[Fiware-tools] T9.2: Initial draft of the FI-App/GE lifecycle for methodology support

[Davide Dalle Carbonare]

Tim,
sorry for the bad delay ...

The structure is fine and I like the approach to start from full S-CUBE and
select those steps that fit with fi-ware.

Perfect with your proposed next step.
I would add also a review of the boxes we have used to describe the workflow
with the aim of turning them into specific chapters of the methodology
where to describe actions and tools usage.

some trivial points:
- is it more appropriate to use the term "construction" or "build"?
- I would try to reduce a bit the size of the images

Davide

On 19/12/2011 18:14, Jonischkat, Tim wrote:
>
> Dear partners,
>
> last week I sent around a draft of a lifecycle to be used for the 
> Methodology definition in T9.2.
>
> Until now, I did not receive any comments yet.
>
> If you want to comment or discuss about the lifecycle, please do not 
> hesitate to contact me. If there is no such discussion until end of 
> this week (Dec 23^rd ), I ask you to define the lifecycle coverage of 
> your companies' asset until Jan 6^th (detailed instructions will 
> follow on Friday).
>
> Afterwards, we can go on by detailing the development process steps!
>
> Thanks in advance for comments and participation.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
> *Von:*Jonischkat, Tim
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 13. Dezember 2011 15:52
> *An:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Betreff:* T9.2: Initial draft of the FI-App/GE lifecycle for 
> methodology support
>
> Dear all,
>
> I created a new wiki page (available from the Main Page) dealing with 
> the methodological tasks in T9.2: 
> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/tools/index.php/Engineering_Methodology
>
> It contains information about the S-CUBE lifecycle for service-based 
> applications, which acts as the main input for the lifecycle defined 
> for FI-Apps/GEs (defined in the second part). As a first draft, I 
> split the activities of the development processes defined in 
> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_DevComE_Technical_Description#DevComE_Use_Casesover 
> the lifecycle stages.
>
> The next step for me would be to clarify the coverage of your assets 
> with respect to the defined lifecycle. An example is attached.
>
> Please do (1) comment on my initial draft of the lifecycle and (2) 
> tell me if you agree with my planning of the next step.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
> ---
>
> Tim Jonischkat
>
> paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology
>
> University of Duisburg-Essen
>
> Gerlingstraße 16
>
> 45127 Essen, Germany
>
> T: +49 201 183 4659
>
> F: +49 201 183 4699
>
> E: tim.jonischkat at paluno.uni-due.de 
> <mailto:tim.jonischkat at paluno.uni-due.de>
>
> http://www.paluno.uni-due.de <http://www.paluno.uni-due.de/> /
>
> http://www.sse.uni-due.de <http://www.sse.uni-due.de/>
>
> VAT ID: DE811272995
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-tools mailing list
> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20111222/30e61366/attachment.html>