From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Mar 1 12:06:32 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:06:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - RoadMap In-Reply-To: <1362043507.2383.2.camel@localhost> References: <512E9C54.7040103@eng.it> <1362043507.2383.2.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <51308BB8.5070508@eng.it> Ciao Yosu, regarding the two items in the roadmap that you've commented, we've decided to keep these points into the list but accordingly with the new vision of FI-CoDE ENG will keep the ownership of those two points. Kind Regards, Davide On 28/02/2013 10:25, Yosu Gorro?ogoitia wrote: > Ciao Davide, > see attached the document commented. Please, see my doubts expressed as > comments for CDE management section. > I have closed old issues in tracker and those I have been working on > this months, as well as fixing sprints for existing and new ones. > Please, let me know if I have to address something else regarding the > roadmap. > Regards > Yosu > > On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 00:52 +0100, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear Partners, >> we've been asked to detail a bit more what will be available for >> the Second Major release, >> and in particular to specify what will be ready for the releases 2.2 >> and 2.3 accordingly >> with this release schedule: >> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering,_with_mapping_to_calendar_dates >> this has been asked by the PO in preparation of the second year >> review. >> >> You can find attached an export in ODT of our roadmap, as it is >> published in the wiki, where >> I've done the initial refinement of the user stories for the two >> releases. What I've done is based >> on what is reported on the tracker. >> >> I ask you to: >> - consider only your parts on the second major release section >> - review the user stories per release, and my comments >> - update the tickets where it's needed >> >> you can work directly on the file with revision recording enabled and >> send it back to me. >> >> the deadline for you is Feb 28th (today) OEB. >> I'll update the wiki page with your contributions by the Mar 1st, >> that's the deadline for this activity (the Feb 28th, unfortunately >> I'll be all day out of office). >> >> Doing this review I've found some tickets that need to be updated, >> they are >> reported at the end of this mail grouped by partner. >> >> Thanks a lot, also for this rush. >> BR >> Davide >> >> >> ATOS: >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2952&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not assigned >> not present in roadmap >> >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1320&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not present in roadmap >> >> IBM >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2178&group_id=15&atid=202 >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2177&group_id=15&atid=202 >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2176&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not present in roadmap >> >> SAP >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2950&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not present in roadmap >> open with passed deadline/sprint >> >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2503&group_id=15&atid=202 >> listed for third major release but open with passed deadline/sprint >> >> UPM >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3888&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not present in roadmap >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 4 09:10:23 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:10:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Sprint transition: from S2.2.2-M22 to S2.2.3-M23 In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EBE01@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EBE01@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <513456EF.20100@eng.it> Dear Partners, I forward you this message from Manuel, he is in charge of monitoring the progress of the project activities. BR Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Sprint transition: from S2.2.2-M22 to S2.2.3-M23 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:12:26 +0000 From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Partners, As you know yesterday we finished Sprint 2.2.2 corresponding to M22, today we start activities belonging to Sprint 2.2.3 corresponding to M23. Please, update your backlog accordingly. 1.Close the tickets you finished along M22 (probably you already did these days when updating the tickets), otherwise, do it 2.Update tickets under execution to belong to Sprint 2.2.3-M23 During next week we should be able to identify and refine all content meant to be done during Sprint S2.2.3-M23. Next week I'll contact you to understand how your backlog for S2.2.3 is defined. During these months we'll improve the tools with a dashboard giving us visual views on how our backlog is evolving during sprints and realeases... for the different enablers, partners, etc. As soon as I can I'll share the consistency rules to be applied to the backlog, so that we all have unanimous understanding and consensus. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Have a nice weekend!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WAREInitiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From jesus.gorronogoitia at atosresearch.eu Mon Mar 4 15:59:48 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atosresearch.eu (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:59:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] R: URGENT - RoadMap In-Reply-To: <1152121662-1362035016-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1169124837-@b15.c6.bise7.blackberry> References: <512E9C54.7040103@eng.it> <1152121662-1362035016-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1169124837-@b15.c6.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: <1362409188.2304.27.camel@localhost> Ciao Andrea, Davide see my comments inline, Regards Yosu On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 07:07 +0000, Andrea Manieri wrote: > ATOS: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2952&group_id=15&atid=202 > not assigned Assigned to me in tracker, issue closed > not present in roadmap This issue does not cover a FICODE feature (or user story). It is a work item, already accomplished, required by engineering reasons. > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1320&group_id=15&atid=202 > not present in roadmap This issue was reported by Davide. I commented in this issue that this user story is not clear at all, requiring for further clarifications. FICODE already includes a FIA Project creation wizard to create new applications that reuse FIWARE enablers. Do we want to create a FICODE wizard supporting the creation of new enablers? If so, does this wizard provides additional features not present in Eclipse Java Project wizard? Does this wizard support the selection of available FIWARE enablers? If so, the functionality of this wizard is exactly the same that FIA Project creation wizard, which has been already reported as feature/user story in the WP9 wiki. Please, let me know how to proceed. -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 4 17:16:26 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:16:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] R: URGENT - RoadMap In-Reply-To: <1362409188.2304.27.camel@localhost> References: <512E9C54.7040103@eng.it> <1152121662-1362035016-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1169124837-@b15.c6.bise7.blackberry> <1362409188.2304.27.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <5134C8DA.6090901@eng.it> Ciao Yosu, because of to some mailing list problems, Andrea's mail has been delivered only today ... consider the last situation as the one I already reported to you. those two tickets are now in charge of ENG thank you, Davide On 04/03/2013 15:59, Yosu Gorro?ogoitia wrote: > Ciao Andrea, Davide > see my comments inline, > Regards > Yosu > > On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 07:07 +0000, Andrea Manieri wrote: >> ATOS: >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2952&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not assigned > Assigned to me in tracker, issue closed >> not present in roadmap > This issue does not cover a FICODE feature (or user story). It is a work > item, already accomplished, required by engineering reasons. > >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1320&group_id=15&atid=202 >> not present in roadmap > This issue was reported by Davide. I commented in this issue that this > user story is not clear at all, requiring for further clarifications. > FICODE already includes a FIA Project creation wizard to create new > applications that reuse FIWARE enablers. Do we want to create a FICODE > wizard supporting the creation of new enablers? If so, does this wizard > provides additional features not present in Eclipse Java Project wizard? > Does this wizard support the selection of available FIWARE enablers? If > so, the functionality of this wizard is exactly the same that FIA > Project creation wizard, which has been already reported as feature/user > story in the WP9 wiki. Please, let me know how to proceed. > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 5 10:10:16 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:10:16 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <5135B678.2080608@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call today at 11.00 CET. The link to shared minutes will be sent right before. Best Regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 5 10:45:52 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:45:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <5135B678.2080608@eng.it> References: <5135B678.2080608@eng.it> Message-ID: <5135BED0.6030400@eng.it> minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1Ar2fi9LxJe-GC6hjWQfOfOVZEjtEkD38rn2hJzDDU/edit BR Davide On 05/03/2013 10:10, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call today at 11.00 CET. > > The link to shared minutes will be sent right before. > > Best Regards, > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 5 11:36:15 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:36:15 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <5135BED0.6030400@eng.it> References: <5135B678.2080608@eng.it> <5135BED0.6030400@eng.it> Message-ID: <5135CA9F.1060709@eng.it> Dear partners, please, take a look at the minutes of today conf call, and pay attention to the deadlines. BR Davide On 05/03/2013 10:45, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > minutes: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G1Ar2fi9LxJe-GC6hjWQfOfOVZEjtEkD38rn2hJzDDU/edit > > BR > Davide > > On 05/03/2013 10:10, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear All, >> this is to remind you our conference call today at 11.00 CET. >> >> The link to shared minutes will be sent right before. >> >> Best Regards, >> Davide >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 5 15:36:35 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:36:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Tools chapter and Live Demo Message-ID: <513602F3.3050707@eng.it> Dear Ferm?n, I've contacted you some time ago regarding the SAMSON Broker and the Live Demo. As Tools chapter we are planning to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal in an integrated way with the Live Demo. Now our first goal is to identify the proper integration points in the overall scenario. Is there an already defined process on how to contribute to the Live Demo? Let us know about the dedicated mailing list, we'll add the proper partners from the Tools chapter. Thank you and Kind Regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Mar 7 18:03:06 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:03:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] work in progress ... Message-ID: <5138C84A.3020206@eng.it> Dear Partners, don't worry if you receive some updates from the tracker ... I'm working on a massive update of the Roadmap page and consequently on the names of the tickets in the Backlog tracker BR Davide From fermin at tid.es Fri Mar 8 17:08:34 2013 From: fermin at tid.