Dear Juanjo, your last mail with subject " Sync on what we have to capture in the Technical Roadmap" is very clear and probably I did not get it very well. Now, to figure out the problem in the subject of this mail and close it, my proposal is the following: 1) for the first year we do not make any official release of Testing\Validation and Deployment tools (as you suggested) in the technical roadmap but at the review we would like to show the progresses we did for any of the just mentioned tools showing proof-of-concepts, running demo and whatever available to demonstrate we are contractually on-time. 2) we want to claim a delay for the methodology as this is something that at the right moment is not really helpful to have and a lot of information is still not completely clear or available. Anyway, we have also started to write this document and, in this respect, my proposal is to show to the reviewers and the P.O. the TOC of the methodology with some preliminary contents we have already started to write. In this way we can collect feedbacks and suggestions from the P.O. and the reviewers since the beginning. Please let me know what you think about this so that we can also better plan our work. Thanks a lot and regards, M. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20120314/314b14d9/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20120314/314b14d9/attachment.vcf>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy