From t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk Fri Nov 1 13:50:01 2013 From: t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk (t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:50:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648607EBF9@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648607EBF9@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <2AAC0B6FF99A064C853BFB1C9295F3CCB982DD6D27@EXMB05CMS.surrey.ac.uk> Hello Thorsten, To the best of my understanding I have provided the initial validation analysis content for FINSENY in the wiki. May I say that the linked report was only 4 pages and did not have a detailed analysis of each of the GEs that were selected/tested. Maybe Salvatore can somehow extract more information when he comes back. In the meantime I will try to improve on it if possible. Any comments are welcome. Best regards, Tarek ------------------------------------------------------------- Tarek Elsaleh Research Officer Centre for Commuication Systems Research (CCSR) Department of Electronic Engineering University of Surrey Guildford, GU2 7XH Tel: 01483 689485 ------------------------------------------------------------- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: 31 October 2013 12:14 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear colleagues, let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis. We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes In the Phc we distributed the work like this: John -> smart agrifood Clara -> Envirofi Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY Thorsten -> FINEST Pier -> Instant Mobility Stefano -> OUTSMART FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!) If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters. As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there - therefore I think it's easy to start. Timeline: * analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November. * There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management. * Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!) * 1st review to start on the 6th of November * still many open contributions missing for the other chapters Thanks for all of your constant support, /Thorsten Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)): == Scenario overview == {{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}} == GE specific questions == {{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }} == GE specific question and provided answers == ; Lows : something ; High : something == Comments by FI-WARE Management == {{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment: * was the usage as anticipated * are we happy with the results/validation * what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles * what would we do again (as being rated high) }} Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Nov 4 18:01:58 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:01:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE Project extension In-Reply-To: <52777E04.6030001@tid.es> References: <5274F26A.8050200@tid.es> <52777E04.6030001@tid.es> Message-ID: fyi ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: 2013/11/4 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE Project extension To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Hi, This is the email with questions about FI-WARE project extension that I sent to Arian. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE Project extension Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 13:39:06 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Dear Arian, As already commented to Jesus and you, we have opened a thread of discussion within FI-WARE about an extension of 4 months to the project in line with the recommendation given in the last review report. In order to give a definitive answer, some partners are asking for some elaborated answer to the following questions: 1. What kind of activities are foreseen during the extended period ? Would they only be related to support, dissemination and training ? 2. Will a given FI-WARE GEi owner be able to chose between a) closing its contribution to FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and its FI-WARE GEi development activities as already planned in the DoW (i.e., delivering updated GE Open Specifications as well as GEi software, testing plans and related documentation in month 33, that is end of January) or b) delay them to be in month 36 ? Ability to choose would be certainly useful, because some GEi owners can adapt to the extension provided that a delay in deliverables is approved, while others can live with the extension but provided that they can close their activities in the dates originally planned in the DoW. Telefonica, as coordinator, doesn't see any problem allowing a partner to close its activities as planned in the DoW. Just to avoid any burden we most probably would submit all the mentioned deliverables in month 36 (despite some partners would submit them internally at month 33) 3. Could month 36 be preserved as the date for submission of deliverables in WP11 (exploitation) ? 4. Could month 40 be defined as the date for submission of deliverables linked to WP12 (communication, collaboration and dissemination) ? 5. Can partners assuming a WPL or WPA role discontinue that role in month 36 if another partner is ready to take over their role until the end of the project ? Could you please answer these questions ? This and any other information that may be helpful to understand what the extension will mean in terms of workload would be certainly helpful to reach an agreement within the consortia as we would love to during this upcoming week. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Nov 4 18:04:38 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:04:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] tomorrow phc: i'm travelling to vilnius! Message-ID: dear all, tomorrow morning at the time of our traditional weekly phc i'll be travelling to vilnius so i'm not bale to attend nor to manage the call. however if there is the need to keep it, feel free to have it and please take the minutes. this case i kindly ask miguel, if he can, to manage the call in my behalf. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 4 18:11:13 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:11:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] tomorrow phc: i'm travelling to vilnius! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5277D531.4070103@tid.es> Dear all, Up to you. Please fill this poll in to see if we should have it depending on your preferences: * http://www.doodle.com/euqe5cxz5h9bench#table B.R. Miguel El 04/11/2013 18:04, stefano de panfilis escribi?: dear all, tomorrow morning at the time of our traditional weekly phc i'll be travelling to vilnius so i'm not bale to attend nor to manage the call. however if there is the need to keep it, feel free to have it and please take the minutes. this case i kindly ask miguel, if he can, to manage the call in my behalf. ciao, stefano -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Nov 5 09:37:34 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:37:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] tomorrow phc: i'm travelling to vilnius! In-Reply-To: <5277D531.4070103@tid.es> References: <5277D531.4070103@tid.es> Message-ID: <5278AE4E.7080802@tid.es> Dear all, After a not particularly amazing number of answers, none of them positive, we have to cancel the confcall today. Best regards, Miguel El 04/11/2013 18:11, Miguel Carrillo escribi?: Dear all, Up to you. Please fill this poll in to see if we should have it depending on your preferences: * http://www.doodle.com/euqe5cxz5h9bench#table B.R. Miguel El 04/11/2013 18:04, stefano de panfilis escribi?: dear all, tomorrow morning at the time of our traditional weekly phc i'll be travelling to vilnius so i'm not bale to attend nor to manage the call. however if there is the need to keep it, feel free to have it and please take the minutes. this case i kindly ask miguel, if he can, to manage the call in my behalf. ciao, stefano -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Tue Nov 5 17:03:40 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:03:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648608D2D7@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, Update concerning the validation analysis, as we didn't get the chance to meet in the phc today: I compiled the current version of the deliverable as doc attached for your consideration and feedback/suggestions and perhaps a small review if some blindingly open things :) There will be a "real" review process, once the contributions below are more finalized. If somebody would kindly step up to nominate himself as a reviewer, this would be highly appreciated - timeframe would be roughly between Friday this week and Thursday next week (14th of nov). Contributions either go to the wiki directly or to the doc and I could merge them to the wiki for you... Best regards, /Thorsten From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2013 13:14 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear colleagues, let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis. We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes In the Phc we distributed the work like this: John -> smart agrifood Clara -> Envirofi Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY Thorsten -> FINEST Pier -> Instant Mobility Stefano -> OUTSMART FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!) If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters. As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there - therefore I think it's easy to start. Timeline: * analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November. * There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management. * Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!) * 1st review to start on the 6th of November * still many open contributions missing for the other chapters Thanks for all of your constant support, /Thorsten Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)): == Scenario overview == {{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}} == GE specific questions == {{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }} == GE specific question and provided answers == ; Lows : something ; High : something == Comments by FI-WARE Management == {{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment: * was the usage as anticipated * are we happy with the results/validation * what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles * what would we do again (as being rated high) }} Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v3_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1749550 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v3_generated.docx URL: From Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu Wed Nov 6 15:27:16 2013 From: Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu (Salvatore Longo) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:27:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc In-Reply-To: <2AAC0B6FF99A064C853BFB1C9295F3CCB982DD6D27@EXMB05CMS.surrey.ac.uk> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648607EBF9@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <2AAC0B6FF99A064C853BFB1C9295F3CCB982DD6D27@EXMB05CMS.surrey.ac.uk> Message-ID: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A5472E8C27@PALLENE.office.hd> Dear All, I did a small contribution on the validation analysis for the FINSENY in the wiki. I have to say that based on the 4 pages doc, Tarek did already a good job and, in my opinion, there are no more information that could be extract from the doc. Anyway a feedback from Thorsten would be appreciated. Best Regards, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk Sent: Freitag, 1. November 2013 13:50 To: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Hello Thorsten, To the best of my understanding I have provided the initial validation analysis content for FINSENY in the wiki. May I say that the linked report was only 4 pages and did not have a detailed analysis of each of the GEs that were selected/tested. Maybe Salvatore can somehow extract more information when he comes back. In the meantime I will try to improve on it if possible. Any comments are welcome. Best regards, Tarek ------------------------------------------------------------- Tarek Elsaleh Research Officer Centre for Commuication Systems Research (CCSR) Department of Electronic Engineering University of Surrey Guildford, GU2 7XH Tel: 01483 689485 ------------------------------------------------------------- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: 31 October 2013 12:14 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear colleagues, let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis. We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes In the Phc we distributed the work like this: John -> smart agrifood Clara -> Envirofi Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY Thorsten -> FINEST Pier -> Instant Mobility Stefano -> OUTSMART FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!) If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters. As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there - therefore I think it's easy to start. Timeline: * analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November. * There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management. * Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!) * 1st review to start on the 6th of November * still many open contributions missing for the other chapters Thanks for all of your constant support, /Thorsten Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)): == Scenario overview == {{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}} == GE specific questions == {{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }} == GE specific question and provided answers == ; Lows : something ; High : something == Comments by FI-WARE Management == {{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment: * was the usage as anticipated * are we happy with the results/validation * what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles * what would we do again (as being rated high) }} Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Nov 6 16:21:30 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:21:30 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc In-Reply-To: <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A5472E8C27@PALLENE.office.hd> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648607EBF9@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <2AAC0B6FF99A064C853BFB1C9295F3CCB982DD6D27@EXMB05CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <5DCCEFAAAAD37745A888BC14F42BF4A5472E8C27@PALLENE.office.hd> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6648608E98A@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Thank you for both of your contributions - highly appreciated. For the 4 pager it was almost the hardest part to get something relevant out there - so thanks a lot! From: Salvatore Longo [mailto:Salvatore.Longo at neclab.eu] Sent: Mittwoch, 6. November 2013 15:27 To: t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk; Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear All, I did a small contribution on the validation analysis for the FINSENY in the wiki. I have to say that based on the 4 pages doc, Tarek did already a good job and, in my opinion, there are no more information that could be extract from the doc. Anyway a feedback from Thorsten would be appreciated. Best Regards, - Salvatore Longo ________________________________ Salvatore Longo Software Engineer NEC Europe Ltd. Kurf?rsten-Anlage 36 D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 246 Fax. +49/(0) 62 21/43 42 - 115 E-Mail: Salvatore.longo at neclab.eu NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 ________________________________ From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of t.elsaleh at surrey.ac.uk Sent: Freitag, 1. November 2013 13:50 To: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Hello Thorsten, To the best of my understanding I have provided the initial validation analysis content for FINSENY in the wiki. May I say that the linked report was only 4 pages and did not have a detailed analysis of each of the GEs that were selected/tested. Maybe Salvatore can somehow extract more information when he comes back. In the meantime I will try to improve on it if possible. Any comments are welcome. Best regards, Tarek ------------------------------------------------------------- Tarek Elsaleh Research Officer Centre for Commuication Systems Research (CCSR) Department of Electronic Engineering University of Surrey Guildford, GU2 7XH Tel: 01483 689485 ------------------------------------------------------------- From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: 31 October 2013 12:14 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear colleagues, let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis. We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes In the Phc we distributed the work like this: John -> smart agrifood Clara -> Envirofi Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY Thorsten -> FINEST Pier -> Instant Mobility Stefano -> OUTSMART FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!) If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters. As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there - therefore I think it's easy to start. Timeline: * analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November. * There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management. * Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!) * 1st review to start on the 6th of November * still many open contributions missing for the other chapters Thanks for all of your constant support, /Thorsten Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)): == Scenario overview == {{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}} == GE specific questions == {{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }} == GE specific question and provided answers == ; Lows : something ; High : something == Comments by FI-WARE Management == {{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment: * was the usage as anticipated * are we happy with the results/validation * what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles * what would we do again (as being rated high) }} Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Thu Nov 7 17:38:31 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:38:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] THIRD REMIND: Call for contribution: FI-WARE WP10 Periodic Report - M25 - M30 - Deadline TOMORROW Message-ID: <50B05F7286D7465BB13E1C8667770558@YamahaRBX250> Dear all, this is a URGENT remind to those partners listed below that are still missing in sending their contributions to the PPR for M25-M30 . - FT -TRDF -ALU-I -FRAUNHOFER -INRIA -UPM -RED.es -ZHAW -DFKI -USAAR-CISPA -EPROS -NSNG1 - Waiting for THALES to send the contribution so to fit in the new template as required by teh coordinator. Please, I kindly ask you to react quickly. Attached again the template to be compiled with activities performed from May to October 2013, only at task level. Please send me your contribution within TOMORROW, November 8th EoB. with thanks and regards, laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:41 PM Subject: SECOND REMIND: Call for contribution: FI-WARE WP10 Periodic Report - M25 - M30 - Deadline October 24 Dear all, this is a second remind for all partners that still haven't sent their contributions for M25-M30 Periodic Report. Please bear in mind that, after having received your contributions, we need also time to integrate and check their consistency and, after this, we should send the whole report to you for a very final check. I kindly ask to those partners to react quickly, since the deadline to send the PPR compiled back to the coordinator was actually today. Following the list of missing contributions. -SAP -FT -NSN-H -DT -TRDF -ALU-I -FRAUNHOFER -INRIA -UPM -RED.es -ZHAW 3 -DFKI 2 -USAAR-CISPA 1 -EPROS 2 -NSNG1 With thanks and regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:02 AM Subject: REMIND: Call for contribution: FI-WARE WP10 Periodic Report - M25 - M30 - Deadline October 24 Dear all, this is a kind remind to send the M25-M30 PPR within today EoB. Up to now only three partners contributed. Please consider that we need time to integrate and review all your contributions and to circulate the overall document to all of you for a final check, this process should be finished by October 30th, it's not so much time. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Best regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 2:16 PM Subject: Call for contribution: FI-WARE WP10 Periodic Report - M25 - M30 - Deadline October 24 Dear WP10 partners, at the end of October we have to submit a new version of D1.2.5, the Project Periodic Report covering the last six months (M25 - M30). The coordinator circulated a new template for this PPR, addressing the remarks coming from reviewers, asking for a description of activities detailed by each partner per task. Please kindly fill-in the attached template with activities performed from May to October 2013 at task level (describing also main progresses, possible deviations/corrective actions). For each task involved partners are already listed. The deadline to send us the PPR compiled is October 24th. The first section of D1.2.5 concerning overall progresses/results/etc at WP level, will be compiled by ENG. For sure, that part could and will be integrated later on, taking into account possible further details coming from your contributions, after we received them. The section related to spent effort will be completed as soon as we receive the updated figures from the Coordinator. Please contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, Laura -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laura Pucci Research and Innovation Directorate laura.pucci at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Terragneta, 90 - 80058 Torre Annunziata (NA) Tel. +39-081.8626884 Fax +39-081.8626819 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP10.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 226674 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Fri Nov 8 18:15:59 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:15:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - validation analysis - current status Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486090D39@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, please find attached the most current version with updated content in almost all chapters - thanks for every contribution done so far - I think the quality of the deliverable actually improved a lot over the last days - we are on a very good track - but still we need some content and overall a lot of "judgement" or "rationals" and/or "implemented measures", which can be only inputted from the project management team (juanjo/stefano?!). Overivew of missing content (AFAIT): 1. use case specific Clara -> Envirofi Stefano -> OUTSMART 2. Overview FI-WARE project management judgements in chapter "FI-WARE level analysis" (WPL or Juanjo/stefano) Additionally I would like to invite for review of the content as attached - please provide your feedback - even in "comments" where you think we hit the spot of the reviewers or where we still need to improve. The mitigation strategy for non-existing content currently would be: - Tuesday the latest I finalize the text & delete every missing contribution - Wednesday -> Thursday - final review - Next Friday - I can have the latest additions and feedback from the review of the commin weeks (the sooner you review, the better for me!!) - Next Friday: submission to EC as planned Any comments or additions, highly welcome. Wish everybody a nice weekend. /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2013 13:15 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc Dear colleagues, let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis. We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes In the Phc we distributed the work like this: John -> smart agrifood Clara -> Envirofi Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY Thorsten -> FINEST Pier -> Instant Mobility Stefano -> OUTSMART FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!) If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters. As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there - therefore I think it's easy to start. Timeline: * analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November. * There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management. * Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!) * 1st review to start on the 6th of November * still many open contributions missing for the other chapters Thanks for all of your constant support, /Thorsten Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)): == Scenario overview == {{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}} == GE specific questions == {{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }} == GE specific question and provided answers == ; Lows : something ; High : something == Comments by FI-WARE Management == {{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment: * was the usage as anticipated * are we happy with the results/validation * what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles * what would we do again (as being rated high) }} Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v4_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1825492 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v4_generated.docx URL: From lorant.nemeth at nsn.com Tue Nov 12 09:50:54 2013 From: lorant.nemeth at nsn.com (Lorant Nemeth) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:50:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Today phc Message-ID: <5281EBEE.9050001@nsn.com> Hi, due to an overlapping meeting, I'll not be able to join today (or will be late). Br, Loci -- L?r?nt N?meth R&D Team Leader Research topics: Software Defined Networking, Network Virtualization Nokia Solutions and Networks Kft. H-1092 Budapest, K?ztelek u. 6. Mobile: +36209849340 Fax: +3612154766 lorant.nemeth at nsn.com http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/ This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. Local registered entity information: From sgala at gsyc.es Tue Nov 12 10:42:00 2013 From: sgala at gsyc.es (Santiago Gala) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:42:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Kicked off the call Message-ID: <5281F7E8.1050904@gsyc.es> I got kicked off the call, several times. Last time, around 10:30, I am not able to rejoin as the Spanish number gives busy signal to me... Not sure if it is a local problem or a problem with the gateway. Sorry about this. In any case, Stefano connection had very bad quality and it was very difficult to follow the call. Regards, I'll keep trying. Santiago From mcp at tid.es Tue Nov 12 10:55:09 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:55:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Kicked off the call In-Reply-To: <5281F7E8.1050904@gsyc.es> References: <5281F7E8.1050904@gsyc.es> Message-ID: <5281FAFD.2000009@tid.es> It works fine from Madrid, there must be something causing trouble with the switch in Barcelona. The problem with the sound quality on Stefano's side has been going on for months now. However, this time got a bit better at some point... You will get sent the minutes of meeting so I guess that you'll get most of the info. BR Miguel El 12/11/2013 10:42, Santiago Gala escribi?: > I got kicked off the call, several times. > > Last time, around 10:30, I am not able to rejoin as the Spanish number > gives busy signal to me... Not sure if it is a local problem or a > problem with the gateway. > > Sorry about this. In any case, Stefano connection had very bad quality > and it was very difficult to follow the call. > > Regards, I'll keep trying. > Santiago > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Nov 12 19:29:11 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:29:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] catalogue status as for today Message-ID: ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Testbed-V2_catalogue_publication_status.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 49761 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Nov 12 19:44:31 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:44:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] minutes of today phc Message-ID: dear all, for your review. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP10_minute_12_11_2013.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 177409 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Nov 13 19:46:32 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:46:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v5_THS.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1999278 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v5_THS.docx URL: From henar at tid.es Thu Nov 14 08:10:03 2013 From: henar at tid.es (=?iso-8859-1?Q?HENAR_MU=D1OZ_FRUTOS?=) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:10:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Some guidelines for going to FI-LAB Message-ID: <9F2BAF5AA3E43A448F6B3DC7D4C56F584CA1694B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all It seems there are a lot of confusion about what is needed to go to FI-LAB. 1.- If your GE is a global instance, you need to provide an image in the testbed. Then, the testbed team will check it and deploy in the FI-LAB. You have to take into account, that your GE should be Oath-security, which means that your image should include it. 2.- If you GE is a dedicated instance you need to satisfy: 2.1- You need to create an image 2.2.- you need to create recipes for your GE. Tell me if you have any doubt. Regards, Henar ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 14 11:05:58 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:05:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Some guidelines for going to FI-LAB In-Reply-To: <9F2BAF5AA3E43A448F6B3DC7D4C56F584CA1694B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <9F2BAF5AA3E43A448F6B3DC7D4C56F584CA1694B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <5284A086.9040607@tid.es> Dear all, I would also like to remind you that there is a tutorial for the recipes here: * http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_create_recipes_for_the_GEs Best regards, Miguel El 14/11/2013 8:10, HENAR MU?OZ FRUTOS escribi?: Dear all It seems there are a lot of confusion about what is needed to go to FI-LAB. 1.- If your GE is a global instance, you need to provide an image in the testbed. Then, the testbed team will check it and deploy in the FI-LAB. You have to take into account, that your GE should be Oath-security, which means that your image should include it. 2.- If you GE is a dedicated instance you need to satisfy: 2.1- You need to create an image 2.2.- you need to create recipes for your GE. Tell me if you have any doubt. Regards, Henar ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 14 23:16:00 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:16:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: Dear Thorsten, here is a version of the document with few minor comments and adjustments from my side (I accepted all changes before introducing mine). Overall the document looks good, considering that the main concern is due to the limited amount of feedback received (i.e. few enablers actually validated); in my view better results couldn't be obtained with such a limited material to manage. I didn't provide answers to the main questions you raise in the doc, as I don't feel to have sufficient elements to draw specific conclusions. I wonder if there's the need to mention somewhere in the doc that I2ND GEs were not validated (except Cloud Proxy in conjunction with Cloud) as they were planned for R2 only. BR Pier Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs, Thorsten Inviato: mercoled? 13 novembre 2013 19:47 A: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v5_THS_PG.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1886114 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v5_THS_PG.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Nov 15 09:57:05 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:57:05 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day In-Reply-To: References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <27266_1384505829_5285E1E4_27266_8023_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1490E5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all, Here is my review. More comments up to you to integrate some changes and some small changes in the text. What about the Outsmart evaluation? If it is required I can do it but only during the week end :(. BR Thierry De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Garino Pierangelo Envoy? : jeudi 14 novembre 2013 23:16 ? : Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear Thorsten, here is a version of the document with few minor comments and adjustments from my side (I accepted all changes before introducing mine). Overall the document looks good, considering that the main concern is due to the limited amount of feedback received (i.e. few enablers actually validated); in my view better results couldn't be obtained with such a limited material to manage. I didn't provide answers to the main questions you raise in the doc, as I don't feel to have sufficient elements to draw specific conclusions. I wonder if there's the need to mention somewhere in the doc that I2ND GEs were not validated (except Cloud Proxy in conjunction with Cloud) as they were planned for R2 only. BR Pier Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs, Thorsten Inviato: mercoled? 13 novembre 2013 19:47 A: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v5_TNA.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 2015868 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v5_TNA.docx URL: From depa at eng.it Fri Nov 15 10:22:24 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:22:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: Re: R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day In-Reply-To: <27266_1384505829_5285E1E4_27266_8023_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1490E5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <27266_1384505829_5285E1E4_27266_8023_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1490E5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <2094620448-1384507346-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1737432390-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> I'm doing it at the moment. Thank you for your kind offer. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sender: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:57:05 To: Garino Pierangelo; Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Nov 15 11:33:28 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:33:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: Re: R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day In-Reply-To: <2094620448-1384507346-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1737432390-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486097396@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <27266_1384505829_5285E1E4_27266_8023_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1490E5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2094620448-1384507346-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1737432390-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: dear thorsten, outsmart done! it is rather poor, but it is what we do have ..... ciao, stefano 2013/11/15 : > I'm doing it at the moment. > Thank you for your kind offer. > > Ciao > Stefano > > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! > > -----Original Message----- > From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com > Sender: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:57:05 > To: Garino Pierangelo; Sandfuchs, Thorsten > Cc: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready > for review within the next business day > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Fri Nov 15 16:58:19 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:58:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report final version (submission postponed to monday) Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7CE3F@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, as juanjo seems to be busy and not in spain, there seems to be the weekend left for last fixes. If you can find any problems in the attached version of the deliverable, please let me know. Please use TRACK CHANGES if you change something in the file. This version is still not released to the final wiki (accessible to all use case projects and EC) - so it is NOT the real final one, but if no changes are there in the text any more, I would release it. I now deleted every "yellow" box in this version, still I would presume that the reviewers would find that FI-ware management did not comment a lot on the "findings" we unearthed, but that most probably will be the risk that we will face here. I as well compiled a possible "executive summary". Please carefully re-read the deliverable and I will do the move to the review-wiki on Monday morning, submission then on Monday EOB the latest. Thanks for everybodies dedication and support in this topic! Best, /Thorsten From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 19:47 To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Juanjo Hierro' Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v7_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 2040093 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v7_generated.docx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 18 07:43:10 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:43:10 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report final version (submission postponed to monday) In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7CE3F@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7CE3F@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5289B6FE.4030603@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, Thanks for your I have planed to review this deliverable before tomorrow, but if you want to deliver it today by all means, I won't object. After all, I quickly checked the yellow boxes where you asked for input and I understood they were not just for me but for all WPLs and WPAs (referred collectively as management since indeed architecture chapter WPs are managed through the direct involvement of WPLs and WPAs). Indeed, while I can provide comments in most of the cases, they shouldn't be so much different from those that can be provided by the WPLs/WPAs because most of the comments by UC projects, or data extracted from the questionnaires they have filled, go into details about usage of the GEis linked to the several chapters. I can carry out, though, a final review before tomorrow as I have just said. As you wish. But let me know so that I don't work in vain. If there is any particular section where my concrete input would relevant, please let me know. BTW, I found a couple of editorial issues when I quickly perform a first reading of the contents of the version you distributed last week ... have you fixed those in this version ? If you don't recall having fixed any editorial ... then I would suggest to carefully review the writing ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/11/13 16:58, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Dear colleagues, as juanjo seems to be busy and not in spain, there seems to be the weekend left for last fixes. If you can find any problems in the attached version of the deliverable, please let me know. Please use TRACK CHANGES if you change something in the file. This version is still not released to the final wiki (accessible to all use case projects and EC) - so it is NOT the real final one, but if no changes are there in the text any more, I would release it. I now deleted every "yellow" box in this version, still I would presume that the reviewers would find that FI-ware management did not comment a lot on the "findings" we unearthed, but that most probably will be the risk that we will face here. I as well compiled a possible "executive summary". Please carefully re-read the deliverable and I will do the move to the review-wiki on Monday morning, submission then on Monday EOB the latest. Thanks for everybodies dedication and support in this topic! Best, /Thorsten From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 19:47 To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Juanjo Hierro' Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Nov 18 11:33:01 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:33:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: integration report status and documentation status Message-ID: dear colleagues, please find attached the status of the integration test. we had already to deliver this, but the situation is that only wp3 and wp6 are fine (well wp6 simply becouse there aro no dependencies to test). the worstto say is that despite the offer to provide support no support has been provided (except wp3, thank you thortsen) thus no integration test was possible at all. our position is to deliver this deliverable as standing, of course this will affect also the effort accounted to wp10 that i'm going unilaterlay to reduce.... in addition you have also the situation of our check over the documentation. again as this table was sent end of september no actions have been taken. this is not part of the deliverable itself (we have to discuss where to put it), but of course affects the answers to lutz .... ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Testbed-Release_2.3_StatusReport.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 47591 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 18 17:33:55 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:33:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Probe Message-ID: <528A4173.3050905@tid.es> This is a test - please ignore -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From laura.pucci at eng.it Mon Nov 18 18:05:49 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:05:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fw: M25-M30 PPR - Feedback and effort justification needed by November 20 Message-ID: Dear all, due to some problems with the MLs I was not able to send you before this email. Now it seems that everything is working again (thanks to Miguel that quickly reacted to manage the issue with the admin/tech staff). Please read carefully the email below and kindly provide me your feedback/contribution within the requested deadline. With regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 2:00 PM Subject: M25-M30 PPR - Feedback and effort justification needed by November 20 Dear WP10 partners, I?m sending (please find it attached) the D1.2.5 almost complete for M25-M30 reporting period. As you can see, only TRDF and UPM didn?t send their contributions, all other partners please kindly have a quick check to see if anything is missing. In addition, this version also includes the figures depicting effort spent (detailed for each reporting period). In the section ?Follow-up of effort in WP 10? there are 5 partners still missing that should send a brief statement justifying the reason why they spent more/less effort WRT planned. Once we receive all your justifications regarding effort spent, Stefano will draw a general statement on the use of resources about WP10. The deadline to send your comments is November 20th at noon, otherwise the report will be sent to Javier as it is. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Best regards, Laura -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP10_V7.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 293528 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Tue Nov 19 10:41:51 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:41:51 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fw: M25-M30 PPR - Feedback and effort justification needed by November 20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7F0C5@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Hi Laura & colleagues, please change the summary-text on the main WP10 level in relation to validation questionnaire as indicated below: [cid:image001.png at 01CEE513.F303B990] The final version would read: * FI-WARE conducted a deep analysis of the answers to the validation questionnaire provided by the use case projects in phase one of the FI-WARE platform. The final analysis started in September upon the receiving of the last answers with intermediate analysis provided FI-WARE internally and on the 5th project review. The initially provided version sounds a bit like we didn't do anything prior to the submission of the last answers - which does not meet the facts. Thanks & best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of laura pucci Sent: Montag, 18. November 2013 18:06 To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fw: M25-M30 PPR - Feedback and effort justification needed by November 20 Importance: High Dear all, due to some problems with the MLs I was not able to send you before this email. Now it seems that everything is working again (thanks to Miguel that quickly reacted to manage the issue with the admin/tech staff). Please read carefully the email below and kindly provide me your feedback/contribution within the requested deadline. With regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 2:00 PM Subject: M25-M30 PPR - Feedback and effort justification needed by November 20 Dear WP10 partners, I'm sending (please find it attached) the D1.2.5 almost complete for M25-M30 reporting period. As you can see, only TRDF and UPM didn't send their contributions, all other partners please kindly have a quick check to see if anything is missing. In addition, this version also includes the figures depicting effort spent (detailed for each reporting period). In the section "Follow-up of effort in WP 10" there are 5 partners still missing that should send a brief statement justifying the reason why they spent more/less effort WRT planned. Once we receive all your justifications regarding effort spent, Stefano will draw a general statement on the use of resources about WP10. The deadline to send your comments is November 20th at noon, otherwise the report will be sent to Javier as it is. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Best regards, Laura -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 16202 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Nov 19 11:02:07 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:02:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Apologize but I have to leave audio now due to another meetng I have at 11am - Apologize and yes will catch up through the minutes Message-ID: <24145_1384855329_528B3721_24145_7628_7_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E020820427F0F@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Tue Nov 19 17:46:52 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:46:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] R: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report final version (submission postponed to monday) In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7CE3F@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7CE3F@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: Dear Thorsten, as defined in WP10 call today, I have added some comment in section 11 Validation methodology analysis. I activated the track changes so it should be easy identifying them, please review them and incorporate in the wiki if acceptable (maybe other WPLs can comment on them). BR Pier Da: fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs, Thorsten Inviato: venerd? 15 novembre 2013 16:58 A: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report final version (submission postponed to monday) Dear colleagues, as juanjo seems to be busy and not in spain, there seems to be the weekend left for last fixes. If you can find any problems in the attached version of the deliverable, please let me know. Please use TRACK CHANGES if you change something in the file. This version is still not released to the final wiki (accessible to all use case projects and EC) - so it is NOT the real final one, but if no changes are there in the text any more, I would release it. I now deleted every "yellow" box in this version, still I would presume that the reviewers would find that FI-ware management did not comment a lot on the "findings" we unearthed, but that most probably will be the risk that we will face here. I as well compiled a possible "executive summary". Please carefully re-read the deliverable and I will do the move to the review-wiki on Monday morning, submission then on Monday EOB the latest. Thanks for everybodies dedication and support in this topic! Best, /Thorsten From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 19:47 To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Juanjo Hierro' Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: D.10.5.2b validation analysis and report ready for review within the next business day Dear colleagues, please find the current version of the D.10.5.2b deliverable for your consideration and review (you have one business day). The latest changes I introduced are yet to be dully synced with the wiki, but this I will do tomorrow prior to final compilation. Of the deliverable on Friday. Please provide your feedback, comments or direct changes (please use the track-changes functionality!!) in the word version directly and send it back to me. What is open? - Especially for FI-WARE project management some more verbose information is highly needed e.g. in chapter FI-WARE level analysis (chapter 3.3). What did we draw out of the validation in this respect and how do we address the identified challenges? What was perceived good by fi-ware? - OUTSMART use case analysis is still missing - I will add some further and more details on the chapter 11 "validation methodology" - Review by all of the interested parties Additionally we need a fresh minded review of the deliverable and judgment whether we present the FI-WARE project "good enough" and actually to the high level, that we actually reached so far. Please take this seriously as I would imagine that this report might be considered for the next review as well in relation to GO or NO-GO decisions of your Generic Enablers! To ease up readability you might consider activating the "final markup"-view in word or, prior to the introduction of new changes, just accept all pending changes that the team did before. Thanks for any support & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052b_WP10_v7_generated-PG.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 2043233 bytes Desc: D1052b_WP10_v7_generated-PG.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Nov 20 10:25:10 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:25:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Final version of D.10.5.2.b validation analysis & recommendation for submission to EC Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A7FBA7@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, I hereby attach the final version of the deliverable "D.10.5.2b Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects" as docx. There is one last thing missing & it is commented in the doc: a link to a file, which I can't upload to the fi-ware-review forge. This is the last AP which is open: @Miguel: please upload the file (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3107/2013-10-07-validation-answers-to-validation-questionnaire-phase-one_updated_september.xlsx) and link it in the final doc. @all: please do a quick check if you find any blocking issues, which I overlook during compilation. @all: thanks again a lot for your very valuable contributions & the support given. Other than that I would recommend submission of this deliverable to the EC ASAP and not later than today, 14:00 (please send any veto until then to Miguel, Juanjo and me). Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.10.5.2b Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 2036252 bytes Desc: D.10.5.2b Report on Validation Process including Validation with Use Case projects.docx URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Nov 21 14:03:41 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:03:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] FYI: D.10.5.2b delivered Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486A81661@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, this is just to let you know that TID submitted D.10.5.2b successfully to the EC & the reviewers today on 11:23. Thanks again for all your contributions and hope for the best that this deliverable will be accepted. Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Nov 21 15:35:22 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:35:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] wp10 ppr Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the ppr i just transmitted to javier. very last changes within 17:00. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP10_V9.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 292875 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sgala at gsyc.es Mon Nov 25 21:57:11 2013 From: sgala at gsyc.es (Santiago Gala) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:57:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Conference call tomorrow at 10:00 Message-ID: <5293B9A7.8080509@gsyc.es> I don't think I will be able to be available tomorrow at the time of the call, but given the fact that our company has no resources in WP10 I don't think it is a big problem. In case that the agenda (I have not seen one sent as of now) requires URJC input I ask that either email is sent mentioning it or the input is delayed till another call. Also I ask that some minutes are posted for us to know if there is need of further collective action. Thanks in advance Santiago From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 28 20:27:42 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:27:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] open Spec (implcit/essential) legal notice - status for consortium & call to action In-Reply-To: <5295A435.6040009@tid.es> References: <5295A435.6040009@tid.es> Message-ID: <5297992E.4050709@tid.es> Dear all, Be aware that we are still linking the old open specification legal notice. And this is something the reviewers were looking at. It is so simple that it should take no time. The details are at the bottom, read on... Please fix asap. Best regards, Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] open Spec (implcit/essential) legal notice - status for consortium & call to action Fecha: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:50:13 +0100 De: Juanjo Hierro Para: Thanks Thorsten for raising this ! Indeed something to be fixed before the month 30 review (and very easy, btw) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 27/11/13 08:39, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Dear colleagues, Let me make you aware of a task that we send around in apps chapter, but most probably is relevant for "your" chapter as well (see arian email). Although it says "details on how to link will be provided", I think we can't wait any longer for this - and in some sense the task is a) easy and b) clear. ? 135 pages link still to either the one or the other old open specification legal notice ? For 66 pages there was a transition to the "new" open specification legal notice Frankly: the status & ratio is alarming. :) Related overview pages to ease up click-through & fixing this: NEW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(essential_patents_license)?limit=500 http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(implicit_patents_license)?limit=500 OLD: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Open_Specifications_Interim_Legal_Notice&limit=500 http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specifications_Legal_Notice&limit=500 It is really easy: 1. Click on both of the link in "OLD" - check if your component still linking wrongly legal notice 2. Change the link as appropriate to one or the other existing (if you don't know which one to link, as you legal contact, this has been agreed on FI-WARE level!) Judging by the email send around by arian, they will look into this & we should not have this 135:66 ratio! Best, /Thorsten (Note: the 135:66 ratio is computed out of the pure links mentioned above - there are some links e.g. the page itself, which might be counted and does not make sense to count - therefore in the end it will not be 135:66 rather 130:63 or something, but excuse this small impreciseness, I think these plus-minus-one is not the point :)) From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Heller, Markus Sent: Montag, 18. November 2013 19:13 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: [Fiware-apps] WP3: Check your License open Spec (implcit/essential) correct.....open spec legal notice usage in fi-ware wiki Hi all, please make sure that you have your license correctly written in the WIKI, this was a reviewer request. You have chosen implicit or essential license, please update then (most often "interim License" is used in your GEs in WP3). For SAP GEs we have corrected this, feel inspired. See what we wrote for Marketplace as an example (we chose essential ...) --> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.Marketplace You can check your license with these related overview pages to ease up click-through & fixing this: Who used new license "essential" or "implicit": NEW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(essential_patents_license)?limit=500 http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(implicit_patents_license)?limit=500 Who uses the outdated licenses: OLD: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Open_Specifications_Interim_Legal_Notice&limit=500 http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/FI-WARE_Open_Specifications_Legal_Notice&limit=500 What to do: Go to "License" are on top of WIKI page for your GE(s) and update license statement with a text. Attention, this is not really free text as you know, it is sort of standardized...So better just replace old link to "Interrim license "with link to your license. You have received mails on this from TID. So, If you find yourself in "OLD" then cross the water and join us in the "NEW" section... Best wishes Markus --- Below one old mail on this open task. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Sonntag, 23. Juni 2013 17:03 To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] ToDos from now and the following months Dear colleagues, I would like to highlight a number of points that we have to deal with, and we have to concentrate our efforts on, during the following weeks. All these points will be followed up regularly at our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls. Staty tuned regarding further clarifications that will come from your WPLs/WPAs or us in the following days. If someone believes there are additional points to add which require a close follow-up, please don't hesitate to comment. Now the list: * FI-WARE Catalogue: * Entries have to comply with the guidelines provided at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Working_with_the_FI-WARE_catalogue#Guidelines_on_what_to_write * A reference example can be found at: http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/application-mashup-wirecloud * Entries which do not comply with the guidelines or whose contents are considered weak will not be made visible and corresponding FI-WARE GEis will therefore not be made available as part of the FI-WARE OIL and Testbed, with potential implications in rejection of costs * Don't forget that FI-WARE GEi have to make public their terms of availability beyond the FI-PPP ("External availability" in "Terms and Conditions") * FI-WARE Legal Notice: * All FI-WARE specifications have to be updated (if not already) to make a reference to any of the two final Legal Notices that have been finally approved: * with implicit patents license: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(implicit_patents_license) * with explicit license on essential patents: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(essential_patents_license) * Detailed instructions about how to update the corresponding sections will be provided * Detailed revision of FI-WARE GEi software and accompanying documentation: * A more in-depth and demanding revision will be carried out from now until end of July, targeted to avoid publication of FI-WARE GEis that we may foresee can receive criticism by developers beyond the research community. * This revision will be carried by programmers from Telefonica and Engineering, other volunteers are welcome. * Note that FI-WARE GEis that have been allowed to be part of FI-WARE r2.2 in our recent submission to the EC may be rejected to be made available in OIL. * In-depth revision of the Architecture and FI-WARE Open Specifications on the wiki * FI-WARE OIL, Testbed and internal Cloud environments setup * The teams in WP10 will have to work hard in order to setup three different FI-WARE Clouds for: * internal developments within FI-WARE (testing of patches, development of new releases) * the FI-WARE Testbed offered to UC projects * the FI-WARE OIL, dealing with quotas * Proper security mechanisms have to be put in place * The deliverables that had to do with Integration Plan and Report will have to be submitted * FI-WARE OIL: recipes for automated deployment of FI-WARE GEi dedicated instances * some FI-WARE GEis may be deployed as a global instance, accessible "as a Service" so that functions can be invoked through well-defined Service End Points and APIs * however, it is highly desirable that some FI-WARE GEis can also be instantiated by application developers on top of the virtual infrastructure they will setup to run their application (Dedicated instances). For this, it is highly recommended that FI-WARE GEi owners support one or several of the following options: * virtual machine images with the FI-WARE GEi properly installed and configured * deployment "recipes" that can be used together with the FI-WARE Cloud tools enabling automated deployment of software on individual VMs * deployment "recipes" that can be used together with the FI-WARE Cloud Blueprint management tools * webinars training on how to build "recipes" have to be organized and run * FI-WARE OIL/Testbed and GEis Support * A JIRA environment will be setup per FI-WARE GEi and for each of the three environments defined above (internal, FI-WARE Testbed and FI-WARE OIL) * A workflow will be defined regarding how tickets can be issued, monitored and resolved. * Access to the corresponding JIRA should be made available from the FI-WARE Catalogue * Generation of training material * WP9 will provide an eLearning and webinar platform which will be adopted as main vehicle for providing training contents * FI-WARE GEi owners will be requested to prepare training material targeted to developers. At least one recorded webinar should be made available per FI-WARE GEi * Organization of Campus Party * There will be a 1-hour session at the main starge of the Campus Party, either on Monday afternoon or Tuesday (most likely this second), where the FI-WARE OIL will be announced. Tentatively, the structure of this session might be (not necessarily in this order): * 15' of someone from the Kroes cabinet that will elaborate on the FI-PPP and will announce launch of the FI-WARE OIL * 15' of keynote speech from some reputed person in the Developers' Community endorsing the initiative (and helping to attract audience :-) * 30' of some sort of panel involving executives from some of the major industry partners (maybe they seating in sofas at the stage and someone acting as chairing/interviewer) * A number of workshops should be programmed, targeted to architects and developers and trying to cover programming practices/exercises that enable attendees to make "hands on" the technology: * Currently we have secured 4 2-hours slot workshops in the workshop area of the Campus Party booked for us. We had initially asked for 6 but seems to be not feasible and I'm trying to negotiate for 5. * Following are the workshops that we have currently identified as suitable for the audience of the Campus Party (programmers), we may decide which to go because there may not be enough number of workshop slots: * Cloud (every function provided through the portal, from deployment of Object Storage and individual VMs, through automated deployment of software on top of available VM instances up to the definition and deployment of blueprints) * Context/Data Management platform (combining a comprehensive review of the Context Broker, CEP and BigData GEs) * IoT, focused on how to connect sensors and make measured data available on the FI-WARE OIL * WireCloud * Identity Management and OAuth2-based Access Control to APIs (potentially to be merged with Cloud) * Advanced Middleware * Media-related GEis (subject to availability of GEis coming from FI-INMEDIA) * Advanced 3D and augmented reality (subject to availability of a first version of GEis coming from WeX) * There will be 2 1-hour sessions where we will be able to introduce the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, explain the ambition, main results, etc as well as announce the different challenges. There will be a space for the UC projects to announce their open calls * There will be a booth we will need to agree how to attend so that we can answer people who may come with questions. * We are negotiating a room for FI-WARE internal meetings for about 10 people, with whiteboard and projector. Our intention is that the different chapters may book slots during the Campus Party for them to meet there, therefore having a f2f meeting there. This way, attendance to the Campus Party may work as a kind of plenary meeting. * FI-WARE OIL terms and conditions * Telefonica has circulated a first draft of terms and conditions and legal departments has been asked to come to a final version by end of July. * The technical/business lead of the different FI-WARE partners should approach their legal departments to make sure they understand the whole thing. * The deadline by end of July is unmovable. FI-WARE GEis for which the corresponding owner do not subscribe the terms and conditions available by then will not be published in the FI-WARE OIL. * FI-WARE Backlog * A report on the status regarding revision and clean up of the FI-WARE Backlog will be submitted to the EC and reviewers by end of June. * Teams have to keep going in all regarding APs related to clean up of the FI-WARE Backlog and adoption of Agile practices * FI-WARE State of the Art deliverable: * We have to get it done. * FI-WARE 3rd Party Innovation Enablement: * We have to find out how we can finish a revised version Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Nov 29 14:36:33 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:36:33 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-testbed] d10.3.2 Message-ID: dear miguel, please find attached d10.3.2 ready for submission to the ec. shortly will come d10.4.2. thank to you and all the colleagues for your help on the matter -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1032_v1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1070039 bytes Desc: not available URL: