From prodriguez at dit.upm.es Tue Oct 1 12:08:12 2013 From: prodriguez at dit.upm.es (Pedro Rodriguez) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:08:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] =?utf-8?q?URGENT_-_Re=3A_Tools_review_report?= In-Reply-To: <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> Message-ID: Hi all, I wasn't available yesterday, sorry for missing the vote. I'm not sure if I will be able to make it at 2PM sharp but will try to join you as soon as I can. BR --? Pedro Rodriguez On 30 de septiembre de 2013 at 21:44:52, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: The call for discussing about the review report is on Wednesday 2nd at 2PM CEST thank you for participating, BR Davide On 30/09/2013 16:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > let's try to find the best time slot > > http://doodle.com/6b3d6wdr2mdvntay > > BR > Davide > > On 30/09/2013 15:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear Partners, >> it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. >> >> I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 >> >> thank you, >> BR >> Davide >> >> >> On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear Juanjo, >>> I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more >>> for the >>> reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. >>> >>> My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, >>> as stated in the DoW. >>> It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used >>> to communicate where >>> the software is available (access and/or download), and references >>> to documentation. >>> >>> I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual >>> WPL/WPA conf call. >>> >>> have a nice week end, >>> BR >>> Davide >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 1 16:49:46 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:49:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] R: Re: URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> Message-ID: <404592282-1380638941-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1418037829-@b14.c4.bise7.blackberry> Hi Pedro, thank you I hope you can join in time. BR Davide Mail sent from BlackBerry? Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Pedro Rodriguez Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:08:12 To: Davide Dalle Carbonare; Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report Hi all, I wasn't available yesterday, sorry for missing the vote. I'm not sure if I will be able to make it at 2PM sharp but will try to join you as soon as I can. BR --? Pedro Rodriguez On 30 de septiembre de 2013 at 21:44:52, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: The call for discussing about the review report is on Wednesday 2nd at 2PM CEST thank you for participating, BR Davide On 30/09/2013 16:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > let's try to find the best time slot > > http://doodle.com/6b3d6wdr2mdvntay > > BR > Davide > > On 30/09/2013 15:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear Partners, >> it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. >> >> I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 >> >> thank you, >> BR >> Davide >> >> >> On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear Juanjo, >>> I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more >>> for the >>> reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. >>> >>> My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, >>> as stated in the DoW. >>> It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used >>> to communicate where >>> the software is available (access and/or download), and references >>> to documentation. >>> >>> I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual >>> WPL/WPA conf call. >>> >>> have a nice week end, >>> BR >>> Davide >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Oct 2 14:03:58 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:03:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> Message-ID: <524C0BAE.9040008@eng.it> here is the link for the minutes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OFu3pfJK2YjBWMMP-efkXo_Ewmt7pQWjGEBgVU4FNsU/edit?usp=sharing BR Davide On 30/09/2013 21:40, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > The call for discussing about the review report is on > > Wednesday 2nd at 2PM CEST > > thank you for participating, > BR > Davide > > > On 30/09/2013 16:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> let's try to find the best time slot >> >> http://doodle.com/6b3d6wdr2mdvntay >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> On 30/09/2013 15:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear Partners, >>> it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. >>> >>> I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 >>> >>> thank you, >>> BR >>> Davide >>> >>> >>> On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>>> Dear Juanjo, >>>> I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more >>>> for the >>>> reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. >>>> >>>> My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, >>>> as stated in the DoW. >>>> It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used >>>> to communicate where >>>> the software is available (access and/or download), and references >>>> to documentation. >>>> >>>> I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual >>>> WPL/WPA conf call. >>>> >>>> have a nice week end, >>>> BR >>>> Davide >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Oct 14 08:50:53 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:50:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Catalogue configuration status Message-ID: <525B944D.20006@eng.it> Hi Pedro, how is it the status of the configuration for publishing tools in the public Catalogue? thank you and BR Davide From laura.pucci at eng.it Mon Oct 14 12:41:34 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:41:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Urgent request for effort calculation of each partner Message-ID: <841BC00341064529B8ADE4E45337442B@YamahaRBX250> Dear WP9 partners, I?m sending on behalf of Davide (he?s currently attending the FIWARE WPA/WPL call) an urgent request in order to evaluate a suitable strategy to address recommendation #15 (?suggesting? to scale down activities of WP9) we kindly ask to each partner to: 1) Evaluate the possibility to freeze on-going activities in WP9 and consequently calculate the remaining effort from the end of M30 (October 2013) until the end of the project 2) Evaluate how much effort is planned to close on-going activities and consequently calculate the remaining effort until the end of the project once those activities are closed 3) Evaluate possible alternative activities in other WPs where to shift remaining effort This will actually be the topic of discussion during tomorrow?s call, so please consider to get at least minimum information to share with all partners within tomorrow morning. With many thanks in advance for your understanding. Best regards Laura -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laura Pucci Technological Innovation Directorate laura.pucci at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Terragneta, 90 - 80058 Torre Annunziata (NA) Tel. +39-081.8626884 Fax +39-081.8626819 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 15 00:44:30 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:44:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct 15th at 11.00 CEST. link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... kind regards, Davide I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it directly with the usual partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already received a notification. anyway, just in case, here is the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net Tue Oct 15 09:31:42 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:31:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> Message-ID: <1381822302.5228.4.camel@localhost> Ciao Davide, I am very sorry, due to another project meeting, i will not be available today. I will react to the meeting minutes asap. Sorry for the inconveniences. Yosu On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 00:44 +0200, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct 15th at > 11.00 CEST. > > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... > > kind regards, > Davide > > I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it > directly with the usual > partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already > received a notification. > anyway, just in case, here is the link: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ From prodriguez at dit.upm.es Tue Oct 15 09:55:21 2013 From: prodriguez at dit.upm.es (Pedro Rodriguez) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:55:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Catalogue configuration status In-Reply-To: <525B944D.20006@eng.it> References: <525B944D.20006@eng.it> Message-ID: Hi Davide, I haven't moved it yet because we were supposed to come up with an standard text for tabs that did not apply to a specific tool.? This topic has not been discussed because of the recent events. Besides that, I could move it at any time. I estimate it should take me around 2 - 3 hours. BR --? Pedro Rodriguez On 15 de octubre de 2013 at 09:51:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: Hi Pedro, how is it the status of the configuration for publishing tools in the public Catalogue? thank you and BR Davide -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Tue Oct 15 10:06:15 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:06:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] REMIND: Urgent request for effort calculation of each partner (needed for today's call) Message-ID: <5F280F75293D453CAF6462F0EB3E0843@YamahaRBX250> ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu ; Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 12:41 PM Subject: Urgent request for effort calculation of each partner Dear WP9 partners, I?m sending on behalf of Davide (he?s currently attending the FIWARE WPA/WPL call) an urgent request in order to evaluate a suitable strategy to address recommendation #15 (?suggesting? to scale down activities of WP9) we kindly ask to each partner to: 1) Evaluate the possibility to freeze on-going activities in WP9 and consequently calculate the remaining effort from the end of M30 (October 2013) until the end of the project 2) Evaluate how much effort is planned to close on-going activities and consequently calculate the remaining effort until the end of the project once those activities are closed 3) Evaluate possible alternative activities in other WPs where to shift remaining effort This will actually be the topic of discussion during tomorrow?s call, so please consider to get at least minimum information to share with all partners within tomorrow morning. With many thanks in advance for your understanding. Best regards Laura ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Laura Pucci Technological Innovation Directorate laura.pucci at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Terragneta, 90 - 80058 Torre Annunziata (NA) Tel. +39-081.8626884 Fax +39-081.8626819 www.eng.it -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 15 10:26:47 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:26:47 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> Message-ID: <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> Dear all, here is the link to shared minutes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing BR Davide On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct 15th at > 11.00 CEST. > > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... > > kind regards, > Davide > > I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it > directly with the usual > partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already > received a notification. > anyway, just in case, here is the link: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Tue Oct 15 11:03:34 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:03:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call - CANCELLED References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> Message-ID: <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> Dear all, the discussion on how to address review recommendations should have all (at least the maximum number of) WP9 participants attending. We realized that too many partners would have been missing in today's call and decided to postpone the call fixing a new date/timing where everyone can attend. A doodle poll link will be ciruclated soon to establish a new date. Best regards and thanks for your attention, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: Davide Dalle Carbonare To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:26 AM Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Dear all, here is the link to shared minutes https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing BR Davide On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct 15th at 11.00 CEST. link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... kind regards, Davide I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it directly with the usual partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already received a notification. anyway, just in case, here is the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 15 16:19:55 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:19:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY IMPORTANT Re: Conference call - CANCELLED In-Reply-To: <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> Message-ID: <525D4F0B.20107@eng.it> Dear partners, please find here the link to the doodle to reschedule the today conf call: http://doodle.com/znxtwy7qpptd28wt It's very important for all of you to attend. This morning I had a conf call with Juanjo, and he will join our conf call to share with all of us the current situation and some indication on how to proceed. BR Davide On 15/10/2013 11:03, laura pucci wrote: > Dear all, > the discussion on how to address review recommendations should have > all (at least the maximum number of) WP9 participants attending. We > realized that too many partners would have been missing in today's > call and decided to postpone the call fixing a new date/timing where > everyone can attend. A doodle poll link will be ciruclated soon to > establish a new date. > Best regards and thanks for your attention, > Laura > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Davide Dalle Carbonare > *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:26 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder > > Dear all, > here is the link to shared minutes > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing > > BR > Davide > > On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear All, >> this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct 15th >> at 11.00 CEST. >> >> link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... >> >> kind regards, >> Davide >> >> I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it >> directly with the usual >> partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already >> received a notification. >> anyway, just in case, here is the link: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Oct 16 12:31:50 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:31:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY IMPORTANT Re: Conference call - RESCHEDULED In-Reply-To: <525D4F0B.20107@eng.it> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> <525D4F0B.20107@eng.it> Message-ID: <525E6B16.4090705@eng.it> Dear WP9 partners, Juanjo, I've closed the Doodle. The conf call is tomorrow *Thursday 17th at 10.00 AM CEST* usual powwownow bridge with PIN: 349445 @Daniel, I hope you can join ... talk to you tomorrow, BR Davide On 15/10/2013 16:19, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partners, > please find here the link to the doodle to reschedule the today > conf call: > http://doodle.com/znxtwy7qpptd28wt > > It's very important for all of you to attend. This morning I had a > conf call with Juanjo, > and he will join our conf call to share with all of us the current > situation and > some indication on how to proceed. > > BR > Davide > > > On 15/10/2013 11:03, laura pucci wrote: >> Dear all, >> the discussion on how to address review recommendations should have >> all (at least the maximum number of) WP9 participants attending. We >> realized that too many partners would have been missing in today's >> call and decided to postpone the call fixing a new date/timing where >> everyone can attend. A doodle poll link will be ciruclated soon to >> establish a new date. >> Best regards and thanks for your attention, >> Laura >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Davide Dalle Carbonare >> *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:26 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder >> >> Dear all, >> here is the link to shared minutes >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct >>> 15th at 11.00 CEST. >>> >>> link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... >>> >>> kind regards, >>> Davide >>> >>> I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared it >>> directly with the usual >>> partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have already >>> received a notification. >>> anyway, just in case, here is the link: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Oct 16 16:51:25 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:51:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY IMPORTANT Re: Conference call - RESCHEDULED In-Reply-To: <525E6B16.4090705@eng.it> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> <525D4F0B.20107@eng.it> <525E6B16.4090705@eng.it> Message-ID: <525EA7ED.8090409@eng.it> Dear WP9 partners, due to an unexpected overlapping call, Juanjo can't attend in the morning. Accordingly with the doodle our call is moved at *Thursday 17th at 4.00 PM CEST* sorry for the inconvenience. BR Davide On 16/10/2013 12:31, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear WP9 partners, Juanjo, > I've closed the Doodle. The conf call is tomorrow > > *Thursday 17th at 10.00 AM CEST* > > usual powwownow bridge with PIN: 349445 > > @Daniel, I hope you can join ... > > talk to you tomorrow, > BR > Davide > > > On 15/10/2013 16:19, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear partners, >> please find here the link to the doodle to reschedule the today >> conf call: >> http://doodle.com/znxtwy7qpptd28wt >> >> It's very important for all of you to attend. This morning I had a >> conf call with Juanjo, >> and he will join our conf call to share with all of us the current >> situation and >> some indication on how to proceed. >> >> BR >> Davide >> >> >> On 15/10/2013 11:03, laura pucci wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> the discussion on how to address review recommendations should have >>> all (at least the maximum number of) WP9 participants attending. We >>> realized that too many partners would have been missing in today's >>> call and decided to postpone the call fixing a new date/timing where >>> everyone can attend. A doodle poll link will be ciruclated soon to >>> establish a new date. >>> Best regards and thanks for your attention, >>> Laura >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Davide Dalle Carbonare >>> >>> *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:26 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder >>> >>> Dear all, >>> here is the link to shared minutes >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> BR >>> Davide >>> >>> On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>>> Dear All, >>>> this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, Oct >>>> 15th at 11.00 CEST. >>>> >>>> link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... >>>> >>>> kind regards, >>>> Davide >>>> >>>> I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've shared >>>> it directly with the usual >>>> partner that attend the conf calls, and that should have >>>> already received a notification. >>>> anyway, just in case, here is the link: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net Wed Oct 16 17:29:54 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:29:54 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY IMPORTANT Re: Conference call - RESCHEDULED In-Reply-To: <525EA7ED.8090409@eng.it> References: <525C73CE.9020609@eng.it> <525CFC47.3040701@eng.it> <4DDD62231B9E49F7A0574A46E8EB0F58@YamahaRBX250> <525D4F0B.20107@eng.it> <525E6B16.4090705@eng.it> <525EA7ED.8090409@eng.it> Message-ID: <1381937394.32269.0.camel@localhost> Ciao Davide, I cannot attend the meeting tomorrow anytime,so i will read the minutes and react to them. Sorry for the inconveniences. Yosu On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 16:51 +0200, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear WP9 partners, > due to an unexpected overlapping call, Juanjo can't attend in the > morning. > Accordingly with the doodle our call is moved at > > Thursday 17th at 4.00 PM CEST > > sorry for the inconvenience. > BR > Davide > > On 16/10/2013 12:31, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > > > Dear WP9 partners, Juanjo, > > I've closed the Doodle. The conf call is tomorrow > > > > Thursday 17th at 10.00 AM CEST > > > > usual powwownow bridge with PIN: 349445 > > > > @Daniel, I hope you can join ... > > > > talk to you tomorrow, > > BR > > Davide > > > > > > On 15/10/2013 16:19, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > > > > > Dear partners, > > > please find here the link to the doodle to reschedule the > > > today conf call: > > > http://doodle.com/znxtwy7qpptd28wt > > > > > > It's very important for all of you to attend. This morning I had a > > > conf call with Juanjo, > > > and he will join our conf call to share with all of us the current > > > situation and > > > some indication on how to proceed. > > > > > > BR > > > Davide > > > > > > > > > On 15/10/2013 11:03, laura pucci wrote: > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > the discussion on how to address review recommendations should > > > > have all (at least the maximum number of) WP9 participants > > > > attending. We realized that too many partners would have been > > > > missing in today's call and decided to postpone the call fixing > > > > a new date/timing where everyone can attend. A doodle poll link > > > > will be ciruclated soon to establish a new date. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards and thanks for your attention, > > > > Laura > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Davide Dalle Carbonare > > > > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:26 AM > > > > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > here is the link to shared minutes > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Lo1NctUq7EAn5rK1GHSTgQYmX-CZSDLKl0Brwb6Fgk/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > BR > > > > Davide > > > > > > > > On 15/10/2013 00:44, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > this is to remind you our conference call, > > > > > tomorrow, Oct 15th at 11.00 CEST. > > > > > > > > > > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as > > > > > possible ... > > > > > > > > > > kind regards, > > > > > Davide > > > > > > > > > > I've created a google doc for editing the letter, I've > > > > > shared it directly with the usual > > > > > partner that attend the conf calls, and that should > > > > > have already received a notification. > > > > > anyway, just in case, here is the link: > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > > > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ From laura.pucci at eng.it Thu Oct 17 13:12:07 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:12:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Call for contribution: Periodic Report M25-M30 - deadline October 24 Message-ID: <8E3E2DFEEF834EE88328E176DEEC23B9@YamahaRBX250> Dear WP9 partners, you may already know that at the end of this month we?ll have to submit another Periodic Report, covering the period from M25 to M30. The coordinator sent a new template for D1.2.5, according to the reviewers? remark to have activities done detailed by each partner for each task. We kindly ask you (partners involved already listed for each Task) to compile the attached template, describing activities performed (main progresses, possible deviations and corrective actions) from May to October 2013 at task level, by October 24th. The first part of D1.2.5, concerning progresses/results/etc at WP level, will be compiled by ENG and, of course, possibly will be integrated later on, taking into account your contributions once received. As for the section related to effort spent, as you can see we are waiting for the updated figures. Should you have any questions, please don?t hesitate to contact me asap. My best regards, Laura -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP9.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 222084 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Oct 21 23:55:10 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:55:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <5265A2BE.1020404@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... The main topic is the letter to the commission. kind regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 22 09:51:12 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:51:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <5265A2BE.1020404@eng.it> References: <5265A2BE.1020404@eng.it> Message-ID: <52662E70.4040208@eng.it> Dear all, here is the link to the minutes for today: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J3V7_CFJPl0pIaQjl8koN-RHy1oWMa6C-OfW2KvxAmE/edit?usp=sharing talk to you later, BR Davide On 21/10/2013 23:55, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. > > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... > > The main topic is the letter to the commission. > > kind regards, > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Oct 23 09:24:45 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:24:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration In-Reply-To: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> Message-ID: <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> Dear Partners, please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website:www.tid.es email:jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website:http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment5 deliverable list (version_date-13-07-17) DRAFT.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 90967 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment5 deliverable list (version_date-13-07-17) DRAFT DDC.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 15863 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net Wed Oct 23 10:59:18 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:59:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Call for contribution: Periodic Report M25-M30 - deadline October 24 In-Reply-To: <8E3E2DFEEF834EE88328E176DEEC23B9@YamahaRBX250> References: <8E3E2DFEEF834EE88328E176DEEC23B9@YamahaRBX250> Message-ID: <1382518758.2286.10.camel@localhost> Dear Laura, please, see attached Atos report for T9.1. I have included Atos' description in this section, focusing on progress and results. If you want me to introduce changes on the report or include it in a different section, please, let me know. Kind regards Yosu On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 13:12 +0200, laura pucci wrote: > Dear WP9 partners, > > you may already know that at the end of this month we?ll have to > submit another Periodic Report, covering the period from M25 to M30. > > The coordinator sent a new template for D1.2.5, according to the > reviewers? remark to have activities done detailed by each partner for > each task. > > > > We kindly ask you (partners involved already listed for each Task) to > compile the attached template, describing activities performed (main > progresses, possible deviations and corrective actions) from May to > October 2013 at task level, by October 24th. > > > > The first part of D1.2.5, concerning progresses/results/etc at WP > level, will be compiled by ENG and, of course, possibly will be > integrated later on, taking into account your contributions once > received. > > As for the section related to effort spent, as you can see we are > waiting for the updated figures. > > > > Should you have any questions, please don?t hesitate to contact me > asap. > > > > > > My best regards, > > Laura > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP9_M25-M30_Atos.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 223922 bytes Desc: not available URL: From MARCEL at il.ibm.com Wed Oct 23 14:15:20 2013 From: MARCEL at il.ibm.com (Marcel Zalmanovici) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:15:20 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration In-Reply-To: <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> Message-ID: I don't see any problem with moving deliverables further into the future. "Worst" case we finish planned work earlier and either have more testing time or can add new features. From: Davide Dalle Carbonare To: "fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 23/10/2013 10:24 AM Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Sent by: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Partners, please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx [attachment "FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment5 deliverable list (version_date-13-07-17) DRAFT.docx" deleted by Marcel Zalmanovici/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "Attached Message Part" deleted by Marcel Zalmanovici/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment5 deliverable list (version_date-13-07-17) DRAFT DDC.docx" deleted by Marcel Zalmanovici/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.scheibli at sap.com Wed Oct 23 15:12:04 2013 From: daniel.scheibli at sap.com (Scheibli, Daniel) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:12:04 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration In-Reply-To: <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> Message-ID: <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> Dear Davide, actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I see the danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. Best Regards, Daniel From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Dear Partners, please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Thu Oct 24 09:34:56 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:34:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> Dear Davide, dear all, following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. In particular, I'd like to share with you my doubts in postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I'll try to explain why below, so to have your precious feedbacks on that. As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be true also for the Tools Chapter. BUT, given that the date of the review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in January. Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans now it's crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. With many thanks in advance for your attention. Kind regards Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: Scheibli, Daniel To: Davide Dalle Carbonare Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Dear Davide, actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I see the danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. Best Regards, Daniel From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Dear Partners, please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------------Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digitalwebsite: www.tid.esemail: jhierro at tid.estwitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From laura.pucci at eng.it Thu Oct 24 11:08:52 2013 From: laura.pucci at eng.it (laura pucci) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:08:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] REMIND: Call for contribution: Periodic Report M25-M30 - deadline October 24 Message-ID: <973121E23EDA48B0BA493F2B7C439F75@YamahaRBX250> Dear all, this is to kindly remind to those partners who still haven't sent their contributions that the deadline for the M25-M30 PPR is today EoB. Please bear in mind that, once we received all contributions, we shall integrate and review them, so to circulate the complete PPR to you for a final check before sending it to the Coordinator (due date is October 30th, we don?t have much time). Thank you in advance for your understanding. Regards, Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: laura pucci To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:12 PM Subject: Call for contribution: Periodic Report M25-M30 - deadline October 24 Dear WP9 partners, you may already know that at the end of this month we?ll have to submit another Periodic Report, covering the period from M25 to M30. The coordinator sent a new template for D1.2.5, according to the reviewers? remark to have activities done detailed by each partner for each task. We kindly ask you (partners involved already listed for each Task) to compile the attached template, describing activities performed (main progresses, possible deviations and corrective actions) from May to October 2013 at task level, by October 24th. The first part of D1.2.5, concerning progresses/results/etc at WP level, will be compiled by ENG and, of course, possibly will be integrated later on, taking into account your contributions once received. As for the section related to effort spent, as you can see we are waiting for the updated figures. Should you have any questions, please don?t hesitate to contact me asap. My best regards, Laura -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.1.2.5 - WP9.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 222084 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Oct 24 17:28:44 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:28:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Letter to the EC Message-ID: <52693CAC.5080509@eng.it> Dear partner, please find the merged letter at the link https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# please let me know your comments by Monday 28th EOB BR Davide -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Oct 24 17:42:42 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:42:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> Message-ID: <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> Dear partner, taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I invite you to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... D9.1 -> M36 D9.2 -> M36 D9.3 -> M33 D9.4 -> M33 this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on Catalogue, eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally planned. Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the indications from the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as responsible for this deliverable) to express his opinion. _*I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON*_ I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is tomorrow, otherwise we will send this proposal. kind regards, Davide On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: > > Dear Davide, dear all, > > following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and > new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation > is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of > possible new plans for each WP9 partner. > > In particular, I'd like to share with you my doubts in postponing the > deliverables deadlines to M36. I'll try to explain why below, so to > have your precious feedbacks on that. > > As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 > Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs > will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be > true also for the Tools Chapter... BUT, given that the date of the > review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, > there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that > the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) > Deliverables will be submitted at M33. > > Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 > deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' > decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If > we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be > difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release > deliverables due in January. > > Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: > > 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time > > 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in > these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those > deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these > plans now it's crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of > a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. > > Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. > > With many thanks in advance for your attention. > > Kind regards > > Laura > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Scheibli, Daniel > *To:* Davide Dalle Carbonare > *Cc:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: > Extension of theproject duration > > Dear Davide, > > actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are > currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. > > Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would > be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that > > extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will > definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I > see the > > danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation > mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. > > Best Regards, > Daniel > > *From:*fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of > *Davide Dalle Carbonare > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 > *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension > of the project duration > > Dear Partners, > please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. > I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. > > We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf > calls with all the partners are in favor of that. > The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that > sounds acceptable from my side. > If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward > them to Juanjo. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration > > *Date: * > > > > Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 > > *From: * > > > > Juanjo Hierro > > *To: * > > > > fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > > , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > *CC: * > > > > fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > > Hi all, > > As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an > extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 > additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in > the last review report. > > This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the > teams in your respective chapters. > > During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the > project would mean a request to move the dates of those > deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying > documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. > Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP > Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be > delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we > would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should > also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. > > So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be > ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in > deliverable dates are incorporated. > > With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the > attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are > highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your > feedback is welcome. > > Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this > Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC > announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 > months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we > propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the > attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some > additional changes you may consider necessary. > > Best regards, > > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------- > > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > > website:www.tid.es > > email:jhierro at tid.es > > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > > and Chief Architect > > > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo > electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only > send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From prodriguez at dit.upm.es Fri Oct 25 10:05:17 2013 From: prodriguez at dit.upm.es (Pedro Rodriguez) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:05:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Message-ID: Dear All, Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide?s). As far as the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until all the deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense to delay the deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. Best Regards --? Pedro Rodriguez On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: Dear partner, ??? taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I invite you to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... D9.1 -> M36 D9.2 -> M36 D9.3 -> M33 D9.4 -> M33 this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on Catalogue, eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally planned. Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the indications from the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as responsible for this deliverable) to express his opinion. I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is tomorrow, otherwise we will send this proposal. kind regards, Davide On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: Dear Davide, dear all, following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation is? a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, so to have your precious feedbacks on that. As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really few activities -? in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in January. Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: 1)??? Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time 2)??? New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans now it?s crucial ?now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. ? Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. ? With many thanks in advance for your attention. ? Kind regards Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: Scheibli, Daniel To: Davide Dalle Carbonare Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Dear Davide, ? actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. ? Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I see the danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. ? Best Regards, Daniel ? ? ? From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration ? Dear Partners, ??? please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, ? As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months.?? This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. ? ? This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. ? During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33.?? Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40.?? We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. ? So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. ? With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List.?? Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them.?? Of course, your feedback is welcome. ? Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official? response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted.??? I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. ? Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ? Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ? _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Oct 25 10:09:38 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:09:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> Message-ID: <526A2742.5010502@eng.it> Thank you Pedro, I have also received the agreement from Marcel (IBM) with regards this last proposal. BR Davide On 25/10/2013 10:04, Pedro Rodriguez wrote: > Dear All, > > Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide?s). As far as > the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until > all the deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense > to delay the deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. > > Best Regards > -- > Pedro Rodriguez > > > On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare > (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it ) > wrote: > >> Dear partner, >> taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I >> invite you >> to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... >> >> D9.1 -> M36 >> D9.2 -> M36 >> D9.3 -> M33 >> D9.4 -> M33 >> >> this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support >> on Catalogue, >> eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally >> planned. >> Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the >> indications from >> the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama >> (as responsible for >> this deliverable) to express his opinion. >> >> _*I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON*_ >> >> I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is >> tomorrow, >> otherwise we will send this proposal. >> >> kind regards, >> Davide >> >> >> On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: >>> >>> Dear Davide, dear all, >>> >>> following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension >>> (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the >>> situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the >>> definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. >>> >>> In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in postponing >>> the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, so >>> to have your precious feedbacks on that. >>> >>> As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 >>> Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs >>> will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should >>> be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the >>> review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, >>> there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that >>> the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) >>> Deliverables will be submitted at M33. >>> >>> Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 >>> deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' >>> decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? >>> If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it >>> will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work >>> to release deliverables due in January. >>> >>> Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: >>> >>> 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time >>> >>> 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking >>> in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those >>> deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these >>> plans now it?s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility >>> of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. >>> >>> Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. >>> >>> With many thanks in advance for your attention. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Laura >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Scheibli, Daniel >>> *To:* Davide Dalle Carbonare >>> *Cc:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: >>> Extension of theproject duration >>> >>> Dear Davide, >>> >>> actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are >>> currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. >>> >>> Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would >>> be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that >>> >>> extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will >>> definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also >>> I see the >>> >>> danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation >>> mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Daniel >>> >>> *From:* fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of* >>> Davide Dalle Carbonare >>> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 >>> *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> *Subject:* [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension >>> of the project duration >>> >>> Dear Partners, >>> please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. >>> I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. >>> >>> We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf >>> calls with all the partners are in favor of that. >>> The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that >>> sounds acceptable from my side. >>> If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward >>> them to Juanjo. >>> >>> kind regards, >>> Davide >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> >>> *Subject:* >>> >>> >>> >>> [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration >>> >>> *Date:* >>> >>> >>> >>> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 >>> >>> *From:* >>> >>> >>> >>> Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> *To:* >>> >>> >>> >>> fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> , >>> fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> *CC:* >>> >>> >>> >>> fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested >>> an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 >>> additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in >>> the last review report. >>> >>> This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with >>> the teams in your respective chapters. >>> >>> During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the >>> project would mean a request to move the dates of those >>> deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying >>> documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of >>> 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the >>> FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would >>> also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I >>> guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be >>> produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. >>> >>> So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be >>> ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in >>> deliverable dates are incorporated. >>> >>> With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the >>> attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are >>> highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your >>> feedback is welcome. >>> >>> Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this >>> Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC >>> announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another >>> 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes >>> we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use >>> the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate >>> some additional changes you may consider necessary. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------- >>> >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> >>> website:www.tid.es >>> >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only >>> send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.scheibli at sap.com Fri Oct 25 11:29:01 2013 From: daniel.scheibli at sap.com (Scheibli, Daniel) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:29:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: <526A2742.5010502@eng.it> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> <526A2742.5010502@eng.it> Message-ID: <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222FAE6D@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> Hi Davide, fine with us. Best Regards, Daniel From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 10:10 To: Pedro Rodriguez Cc: JuanQuemada; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Thank you Pedro, I have also received the agreement from Marcel (IBM) with regards this last proposal. BR Davide On 25/10/2013 10:04, Pedro Rodriguez wrote: Dear All, Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide?s). As far as the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until all the deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense to delay the deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. Best Regards -- Pedro Rodriguez On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: Dear partner, taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I invite you to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... D9.1 -> M36 D9.2 -> M36 D9.3 -> M33 D9.4 -> M33 this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on Catalogue, eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally planned. Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the indications from the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as responsible for this deliverable) to express his opinion. I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is tomorrow, otherwise we will send this proposal. kind regards, Davide On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: Dear Davide, dear all, following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, so to have your precious feedbacks on that. As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in January. Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans now it?s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. With many thanks in advance for your attention. Kind regards Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: Scheibli, Daniel To: Davide Dalle Carbonare Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Dear Davide, actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I see the danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. Best Regards, Daniel From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Dear Partners, please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de Fri Oct 25 12:36:43 2013 From: osama.sammodi at paluno.uni-due.de (Sammodi, Osama) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:36:43 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222FAE6D@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> <526A2742.5010502@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222FAE6D@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <11798C8384F9C547948DFC33C819B8D4152DB040@WIWINF-EXDAG02.wiwinf.uni-due.de> Hi Davide, Also fine with us. Kind regards, Osama > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Scheibli, Daniel > Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 11:29 > To: Davide Dalle Carbonare > Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > Hi Davide, > > > > fine with us. > > > > Best Regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare > Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 10:10 > To: Pedro Rodriguez > Cc: JuanQuemada; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > > > Thank you Pedro, > > I have also received the agreement from Marcel (IBM) with regards this last > proposal. > > BR > Davide > > On 25/10/2013 10:04, Pedro Rodriguez wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide?s). As far as > the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until all the > deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense to delay the > deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. > > > > Best Regards > > -- > Pedro Rodriguez > > > > On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare > (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: > > Dear partner, > taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's > comments, I invite you > to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments > promptly ... > > D9.1 -> M36 > D9.2 -> M36 > D9.3 -> M33 > D9.4 -> M33 > > this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and > support on Catalogue, > eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as > originally planned. > Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to > incorporate the indications from > the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask > Osama (as responsible for > this deliverable) to express his opinion. > > I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON > > I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to > Juanjo is tomorrow, > otherwise we will send this proposal. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > > On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: > > Dear Davide, dear all, > > following the email coming by SAP, with respect to > the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 > the situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of > possible new plans for each WP9 partner. > > In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in > postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, > so to have your precious feedbacks on that. > > As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next > Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable > tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should > be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the review > will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really > few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at > that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. > > Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move > all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' > decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep > the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for > reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in > January. > > Of course, these considerations could fit and make > sense only if: > > 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time > > 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing > and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of > those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans > now it?s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) > extension also for the Tools Chapter. > > > > Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about > my concerns. > > > > With many thanks in advance for your attention. > > > > Kind regards > > Laura > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Scheibli, Daniel > > > To: Davide Dalle Carbonare > > > Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > > > Dear Davide, > > > > actually SAP has concerns regarding the > extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium > management / Juanjo. > > > > Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to > M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we > really need that > > extra elapsed time? One down side will be, > that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I > see the > > danger that it further exposes the tools to > the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. > > > > Best Regards, > Daniel > > > > > > > > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle > Carbonare > Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration > > > > Dear Partners, > please find below a main from Juanjo on > the project extension. > I also attach the list of deliverables with some > updates I've done. > > We already talked about the project > extension during our lasts conf > calls with all the partners are in favor of that. > The shift of the dates for our deliverable is > from M33 to M36 that > sounds acceptable from my side. > If you have some objection, please let me > know in time to forward > them to Juanjo. