf. External numbers can be seen here: https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ Br, Loci -------- Original Message -------- Subject: (Forward to attendees) Meeting invitation: FI-WARE WP10 PhC Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:39:26 +0000 From: ext NemethL?r?nt Reply-To: To: **** You can forward this email invitation to attendees **** Hello , NemethL?r?nt invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE WP10 PhC Date: Every Monday, from Monday, 25 March 2013 to no end date Time: 15:00, Europe Time (Berlin, GMT+01:00) Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: wp10 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&ORT=MTgjMjU%3D ------------------------------------------------------- To join the teleconference only ------------------------------------------------------- https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ Conference code: 2210382800 ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=18&ST=1&SHA2=0dXg3Krea6u0ZYPjLNi6hGTX2IurPHwy01VwJytyE2I=&RT=MTgjMjU%3D _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon May 6 16:46:18 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 16:46:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA8186@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA8186@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <5187C23A.6070207@tid.es> Hi, I have received this message from our PO, Arian Zwegers, despite I don't recall asking him about WP10 deliverables rejection but WP4 and WP5 deliverables rejection ... Did you contact him directly ? Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 13:55:22 +0000 From: To: CC: Dear Juanjo, I looked into the rejection of WP10 deliverables and find the review report clear in why these were rejected and what needs to be done. Best regards, Arian . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 6 18:11:36 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:11:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly phc today at 17:00: MINUTES Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the minutes of the today phc (thank you very much to the attendees). Please amend them where needed. in addition due to the next coming of summer working in the time in spain and due to some unavailabilities here is a poll for a new time slot proposal agreed during the call (http://www.doodle.com/xm2ai7f7vfqtkw8r). the idea is to keep our weekly phc rigth after the weekly wpl/wpa weekly phc so that we can immediately react if needed. please vote! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_06_05_2013.doc Type: application/msword Size: 198656 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 6 18:12:44 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:12:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 weekly phc today at 17:00: MINUTES In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: dear all, the new agreed time for the phc will be in place from next phc, so please vote within this Wednesday e.o.b! ciao, stefano 2013/5/6 stefano de panfilis > dear all, > > please find attached the minutes of the today phc (thank you very much to > the attendees). Please amend them where needed. > > in addition due to the next coming of summer working in the time in spain > and due to some unavailabilities here is a poll for a new time slot > proposal agreed during the call (http://www.doodle.com/xm2ai7f7vfqtkw8r). > > the idea is to keep our weekly phc rigth after the weekly wpl/wpa weekly > phc so that we can immediately react if needed. > > please vote! > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon May 6 18:19:38 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 16:19:38 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] signoff D.10.5.2 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461074349@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, I was compiling the final version of the "in time" version of the deliverable D.10.5.2: Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects. Find this attached. You can track the changes that I introduced (some small typos & mainly summarizing the rational given before in the "executive" summary), as I used "track changes". Please shortly indicate if you would VETO a submission of this deliverable to the EC before Wednesday, 08.05.2013, 14:00. Depending on the we would submit to the EC the deliverable as attached by the end of the 8th May 2013. If you veto, please indicate to us when potential contributions would be ready and issue an alternative date for submission. The major concern with the deliverable are - ...that there were only very little contributions and review comments throughout the complete process (although send multiple times around). - .... we expose internal rational and information from the resolution in the WPL/WPA meeting - ...overall there is not much "delta" between D.10.5.1 and D.10.5.2 and the former deliverable has been rejected (see 4th review report for details) Additional contributions still very much welcomed, they will be integrated prior to submission. Thanks for your support in the matter and best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.10.5.2 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1714630 bytes Desc: D.10.5.2 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects.docx URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 6 19:58:50 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:58:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables In-Reply-To: <5187C23A.6070207@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA8186@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <5187C23A.6070207@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, thorsten and i contacted him in person in madrid and asked explanations about the rejection of d10.5.1. he promised to be back to us as he had not glue at the moment which was the issue. no further contacts with him after that f2f chat about d10.5.1. not very much sure he was referring to d10.5.1 (a single deliverable was rejected, indeed) in his email, but it could be that as well. sometimes arian is very much criptical. ciao, stefano 2013/5/6 Juanjo Hierro > Hi, > > I have received this message from our PO, Arian Zwegers, despite I don't > recall asking him about WP10 deliverables rejection but WP4 and WP5 > deliverables rejection ... > > Did you contact him directly ? > > Thanks, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: question about WP > 10 deliverables Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 13:55:22 +0000 From: > To: > CC: > > Dear Juanjo, > > I looked into the rejection of WP10 deliverables and find the review report clear in why these were rejected and what needs to be done. > > Best regards, > Arian > . > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon May 6 20:17:17 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 20:17:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA82B9@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA82B9@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <5187F3AD.2030902@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:38:17 +0000 From: To: CC: , , Dear Juanjo, The question was made by Stefano and Thomas during the Architects Week. I know the response on the other request is pending. We are doing more than the impossible already ... Best regards, Arian. -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 5:59 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; BERGSTROM Ragnar (CNECT); Miguel Carrillo; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FI-WARE: question about WP 10 deliverables Dear Arian, I don't recall to formulate a question about WP10 deliverable (yet) although I'm aware that comments on the review report of WP10 are under preparation and I guess they will be sent soon. However, I formulated a formal question about concrete and more detailed comments regarding rejection of deliverables in WP4 (Cloud Hosting) and WP5 (IoT Services Enablement). See my email on April 29th, which was a reminder of the one sent on April 11 ... We haven't received yet any feedback by reviewers. Cheers, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 06/05/13 15:55, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > > I looked into the rejection of WP10 deliverables and find the review report clear in why these were rejected and what needs to be done. > > Best regards, > Arian > . > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu Mon May 13 17:03:47 2013 From: Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu (Salvatore Longo) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:03:47 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Message-ID: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon May 13 17:06:40 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:06:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> I'm dialed in, but no moderator seems to be joining. From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Salvatore Longo Sent: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:04 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu Mon May 13 17:07:08 2013 From: Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu (Salvatore Longo) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:07:08 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E7495C@DAPHNIS.office.hd> I am in the call, but no moderator yet. :( ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:07 To: Salvatore Longo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: WP10 phc? I'm dialed in, but no moderator seems to be joining. From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Salvatore Longo Sent: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:04 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Mon May 13 17:07:40 2013 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:07:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C95B5D9A@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Same for me (and same on the WebEx page ...) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CE4FFC.6013DB30] [cid:image002.png at 01CE4FFC.6013DB30] Research & Innovation Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 - BU4/114 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: lundi 13 mai 2013 17:07 To: Salvatore Longo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? I'm dialed in, but no moderator seems to be joining. From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Salvatore Longo Sent: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:04 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com Mon May 13 17:10:38 2013 From: thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com (Banniza, Thomas-Rolf (Thomas-Rolf)) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:10:38 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C95B5D9A@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108374C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C95B5D9A@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: Hi all, as far as I know, a new date for Tuesday was in discussion, but I didn't receive details... Thomas Von: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von Heijnen Henk Gesendet: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:08 An: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; Salvatore Longo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: Re: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Same for me (and same on the WebEx page ...) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CE4FFC.C95C5EF0] Research & Innovation Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 - BU4/114 From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: lundi 13 mai 2013 17:07 To: Salvatore Longo; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? I'm dialed in, but no moderator seems to be joining. From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Salvatore Longo Sent: Montag, 13. Mai 2013 17:04 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 13 17:27:02 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:27:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> Message-ID: dear all, as agreed last phc, and in the minutes, we agreed to cancel the phc on mondays afternoon to have it on tuesday morning. the poll very few voted indeed, has as majority the slot 10:00-11:00. so let's talk tomorrow at 10:00 and put this in your agendas as fixed slot! please, loci can you check that the bridge will work tomorrow at that time. ciao, stefano 2013/5/13 Salvatore Longo > Hi all,**** > > No WP10 phc today??**** > > ** ** > > BR,**** > > **- **Salvatore Longo**** > > ** ** > > ________________________________**** > > ** ** > > Salvatore Longo**** > > Software Engineer**** > > NEC Europe Ltd.**** > > Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36**** > > D-69115 Heidelberg**** > > ** ** > > Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 ? 246**** > > Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 ? 115 **** > > E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu**** > > ** ** > > NEC Europe Limited**** > > Registered Office: NEC House,**** > > 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL**** > > Registered in England 2832014**** > > ** ** > > ________________________________**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon May 13 18:24:40 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:24:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? In-Reply-To: References: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A538E74944@DAPHNIS.office.hd> Message-ID: <25680_1368462282_519113CA_25680_4372_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E556310D@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear Stefano, This just to let you know that unfortunately tomorrow at 10 is no more convenient for me due to a WP8 audio conf I had to call for starting at 10am. So apologize and will catch up through the minutes. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : lundi 13 mai 2013 17:27 ? : Salvatore Longo Cc : fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-testbed] WP10 phc? dear all, as agreed last phc, and in the minutes, we agreed to cancel the phc on mondays afternoon to have it on tuesday morning. the poll very few voted indeed, has as majority the slot 10:00-11:00. so let's talk tomorrow at 10:00 and put this in your agendas as fixed slot! please, loci can you check that the bridge will work tomorrow at that time. ciao, stefano 2013/5/13 Salvatore Longo > Hi all, No WP10 phc today?? BR, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manieri at eng.it Tue May 14 09:54:45 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:54:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW - VERY IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY AND REACT In-Reply-To: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> Message-ID: <5191EDC5.2060308@eng.it> Dear All, please find enclosed an update version of the WP10 as proposed by the Technical Manager, to ensure the coherence of the whole project. Please read it quickly, so that we can discuss during the today call. Then you will have a couple of hours to check with your partner representatives. I expect any comment approval by today 16.00 at very latest. Best A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Data: Tue, 14 May 2013 03:11:50 +0200 Mittente: Juanjo Hierro A: Davide Dalle Carbonare , Andrea Manieri CC: Javier de Pedro Sanchez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Davide and Andrea, Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. Please come back to us with a final revised version during today (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10 description in FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 - v3 (version_date-13-05-02).docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 106573 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue May 14 10:16:38 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:16:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Link to R2 deliverables Message-ID: <5191F2E6.6020507@tid.es> As requested in the ongoing call https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Tue May 14 11:11:50 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:11:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Problem with Unit Testing Message-ID: <5191FFD6.6050301@tid.es> Dear all, Whoever was talking about a concrete case of a rejection of unit testing plan please contact privately Manuel and myself - let us avoid spamming the list! :) Thanks Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue May 14 11:48:49 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:48:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something you'd like to correct. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_14_05_2013.doc Type: application/msword Size: 207360 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue May 14 12:57:01 2013 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:57:01 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW - VERY IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY AND REACT In-Reply-To: <5191EDC5.2060308@eng.it> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <5191EDC5.2060308@eng.it> Message-ID: The following statement in 10.3 is incorrect: ? IBM-IL will support the integration testing of GEs in WP5 (IoT Services Enablement Chapter). Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: Andrea Manieri To: "fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 14/05/2013 10:54 AM Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW - VERY IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY AND REACT Sent by: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear All, please find enclosed an update version of the WP10 as proposed by the Technical Manager, to ensure the coherence of the whole project. Please read it quickly, so that we can discuss during the today call. Then you will have a couple of hours to check with your partner representatives. I expect any comment approval by today 16.00 at very latest. Best A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Data: Tue, 14 May 2013 03:11:50 +0200 Mittente: Juanjo Hierro A: Davide Dalle Carbonare , Andrea Manieri CC: Javier de Pedro Sanchez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Davide and Andrea, Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. Please come back to us with a final revised version during today (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx [attachment "WP10 description in FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 - v3 (version_date-13-05-02).docx" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Tue May 14 14:51:44 2013 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:51:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW - VERY IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY AND REACT In-Reply-To: <5191EDC5.2060308@eng.it> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <5191EDC5.2060308@eng.it> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C95B6726@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Andrea, It is always difficult to find a way to describe what Technicolor provides because it is not "strictly inside the testbed" (the Cloud Edge is a IaaS server located at the Customer Premises. It can locally execute applications that could be proxies to Cloud-based apps. Practically, the Cloud Proxy is a box with some embedded software, it is NOT a PC and it can't be virtualized). Where could we put some words about that in the current template ??? Regards Henk From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 9:55 AM To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW - VERY IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY AND REACT Dear All, please find enclosed an update version of the WP10 as proposed by the Technical Manager, to ensure the coherence of the whole project. Please read it quickly, so that we can discuss during the today call. Then you will have a couple of hours to check with your partner representatives. I expect any comment approval by today 16.00 at very latest. Best A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Data: Tue, 14 May 2013 03:11:50 +0200 Mittente: Juanjo Hierro A: Davide Dalle Carbonare , Andrea Manieri CC: Javier de Pedro Sanchez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Davide and Andrea, Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. Please come back to us with a final revised version during today (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manieri at eng.it Tue May 14 22:14:34 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 22:14:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> Message-ID: <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10 description in FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 - v3 (version_date-13-05-02)-IBM-ENG approved.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 86479 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP9 description in FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 - v3 (version_date-13-05-14).SAP-ATOS-UPM-IBM-ENG approved.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 78619 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed May 15 08:38:11 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 06:38:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] mail to fiware@ Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108686F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, I think we should send out an email to fiware@ exposing the current status of D.10.5.2 and asking for contributions. Here is my draft. Anything I might forgot? Would you disagree to send something like this? Best, /Thorsten Dear fi-ware colleagues and GE providers, while in former conversations we approached the GE providers directly, we want to engage more with everybody in the consortium. On the 14.05. we release the validation report of FI-PPP use cases from phase 1 to the EC in a "in time" and not "complete" version. You can find the document in the fi-ware-private wiki and in the docman (e.g. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/D.10.5.2.Report_on_Validation_process_including_Validation_with_Use_Case_projects_front_page - and the linked pages!) It touches on how the Use case of phase 1 planned and executed the validation of FI-WARE GEs. Please familiarize yourself with the content especially the part about the validation execution report on the following page is interesting for GE providers that want to know more on how their component was rated or how to find this out https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/The_Validation_Report. As you can read in the executive summary, we expect that we have to resubmit this deliverable within the july time frame. For phase 2 UC projects there will be a separate process to refine the validation process tailored to their needs. The "Validation Report" is only the beginning - within the next months and subsequently we have to work on chapter-specific analysis of the validation answers (metrics and scenario documents) which has been provided to us. We are still waiting for 3 use cases to finalize their projects and send us the relevant documents, but we should already start documenting more thoroughly what happened during the past month with the UC projects and how they did find it. In the end this can be a chance for everybody to get crisp messages for the review in June! Being relevant, usefull and used and being able to "proof" this. Please find all scenario descriptions (on where they used FI-WARE GEs) and the answers to all the GEs (star-ratings and free text) in the private docman: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=27 Folder: "Validation" If you want to know how to use the xls-pivot table to your advantage in order to see "your" rating - or the rating of the chapter, have a look at the Validation Report, referenced above. As said we will furthermore engage with you and gather your view and ask for your analysis of the answers provided towards your chapter or your component. This will be most probably gathered in the fi-ware-private wiki and has a PP-only dissemination level. thanks -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 8783 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed May 15 10:13:03 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:13:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> Message-ID: <5193438F.3040300@tid.es> Dear Andrea, Thanks for your revision. We'll incorporate all your revision (dropping some of the comments that were there to suppor our internal discussion because they don't need to be visible to the PO) Just a clarification on my side. When you provide the comment: Note: we come up with the need to have testbed resources for FICODE running. To avoid risks with the production resources, we think that separate environments need to be provided. For doing that we will integrate our cloud infra as a datacenter of the testbed. Does this means that Engineering will offer computing resources in its datacenter infrastructures to expand the set of resources available for the FI-WARE Testbed and OIL ? Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/05/13 22:14, Andrea Manieri wrote: Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Dear Davide and Andrea, Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. Please come back to us with a final revised version during today (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed May 15 10:30:57 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:30:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed May 15 10:40:48 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:40:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] mail to fiware@ In-Reply-To: <1368601161312.1266129892@boxbe> References: <1368601161312.1266129892@boxbe> Message-ID: dear thorsten, the email is fine for me and you can certainly forward it. honetsly i think the other colleagues will be very much involved in the geis delivery process, so even if from one side analysisng the validation migth help them to provide better versions of the new and phase 1 geis, on the other side i think they will be concentrated on the delivery only ... anyway better to send and remind the issue during the next wlp/wpa board which, i can anticipate you, i cannot attend. ciao, stefano 2013/5/15 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > [image: Boxbe] You chose to allow > thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com even though this message failed authentication > Click to disallow > > Dear colleagues,**** > > I think we should send out an email to fiware@ exposing the current > status of D.10.5.2 and asking for contributions. Here is my draft.**** > > ** ** > > Anything I might forgot? Would you disagree to send something like this?** > ** > > ** ** > > Best,**** > > /Thorsten**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Dear fi-ware colleagues and GE providers,**** > > while in former conversations we approached the GE providers directly, we > want to engage more with everybody in the consortium.**** > > ** ** > > On the 14.05. we release the validation report of FI-PPP use cases from > phase 1 to the EC in a ?in time? and not ?complete? version. You can find > the document in the fi-ware-private wiki and in the docman (e.g. > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/D.10.5.2.Report_on_Validation_process_including_Validation_with_Use_Case_projects_front_page- and the linked pages!) > **** > > It touches on how the Use case of phase 1 planned and executed the > validation of FI-WARE GEs.**** > > ** ** > > Please familiarize yourself with the content especially the part about the > validation execution report on the following page is interesting for GE > providers that want to know more on how their component was rated or how to > find this out > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/The_Validation_Report. > **** > > ** ** > > As you can read in the executive summary, we expect that we have to > resubmit this deliverable within the july time frame. For phase 2 UC > projects there will be a separate process to refine the validation process > tailored to their needs.**** > > ** ** > > The ?Validation Report? is only the beginning - within the next months and > subsequently we have to *work on chapter-specific analysis* of the > validation answers (metrics and scenario documents) which has been provided > to us. We are still waiting for 3 use cases to finalize their projects and > send us the relevant documents, but we should already start documenting > more thoroughly what happened during the past month with the UC projects > and how they did find it.**** > > ** ** > > In the end this can be a chance for everybody to get crisp messages for > the review in June! Being relevant, usefull and used and being able to > ?proof? this.**** > > ** ** > > Please find all scenario descriptions (on where they used FI-WARE GEs) and > the answers to all the GEs (star-ratings and free text) in the private > docman: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=27 Folder: ?Validation? > **** > > **** > > If you want to know how to use the xls-pivot table to your advantage in > order to see ?your? rating ? or the rating of the chapter, have a look at > the Validation Report, referenced above.**** > > ** ** > > As said we will furthermore engage with you and gather * your* view and > ask for your analysis of the answers provided towards your chapter or your > component. This will be most probably gathered in the fi-ware-private wiki > and has a PP-only dissemination level.**** > > ** ** > > thanks**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- ** ** > > ** ** > > Thorsten Sandfuchs**** > > ** ** > > SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | > www.sap.com **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx **** > > ** ** > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. **** > > ** ** > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > ** ** > > Please consider the environment before printing this mail!**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 8783 bytes Desc: not available URL: From manieri at eng.it Wed May 15 11:03:01 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:03:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <5193438F.3040300@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <5193438F.3040300@tid.es> Message-ID: <51934F45.5060301@eng.it> yes > > Just a clarification on my side. When you provide the comment: > > /Note: we come up with the need to have testbed resources for > FICODE running. To avoid risks with the production resources, we > think that separate environments need to be provided. For doing > that we will integrate our cloud infra as a datacenter of the > testbed. / > > > Does this means that Engineering will offer computing resources in > its datacenter infrastructures to expand the set of resources > available for the FI-WARE Testbed and OIL ? > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > On 14/05/13 22:14, Andrea Manieri wrote: >> Dear Juanjo, All, >> >> here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs >> (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). >> >> If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove >> comments. >> >> Best, >> >> A. >> >> Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: >>> Dear Davide and Andrea, >>> >>> Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 >>> description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to >>> make >>> it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. >>> >>> The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I >>> have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional >>> changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the >>> proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. >>> >>> In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the >>> scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 >>> was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you >>> will >>> agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in >>> 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. >>> >>> Please come back to us with a final revised version during today >>> (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for >>> final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. >>> >>> Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to >>> submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add >>> new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not >>> sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will >>> consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the >>> returned >>> WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website: www.tid.es >>> email: jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed May 15 11:07:18 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:07:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <51935046.3070009@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed May 15 11:41:49 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:41:49 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <51935046.3070009@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51935046.3070009@tid.es> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Juanjo, The point you are raising is for sure right for the direction who is coordinating - I even opted that in the task description of 10.5 this does not make sense at all and should be dropped - Miguel and Javier declined this request. But the initial statement given in the DoW and that was agreed with me should point to the ones that produce the documentation - I just discovered that you again changed this without letting me know. :( The statement that was agreed is attached - it must be clear that Task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself on the operation of a testbed instance (this information is just not part of the 10.5 task as - operation and therefore as well documentation of operation is in scope of 10.2 and 10.3 or perhaps 10.4 - but for sure not 12.4 and not 10.5.). ? If we do not shift this text away from Task 10.5 (as I was initially proposing) then I still want to have reflected in the task description that task 10.5 does not provide the information itself. And therefore the initial statement agreed with Javier and Miguel should be suitable "The documentation and training material will be ultimately provided by 10.X and 10.Y" and yes: please drop this part completely in this task description and write it to the relevant task in 10.X - my impression was that it was just misplaced in the first place - but do not leave it in the task that is primarily focusing on validation. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. /Thorsten PS: I dropped the WP9 list from the cc [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE45EF.91129EE0] It -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 11:07 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 82265 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed May 15 13:30:29 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:30:29 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51935046.3070009@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <519371D5.3070501@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, It is clear that task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself. That's why it is stated that task 10.5 will only offer Usage Areas "pointers". By making a reference to task 12.4, it is clear that creation/provision of training material on FI-WARE GEis is a task that belongs to WP3-WP9. Indeed, task 12.4 would only deal with organization of, and participation in, webinars. Adding "organized as part of Task 12.4" was precisely intended to remark that. However, you raise an interesting point about "training on FI-WARE Testbed operation". I honestly consider that training on operation of FI-WARE Instances was NEVER committed to be offered to Use Case projects. That's why I also introduced a change and talked about providing pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training regarding how to setup and configure/operate FI-WARE GEi instances (which is different than FI-WARE Instances in the original text) and again made a reference to task 12.4. The only project that we have committed to provide some support regarding setup of FI-WARE Instances is the Capacity Building project, but that is already covered in task 10.4. Hope it helps to clarify that the provided text addresses your concerns, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 11:41, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, The point you are raising is for sure right for the direction who is coordinating - I even opted that in the task description of 10.5 this does not make sense at all and should be dropped - Miguel and Javier declined this request. But the initial statement given in the DoW and that was agreed with me should point to the ones that produce the documentation - I just discovered that you again changed this without letting me know. :( The statement that was agreed is attached - it must be clear that Task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself on the operation of a testbed instance (this information is just not part of the 10.5 task as - operation and therefore as well documentation of operation is in scope of 10.2 and 10.3 or perhaps 10.4 - but for sure not 12.4 and not 10.5.). ? If we do not shift this text away from Task 10.5 (as I was initially proposing) then I still want to have reflected in the task description that task 10.5 does not provide the information itself. And therefore the initial statement agreed with Javier and Miguel should be suitable "The documentation and training material will be ultimately provided by 10.X and 10.Y" and yes: please drop this part completely in this task description and write it to the relevant task in 10.X - my impression was that it was just misplaced in the first place - but do not leave it in the task that is primarily focusing on validation. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. /Thorsten PS: I dropped the WP9 list from the cc [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE45EF.91129EE0] It -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 11:07 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 82265 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed May 15 14:02:24 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:02:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <519371D5.3070501@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51935046.3070009@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <519371D5.3070501@tid.es> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108734C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Juanjo, As you can see in the screenshot - the original DoW text offers and envisions exactly this: This task will also offer Usage Areas specific documentation and dedicated training helping them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE Instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material.... So I only tried to clarify this and make it go away from the single task where it's not bellowing. I would doubt that the EC would accept to drop it completely (at least this was the implication Miguel and Javier told to me) Best, /Thorsten From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 13:30 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; jhierro >> "jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro"" Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, It is clear that task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself. That's why it is stated that task 10.5 will only offer Usage Areas "pointers". By making a reference to task 12.4, it is clear that creation/provision of training material on FI-WARE GEis is a task that belongs to WP3-WP9. Indeed, task 12.4 would only deal with organization of, and participation in, webinars. Adding "organized as part of Task 12.4" was precisely intended to remark that. However, you raise an interesting point about "training on FI-WARE Testbed operation". I honestly consider that training on operation of FI-WARE Instances was NEVER committed to be offered to Use Case projects. That's why I also introduced a change and talked about providing pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training regarding how to setup and configure/operate FI-WARE GEi instances (which is different than FI-WARE Instances in the original text) and again made a reference to task 12.4. The only project that we have committed to provide some support regarding setup of FI-WARE Instances is the Capacity Building project, but that is already covered in task 10.4. Hope it helps to clarify that the provided text addresses your concerns, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 11:41, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, The point you are raising is for sure right for the direction who is coordinating - I even opted that in the task description of 10.5 this does not make sense at all and should be dropped - Miguel and Javier declined this request. But the initial statement given in the DoW and that was agreed with me should point to the ones that produce the documentation - I just discovered that you again changed this without letting me know. :( The statement that was agreed is attached - it must be clear that Task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself on the operation of a testbed instance (this information is just not part of the 10.5 task as - operation and therefore as well documentation of operation is in scope of 10.2 and 10.3 or perhaps 10.4 - but for sure not 12.4 and not 10.5.). => If we do not shift this text away from Task 10.5 (as I was initially proposing) then I still want to have reflected in the task description that task 10.5 does not provide the information itself. And therefore the initial statement agreed with Javier and Miguel should be suitable "The documentation and training material will be ultimately provided by 10.X and 10.Y" and yes: please drop this part completely in this task description and write it to the relevant task in 10.X - my impression was that it was just misplaced in the first place - but do not leave it in the task that is primarily focusing on validation. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. /Thorsten PS: I dropped the WP9 list from the cc [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE45EF.91129EE0] It -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 11:07 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 82265 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed May 15 16:27:09 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:27:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108734C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51935046.3070009@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <519371D5.3070501@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108734C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <51939B3D.1070406@tid.es> On 15/05/13 14:02, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, As you can see in the screenshot - the original DoW text offers and envisions exactly this: This task will also offer Usage Areas specific documentation and dedicated training helping them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE Instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material.... Yes I know, that's why I wanted to fix it and to clarify that we were indeed referring to FI-WARE GEi instances. So I only tried to clarify this and make it go away from the single task where it's not bellowing. I would doubt that the EC would accept to drop it completely (at least this was the implication Miguel and Javier told to me) Well, we are not dropping it completely, but fixing it to refer to FI-WARE GEi instances rather than FI-WARE Instances :-) We want to argue that the right thing to refer there in task 10.5 was to FI-WARE GEis because help/training on how to setup, configure and operate FI-WARE Instances was already addressed in task 10.4. Let's see how the PO reacts. What is critical is that we agree on what to keep as scope of WP10 in the DoW after amendment 4: * help/training on how to setup, configure and operate FI-WARE Instances only to XiFi and within the scope of 10.4. * provide pointers to specific documentation and training material/events that the UC projects can use to setup and configure FI-WARE GEi instances to be deployed outside the FI-WARE Testbed/OIL * make it clear that documentation and training material associated to FI-WARE GEis (not only about how to develop applications using them, but also about how to deploy and configure them) is a task that is up to the corresponding technical chapter WPs and not WP10. Cheers, -- Juanjo Best, /Thorsten From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 13:30 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; jhierro >> "jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro"" Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, It is clear that task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself. That's why it is stated that task 10.5 will only offer Usage Areas "pointers". By making a reference to task 12.4, it is clear that creation/provision of training material on FI-WARE GEis is a task that belongs to WP3-WP9. Indeed, task 12.4 would only deal with organization of, and participation in, webinars. Adding "organized as part of Task 12.4" was precisely intended to remark that. However, you raise an interesting point about "training on FI-WARE Testbed operation". I honestly consider that training on operation of FI-WARE Instances was NEVER committed to be offered to Use Case projects. That's why I also introduced a change and talked about providing pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training regarding how to setup and configure/operate FI-WARE GEi instances (which is different than FI-WARE Instances in the original text) and again made a reference to task 12.4. The only project that we have committed to provide some support regarding setup of FI-WARE Instances is the Capacity Building project, but that is already covered in task 10.4. Hope it helps to clarify that the provided text addresses your concerns, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 11:41, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, The point you are raising is for sure right for the direction who is coordinating - I even opted that in the task description of 10.5 this does not make sense at all and should be dropped - Miguel and Javier declined this request. But the initial statement given in the DoW and that was agreed with me should point to the ones that produce the documentation - I just discovered that you again changed this without letting me know. :( The statement that was agreed is attached - it must be clear that Task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself on the operation of a testbed instance (this information is just not part of the 10.5 task as - operation and therefore as well documentation of operation is in scope of 10.2 and 10.3 or perhaps 10.4 - but for sure not 12.4 and not 10.5.). => If we do not shift this text away from Task 10.5 (as I was initially proposing) then I still want to have reflected in the task description that task 10.5 does not provide the information itself. And therefore the initial statement agreed with Javier and Miguel should be suitable "The documentation and training material will be ultimately provided by 10.X and 10.Y" and yes: please drop this part completely in this task description and write it to the relevant task in 10.X - my impression was that it was just misplaced in the first place - but do not leave it in the task that is primarily focusing on validation. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. /Thorsten PS: I dropped the WP9 list from the cc [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE45EF.91129EE0] It -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 11:07 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware..eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 82265 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed May 15 16:37:29 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:37:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW In-Reply-To: <51939B3D.1070406@tid.es> References: <51918F56.9060806@tid.es> <51929B2A.3010001@eng.it> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086CD3@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51935046.3070009@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66461086F03@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <519371D5.3070501@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108734C@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51939B3D.1070406@tid.es> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646108798F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> OK - now I got it & I do agree. Fine with me & go ahead. Best From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 16:27 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW On 15/05/13 14:02, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, As you can see in the screenshot - the original DoW text offers and envisions exactly this: This task will also offer Usage Areas specific documentation and dedicated training helping them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE Instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material.... Yes I know, that's why I wanted to fix it and to clarify that we were indeed referring to FI-WARE GEi instances. So I only tried to clarify this and make it go away from the single task where it's not bellowing. I would doubt that the EC would accept to drop it completely (at least this was the implication Miguel and Javier told to me) Well, we are not dropping it completely, but fixing it to refer to FI-WARE GEi instances rather than FI-WARE Instances :-) We want to argue that the right thing to refer there in task 10.5 was to FI-WARE GEis because help/training on how to setup, configure and operate FI-WARE Instances was already addressed in task 10.4. Let's see how the PO reacts. What is critical is that we agree on what to keep as scope of WP10 in the DoW after amendment 4: * help/training on how to setup, configure and operate FI-WARE Instances only to XiFi and within the scope of 10.4. * provide pointers to specific documentation and training material/events that the UC projects can use to setup and configure FI-WARE GEi instances to be deployed outside the FI-WARE Testbed/OIL * make it clear that documentation and training material associated to FI-WARE GEis (not only about how to develop applications using them, but also about how to deploy and configure them) is a task that is up to the corresponding technical chapter WPs and not WP10. Cheers, -- Juanjo Best, /Thorsten From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 13:30 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; jhierro >> "jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro"" Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, It is clear that task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself. That's why it is stated that task 10.5 will only offer Usage Areas "pointers". By making a reference to task 12.4, it is clear that creation/provision of training material on FI-WARE GEis is a task that belongs to WP3-WP9. Indeed, task 12.4 would only deal with organization of, and participation in, webinars. Adding "organized as part of Task 12.4" was precisely intended to remark that. However, you raise an interesting point about "training on FI-WARE Testbed operation". I honestly consider that training on operation of FI-WARE Instances was NEVER committed to be offered to Use Case projects. That's why I also introduced a change and talked about providing pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training regarding how to setup and configure/operate FI-WARE GEi instances (which is different than FI-WARE Instances in the original text) and again made a reference to task 12.4. The only project that we have committed to provide some support regarding setup of FI-WARE Instances is the Capacity Building project, but that is already covered in task 10.4. Hope it helps to clarify that the provided text addresses your concerns, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 11:41, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, The point you are raising is for sure right for the direction who is coordinating - I even opted that in the task description of 10.5 this does not make sense at all and should be dropped - Miguel and Javier declined this request. But the initial statement given in the DoW and that was agreed with me should point to the ones that produce the documentation - I just discovered that you again changed this without letting me know. :( The statement that was agreed is attached - it must be clear that Task 10.5 can't provide the information and training material itself on the operation of a testbed instance (this information is just not part of the 10.5 task as - operation and therefore as well documentation of operation is in scope of 10.2 and 10.3 or perhaps 10.4 - but for sure not 12.4 and not 10.5.). => If we do not shift this text away from Task 10.5 (as I was initially proposing) then I still want to have reflected in the task description that task 10.5 does not provide the information itself. And therefore the initial statement agreed with Javier and Miguel should be suitable "The documentation and training material will be ultimately provided by 10.X and 10.Y" and yes: please drop this part completely in this task description and write it to the relevant task in 10.X - my impression was that it was just misplaced in the first place - but do not leave it in the task that is primarily focusing on validation. Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. /Thorsten PS: I dropped the WP9 list from the cc [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE45EF.91129EE0] It -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2013 11:07 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Andrea Manieri; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware..eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Thorsten, I'm afraid you are not right. Indeed, this was one of thing that I found had to be fixed in the previous version of the WP10 description. If you take a look to the description of Task 12.4, which is there since the very first DoW, you will find: Training material will be generated in WP03-WP10 and used in specific events such as the FI-WARE developer's day. This will allow communities to be involved in the training process on a continuous basis, thus helping others to use the results of the project, including, but not restricted to usage area projects. Training material will include but will not be limited to: * A set of training resources primarily composed of PowerPoint slide sets which may be used as training workshops organized around the FI-WARE Testbed. * A selected number of tutorials using some sort of webcasting technology. This will typically involve production of online streaming webcasts in a format which links the video footage of a speaker with the presented PowerPoint slides. Somehow, it was considered that training material should be generated in the WPs itself while coordination of training activities (e.g., Developers' days but we may also consider the Architects Weeks or the webinars organized for UC projects) would be considered in task 12.4. Apparently, when you generated the previous version of WP10, you were not aware that coordination of the generation of training material was already considered as part of Task 12.4 since the very first DoW. That's what Miguel told me. It was clear that you wanted to make it explicit that responsibility of task 10.5 was only to "offer pointers" and this was something I agreed to, but fixing reference to the tasks where coordination of the elaboration of the training material, as well as organization of webinars, etc, will take place, which should not be any task in WP10 (as you originally proposed) but task 12.4 as considered in the original DoW Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/05/13 10:30, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Andrea, Juanjo Sorry for not finding time to comment here earlier - I think there is a small _editorial_ problem in the task-description of 10.5: This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 12.4. This task will also offer Usage Areas pointers to specific documentation and dedicated training resources that may help them to setup and configure as well as to operate FI-WARE GEi instances. Such training can be materialised, depending on the specific needs, through dedicated workshops and material organized as part of Task 10.4. Best, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Andrea Manieri Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 22:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Javier de Pedro Sanchez; Davide Dalle Carbonare; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] Revised versions of WP9 and WP10 to incorporate in amendment 4 of the DoW Dear Juanjo, All, here the final version, after an internal check of respective WPs (partners explicitly approving are listed in the filename). If agreed with the changes, you can simply accept all and remove comments. Best, A. Il 14/05/2013 03:11, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Davide and Andrea, > > Please find enclosed the revised versions of the WP9 and WP10 > description forms with all the changes I believe would be needed to make > it clear the goals and scope of activities in both WPs. > > The WP10 is actually the same I already sent to you last week. I > have reviewed once again and I believe it doesn't require additional > changes to the ones I originally proposed. I understood that the > proposed changes were ok for you but just wanted to double-check. > > In the reviewed WP9, I would say that the changes mostly clarify the > scope and goals. I believe that the scope of activities in task 9.1 > was rather hard to understand in the existing version. I hope you will > agree with most (if not all) of the changes. The rest of changes in > 9.2 and 9.3 are minor. > > Please come back to us with a final revised version during today > (tuesday) so that we can submit by the evening a version of the DoW for > final approval by our deputy PO, Ragnar Bergstrom. > > Please don't accept the changes you agree with since we will have to > submit the WPs with changes highlighted to our PO. Just modify or add > new changes if you don't agree with them or consider them not > sufficient. Then return back the resulting final version. We will > consider that those changes we have proposed that remain in the returned > WP description forms are there because they were ok for you. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 82265 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu May 16 14:46:15 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:46:15 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, I finished editing with due respect of WP3 https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today dear all, please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something you'd like to correct. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu May 16 15:22:08 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:22:08 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Downtime in testbed tomorrow Message-ID: <5194DD80.8050506@tid.es> Dear partner, You are receiving this mesage because you are the representative of your company/institution in the Testbed list. Please distribute internally as this will not be sent to other lists. Tomorrow we will do maintenance work on the testbed. In principle, it impacts the backup server and also the DNS servers but it will be mostly transparent to the tested users. * Date: Friday, 17 * Time: between 11 am and 12 am * Duration: 10 minutes The servers with your GE instances should be working but the name resolution may temporarily fail (use the IPs if you really need to access them). It will take 10 minutes, anyway. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu May 16 17:19:58 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:19:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5194F91E.3020602@tid.es> Stefano, A reminder. Something else we need it to create the tickets for the installation of the GEis on the testbed. I refer to creating the entries here: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?atid=224&group_id=18&func=browse Best regards, Miguel El 16/05/2013 14:46, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Stefano, I finished editing with due respect of WP3 https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today dear all, please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something you'd like to correct. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu May 16 17:42:27 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:42:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: <1368709397046.1549222243@boxbe> References: <1368709397046.1549222243@boxbe> Message-ID: dear thorsten, many thanks! stefano 2013/5/16 Sandfuchs, Thorsten > [image: Boxbe] You chose to allow > thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com even though this message failed authentication > Click to disallow > > Hi Stefano,**** > > I finished editing with due respect of WP3**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit > **** > > ** ** > > Best,**** > > /Thorsten**** > > ** ** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *stefano de > panfilis > *Sent:* Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 > *To:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today**** > > ** ** > > dear all,**** > > **** > > please find attached the minutes of the phc of today.**** > > please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something > you'd like to correct.**** > > **** > > ciao,**** > > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu May 16 20:44:35 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:44:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <51952913.8030708@tid.es> Hi, I forwarded this to my collegues in TID and got a waterfall of comments. The conclusion is that this is very old and that does not conform to the new list for FI-WARE. So 2 things to the to-do list: Updating this Creating the tickets. Last time it was Paolo who did it. I guess that Stefano can find someone to fix this for the coming integrations. Best regards, Miguel El 16/05/2013 14:46, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Stefano, I finished editing with due respect of WP3 https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today dear all, please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something you'd like to correct. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri May 17 00:59:27 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 00:59:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: <51952913.8030708@tid.es> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51952913.8030708@tid.es> Message-ID: dear Miguel, only the chapter 3 part of cockpit is ready!! the rest still to be finalised. as you migth remember this will be ready for our weekly phc of this thuesday, so do not to distribute the cockpit now as this can create huge misunderstandings..... on the other end, if you mean that the comments of your colleagues are on chapter 3, than yes fwd them immediately to thorsten and me so we can adjust everything before this thuesday. did the others testbed team colleagues checked their own chapters as agreed and reported in the last meeting minute? ciao, stefano 2013/5/16 Miguel Carrillo > Hi, > > I forwarded this to my collegues in TID and got a waterfall of comments. > The conclusion is that this is very old and that does not conform to the > new list for FI-WARE. > > So 2 things to the to-do list: > Updating this > Creating the tickets. > > Last time it was Paolo who did it. I guess that Stefano can find someone > to fix this for the coming integrations. > > > Best regards, > > Miguel > El 16/05/2013 14:46, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: > > Hi Stefano, > > I finished editing with due respect of WP3 > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit > > > > Best, > > /Thorsten > > > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ > mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] > *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > > *Sent:* Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 > *To:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today > > > > dear all, > > > > please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. > > please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something > you'd like to correct. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing listFiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.euhttps://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com Fri May 17 10:09:14 2013 From: thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com (Banniza, Thomas-Rolf (Thomas-Rolf)) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:09:14 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51952913.8030708@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Stefano, according to topic 1 from minutes of last telco's meeting minutes ( AP: All to check by 15 May e.o.b. the list of GE implentations already provided in the forge in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2. ), I have updated for WP7 the 'June branches' of the document trees for the deliverables linked from https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2. As far as I have understood, you will use this information to update the table https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit in the Testbed V2 Implementation Cockpit. Is this correct or should I do further things? (Thorsten's mail from 16/05/2013 14:46, see below, suggests that he has also updated the cockpit tabe???) Best regards, Thomas Von: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von stefano de panfilis Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Mai 2013 00:59 An: Miguel Carrillo Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: Re: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today dear Miguel, only the chapter 3 part of cockpit is ready!! the rest still to be finalised. as you migth remember this will be ready for our weekly phc of this thuesday, so do not to distribute the cockpit now as this can create huge misunderstandings..... on the other end, if you mean that the comments of your colleagues are on chapter 3, than yes fwd them immediately to thorsten and me so we can adjust everything before this thuesday. did the others testbed team colleagues checked their own chapters as agreed and reported in the last meeting minute? ciao, stefano 2013/5/16 Miguel Carrillo > Hi, I forwarded this to my collegues in TID and got a waterfall of comments. The conclusion is that this is very old and that does not conform to the new list for FI-WARE. So 2 things to the to-do list: Updating this Creating the tickets. Last time it was Paolo who did it. I guess that Stefano can find someone to fix this for the coming integrations. Best regards, Miguel El 16/05/2013 14:46, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Stefano, I finished editing with due respect of WP3 https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today dear all, please find attached the minutes of the phc of today. please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something you'd like to correct. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Fri May 17 10:54:10 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:54:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc Message-ID: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04ADBB@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> When: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM. Greenwich Standard Time *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Phone details: Phone Number: https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ ID for phone connection: 2210382800 Webex details: Link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2468 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri May 17 12:32:42 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:32:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51952913.8030708@tid.es> Message-ID: dear Thomas, thank you very much. i'll take care of the table, thank you any way of your kind offer. ciao, stefano 2013/5/17 Banniza, Thomas-Rolf (Thomas-Rolf) < thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com> > Dear Stefano,**** > > ** ** > > according to topic 1 from minutes of last telco?s meeting minutes**** > > ( AP: All to check by 15 May e.o.b. the list of GE implentations already > provided in the forge in > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2. > ),**** > > I have updated for WP7 the ?June branches? of the document trees for the > deliverables linked from > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2 > .**** > > ** ** > > As far as I have understood, you will use this information to update the > table > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit in > the Testbed V2 Implementation Cockpit.**** > > ** ** > > Is this correct or should I do further things? (Thorsten?s mail from > 16/05/2013 14:46, see below, suggests that he has also updated the cockpit > tabe???)**** > > ** ** > > Best regards,**** > > Thomas**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Von:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *Im Auftrag von *stefano de > panfilis > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 17. Mai 2013 00:59 > *An:* Miguel Carrillo > *Cc:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Betreff:* Re: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today**** > > ** ** > > dear Miguel,**** > > **** > > only the chapter 3 part of cockpit is ready!! the rest still to be > finalised. as you migth remember this will be ready for our weekly phc of > this thuesday, so do not to distribute the cockpit now as this can create > huge misunderstandings.....**** > > **** > > on the other end, if you mean that the comments of your colleagues are on > chapter 3, than yes fwd them immediately to thorsten and me so we can > adjust everything before this thuesday.**** > > **** > > did the others testbed team colleagues checked their own chapters as > agreed and reported in the last meeting minute?