[Fiware-testbed] [Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me

[Sandfuchs, Thorsten]

The schedule who delivered already or finished their contributions should be visible in the private wiki, see below the links - if not, just test the R3.2 version?!

Follow these links for the edition of the deliverables:
§  FI-WARE Deliverable "D*.3 FIWARE Installation and Administration Guide Release 3"<https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD*.3.R3>
§  FI-WARE Deliverable "D*.4 FIWARE User and Programmers Guide Release 3"<https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD*.4.R3>
§  FI-WARE Deliverable "D*.5 FIWARE Unit Testing Plan and Report Release 3"<https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD*.5.R3>

On the suppages you would find the links to either the R3.3 or R3.2 versions of the software - depending on the availability of the software in the forge, I guess you can start working immediately. Otherwise it might be as well a good idea to notify the GE-owner about your plan previously.

Best,

                                                               /Thorsten

From: Iranzo Yuste, Joaquin [mailto:joaquin.iranzo at atos.net]
Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 14:07
To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten
Cc: Garrido Ostermann, Elena; Pezuela Robles, Clara M; stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: RE: [Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me

Dear Thorsten,

Thank you for you explanation.

On the other hand, I have a doubt about when starting to test the GEs (since we have a new release now). I mean that the new version (documentation) will be delivered during this week in the private wiki, so I am not sure if it is sense to start to test them, since we don't have the last version (maybe some GEs don't deliver in the R3.3.3). What do you think?

Regards,

Joaquin

From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:55 PM
To: Iranzo Yuste, Joaquin
Cc: Garrido Ostermann, Elena; Pezuela Robles, Clara M; stefano de panfilis; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Subject: RE: [Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me

Thanks for making the link - my idea is that the page in this respect administrates on it's own:
Everybody testing should start documenting their tests ASAP, therefore other might be able to see that testing on "this" GE is already in place - nonetheless different reviewers will find different "problems", and everything is helping - so in the end there shouldn't be a lot harm done, if we have some GEs tested twice.

Any other question?

Just to let the testbed-team know, I will CC them as well and to "spread the word".

Best,
                                                               /Thorsten

From: Iranzo Yuste, Joaquin [mailto:joaquin.iranzo at atos.net]
Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 13:51
To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten
Cc: Garrido Ostermann, Elena; Pezuela Robles, Clara M
Subject: RE: [Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me

Dear Thorsten,

I want to introduce my colleague Elena (in CC), since she will be the responsible to test the GEs. However, in the link, we haven't seen the GEs and their assignations. I wonder if you can indicate us what GEs we should validate (to avoid overlapping).

Regards,

Joaquin.

From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org> [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:28 AM
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me


Dear colleagues,

as most of you know in the M30 review the reviewers requested us to do installation of GEs in a "eat your own dog-food" style within the consortium. E.g. a company A will install and test the installation and admin guides of company B and gives direct feedback. This would help to raise the level of completeness of the installation and admin guides and the related software and would basically enable us to have something like the famous "lutz report" on our own.

With the latest review report the reviewers requested to persist the results of this information in the upcoming 10.5.3 deliverable (which is reporting on validation of the Testbed - therefore such kind of internal "validation" of installation guides would be part) - I copied the text below.



Please act accordingly and

a)      Try to install a GE of another company following their installation guides and downloading their software

b)      Please document your effort shortly on the page

a.       https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/The_internal_Installation_and_usage_Test_Cockpit

b.      It should incorporate

                                                               i.      Your Company name/or contact

                                                             ii.      The GE which you try to install and test

                                                            iii.      The result of your test

                                                           iv.      Information of the result of your test in the "style" of Lutz Schubert

(for the sake of simplicity I copied two of the examples Lutz gave us on the wiki page and a template to ease this up mor)

c)       Please provide direct feedback to the Guide to the respective party, if you find errors

d)      As a "tested" GE-owner you can as well comment on the wiki page above and introduce a paragraph



It should be in the interest of every GE to be internally tested by "somebody" other that yourself and have a proper representation of this test on the above page in the testbed-wiki, as the reviewers will clearly monitor this as part of the 10.5.3 deliverable.

ð  Therefore - even if you can't provide a test of another component, please try to proactively find somebody within the consortium of another company to test your GE and let him report on this page!



Thanks for any support in this,



                                                                              /Thorsten

As reference

1.       The text of the review report which implies to do this
Obviously, hardly any of the documentation can claim completeness in the remaining time, but should at least cover all known grounds. To this end, extensive and directed installation and usage tests should be performed - not only through the Use Case projects, but also within the consortium. For example, partners not involved in the development of a specific Generic Enabler can verify it through installation and testing. The according results and findings should be incorporated in the forthcoming Release 3 and the validation reporting of deliverable D10.5.3.

2.       the original "Lutz report" is attached and our "answer" was the following:
                https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FVDmcUqamhfMhCDundzcrGwrLBYWF8xePUyic5Axr6A/edit?pli=1

--

Thorsten Sandfuchs

SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com/>


Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx

Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.

This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.

Please consider the environment before printing this mail!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20140407/37d15258/attachment.html>