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: > > [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration > > Date: > > Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 > > From: > > Juanjo Hierro > > To: > > fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> > > CC: > > fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> > > > > Hi all, > > As we have discussed a couple of times, the > EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 > additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last > review report. > > This was a topic that I have encouraged you > to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. > > During our meetings, it was also agreed that > extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those > deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation > so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked > to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were > planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't > discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be > produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. > > So far, the only feedback I have got is that > partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned > changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. > > With all these considerations in mind, I have > produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are > highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is > welcome. > > Unless I hear about any objection from your > side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC > announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months > (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the > deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis > although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider > necessary. > > Best regards, > > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - > Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core > Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: > http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > ________________________________ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su > destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo > electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its > addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out > at: > > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > ________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net Fri Oct 25 13:35:10 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:35:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> Message-ID: <1382700910.8481.2.camel@localhost> Ciao Davide, also fine with us. Regards Yosu On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 17:42 +0200, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear partner, > taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I > invite you > to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... > > D9.1 -> M36 > D9.2 -> M36 > D9.3 -> M33 > D9.4 -> M33 > > this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on > Catalogue, > eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally > planned. > Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the > indications from > the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as > responsible for > this deliverable) to express his opinion. > > I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON > > I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is > tomorrow, > otherwise we will send this proposal. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: > > > Dear Davide, dear all, > > > > following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension > > (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the > > situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the > > definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. > > > > In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in postponing > > the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, so > > to have your precious feedbacks on that. > > > > As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 > > Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs > > will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should > > be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the > > review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, > > there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that > > the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) > > Deliverables will be submitted at M33. > > > > Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 > > deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' > > decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? > > If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it > > will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work > > to release deliverables due in January. > > > > Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: > > > > 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time > > > > 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking > > in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those > > deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these > > plans now it?s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility > > of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. > > > > > > > > Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. > > > > > > > > With many thanks in advance for your attention. > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > Laura > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Scheibli, Daniel > > To: Davide Dalle Carbonare > > Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: > > Extension of theproject duration > > > > > > Dear Davide, > > > > > > > > actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they > > are currently being addresses with the consortium > > management / Juanjo. > > > > > > > > Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question > > would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really > > need that > > > > extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will > > definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. > > Also I see the > > > > danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation > > mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last > > Thurday. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > > [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of > > Davide Dalle Carbonare > > Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 > > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: > > Extension of the project duration > > > > > > > > > > Dear Partners, > > please find below a main from Juanjo on the project > > extension. > > I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates > > I've done. > > > > We already talked about the project extension during our > > lasts conf > > calls with all the partners are in favor of that. > > The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to > > M36 that > > sounds acceptable from my side. > > If you have some objection, please let me know in time to > > forward > > them to Juanjo. > > > > kind regards, > > Davide > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > > Subject: > > > > > > [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: > > Extension of the project > > duration > > > > > > Date: > > > > > > Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 > > +0200 > > > > > > From: > > > > > > Juanjo Hierro > > > > > > To: > > > > > > fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > > , > > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > > > > > CC: > > > > > > fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has > > suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for > > at least 4 additional months. This was actually a > > recommendation given in the last review report. > > > > This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss > > with the teams in your respective chapters. > > > > During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of > > the project would mean a request to move the dates of those > > deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying > > documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of > > 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on > > the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month > > 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss > > this but I guess we would agree that some of the final > > reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 > > until month 40. > > > > So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners > > would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the > > mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. > > > > With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the > > attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes > > are highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of > > course, your feedback is welcome. > > > > Unless I hear about any objection from your side before > > this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the > > EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration > > another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided > > the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are > > accepted. I will use the attached table as basis although > > I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may > > consider necessary. > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------- > > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > > website: www.tid.es > > email: jhierro at tid.es > > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > > and Chief Architect > > > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. > > Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de > > correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We > > only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set > > out at: > > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Oct 25 14:29:18 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:29:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration In-Reply-To: <526A63AC.3010803@eng.it> References: <526A63AC.3010803@eng.it> Message-ID: <526A641E.7010909@eng.it> FYI kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:27:24 +0200 From: Davide Dalle Carbonare To: Juanjo Hierro CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Juanjo, I report you here and in the attached document (in track changes) the position of the Tools Chapter with regards the deliverable dates. Deliverables to be moved to *M36* D9.1.d FI-CoDE Basic Framework D9.2.c FI-CoDE Handbook Deliverable to stay at *M33* D9.3.c API IDE Support D9.4.c Application Testing and Deployment Support Tools kind regards, Davide On 23/10/2013 