**** > > **** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > ** ** > > 2013/5/16 Miguel Carrillo **** > > Hi, > > I forwarded this to my collegues in TID and got a waterfall of comments. > The conclusion is that this is very old and that does not conform to the > new list for FI-WARE. > > So 2 things to the to-do list: > Updating this > Creating the tickets. > > Last time it was Paolo who did it. I guess that Stefano can find someone > to fix this for the coming integrations.**** > > > > Best regards, > > Miguel**** > > El 16/05/2013 14:46, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?:**** > > Hi Stefano,**** > > I finished editing with due respect of WP3**** > > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit > **** > > **** > > Best,**** > > /Thorsten**** > > **** > > *From:* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ > mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] > *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis**** > > > *Sent:* Dienstag, 14. Mai 2013 11:49 > *To:* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu**** > > *Subject:* [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today**** > > **** > > dear all,**** > > **** > > please find attached the minutes of the phc of today.**** > > please let me know if i missed anything important or there is something > you'd like to correct.**** > > **** > > ciao,**** > > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________**** > > Fiware-testbed mailing list**** > > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu**** > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed**** > > > > **** > > -- **** > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------**** > > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco**** > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica **** > > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 **** > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N **** > > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) **** > > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 **** > > ** ** > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es**** > > ** ** > > Follow FI-WARE on the net**** > > ** ** > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu**** > > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242**** > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware**** > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932**** > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx**** > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed**** > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From depa at eng.it Thu May 16 21:51:46 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 19:51:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: Re: minutes of the phc of today In-Reply-To: <51952913.8030708@tid.es> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD664610894B8@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <51952913.8030708@tid.es> Message-ID: <588948905-1368733719-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-107634359-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Miguel, Only chapter 3 is ready, all the rest not yet!!! We agreed to make it public on tuesday following our weekly call, please keep with the decisions made. If the comments are related to chapter 3, than please fwd immediately to thorsten and me. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Miguel Carrillo Sender: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:44:35 To: Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the phc of today _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Sat May 18 01:49:58 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 01:49:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] cockpit v2 ready Message-ID: dear all, the implementation cockpit v2 page at ( https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit ), is now ready for final check before use since our next phc as agreed. the only section i have problem to update with respect to the installation and administration guide page (both april and june subsections) is iot which indeed is marked in red. infact the missmatch between the two pages are too big and unclear to me. please salvatore (and thierry) can you clarify? there is also a single missmatch with the june section which i do not know how to solve (publsh subscribe ges family ...). please Miguel to verify it with Carlos. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk Mon May 20 09:48:20 2013 From: t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk (t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk) Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 08:48:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] cockpit v2 ready In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2AAC0B6FF99A064C853BFB1C9295F3CCA789E668F0@EXMB05CMS.surrey.ac.uk> Hello Stefano, With regards to IoT, University of Surrey is planning to release a GEI of the Configuration Management for 30/06/13 (2.x.x). Apparently there is some missing information. Could you please point to me where you gather the information so that I can add it? Is this via the template (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Template:GETestbedRequirements )? Best regards, Tarek From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: 18 May 2013 00:50 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] cockpit v2 ready dear all, the implementation cockpit v2 page at (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V2_Implementation_Cockpit#Cockpit), is now ready for final check before use since our next phc as agreed. the only section i have problem to update with respect to the installation and administration guide page (both april and june subsections) is iot which indeed is marked in red. infact the missmatch between the two pages are too big and unclear to me. please salvatore (and thierry) can you clarify? there is also a single missmatch with the june section which i do not know how to solve (publsh subscribe ges family ...). please Miguel to verify it with Carlos. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Mon May 20 11:32:06 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M24 (WP10) - Final version for submission Message-ID: <1E876BE3B89B4E619DACF42AC69D1F20@YamahaRBX250> Dear all, Please find attached the WP10 PPR in its final version. As written before, the deadline for submitting the PPR (to the coordinator) was last week, and we are very late since we had to wait for all contributions from WP10 participants to be sent (though still three partners are missing). The PPR must be submitted today, so we kindly ask to those who want to have a final check to please let us have any comments and feedback within lunchtime, at 15.00 (CEST) this version will be submitted. With many thanks in advance and kind regards, Laura Pucci ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Stefano.DePanfilis at eng.it Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:09 PM Subject: FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M24 (WP10) - call for contribution Dear WP10 partners, This is to kindly ask your contribution to the D1.2.4, the Project Periodic Report we have to deliver before the next Review at M24. As WP leader ENG is responsible to ensure that all activities performed in WP10 are fully described in this PPR, that will cover the 2nd year of the project, from M13 to M24. We ask to each partner involved in WP10 to use the attached template and describe activities done, progresses towards objectives and main achievements from May 2012 to April 2013. Please consider that we will have to integrate your contributions before sending the part related to WP9 to the coordinator, so I kindly ask you to send the document back within the end of this week, in order to have enough time to review the full document. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Please feel free to contact me any doubts you may have. My best regards, Laura ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Laura Pucci Research and Innovation Directorate laura.pucci at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Terragneta, 90 - 80058 Torre Annunziata (NA) Tel. +39-081.8626884 Fax +39-081.8626819 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.4-FI-WARE_Periodic_Peport-M13-M24_WP10_v_Final.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 295450 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue May 21 10:13:07 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:13:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Confcall today? Message-ID: <519B2C93.8060104@tid.es> Dear all, Henar and I have been on the WP10 call for a while but we continue hearing an annoying tune with a voice saying that "the leader has not yet arrived". Any news? Was it not scheduled for today? BR Mgiuel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Tue May 21 10:51:22 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:51:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc Message-ID: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04B6EF@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> When: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM. Greenwich Standard Time *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Phone details: Phone Number: https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ ID for phone connection: 2210382800 Webex details: Link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2512 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Tue May 21 10:53:48 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:53:48 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc Message-ID: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04B73D@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> When: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:00 AM-9:00 AM. Greenwich Standard Time *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Phone details: Phone Number: https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ ID for phone connection: 2210382800 Webex details: Link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2512 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue May 21 19:20:11 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:20:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of the today phc Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the minutes of our weekly phc. if anything missing or incorrect please let me know. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_21_05_2013.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 177594 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed May 22 01:31:56 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 01:31:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] =?windows-1252?q?Fwd=3A_Observations_regarding_r?= =?windows-1252?q?ejection_of_deliverable_=93D10=2E5=2E1_Report_on_Validat?= =?windows-1252?q?ion_Process_including_Validation_with_Use_Case_projects?= =?windows-1252?q?=94?= In-Reply-To: <519C03C3.5060408@tid.es> References: <519C03C3.5060408@tid.es> Message-ID: <519C03EC.6080804@tid.es> FYI -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Observations regarding rejection of deliverable ?D10.5.1 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects? Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 01:31:15 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Ragnar.Bergstrom at ec.europa.eu CC: Fatelnig Peter , EC - Jes?s Villasante , Miguel Carrillo , stefano de panfilis , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" , "subsidies at tid.es" Dear Arian, Ragnar, Peter, Jesus, After careful analysis of the report associated to the M18 review, we would like to submit to you the following observations regarding comments provided in the review report that you provided as justification of the rejection of deliverable ?D10.5.1 Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects?. Please take them into account in the final assessment of this deliverable during the 2nd year review. Your feedback, of course, is more than welcome. We will be also happy to provide any further clarifications if needed. We leave to you the decision on how/when to share this with the project reviewers. Thanks and best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro 1. ?The validation process described in the document is generally well thought and detailed; however, it has been devised without sufficient consideration of the FI-WARE project and FI-WARE Releases.? Observation by FI-WARE: - The validation process was initially proposed by FI-WARE to the Use-Case projects. This approach was discussed and agreed by representatives of the Use-Case projects within the Architecture Board. - The architecture board recognized the reviewers comments in M6 and FI-WARE proposed a subsequent ?initial feedback survey? to cater for short-term feedback cycle and to allow feedback on the first Testbed instances (therefore being closely aligned with the FI-WARE project and FI-WARE release ? major FI-WARE release end of M17/30.09.2012 - survey send out: Di 02.10.2012 01:03). - Subsequent and proposed validation schedules are by definition of the process to be aligned within the involved stakeholders: FI-WARE and use case projects. There is no defined schedule by the validation process, therefore alignment towards subsequent FI-WARE Release is part of the involved partners and not of the process. The process allows maximum flexibility. 2. ?The validation approach is also considered insufficient, in view of what is envisaged in the DoW in supporting Use Case projects on deployment, execution and validation of the conceptual prototypes in respect of the available GEs. ? Observation by FI-WARE: - FI-WARE Testbed Team including the GE instances owner gave continuous support to the UC projects in the access and use of the GEis of interest. Due to this continuous support FI-WARE provided dedicated webinars for each chapter and sometimes more for the same chapter in order to cover different aspects on different GEis. This continuous support welcomed by the UCs (it can be seen in the answers of the "first initial survey") is not explicitly reported in the deliverable as we intend it more to describe the validation itself rather than the support provided. - FI-WARE agrees with the reviewers comments that the validation process as outlined and executed within the FI-WARE project within Task 10.5 does not completely follow the description of the task in the DoW ? but again as this was decided and discussed within the highest possible technology board (the FI-WARE architecture board) this deviation from the DoW is in line with all related parties and the deviation in general should be acceptable. As changes to the DoW take time, these changes in the process could only be reflected as part of the upcoming amendment 4 to the DoW. 3. ?According to the deliverable, the design phase of FI-WARE incorporates requirements that have been successfully communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters. As the link between Use Case requirements and the actual content of the individual chapters is not readily traceable, this has a significant impact on the validation, and the extent to which the Agile best practices have been embraced. [..]The available questionnaire is presently basic, and is a long way off from providing the validation required to enrich the characterization of Use Case scenarios (as a contribution towards Phase 2 trials) and generally boost GE uptake. Observation by FI-WARE - The D.10.5.1 deliverables states: ?The design phase occurs taking care also requirements that have been successfully communicated from the Use Cases Projects to the FI-WARE chapters.? ? which should imply a given fact that requirements actually were formally communicated and does not imply that these requirements can be tracked throughout the whole process in the current way, agile is implemented and ?lived?. The deliverable in this point may have wrongly lead to the assumption that there were successfully communicated requirements, which the validation team itself couldn?t really judge or imply. As the deliverable outlined later there is no tight linkage between defined requirements and the features provided. - Secondly the decision taken by the Architecture board was bond to the fact that validation based on all relevant features/epics provided by the FI-WARE project was not reasonable for the given amount of time and expected efforts - FI-WARE features do comprise of more than 900 features (please bear in mind that only limited resources were foreseen in the DoW to actually execute on the validation task towards the core platform). - Finally it was decided by the Architecture board that a ?validation questionnaire? to be provided by FI-WARE has to cater for validation and mainly will be based upon questions related to ?validation context? and ?generic enablers? and not based on features and requirements. The use case projects therefore were only bound to give the scenarios and their descriptions to FI-WARE and not their requirements. - Enrichment of the characterization of use case scenarios and boost of GE uptake was not in scope of the validation approach as implied in the reviewer statement. - As the amendment 4 foresees there will be again a reiteration of the validation process towards the phase 2 projects and their trials, where further changes in the process are currently being considered by the architecture board, potentially leading to a tighter linkage between requirements and GEs which might lead to a better validation. E.g. it is foreseen that use case projects will input their requirements to GE-based trackers and not to a common fi-ware tracker any more. One of the feedbacks received by the use case projects almost speaks for itself: As a general impression, the validation questions were quite helpful to provide feedback. The only issue we faced in our case was due to the fact that we evaluated the GEs per prototype component and not for specific scenarios. 4. Additionally, how testing and evaluation would be conducted in relation to the non-functional capabilities that are listed for the first releases in the Technical Roadmap is yet to be described. Observation by FI-WARE - Checking non-functional capabilities was again reiterated within the architecture board and no common consensus could be found towards the validation process. This recommendation will be taken into the next discussion which will redefine the process for FIWARE v2 (but will not be part of the D.10.5.2 deliverable as for time constraints: phase 2 projects did not start to redefine the validation process and potentially won?t do so for the next two month ) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed May 22 12:27:43 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:27:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] ppr revised according to the phc of yesterday Message-ID: dear all, as immediate reaction to an ap agreed yesterday and minuted about the ppr, please find attached a revised version of the ppr. in summary i took out all "individual" refernces from the first part making it a wp view and than harmonising those information in the relevant task descriptions. it means there is no change in the content only the correct positioning of it in the report. please have a look at it by today so finally we will submit tomorrow. reading again this ppr i'd like to thank you all again for the huge and outstanding work provided in the period! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.4-FI-WARE_Periodic_Peport-M13-M24_WP10_vFinal_depa.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 293482 bytes Desc: not available URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Fri May 24 14:38:43 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:38:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] ppr revised according to the phc of yesterday - submitted version References: Message-ID: <8686ADA16F024CD0AD30E278C57155BA@YamahaRBX250> Dear all, For convenience, please find attached the final version of the WP10 report sent to the coordinator for the PPR (addressing comments coming from IBM-CH and INRIA). Regards Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: stefano de panfilis To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:27 PM Subject: [Fiware-testbed] ppr revised according to the phc of yesterday dear all, as immediate reaction to an ap agreed yesterday and minuted about the ppr, please find attached a revised version of the ppr. in summary i took out all "individual" refernces from the first part making it a wp view and than harmonising those information in the relevant task descriptions. it means there is no change in the content only the correct positioning of it in the report. please have a look at it by today so finally we will submit tomorrow. reading again this ppr i'd like to thank you all again for the huge and outstanding work provided in the period! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.4-FI-WARE_Periodic_Peport-M13-M24_WP10_vFinal_4.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 295688 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Mon May 27 16:46:05 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:46:05 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc Message-ID: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04D112@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> When: Occurs every Monday from 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM effective 10/1/2012. Europe/Budapest *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Phone details: Phone Number: https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ ID for phone connection: 2210382800 Webex details: Link: https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3731 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Mon May 27 16:54:34 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:54:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc In-Reply-To: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04D112@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> References: <792F40D951AC71438502A7FB0501E8AB04D112@DEMUMBX011.nsn-intra.net> Message-ID: <51A373AA.5070400@nsn.com> Hi, please ignore my previous mail. Br, Loci On 05/27/2013 04:46 PM, Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) wrote: > > Event Invitation > > Title: > > > > FI-WARE WP10 weekly phc > > Location: > > > > When: > > > > Occurs every Monday effective 10/01/2012 from 05:00 PM to 06:00 PM. > > Organizer: > > > > Nemeth, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) > > Description: > > > > When: Occurs every Monday from 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM effective 10/1/2012. > Europe/Budapest Phone details: Phone Number: > https://www2.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/nvc/ ID for phone connection: > 2210382800 Webex details: Link: > https://nsn.webex.com/nsn/j.php?ED=248089647&UID=0&PW=NYTExMDU5OTM1&RT=MTgjMjU%3D > Meeting Number: 704 335 226 Meeting Password: wp10 > > Comment: > > > > Attendees: > > > > > 'fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu' > > 'ext Salvatore Longo' > > 'ext Moltchanov Boris' > > 'ext Clara M Pezuela Robles' > > 'ext Hans.Einsiedler at telekom.de' > > 'ext Heijnen Henk' > -- L?r?nt N?meth R&D Team Leader Research topics: Software Defined Networking, Network Virtualization Nokia Siemens Networks Kft. H-1092 Budapest, K?ztelek u. 6. Mobile: +36209849340 Fax: +3612154766 lorant.nemeth at nsn.com http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/ This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. Local registered entity information: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: