[Fiware-tools] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] **** VERY URGENT *** Fwd: Tools questionnaire v2

[Jonischkat, Tim]

Dear all,

first - Davide, excuse me for breaking up the discussion on that point,  - but I really did not get Alex's point in the confcall! :)

I understand that Alex wants to remind us that his chapter will have to provide an API for deploying applications from the IDE into the Cloud environment. That is clear for me. So the interfacing component of our WP would only be ETICS in that case, right? The OVF packaging is more a task for the IDE itself, right?

What I don't get is what the difference is between the two scenarios he describes. Can someone clarify? What is the difference between a deployment and deployment testing? For me, deployment testing is trying to deploy something and then checking that everything works as expected. Is that the right definition?

Gabriele, maybe you can clarify that?

Cheers
Tim

Von: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von Davide Dalle Carbonare
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Dezember 2011 11:30
An: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
Betreff: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] **** VERY URGENT *** Fwd: Tools questionnaire v2

let's discuss about this in the conf call

ciao,
D

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:

Re: [Fiware-wpl] **** VERY URGENT *** Fwd: Tools questionnaire v2

Date:

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:42:15 +0200

From:

Alex Glikson <GLIKSON at il.ibm.com><mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com>

To:

matteo.melideo at eng.it<mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>, Davide Dalle Carbonare <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it><mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>

CC:

Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>



Hi,

I have one rather significant comment, related to several questions throughout the questionnaire.
There are two scenarios potentially requiring integration with cloud deployment:
 A) app developer uses IaaS cloud infrastructure in order to test his application (instead of heaving a dedicated testbed comprising physical machines);
B) app developer is developing an application which is designed to run on top of Cloud infrastructure -- IaaS-style or PaaS-style.
The two scenarios are very different in nature, but both would potentially need to leverage deployment APIs provided by Cloud Hosting GEs. By the way, this would also require tooling for creation of the deployment package -- e.g., in OVF format.
I would recommend adding explicitly these use-cases to the document. Please, notice that in this case the "user" of the Cloud GEs would be the IDE, rather the application or the application developer directly.

Regards,
Alex




From:        Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it><mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>
To:        FI-WARE WPL <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu><mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Date:        12/12/2011 07:03 PM
Subject:        [Fiware-wpl] **** VERY URGENT *** Fwd: Tools questionnaire v2
Sent by:        fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>
________________________________



Dear WP-Leaders,
it is extremely important that you collaborate with us to fill the attached questionnaire.

We have to start coding and the risk is that we will do this without taking into account your requirements and realizing, in the end, something completely useless and not in line with your expectations.

Please dedicate part of your valuable time for this!!!

Thanks in advance and regards,

M.

P.S.
In the meantime also the final, v2, of the document is published into the official FI-WARE wiki

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto:

Tools questionnaire v2

Data:

Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:02:40 +0100

Mittente:

Davide Dalle Carbonare <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it><mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>

A:

fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>

CC:

Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>, Thomas Michael Bohnert <thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com><mailto:thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com>, Stefano De Panfilis <stefano.depanfilis at eng.it><mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>, Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it><mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>




Dear leaders and architects,

The WP9 needs few minutes of your time to fill the attached questionnaire.
We strongly ask you take care of it in order to provide us your
requirements
for the development, deploy, test and validation infrastructure.
Thanks to your information we can avoid to waste time towards wrong
directions
that can also be read by the reviewers as a communication problems inside
the consortium.

I ask you to send it back to me by Friday 9th EOB and, in the case you will
not be able to meet this deadline, please, write me a message with the
new date.

Kind Regards,
Davide

ps: the final, v2, of the document will be published into the official
FI-WARE wiki
within next week with some possible minor updates, nevertheless, you can
use
the attached version to fill the questionnaire without any problem.

[attachment "FI-WARE WP9 Questionnaire v2.doc" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "FI-WARE WP9 Questionnaire v2.odt" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "FI-WARE DevComE Technical Description v2.pdf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "matteo_melideo.vcf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20111213/7b142ca7/attachment.html>