07:36, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an > extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional > months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last review > report. > > This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the > teams in your respective chapters. > > During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the > project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables > linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that > they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked > to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were > planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't > discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports > to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. > > So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok > for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in > deliverable dates are incorporated. > > With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached > updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are highlighted so > that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is welcome. > > Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday > EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC announcing our > agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until > end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the > deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as > basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you > may consider necessary. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment5 deliverable list (version_date-13-07-17) DRAFT DDC.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 15194 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From lodoyun at gmail.com Fri Oct 25 10:04:08 2013 From: lodoyun at gmail.com (Pedro Rodriguez) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:04:08 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration In-Reply-To: <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> References: <52676049.8020105@tid.es> <526779BD.3050201@eng.it> <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229222F524A@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> <200C8D235E6344ECA9C263562263D474@YamahaRBX250> <52693FF2.8030504@eng.it> Message-ID: Dear All, Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide?s). As far as the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until all the deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense to delay the deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. Best Regards --? Pedro Rodriguez On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: Dear partner, ??? taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I invite you to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... D9.1 -> M36 D9.2 -> M36 D9.3 -> M33 D9.4 -> M33 this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on Catalogue, eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally planned. Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the indications from the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as responsible for this deliverable) to express his opinion. I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is tomorrow, otherwise we will send this proposal. kind regards, Davide On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: Dear Davide, dear all, following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation is? a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. In particular, I?d like to share with you my doubts in postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I?ll try to explain why below, so to have your precious feedbacks on that. As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be true also for the Tools Chapter? BUT, given that the date of the review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really few activities -? in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in January. Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: 1)??? Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time 2)??? New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans now it?s crucial ?now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. ? Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. ? With many thanks in advance for your attention. ? Kind regards Laura ----- Original Message ----- From: Scheibli, Daniel To: Davide Dalle Carbonare Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration Dear Davide, ? actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. ? Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I see the danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. ? Best Regards, Daniel ? ? ? From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration ? Dear Partners, ??? please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf calls with all the partners are in favor of that. The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that sounds acceptable from my side. If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward them to Juanjo. kind regards, Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, ? As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 additional months.?? This was actually a recommendation given in the last review report. ? ? This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. ? During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33.?? Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40.?? We didn't discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. ? So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. ? With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List.?? Changes are highlighted so that you can easily track them.?? Of course, your feedback is welcome. ? Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official? response to the EC announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted.??? I will use the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider necessary. ? Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ? Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ? _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.scheibli at sap.com Mon Oct 28 15:37:36 2013 From: daniel.scheibli at sap.com (Scheibli, Daniel) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:37:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Letter to the EC In-Reply-To: <52693CAC.5080509@eng.it> References: <52693CAC.5080509@eng.it> Message-ID: <0D29AC92E8D8114EA18159BC1D5EF229223005A8@DEWDFEMB18A.global.corp.sap> Dear Davide, I added my comments your and Osama's letter in the Google Doc. IMHO we would ideally combine the two letter. For instance I like Osama's straight approach of acknowledging the situation and openly addressing the points. But I also like your second paragraph, about our understanding that the reviewers recognizing our effort spent in WP9, very much. For the FI-CoDE Handbook I would assume you would prefer your version as well. Here I would additionally propose to add Osama's part about the "expected content". Thanks & Best Regards, Daniel From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013 17:29 To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-tools] Letter to the EC Dear partner, please find the merged letter at the link https://docs.google.com/document/d/190TGJUdRxXkD8AvxIka2MVyhjNN0-DgkrpcQKr8zyWU/edit# please let me know your comments by Monday 28th EOB BR Davide -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Oct 29 08:41:30 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:41:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <526F66AA.7050500@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, today, at 11.00 CEST. here is the link to the minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DtVENvI-W1mnyJGvwnvppf9HoMLnNPEMOEiFRRns0l4/edit?usp=sharing The main topic to discuss is the letter to the commission, if you have any other business to discuss, please add a point to the minutes. kind regards, Davide From prodriguez at dit.upm.es Thu Oct 31 11:21:04 2013 From: prodriguez at dit.upm.es (Pedro Rodriguez) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:21:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Publishing the Tools on the Catalogue Message-ID: Dear all, In the last conference, we discussed publishing the new Tools section of the Catalogue in the production environment. Before doing that we have to agree on the final configuration we want. I?ll summarise what there is in the development Catalogue right now: Tools are created using the same procedure as a Generic Enabler but selecting the ?Tools? Chapter, an empty tool has the following tabs: (Format Tab name - default text) - Overview - mandatory - Documentation:? No documentation is available for this enabler? If you are the administrator of this enabler, please edit this page to add documentation. - Downloads: There are no downloads available for this enabler. - Instances: There are no instances of this Generic Enabler yet. - Terms and Conditions:? No terms and conditions are available for this content. If you are the administrator of this content, please edit this page to add the terms. NOTE: There is a base text for the terms and conditions provided by TID that was distributed to GE Owners via email ?????????????????????? So, in the development instance, the only difference is the Creating Instances tab that I was asked to remove. In my opinion, the parts that make less sense for the Tools are the ones about instances. Furthermore, the Tools already in the Development Catalogue don?t use the Instances tab.? My recommendation at this point is to port this to the new Catalogue without the ?Creating Instances? or the ?Instances? tab.? No additional ?default? text is needed, only changing ?enabler? for ?enabler/tool? in some cases. The only minor issue to discuss is how to provide the Terms and Conditions compared to the GEs (Do we use the text provided by TID?) This would be quite fast to implement in the Production Catalogue. Please tell me what you think or if you prefer to discuss this in the next conference call. Best Regards --? Pedro Rodr?guez -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: