[Fiware-testbed] D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc

[Sandfuchs, Thorsten]

Dear colleagues,
Update concerning the validation analysis, as we didn't get the chance to meet in the phc today:
I compiled the current version of the deliverable as doc attached for your consideration and feedback/suggestions and perhaps a small review if some blindingly open things :)

There will be a "real" review process, once the contributions below are more finalized. If somebody would kindly step up to nominate himself as a reviewer, this would be highly appreciated - timeframe would be roughly between Friday this week and Thursday next week (14th of nov).

Contributions either go to the wiki directly or to the doc and I could merge them to the wiki for you...

Best regards,
                                                                              /Thorsten


From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten
Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2013 13:14
To: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: D.10.5.2b - use case specific analysis as discussion on the last Phc


Dear colleagues,

let me shortly summarize the status and tasks in relation to finalizing the validation-analysis content wrt the use case project analysis.

We will jointly write the use case scenario analysis based on the free-text format, provided by use cases in phase one. We will work on the wiki page: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis



For FINEST I started already the summary their answers to the validation context / scenario questionnaire as an example. The main dimensions I took were the following (already in wiki, syntax for you to copy, see below): scenario overview, GE specific questions, use case specific quotes



In the Phc we distributed the work like this:

John -> smart agrifood

Clara -> Envirofi

Tarek & Salvatore -> FINSENY

Thorsten -> FINEST

Pier -> Instant Mobility

Stefano -> OUTSMART



FI-CONTENT - currently not assigned (!)



If you find relevant information, which deem relevant for the "upper"-sections of this page - namely "Main inhibitors identified by the use case projects" and "overall confidence and tension of tone" - please just not only fill them in "your" chapter specific parts, but as well in these subchapters.



As you can see in my analysis of FINEST, I really concentrated on the most relevant parts - there is still room for improving the surrounding text, but I can't work on this part currently, therefore open for suggestions in your subchapters. The relevant questionnaire answers is part of the wiki page and linked from there  - therefore I think it's easy to start.



Timeline:

* analysis should be provided ASAP, but not later than 5th of November.

* There will be the need to comment on the findings as well in these sections or in one overall section from FI-WARE management.

* Overall submission envisioned for the 15th November of number the latest (currently not confirmed by European commission, stefano or Juanjo !!!)

* 1st review to start on the 6th of November

* still many open contributions missing for the other chapters



Thanks for all of your constant support,



                                                                              /Thorsten



Here is the blueprint for the section headings already in wiki-syntax (as well open for suggestions on how to improve the heading-text, welcome :)):



== Scenario overview ==

{{Remark|shortly describe the validated scenario and what/who/where/when the validation took place}}



== GE specific questions ==

{{Remark|Question VC.5 and VC.6 (GE cover requirements of the prototype) and (positive/negative comments/feedback) on the GE-level }}



== GE specific question and provided answers ==

; Lows

:  something



; High

: something



== Comments by FI-WARE Management ==

{{Remark|Here fi-ware management (WPL/WPA or other content personel) should comment:

* was the usage as anticipated

* are we happy with the results/validation

* what did we do in order to tackle identified obstacles

* what would we do again (as being rated high)

}}

Related wiki page (again :)): https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Use_Case_scenario_analysis

--

Thorsten Sandfuchs

SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com/>


Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx

Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.

This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.

Please consider the environment before printing this mail!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20131105/fb87bdf1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D1052b_WP10_v3_generated.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1749550 bytes
Desc: D1052b_WP10_v3_generated.docx
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20131105/fb87bdf1/attachment.docx>