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ferm=EDn_Gal=E1n_M=E1rquez?=) Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:08:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Tools chapter and Live Demo In-Reply-To: <513602F3.3050707@eng.it> References: <513602F3.3050707@eng.it> Message-ID: <513A0D02.1040708@tid.es> Dear Davide, The process is being refined right now and will be kicked off next week. As far as I know, Miguel or Juanjo will be outlining the process during the WPL/WPA audio on Monday, asking to every WPL/WPA to subscribe the required partners/people in his/her WP. However, seeing your proactivity :), I have just subscribed to the mailing list. Other people can request subscription from https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-demo Best regards, ------ Ferm?n El 05/03/2013 15:36, Davide Dalle Carbonare escribi?: > Dear Ferm?n, > I've contacted you some time ago regarding the SAMSON Broker and > the Live Demo. > > As Tools chapter we are planning to demonstrate the effectiveness of > our proposal in > an integrated way with the Live Demo. Now our first goal is to > identify the proper integration > points in the overall scenario. > > Is there an already defined process on how to contribute to the Live > Demo? > Let us know about the dedicated mailing list, we'll add the proper > partners from the Tools chapter. > > Thank you and > Kind Regards, > Davide > > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 11 10:50:32 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:50:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Tools chapter and Live Demo In-Reply-To: <513A0D02.1040708@tid.es> References: <513602F3.3050707@eng.it> <513A0D02.1040708@tid.es> Message-ID: <513DA8E8.2010402@eng.it> Dear Fermin, I'm going to attend the WPL/WPA conf call in 10 minutes. Thank you for the subscription to fiware-demo. BR Davide On 08/03/2013 17:08, Ferm?n Gal?n M?rquez wrote: > Dear Davide, > > The process is being refined right now and will be kicked off next week. > As far as I know, Miguel or Juanjo will be outlining the process during > the WPL/WPA audio on Monday, asking to every WPL/WPA to subscribe the > required partners/people in his/her WP. > > However, seeing your proactivity :), I have just subscribed to the > mailing list. Other people can request subscription from > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-demo > > Best regards, > > ------ > Ferm?n > > El 05/03/2013 15:36, Davide Dalle Carbonare escribi?: >> Dear Ferm?n, >> I've contacted you some time ago regarding the SAMSON Broker and >> the Live Demo. >> >> As Tools chapter we are planning to demonstrate the effectiveness of >> our proposal in >> an integrated way with the Live Demo. Now our first goal is to >> identify the proper integration >> points in the overall scenario. >> >> Is there an already defined process on how to contribute to the Live >> Demo? >> Let us know about the dedicated mailing list, we'll add the proper >> partners from the Tools chapter. >> >> Thank you and >> Kind Regards, >> Davide >> >> > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 11 17:15:02 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:15:02 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Catalogue: FAQ page per GE Message-ID: <513E0306.3090103@eng.it> Dear Rafael, Raquel during the today conf call with WPLs/WPAs it has been raised the request for a FAQ page per GE. The most convenient place for this page, it seems to be the Catalogue (and I agree with this vision). I think this can be an additional page available from the GE details ... anyway, any other solution is more than welcome, you know the platform better than me. Can you please elaborate on a proposal and send me few rows of description that I can circulate to the other WPLs/WPAs? by end of this week 15/03? Can you also estimate by when your proposal may be published? Next Monday I can ask for an approval on the solution proposed and after that you can include it on your backlog and realize it. Thank you and Best Regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 12 10:58:50 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:58:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Roadmap Message-ID: <513EFC5A.7040709@eng.it> Dear partners, after a quick review of Tools Roadmap we have to consider a comment from Miguel. You know that our presentation of the Roadmap is slightly different from the others because of we don't have crated 'Features' (as wiki pages) between Epics and User Stories. This is reflected in the Roadmap as direct links to our backlog tracker. This misalignment can cause comment from the reviewers that we'll have to take into account. The proposal is to turn the backlog tracker public, so it's possible to access the user stories linked from the Roadmap wiki page without any restriction (login). After that, if we'll receive the comment from the reviewers, we'll create the wiki pages for Features, update the Roadmap page reporting them and turn the backlog tracker private again. If there aren't objection (by tomorrow EOB) we can proceed with the proposed solution. BR Davide. From rafael.garcia.gallego at gmail.com Tue Mar 12 11:13:34 2013 From: rafael.garcia.gallego at gmail.com (Rafa Garcia Gallego) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:13:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Catalogue: FAQ page per GE In-Reply-To: <513E0306.3090103@eng.it> References: <513E0306.3090103@eng.it> Message-ID: Davide, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Rafael, Raquel > during the today conf call with WPLs/WPAs it has been raised the request > for a FAQ page per GE. The most convenient place for this page, it seems to be the Catalogue (and I > agree with this vision). We too agree this seems like the natural place to host such a page. > I think this can be an additional page available from the GE details anyway, > any other solution is more than welcome, you know the platform better than > me. > Can you please elaborate on a proposal and send me few rows of description > that I can circulate to the other WPLs/WPAs? by end of this week 15/03? > Can you also estimate by when your proposal may be published? A first, zero-effort, trivial solution would be to create a page in the Fi-Ware wiki and link it in each GE's "Documentation" section, as it's done now with user / programmer / administrator / whatnot guides: http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/bigdata-analysis-samson/documentation Our next approach would be to include a new bullet named "FAQ" in each GE view alongside "Overview", "Documentation", "Downloads", "Instances" and "Terms and Conditions" (again see http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/bigdata-analysis-samson/documentation ). This is a simple HTML / Wikitext page and should be very easy to implement. Do you need any details about how this would work inside Drupal? > Next Monday I can ask for an approval on the solution proposed and after > that you can include it on your backlog and realize it. BR, Raquel and Rafael. From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 12 11:34:05 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:34:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Catalogue: FAQ page per GE In-Reply-To: References: <513E0306.3090103@eng.it> Message-ID: <513F049D.1080002@eng.it> Hi, I would go directly for the second solution. Together with the implementation, can you provide an example (as source content) for publishing a couple of questions and their answers? This will be provided as a template to follow in order to maintain all the FAQ pages with the same look & feel. Is it fine to summarize it in this way? The FAQ page is available as a new bullet named "FAQ" in each GE view alongside "Overview", "Documentation", "Downloads", "Instances" and "Terms and Conditions". This is a simple HTML / Wikitext page manged by the GE owner/editor in the form of a free text page. can you complete the text above with a possible solution for the interaction with the user? for example: - a plain text page with questions and answers - a list of links with the questions at the beginning of the page that send the user to the proper anchor within the page - a list of questions with the answers in a hidden box (below the question) that has the visibility toggled by clicking on the question ... some other proposals? by when, this solution may be ready and published? BR Davide On 12/03/2013 11:13, Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote: > Davide, > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Davide Dalle Carbonare > wrote: >> Dear Rafael, Raquel >> during the today conf call with WPLs/WPAs it has been raised the request >> for a FAQ page per GE. The most convenient place for this page, it seems to be the Catalogue (and I >> agree with this vision). > We too agree this seems like the natural place to host such a page. > > >> I think this can be an additional page available from the GE details anyway, >> any other solution is more than welcome, you know the platform better than >> me. >> Can you please elaborate on a proposal and send me few rows of description >> that I can circulate to the other WPLs/WPAs? by end of this week 15/03? >> Can you also estimate by when your proposal may be published? > A first, zero-effort, trivial solution would be to create a page in > the Fi-Ware wiki and link it in each GE's "Documentation" section, as > it's done now with user / programmer / administrator / whatnot guides: > http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/bigdata-analysis-samson/documentation > > Our next approach would be to include a new bullet named "FAQ" in each > GE view alongside "Overview", "Documentation", "Downloads", > "Instances" and "Terms and Conditions" (again see > http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/bigdata-analysis-samson/documentation > ). This is a simple HTML / Wikitext page and should be very easy to > implement. > > Do you need any details about how this would work inside Drupal? > > >> Next Monday I can ask for an approval on the solution proposed and after >> that you can include it on your backlog and realize it. > BR, > Raquel and Rafael. > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 12 11:53:26 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:53:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Roadmap - UPDATE In-Reply-To: <513EFC5A.7040709@eng.it> References: <513EFC5A.7040709@eng.it> Message-ID: <513F0926.2030301@eng.it> Dear partners, I had a chat with Miguel in order to clarify the situation. As a quick workaround we can open the backlog tracker, but after the review (planned in June) we have to align our presentation of the Roadmap anyway: crate wiki pages for features. I apologize for the misunderstanding, BR Davide On 12/03/2013 10:58, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > after a quick review of Tools Roadmap we have to consider a > comment from Miguel. > > You know that our presentation of the Roadmap is slightly different > from the others because > of we don't have crated 'Features' (as wiki pages) between Epics and > User Stories. This is reflected > in the Roadmap as direct links to our backlog tracker. > > This misalignment can cause comment from the reviewers that we'll have > to take into account. > > The proposal is to turn the backlog tracker public, so it's possible > to access the user stories linked > from the Roadmap wiki page without any restriction (login). > After that, if we'll receive the comment from the reviewers, we'll > create the wiki pages for Features, > update the Roadmap page reporting them and turn the backlog tracker > private again. > > If there aren't objection (by tomorrow EOB) we can proceed with the > proposed solution. > > BR > Davide. > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 12 12:03:51 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:03:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture Message-ID: <513F0B97.8040808@eng.it> Dear partners, as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a more coherent publication of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 that's available here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-CoDE_Technical_Description and the contribution to D2.3 https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_and_Tools_Architecture the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the D9.5 will not be updated anymore. I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better keep track of the changes. I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and review your parts in that GDoc. We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. BR Davide. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Mar 13 09:56:01 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:56:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] FI-WARE Live Demo mailing list Message-ID: <51403F21.3030904@eng.it> Dear Partner, the work on the preparation of the live demo is going to start, for this reason it has been created a dedicated mailing list. I think that at least one representative per partner/tool from WP9 have to subscribe to this list. The goal for WP9 is to include in the Live Demo a concrete use case that demonstrate the effectiveness of our tools. The deadline for the subscription is today EOB and you can do it by yourself at this page: https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-demo I kindly ask you to confirm your subscription replying to this mail. Thank you and, Best Regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Mar 14 10:49:04 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:49:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-demo] Live Demo evolution kick-off In-Reply-To: <51419AC7.5040502@tid.es> References: <51419AC7.5040502@tid.es> Message-ID: <51419D10.4000605@eng.it> I forward you this mail ... and I remind you to subscribe to fiware-demo list Up to now I received a confirmation only from UDE. The responsibility of having a tool integrated in the live demo is up to the partner responsible of that tool. BR Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-demo] Live Demo evolution kick-off Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:39:19 +0100 From: Ferm?n Gal?n M?rquez To: fiware-demo at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi, As discussed during WPL/WPA weekly calls (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VpWyuWl44m22l-swR1aQK1tsyZMoiIQCfrdWTPZvub8/edit#heading=h.a4ogm75ss3zu), this list has been created to discuss Live Demo evolution. I have been appointed to lead this cross chapter task force. As you know, a first version of this Live Demo (let's name it "Live Demo Release1") was successfully performed during second year review at the end of 2012. Our goal now is to evolve an enrich this demo, to be used not only during the next review but also in any moment we need to show the work we are doing in FI-WARE project. We will be using here the same Agile methodology that we use in the rest of the project (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Agile_Development_Methodology). We will have a backlog associated to the Live Demo. _Topics not include in the backlog will not be discussed or taken into account at all for the Live Demo evolution_. The basic procedure will be as follow: * The backlog tracker is https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?atid=227&group_id=27&func=browse. Please, verify that you have access to the tracker and notify me if in negative case. * We will start by including Epics in the backlog. Each new topic to be included in the Live Demo has to start with a Epic definition. * Then, Epics will be discussed and refined to concrete Features that, in sequence, will be split in User Stories to be developed during the project sprints. * Epics and Features have to be defined in the wiki and trac. For user Stories, it is not necessary. * We will use the /"FIWARE.{Type}.Cross.LiveDemo."/ prefix in our backlog items. Manuel Escriche, Agile Project Manager in FI-WARE, will ensure that our practices are ok with project methodology. Manuel, don't hesitate to comment on the procedure that I have mention above (or tell us if I'm saying something wrong :) Two first action points have to be accomplished as soon as possible: * *@all*: to create Epics corresponding to elements that we want to include in the Live Demo. In this sense, you can have a look to this two examples of elements that (from TID's side) we would like to include. o https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Cross.LiveDemo.IoTGEsIntegration o https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Cross.LiveDemo.CEPIntegration * *@SAP, @TID, @UPM*: create Features corresponding to the existing functionality in Live Demo, i.e. Live Demo Release 1, by the partners that were involved in that demo. From TID's side, we will do the part related with our GEs as soon as possible. We will be using the private wiki and the "FIWARE Private" project in the Forge. A "home page" for Live Demo Evolution has been created at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Live_Demo_Evolution Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any question on doubt, please. Best regards, ------ Ferm?n PD. The current subscribers list follows. If you miss somebody, please tell me so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 20159 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-demo mailing list Fiware-demo at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-demo From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 18 16:41:32 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:41:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <514735AC.704@eng.it> Dear All, the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been moved tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our time slot. I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 and keep it within 30 minutes. BR Davide From MARCEL at il.ibm.com Mon Mar 18 18:13:51 2013 From: MARCEL at il.ibm.com (Marcel Zalmanovici) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:13:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <514735AC.704@eng.it> References: <514735AC.704@eng.it> Message-ID: No problem with me From: Davide Dalle Carbonare To: "fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 18/03/2013 05:41 PM Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder Sent by: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear All, the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been moved tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our time slot. I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 and keep it within 30 minutes. BR Davide _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 18 22:31:43 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:31:43 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123335D@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> References: <514735AC.704@eng.it> <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123335D@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> Message-ID: <514787BF.6020402@eng.it> thank you, I still don't have a confirmation from Daniel, Yosu and Rafael ... Let's wait for at least other two confirmations. BR Davide. On 18/03/2013 21:10, Sammodi, Osama wrote: > Hi Davide, > > No problem with me. > > Kind regards, > Osama > > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare > Sent: Montag, 18. M?rz 2013 16:42 > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder > > Dear All, > the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been moved tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our time slot. > > I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 and keep it within 30 minutes. > > BR > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 18 23:55:55 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:55:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <514787BF.6020402@eng.it> References: <514735AC.704@eng.it> <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123335D@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <514787BF.6020402@eng.it> Message-ID: <51479B7B.9070003@eng.it> Dear partners, here is the link for the minutes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yyx2pwiAoCar-iIZ_3S2_sSgz2YZf6zLne7tQuJub3s/edit?usp=sharing BR Davide On 18/03/2013 22:31, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > thank you, > > I still don't have a confirmation from Daniel, Yosu and Rafael ... > Let's wait for at least other two confirmations. > > BR > Davide. > > On 18/03/2013 21:10, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >> Hi Davide, >> >> No problem with me. >> >> Kind regards, >> Osama >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide >> Dalle Carbonare >> Sent: Montag, 18. M?rz 2013 16:42 >> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder >> >> Dear All, >> the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been moved >> tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our time slot. >> >> I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 and >> keep it within 30 minutes. >> >> BR >> Davide >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 19 00:47:55 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:47:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <51479B7B.9070003@eng.it> References: <514735AC.704@eng.it> <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123335D@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <514787BF.6020402@eng.it> <51479B7B.9070003@eng.it> Message-ID: <5147A7AB.9030001@eng.it> Dear partners, the conference call is confirmed 19/03 at 10.30 CET thank you and kind regards, Davide On 18/03/2013 23:55, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > here is the link for the minutes > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yyx2pwiAoCar-iIZ_3S2_sSgz2YZf6zLne7tQuJub3s/edit?usp=sharing > > > BR > Davide > > On 18/03/2013 22:31, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> thank you, >> >> I still don't have a confirmation from Daniel, Yosu and Rafael ... >> Let's wait for at least other two confirmations. >> >> BR >> Davide. >> >> On 18/03/2013 21:10, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >>> Hi Davide, >>> >>> No problem with me. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Osama >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide >>> Dalle Carbonare >>> Sent: Montag, 18. M?rz 2013 16:42 >>> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder >>> >>> Dear All, >>> the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been moved >>> tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our time >>> slot. >>> >>> I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 >>> and keep it within 30 minutes. >>> >>> BR >>> Davide >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Mar 19 11:12:52 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:12:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <5147A7AB.9030001@eng.it> References: <514735AC.704@eng.it> <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123335D@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <514787BF.6020402@eng.it> <51479B7B.9070003@eng.it> <5147A7AB.9030001@eng.it> Message-ID: <51483A24.6060906@eng.it> Dear partners, I'm not able to connect anymore to the phone number I have ... ... in conclusion ... I think that the process to deal with the tickets in the tracker is clear, but ask me if you have some questions, especially who of you that joined recently. please briefly report, your last activities under the dedicated point. BR Davide On 19/03/2013 00:47, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > the conference call is confirmed 19/03 at 10.30 CET > > thank you and > kind regards, > Davide > > > On 18/03/2013 23:55, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear partners, >> here is the link for the minutes >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yyx2pwiAoCar-iIZ_3S2_sSgz2YZf6zLne7tQuJub3s/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> On 18/03/2013 22:31, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> thank you, >>> >>> I still don't have a confirmation from Daniel, Yosu and Rafael ... >>> Let's wait for at least other two confirmations. >>> >>> BR >>> Davide. >>> >>> On 18/03/2013 21:10, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >>>> Hi Davide, >>>> >>>> No problem with me. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Osama >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide >>>> Dalle Carbonare >>>> Sent: Montag, 18. M?rz 2013 16:42 >>>> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] ATTENTION - Conference call Reminder >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> the usual WPL/WPA conference call for this week has been >>>> moved tomorrow 19/03 staring from 11.00 and this conflicts with our >>>> time slot. >>>> >>>> I kindly ask you if it's possible to anticipate our call at 10.30 >>>> and keep it within 30 minutes. >>>> >>>> BR >>>> Davide >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From manieri at eng.it Tue Mar 19 15:34:52 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:34:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: Fwd: Ericsson role/effort redistribution In-Reply-To: <512B8C29.3070606@eng.it> References: <512B8C29.3070606@eng.it> Message-ID: <5148778C.4040009@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, please find below the effort/budget redistribution from Ericcson to UPM (to support the completion of the catalogue) and to ENG (to set up the training tools and sessions). Just to highlight that we, ENG, are already working on the training tools and an intro will be provided at the Madrid meeting. All the best, A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Fwd: [Fiware-tools] Ericsson role/effort redistribution Data: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:07:05 +0100 Mittente: Andrea Manieri A: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: stefano de panfilis , Davide Dalle Carbonare Dear Juanjo, Davide informed me that you're going to send an email to Arian about the re-distribution of the effort. Please, find enclosed the proposal currently under discussion within WP9. Should any other partner express the interest to cover the webinar part, we (ENG) can do it. please confirm that the deadline (Wed 27th Feb) is ok with your plans. Cheers A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: [Fiware-tools] Ericsson role/effort redistribution Data: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:32:27 +0100 Mittente: Andrea Manieri CC: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear All, As you may recall the decision of Ericsson for leaving the project imposed to us to re-think the tasks allocation and provide a redistribution of the duties and related funding. I've discussed with UPM (thanks Juan) that kindly accepted to take-over the responsibility on the catalogue and related stuff. Until now neither Davide nor myself have received any request for extra-funding from any of you, nor proposals for any extra activity, nor we're aware of any delayed item. For this reason I would like to propose to devote the rest of the funding not claimed from UPM for the Catalogue to be assigned to: - the re-design of the user experience of FiCoDE and the integration in the platform-like environment (details will follow). - the integration in FiCoDE of an eLearning enviroment (including webinars facilities), able to manage SCORM-like objects and being accessible from the platform (as courses), the web-site (as webinars), the catalogue (as single item). - the preparation of the material for courses/webinars about FiCoDE and the coordination of the training on the Fiware tools. We assume that the first item can be covered by ENG, due to the actual responsibility and role. The other two items are looking for owners. Should you like to take the lead on them, please inform the WP by no later than wed 27th Feb. If no volunteers will raise up, ENG will take over also this responsibility. I've already considered some splitting of the budget based on an estimation of the effort needed (see table below). Any comment is welcome, XXX Monthly costs EUR10.000,00 ENG Monthly costs EUR10.740,00 UPM Monthly costs EUR10.613,13 Funding left by Ericsson Funding redistributed to partners effort costs Funding requested (50%) Reason effort costs Funding requested (50%) Reason effort costs Funding requested (75%) Reason 147648,64 176919,087 5 EUR 50.000 EUR 25.000 FiCoDE eLearning Environment 12 EUR 128.880 EUR 64.440 Integration of Catalogue, Test Env, Dinamic creation of CDEs within FiCoDE, testing and bug-fixing, documentation 4 EUR 42.453 EUR 31.839 Catalogue maintenance, push/pull API to share content with marketplace, multiple instances for scalability and/or privacy issues, Integration of accounting APIs with ID Mgmt server, Multitenancy, Eclipse plug-in to Catalogue (M24) 1,5 EUR 15.000 EUR 7.500 FiCoDe Webinars preparation (FiCoDE) and coordination 2 EUR 21.226 EUR 15.920 Maintenance (Bug-fixing, code documentation and user manuals) and Training -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Mar 20 11:45:38 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:45:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Tools Architecture document Message-ID: <51499352.40000@eng.it> Dear contributors, this message for who will be contributing to the Tools Architecture during the next days. I'll invite you directly using your gmail account. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o7pBi9OLniVPXIVYPtpZOG6_10htQ2KsdFfbKFW7j30/edit editing rules: - apply the "normal text" formatting to the text you have reviewed - change the color of the text you have changed or added (chose your color) - set the header (1 to 4) for the sections to include them in the ToC - use the strikethrough formatting for the text remove - use comments for questions or notes - add "- TO REVIEW" to the headers of section that need attention. - don't change the formatting for the text you don't have reviewed. thank you and BR Davide -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de Mon Mar 25 10:31:37 2013 From: osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de (Sammodi, Osama) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 09:31:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture and Contribution to the Technical Description Message-ID: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> Dear Partners, I would like to kindly remind you to contribute to the FI-CoDE technical description as stated in the below email. Please also consider the comments to your parts in the working Google Doc. The deadline for this task was last Friday! Thanks and kind regards, Osama Sammodi -------------------------------- Paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology University of Duisburg-Essen Gerlingstra?e 16 45127 Essen, Germany Tel.:? +49 201 183 4657 Fax:?? +49 201 183 4699 mailto:osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de http://www.sse.uni-due.de VAT - University Duisburg-Essen DE811272995 -------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare > Sent: Dienstag, 12. M?rz 2013 12:04 > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture > > Dear partners, > as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a more coherent > publication > of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 that's > available here: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI- > CoDE_Technical_Description > > and the contribution to D2.3 > https://forge.fi- > ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_ > and_Tools_Architecture > > the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the D9.5 will not > be updated anymore. > > I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better keep track of > the changes. > I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and review your parts > in that GDoc. > We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. > > BR > Davide. From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 25 10:36:26 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:36:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture and Contribution to the Technical Description In-Reply-To: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> References: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> Message-ID: <51501A9A.9030901@eng.it> Dear partners, at the right moment it seems that contribution/review is missing from IBM, SAP, UDE. I kindly ask you to react very fast. BR Davide On 25/03/2013 10:31, Sammodi, Osama wrote: > Dear Partners, > > I would like to kindly remind you to contribute to the FI-CoDE technical description as stated in the below email. > > Please also consider the comments to your parts in the working Google Doc. > > The deadline for this task was last Friday! > > Thanks and kind regards, > > Osama Sammodi > -------------------------------- > Paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology > University of Duisburg-Essen > Gerlingstra?e 16 > 45127 Essen, Germany > > Tel.: +49 201 183 4657 > Fax: +49 201 183 4699 > mailto:osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de > http://www.sse.uni-due.de > > VAT - University Duisburg-Essen DE811272995 > -------------------------------- > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- >> bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare >> Sent: Dienstag, 12. M?rz 2013 12:04 >> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture >> >> Dear partners, >> as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a more coherent >> publication >> of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 that's >> available here: >> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI- >> CoDE_Technical_Description >> >> and the contribution to D2.3 >> https://forge.fi- >> ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_ >> and_Tools_Architecture >> >> the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the D9.5 will not >> be updated anymore. >> >> I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better keep track of >> the changes. >> I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and review your parts >> in that GDoc. >> We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. >> >> BR >> Davide. > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 25 10:39:32 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:39:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture and Contribution to the Technical Description In-Reply-To: <51501A9A.9030901@eng.it> References: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <51501A9A.9030901@eng.it> Message-ID: <51501B54.3050100@eng.it> My mistake ... the missing contribution is not from UDE but from UPM, on the Catalogue. BR Davide On 25/03/2013 10:36, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > at the right moment it seems that contribution/review is missing > from IBM, SAP, UDE. > > I kindly ask you to react very fast. > > BR > Davide > > On 25/03/2013 10:31, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >> Dear Partners, >> >> I would like to kindly remind you to contribute to the FI-CoDE >> technical description as stated in the below email. >> >> Please also consider the comments to your parts in the working Google >> Doc. >> >> The deadline for this task was last Friday! >> >> Thanks and kind regards, >> >> Osama Sammodi >> -------------------------------- >> Paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology >> University of Duisburg-Essen >> Gerlingstra?e 16 >> 45127 Essen, Germany >> >> Tel.: +49 201 183 4657 >> Fax: +49 201 183 4699 >> mailto:osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de >> http://www.sse.uni-due.de >> >> VAT - University Duisburg-Essen DE811272995 >> -------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- >>> bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare >>> Sent: Dienstag, 12. M?rz 2013 12:04 >>> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture >>> >>> Dear partners, >>> as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a more >>> coherent >>> publication >>> of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 that's >>> available here: >>> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI- >>> CoDE_Technical_Description >>> >>> and the contribution to D2.3 >>> https://forge.fi- >>> ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_ >>> and_Tools_Architecture >>> >>> the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the >>> D9.5 will not >>> be updated anymore. >>> >>> I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better >>> keep track of >>> the changes. >>> I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and review >>> your parts >>> in that GDoc. >>> We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. >>> >>> BR >>> Davide. >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Mar 25 18:03:07 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:03:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] LAST CALL - Re: Review of WP9 Architecture and Contribution to the Technical Description In-Reply-To: <51501B54.3050100@eng.it> References: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <51501A9A.9030901@eng.it> <51501B54.3050100@eng.it> Message-ID: <5150834B.8010904@eng.it> Dear partners, due to the fact that there are still some section under editing, the very last deadline is tomorrow 26/03 EOB. I kindly ask you to take care of all the comments assigned to you, and mark as resolved every comment that can be closed. Starting from Wednesday 27/03 the GDoc will be frozen and ported to the private wiki. Kind Regards, Davide On 25/03/2013 10:39, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > My mistake ... > > the missing contribution is not from UDE but from UPM, on the > Catalogue. > > BR > Davide > > On 25/03/2013 10:36, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear partners, >> at the right moment it seems that contribution/review is missing >> from IBM, SAP, UDE. >> >> I kindly ask you to react very fast. >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> On 25/03/2013 10:31, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >>> Dear Partners, >>> >>> I would like to kindly remind you to contribute to the FI-CoDE >>> technical description as stated in the below email. >>> >>> Please also consider the comments to your parts in the working >>> Google Doc. >>> >>> The deadline for this task was last Friday! >>> >>> Thanks and kind regards, >>> >>> Osama Sammodi >>> -------------------------------- >>> Paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology >>> University of Duisburg-Essen >>> Gerlingstra?e 16 >>> 45127 Essen, Germany >>> >>> Tel.: +49 201 183 4657 >>> Fax: +49 201 183 4699 >>> mailto:osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de >>> http://www.sse.uni-due.de >>> >>> VAT - University Duisburg-Essen DE811272995 >>> -------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- >>>> bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare >>>> Sent: Dienstag, 12. M?rz 2013 12:04 >>>> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture >>>> >>>> Dear partners, >>>> as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a >>>> more coherent >>>> publication >>>> of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 >>>> that's >>>> available here: >>>> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI- >>>> CoDE_Technical_Description >>>> >>>> and the contribution to D2.3 >>>> https://forge.fi- >>>> ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_ >>>> and_Tools_Architecture >>>> >>>> the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the >>>> D9.5 will not >>>> be updated anymore. >>>> >>>> I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better >>>> keep track of >>>> the changes. >>>> I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and review >>>> your parts >>>> in that GDoc. >>>> We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. >>>> >>>> BR >>>> Davide. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From manieri at eng.it Tue Mar 26 19:38:57 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:38:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0A8382@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0A8382@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <5151EB41.1060600@eng.it> Dear All, As requested, please provide to me your (one per partner) review ot the effort-by-task allocation and task description reviews asap. thanks in advance A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Data: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:59:09 +0000 Mittente: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es Dear all. Please find attached one zip file for each WP. They are an extract from the current updated DoW of the amendment 4 to be reviewed and modified if needed by each WPL. I really need your prompt reaction in order to integrate all the changes and send the updated DoW to Officer tomorrow. *Please, each WPL has to reply with his reviewed DoW today*. Please review: Effort by task for each partner. (excel file) Role for each partner (word file, according with excel file) Description of each task. (word file) Thank you for understanding and for your contribution. BR Javier. *De:*JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA *Enviado el:* martes, 26 de marzo de 2013 6:57 *Para:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu *CC:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ *Asunto:* Fwd: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Hi all, A first reaction from Arian to the reallocation of PMs and my response to him. I decided to respond quickly to avoid justification of further delays on the side of the Commission. If you believe that I should have added something in my response or you believe I said something wrong, please let me know. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website:www.tid.es email:jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website:http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- *Subject: *** Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation *Date: *** Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:54:38 +0100 *From: *** Juanjo Hierro *To: *** *CC: *** , , , , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Thanks for your quick response. My response between lines of your message below ... On 25/03/13 19:26, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo, *The overview of changes presented is very well done and clear, and I don't have any issues with them, except for the points below. * I don't care that much about shifting PMs and who gets what. Here the consortium has apparently bound itself to all kind of weird pre-existing agreements anyway, not using the flexibility offered by the grant agreement. I don't know exactly what you mean, but certainly the consortium has not bound itself to any weird agreement ... I rather see it the other way around ... the consortium has been flexible and agile to reallocate efforts and roles of the partners so that each partner has concentrated its efforts in less things (thus increasing the efforts in the things they have decided to concentrate on). I rather believe this is a positive thing. I would be much more worried if we had adopted an approach where partners were participating in many things, with no significant effort in any. One of the things that I believe is rather good in the way FI-WARE is organized is that it is like 7 IPs (one per technical chapter) but with the big difference that if you look at each of these IPs, there is a limited number of key partners (4-6). There is also a clear role of partners within each chapter, each partner typically bound to the implementation of some GE in the chapter. All of this will help, imho, in achieveing good results. Having said that, the thing to avoid is that industry withdraws and academia gets more funding. That is the trend here, with industry reducing its involvement with 640k and academia/research institutes increasing with 640k. I understand there is no choice because industry is not willing/able to do more, but it is against the spirit of the industry leadership in FI-WARE/FI-PPP. And frankly, it looks very bad on EU industry. The industrial partners has taken the decisions consciously and I honestly believe that the situation is not as bad as it may be considered in a very first approach: * There were only two GEs for which the implementation has been transferred to an academia partner: o Ericsson was originally planned to contribute the implementation of the IoT Gateway Device Management GE in the IoT chapter and, while it was agreed with them that they would support an ETSI M2M compliant interface, they were only able to commit to support this interface in their product for the 3rd Release of FI-WARE. When Ericsson withdrew, we found here an opportunity to find someone who could contribute an ETSI M2M implementation already rather than to be able to develop it from the start. This was Franhoufer. This made us feel more confident to keep our initial plans to deliver an Architecture which already considered support to the relevant ETSI M2M standard. There were not many other options from any industry partner in Europe so that's why. o Ericsson was also originally planned to contribute an implementation of the Store GE in the Apps Chapter (part of the Business Framework). Here, we decided to go for UPM basically for two reasons. First because they had an asset (WireCloud) part of which (WireCloud's catalogue) could evolve to become the Store we were looking for in reasonable time. Second because they were committed to contribute their implementation as open source. Here, we found that elivering the code of the Store as open source could be something that would give FI-WARE better chances to make impact: there are many proprietary commercial stores out there ... but none is open source so we expect this will call the attention of third parties. * The rest of new PMs allocated to academia partners do not correspond to transference of the responsibility to implement FI-WARE GEs: o PMs transferred from Ericsson to UPM in WP9 (Tools) correspond to the implementation of the FI-WARE Catalogue portal: this is not a FI-WARE GE in itself nor anything that will be used to setup and operate FI-WARE Instances. It will not be commercialized standalone so it was a matter of finding who could make a good job and the UPM had proved they can develop a good implementation of the FI-WARE Catalogue. The UPM also committed to implement it as open source and that is also relevant to ensure sustainability. o When NSN-Germany withdrew from WP5 (tools) we found out that finding a replacement for them was not rather critical so that we may use the corresponding PMs/funding in reinforcing other tasks in other WPs. We finally decided to transfer the PMs, initally allocated to NSN-Germany in the IoT chapter, to UPM because a) it would reinforce the work they were already doing with the Cloud portal (to be delivered as open source and contributed to the OpenStack Community), b) it allowed us to assign the UPM the task of designing and maintaining the look&feel of FI-WARE web portals (since they were in charge of the most significant one in FI-WARE, it sounded like it made sense) and c) it allowed us to assign the UPM to implement some pieces of the FI-WARE Testbed/OIL portal that were not initially foreseen as needed. There was unanimity in considering that the UPM was doing a great job regarding the Cloud portal so it was like natural to select them. o Some new PMs were assigned to UniRoma because it was found that the amount of PMs they had currently assigned was not enough for them to carry out their assigned tasks. This is just a first quick response to your concern. A more elaborated response can be provided if needed. Please note that I care more about changes in the DoW wrt tasks/activities to be carried out. Large changes in efforts without any change in the task description (e.g. the iMinds addition in WP3) cannot be correct. We prepared a new description of WP3 as a result of their inclusion as new beneficiaries in amendment 3 ... Is there anything you are still missing ? If it was just an example, be sure we understand that we should provide new description of tasks/WPs where major changes are incorporated. We are here just anticipating the figures, so that you can approve them, subject to proper description in an amendment of the DoW. Then, what is most important is *what happens with the contributions from the withdrawing partners, NSN-FI and EAB.* Just a clarification: NSN-FI withdraw without having made any relevant contribution. I believe you refer to NSN-H (Hungary) who was indeed playing the role of WPA in the IoT chapter and were the ones that were contributing the Cumulocity product as implementation of the IoT Backend Device Management GE ... What happens with Ericsson's Service Composition - Ericsson Composition Engine (ECE) What happens with Ericsson's Gateway Device Management GE - Ericsson IoT Gateway In a previous email (19 Nov 2012), you concluded (for the ECE): "So the problem here is not about sustainability beyond the FI-PPP (which Ericsson states would be provided) but inside the FI-PPP ..." Will they remain available to FI-WARE? Under what conditions? If nothing remains available, what does that mean for their contribution to FI-WARE? Will these be replaced? Ericsson was contributing the implementation of two GEs in WP3 (Apps Chapter): the Store GE, part of the Business Framework, and the ECE GE. The amount of PMs/funding assigned to Ericsson for contributing these two assets and evolve them was fair because Ericsson was relying on existing and mature assets. When Ericsson withdrew from WP3, we couldn't find any partner that may provide an asset for the Store GE so therefore we had to plan its development. Then we found that the whole amount of funding assigned to Ericsson was necessary to carry out that development and we were lucky because we could leverage on the WireCloud's catalogue for that purpose. Since there were already other service composition tools already, we concluded that it was not critical to find a replacement for the ECE. Same questions for NSN-FI. I understand they were in charge of the GE "Backend Device Management"?? And they contributed an asset called "Cumulocity". So same questions as above. The IoT Backend Device Management GE will be implemented through the IDAS DCA product contributed by Telefonica. This product essentially replaces the Cumulocity product that was planned to be contributed by NSN. Specific questions: 1) What does the underlined text mean in the sentence "Withdrawal of Ericsson from WP5. EAB has 20 PM in DoW and it has declared 3,34 PM until M18, so it transfers 16 PM to FRAUNHOFER because they have to assume Advanced Connectivity GEs with ETSI-M2M interface and _will be involeved in the project at the beginning of April 2013!"_ Well, we are simply saying that in the case of Fraunhofer, they will start working in the IoT chapter since beginning of April 2013 ... Of course, Franhoufer has been working on the project since its beginning, but in different WPs. 2) What does the following sentence mean? "TRDF-P finished at 31-12-2012. People moved to TRDF." TRDP is no longer a third party? I hope Javier de Pedro, in copy, can reply this part since I'm not so much aware of what third party is involved in each case. For me, all of them are Thales ... Finally, are you going to ask an amendment for the *Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C *(see attachment)? Again, I would ask Javier de Pedro to answer this part. Cheers, -- Juanjo Best regards, Arian. PS. I am kind-of allergic to statements like your "No early response...", knowing that the only deadlines I'm bound to are the ones in the grant agreement??? -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:06 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es ; Miguel Carrillo; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Subject: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Once we have finalized amendment 3 of our DoW, we should open a new amendment dealing with fixing all PMs reallocation that were pending (some of which pending since July last year). As already announced in our mail on January 20th this year, the situation is critical regarding some of these PMs reallocation, particularly dealing with the ability to handle withdrawal of several partners. All this PMs reallocation have been agreed among the partners at PCC (Project Coordination Committee), WPLs/WPAs and General Assembly level. We believe that is is critical to close this amendment 4 before end of April as to allow a reporting of costs for the 2nd period that is aligned with an approved DoW. Please find enclosed a spreadsheet which summarizes the changes already implemented in amendment 3 as well as changes proposed in amendment 4. Changes being proposed for amendment 4 are summarized in the sheet titled "Changes (amendment 4)". There is a final picture of PMs allocation to tasks for each WP as well as impact in figures (overall funding is kept the same). Consumption of allocated PMs have taken place since start of the 2nd reporting period and, in the case of partners withdrawing the consortium, since a decision was taken regarding what partner was going to take over their responsibilities. We will soon send you a draft of the DoW that will incorporate the changes summarized here. We will kindly ask you to send a response to this mail with your agreement to the proposed PMs reallocation in advance to approval of the DoW amendment itself which may take more time. That would give the existing partners, overall those taking the responsibility to take over the tasks from withdrawing partners, the necessary security to keep their investments they have been making so far. No early response will be taken as acknowledge and acceptance of this proposed PMs reallocation. We will rather appreciate your help in moving this forward. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WP9.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 93471 bytes Desc: not available URL: From manieri at eng.it Wed Mar 27 16:13:24 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:13:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0A9B9D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0A9B9D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <51530C94.9010708@eng.it> For those who have not replied yet. A bit more time, but due to the Easter holidays and the meeting in Madrid you're kindly requested to provide you reply (all partners need to reply) by no later than Thur 28th April, End of Day. Best, A. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Data: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:16:26 +0000 Mittente: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es Dear all, some of you are telling me that you need more time because you need to contact with the partner involved in your WP. It is reasonable. So, please, provide the update DoW by April 2^nd , 2013. Please don???t forget to activate the control change of the document. Thank you very much for your contribution. BR Javier. *De:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ *Enviado el:* martes, 26 de marzo de 2013 9:00 *Para:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu *CC:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es *Asunto:* RE: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation *Importancia:* Alta Dear all. Please find attached one zip file for each WP. They are an extract from the current updated DoW of the amendment 4 to be reviewed and modified if needed by each WPL. I really need your prompt reaction in order to integrate all the changes and send the updated DoW to Officer tomorrow. *Please, each WPL has to reply with his reviewed DoW today*. Please review: Effort by task for each partner. (excel file) Role for each partner (word file, according with excel file) Description of each task. (word file) Thank you for understanding and for your contribution. BR Javier. *De:*JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA *Enviado el:* martes, 26 de marzo de 2013 6:57 *Para:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu *CC:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ *Asunto:* Fwd: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Hi all, A first reaction from Arian to the reallocation of PMs and my response to him. I decided to respond quickly to avoid justification of further delays on the side of the Commission. If you believe that I should have added something in my response or you believe I said something wrong, please let me know. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website:www.tid.es email:jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website:http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- *Subject: *** Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation *Date: *** Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:54:38 +0100 *From: *** Juanjo Hierro *To: *** *CC: *** , , , , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Thanks for your quick response. My response between lines of your message below ... On 25/03/13 19:26, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo, *The overview of changes presented is very well done and clear, and I don't have any issues with them, except for the points below. * I don't care that much about shifting PMs and who gets what. Here the consortium has apparently bound itself to all kind of weird pre-existing agreements anyway, not using the flexibility offered by the grant agreement. I don't know exactly what you mean, but certainly the consortium has not bound itself to any weird agreement ... I rather see it the other way around ... the consortium has been flexible and agile to reallocate efforts and roles of the partners so that each partner has concentrated its efforts in less things (thus increasing the efforts in the things they have decided to concentrate on). I rather believe this is a positive thing. I would be much more worried if we had adopted an approach where partners were participating in many things, with no significant effort in any. One of the things that I believe is rather good in the way FI-WARE is organized is that it is like 7 IPs (one per technical chapter) but with the big difference that if you look at each of these IPs, there is a limited number of key partners (4-6). There is also a clear role of partners within each chapter, each partner typically bound to the implementation of some GE in the chapter. All of this will help, imho, in achieveing good results. Having said that, the thing to avoid is that industry withdraws and academia gets more funding. That is the trend here, with industry reducing its involvement with 640k and academia/research institutes increasing with 640k. I understand there is no choice because industry is not willing/able to do more, but it is against the spirit of the industry leadership in FI-WARE/FI-PPP. And frankly, it looks very bad on EU industry. The industrial partners has taken the decisions consciously and I honestly believe that the situation is not as bad as it may be considered in a very first approach: * There were only two GEs for which the implementation has been transferred to an academia partner: o Ericsson was originally planned to contribute the implementation of the IoT Gateway Device Management GE in the IoT chapter and, while it was agreed with them that they would support an ETSI M2M compliant interface, they were only able to commit to support this interface in their product for the 3rd Release of FI-WARE. When Ericsson withdrew, we found here an opportunity to find someone who could contribute an ETSI M2M implementation already rather than to be able to develop it from the start. This was Franhoufer. This made us feel more confident to keep our initial plans to deliver an Architecture which already considered support to the relevant ETSI M2M standard. There were not many other options from any industry partner in Europe so that's why. o Ericsson was also originally planned to contribute an implementation of the Store GE in the Apps Chapter (part of the Business Framework). Here, we decided to go for UPM basically for two reasons. First because they had an asset (WireCloud) part of which (WireCloud's catalogue) could evolve to become the Store we were looking for in reasonable time. Second because they were committed to contribute their implementation as open source. Here, we found that elivering the code of the Store as open source could be something that would give FI-WARE better chances to make impact: there are many proprietary commercial stores out there ... but none is open source so we expect this will call the attention of third parties. * The rest of new PMs allocated to academia partners do not correspond to transference of the responsibility to implement FI-WARE GEs: o PMs transferred from Ericsson to UPM in WP9 (Tools) correspond to the implementation of the FI-WARE Catalogue portal: this is not a FI-WARE GE in itself nor anything that will be used to setup and operate FI-WARE Instances. It will not be commercialized standalone so it was a matter of finding who could make a good job and the UPM had proved they can develop a good implementation of the FI-WARE Catalogue. The UPM also committed to implement it as open source and that is also relevant to ensure sustainability. o When NSN-Germany withdrew from WP5 (tools) we found out that finding a replacement for them was not rather critical so that we may use the corresponding PMs/funding in reinforcing other tasks in other WPs. We finally decided to transfer the PMs, initally allocated to NSN-Germany in the IoT chapter, to UPM because a) it would reinforce the work they were already doing with the Cloud portal (to be delivered as open source and contributed to the OpenStack Community), b) it allowed us to assign the UPM the task of designing and maintaining the look&feel of FI-WARE web portals (since they were in charge of the most significant one in FI-WARE, it sounded like it made sense) and c) it allowed us to assign the UPM to implement some pieces of the FI-WARE Testbed/OIL portal that were not initially foreseen as needed. There was unanimity in considering that the UPM was doing a great job regarding the Cloud portal so it was like natural to select them. o Some new PMs were assigned to UniRoma because it was found that the amount of PMs they had currently assigned was not enough for them to carry out their assigned tasks. This is just a first quick response to your concern. A more elaborated response can be provided if needed. Please note that I care more about changes in the DoW wrt tasks/activities to be carried out. Large changes in efforts without any change in the task description (e.g. the iMinds addition in WP3) cannot be correct. We prepared a new description of WP3 as a result of their inclusion as new beneficiaries in amendment 3 ... Is there anything you are still missing ? If it was just an example, be sure we understand that we should provide new description of tasks/WPs where major changes are incorporated. We are here just anticipating the figures, so that you can approve them, subject to proper description in an amendment of the DoW. Then, what is most important is *what happens with the contributions from the withdrawing partners, NSN-FI and EAB.* Just a clarification: NSN-FI withdraw without having made any relevant contribution. I believe you refer to NSN-H (Hungary) who was indeed playing the role of WPA in the IoT chapter and were the ones that were contributing the Cumulocity product as implementation of the IoT Backend Device Management GE ... What happens with Ericsson's Service Composition - Ericsson Composition Engine (ECE) What happens with Ericsson's Gateway Device Management GE - Ericsson IoT Gateway In a previous email (19 Nov 2012), you concluded (for the ECE): "So the problem here is not about sustainability beyond the FI-PPP (which Ericsson states would be provided) but inside the FI-PPP ..." Will they remain available to FI-WARE? Under what conditions? If nothing remains available, what does that mean for their contribution to FI-WARE? Will these be replaced? Ericsson was contributing the implementation of two GEs in WP3 (Apps Chapter): the Store GE, part of the Business Framework, and the ECE GE. The amount of PMs/funding assigned to Ericsson for contributing these two assets and evolve them was fair because Ericsson was relying on existing and mature assets. When Ericsson withdrew from WP3, we couldn't find any partner that may provide an asset for the Store GE so therefore we had to plan its development. Then we found that the whole amount of funding assigned to Ericsson was necessary to carry out that development and we were lucky because we could leverage on the WireCloud's catalogue for that purpose. Since there were already other service composition tools already, we concluded that it was not critical to find a replacement for the ECE. Same questions for NSN-FI. I understand they were in charge of the GE "Backend Device Management"?? And they contributed an asset called "Cumulocity". So same questions as above. The IoT Backend Device Management GE will be implemented through the IDAS DCA product contributed by Telefonica. This product essentially replaces the Cumulocity product that was planned to be contributed by NSN. Specific questions: 1) What does the underlined text mean in the sentence "Withdrawal of Ericsson from WP5. EAB has 20 PM in DoW and it has declared 3,34 PM until M18, so it transfers 16 PM to FRAUNHOFER because they have to assume Advanced Connectivity GEs with ETSI-M2M interface and _will be involeved in the project at the beginning of April 2013!"_ Well, we are simply saying that in the case of Fraunhofer, they will start working in the IoT chapter since beginning of April 2013 ... Of course, Franhoufer has been working on the project since its beginning, but in different WPs. 2) What does the following sentence mean? "TRDF-P finished at 31-12-2012. People moved to TRDF." TRDP is no longer a third party? I hope Javier de Pedro, in copy, can reply this part since I'm not so much aware of what third party is involved in each case. For me, all of them are Thales ... Finally, are you going to ask an amendment for the *Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C *(see attachment)? Again, I would ask Javier de Pedro to answer this part. Cheers, -- Juanjo Best regards, Arian. PS. I am kind-of allergic to statements like your "No early response...", knowing that the only deadlines I'm bound to are the ones in the grant agreement??? -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:06 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es ; Miguel Carrillo; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Subject: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Once we have finalized amendment 3 of our DoW, we should open a new amendment dealing with fixing all PMs reallocation that were pending (some of which pending since July last year). As already announced in our mail on January 20th this year, the situation is critical regarding some of these PMs reallocation, particularly dealing with the ability to handle withdrawal of several partners. All this PMs reallocation have been agreed among the partners at PCC (Project Coordination Committee), WPLs/WPAs and General Assembly level. We believe that is is critical to close this amendment 4 before end of April as to allow a reporting of costs for the 2nd period that is aligned with an approved DoW. Please find enclosed a spreadsheet which summarizes the changes already implemented in amendment 3 as well as changes proposed in amendment 4. Changes being proposed for amendment 4 are summarized in the sheet titled "Changes (amendment 4)". There is a final picture of PMs allocation to tasks for each WP as well as impact in figures (overall funding is kept the same). Consumption of allocated PMs have taken place since start of the 2nd reporting period and, in the case of partners withdrawing the consortium, since a decision was taken regarding what partner was going to take over their responsibilities. We will soon send you a draft of the DoW that will incorporate the changes summarized here. We will kindly ask you to send a response to this mail with your agreement to the proposed PMs reallocation in advance to approval of the DoW amendment itself which may take more time. That would give the existing partners, overall those taking the responsibility to take over the tasks from withdrawing partners, the necessary security to keep their investments they have been making so far. No early response will be taken as acknowledge and acceptance of this proposed PMs reallocation. We will rather appreciate your help in moving this forward. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Mar 27 18:01:11 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:01:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Sprint transition: from S2.2.3-M23 to S2.3.1-M24 -Release 2.2 is finished - Release2.3 is opened In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551FAF46@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551FAF46@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <515325D7.70607@eng.it> FYI kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Sprint transition: from S2.2.3-M23 to S2.3.1-M24 -Release 2.2 is finished - Release2.3 is opened Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:33:19 +0000 From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Partners, As you know we are about to finish Sprint 2.2.3 corresponding to M23. This sprint closes Release 2.2 Next 1.April (M24) Sprint 2.3.1 (1^st sprint of Release 2.3) is opened. Please, update your backlog items accordingly. 1.Close the tickets you finished along M23 (if not already done) 2.Update tickets under execution not finished to belong to Sprint 2.3.1 3.Open those new tickets you have scheduled/planned for Release 2.3 Sprint 2.3.1 -- be aware Release 2.3 is the last release available for the current reporting period. Let me stress agile is obsessed with delivery, so there's need to commit to the backlog content allocated for a sprint (step 3), then few tickets are moved to next sprint (step 2). During this month we have updated the wiki templates for the public backlog items, please, check your content is consistent. Now there're fewer fields than before but still some content is missing or not correct. The templates have categories, please, check your team is using them properly. If anything, please, let me know. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WAREInitiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Mar 28 10:09:42 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:09:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] LAST CALL - Re: Review of WP9 Architecture and Contribution to the Technical Description In-Reply-To: <5150834B.8010904@eng.it> References: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D41123A6ED@WIWINF-EXDAG01.wiwinf.uni-due.de> <51501A9A.9030901@eng.it> <51501B54.3050100@eng.it> <5150834B.8010904@eng.it> Message-ID: <515408D6.2060509@eng.it> Dear partners, I've frozen the GDoc version, you can continue to view it. I start to port it into the private wiki, and I'll ask you to review that everything has been ported correctly. BR Davide On 25/03/2013 18:03, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > due to the fact that there are still some section under editing, > the very last deadline is tomorrow 26/03 EOB. > > I kindly ask you to take care of all the comments assigned to you, and > mark as resolved > every comment that can be closed. > > Starting from Wednesday 27/03 the GDoc will be frozen and ported to > the private wiki. > > Kind Regards, > Davide > > > > On 25/03/2013 10:39, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> My mistake ... >> >> the missing contribution is not from UDE but from UPM, on the >> Catalogue. >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> On 25/03/2013 10:36, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear partners, >>> at the right moment it seems that contribution/review is missing >>> from IBM, SAP, UDE. >>> >>> I kindly ask you to react very fast. >>> >>> BR >>> Davide >>> >>> On 25/03/2013 10:31, Sammodi, Osama wrote: >>>> Dear Partners, >>>> >>>> I would like to kindly remind you to contribute to the FI-CoDE >>>> technical description as stated in the below email. >>>> >>>> Please also consider the comments to your parts in the working >>>> Google Doc. >>>> >>>> The deadline for this task was last Friday! >>>> >>>> Thanks and kind regards, >>>> >>>> Osama Sammodi >>>> -------------------------------- >>>> Paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology >>>> University of Duisburg-Essen >>>> Gerlingstra?e 16 >>>> 45127 Essen, Germany >>>> >>>> Tel.: +49 201 183 4657 >>>> Fax: +49 201 183 4699 >>>> mailto:osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de >>>> http://www.sse.uni-due.de >>>> >>>> VAT - University Duisburg-Essen DE811272995 >>>> -------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- >>>>> bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare >>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 12. M?rz 2013 12:04 >>>>> To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] Review of WP9 Architecture >>>>> >>>>> Dear partners, >>>>> as you know I'm reviewing the Tools Architecture and for a >>>>> more coherent >>>>> publication >>>>> of our work we've decided to merge what we've delivered for D9.5 >>>>> that's >>>>> available here: >>>>> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI- >>>>> CoDE_Technical_Description >>>>> >>>>> and the contribution to D2.3 >>>>> https://forge.fi- >>>>> ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Community_ >>>>> and_Tools_Architecture >>>>> >>>>> the final single document will be contributed to the D2.3 and the >>>>> D9.5 will not >>>>> be updated anymore. >>>>> >>>>> I'm doing this review in a private Google Doc in order to better >>>>> keep track of >>>>> the changes. >>>>> I'll send you soon, directly, a mail asking you to merge and >>>>> review your parts >>>>> in that GDoc. >>>>> We have to finalize this single document in a couple of weeks. >>>>> >>>>> BR >>>>> Davide. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > >