[Fiware-tools] Postpone our conf call to Wed 26

[Marcel Zalmanovici]

Hi Davide,

Regarding the "Analysis of requirements from UC projects ..."
I think we should know some things about how they are planning on tackling 
performance problems and more importantly what types of problems are they 
interested in.
Without this info it may be hard to define requirements. I would like to 
know, for example:

Are the UCs monitoring their own system (more specific info) OR expecting 
to get an automatic tool (more generic info)?
Which info is relevant? e.g. network congestion, disk speed, CPU 
utilization, memory footprint, etc
Are they going to monitor one or more processes, one or more threads? Does 
the info need to be separated per thread/process?
What is an acceptable overhead of the monitoring?

Regarding "Status of each asset..."
No changes. I have changed the text back to black.

Marcel



From:   Davide Dalle Carbonare <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>
To:     Roozbeh Farahbod <roozbeh.farahbod at sap.com>, Marcel 
Zalmanovici/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Yosu Gorroñogoitia 
<jesus.gorronogoitia at atosresearch.eu>, 
Cc:     fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
Date:   26/09/2012 11:51 AM
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-tools] Postpone our conf call to Wed 26



Hi All,

I kindly ask you to check the minutes of the today conference call and 
pay attention
to these points:

"Analysis of requirements from UC projects and GEs + follow-up actions 
definition"
this allow us to extract additional requirements from the questionnaires 
circulated to the UC projects.

"Status of each assets, deviations and risks"
please update the status of your part. It's in light gray, turn it black 
when you've done.

Thank you for your collaboration,
Best Regards,
Davide


On 26/09/2012 10:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> here is the link for the minutes
> 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pH7ubvbueOJAxF_WQ3RW25iUWfQMT8AC2tD6jiimo3E/edit 

>
>
> BR
> Davide
>
> On 26/09/2012 09:37, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I apologize for the very late confirmation, our conference call can 
>> is today
>> at 11.00. I thank you all for the availability and I kindly ask the 
>> people
>> that can't attend to check the minutes.
>>
>> the shared minutes for today will be sent soon.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Davide
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24/09/2012 11:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I kindly ask you if it's possible to postpone our weekly conf call 
>>> to Wed 26 at 11:00,
>>> tomorrow neither me nor Matter are available.
>>>
>>> Please can you confirm by mail who of you will be available on Wed?
>>>
>>> thank you and
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Davide
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fiware-tools mailing list
>>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
>>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fiware-tools mailing list
>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-tools mailing list
> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20120927/14574a0c/attachment.html>