[Fiware-testbed] FW: Initial version of 10.5.2 validation report

[Sandfuchs, Thorsten]

Dear colleagues,
On Monday the WPL/WPA decided that we should submit the deliverable to the EC, despite we have some missing deep analysis, but to keep the time line.

I would like you to do a review on the content an get back to me if you think we can and should submit this without major changes.

Thanks in advance,

                                                                /Thorsten

From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten
Sent: Montag, 29. April 2013 15:59
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpa] FW: Initial version of 10.5.2 validation report


Dear colleagues,

find attached the doc version of the D.10.5.2 deliverable which is due in M24. You can enter comments and text in the doc-version and I will integrate it later to the wiki and the final deliverable.



I would say, the document currently provides the mere basis of this report - e.g. in chapter 6 there is a really really small initial analysis more touching on how the general process of analysis and provisioning of answers did work and not providing a deep analysis of the answers given by the use case projects.

The reviewers might expect that this deliverable really assesses the complete validation process and summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs. introduced.



As discussed in the WPL/WPA meeting, we will target to submit it - with your corrections - in time, and not doing a deep analysis.



It might be needed that we have the rationale behind this in-time-submission in the executive summary - so that reviewers can touch on this.

Rational I heard were (not phrasing it like this, just a summary for further :



-          Timing problems (rather go for development, than more papers)

-          Feedback from the UC projects was not very verbose, therefore there is not much to comment on

-          Feedback and all of the answers provided until "today" could be part of the review (in plain) - delaying the deliverable might lead to non of the answers being there "in time".



I'm as well attaching the excel table, which allows a more deeper analysis of the answers (With the help of "pivot"-tables there are quite nice things to do in order to analyse the resuts). You can play around with these tables on your own.



Our discussion was as well to have another relevant/potential chapter that

-          Every WPL gives a statement on "his" evaluation touching on

o   What got validated

o   Summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs

o   Major actions the WP take

o   General assumption about the validation in relation to each of the use cases

-          Another chapter: e.g. could explain to a given reader of the document how to use these pivot tables in order to enable somebody to do this kind of "analysis" on his own.



Thanks for your support in any case & best regards,



                                                                /Thorsten



--

Thorsten Sandfuchs

SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com/>


Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx

Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.

This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.

Please consider the environment before printing this mail!





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130502/5b2b7fe4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D1052_WP10_generated.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1795982 bytes
Desc: D1052_WP10_generated.docx
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130502/5b2b7fe4/attachment.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 93706 bytes
Desc: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130502/5b2b7fe4/attachment.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130502/5b2b7fe4/attachment.txt>