Dear partner,
taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I
invite you
to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ...
D9.1 -> M36
D9.2 -> M36
D9.3 -> M33
D9.4 -> M33
this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support on
Catalogue,
eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally
planned.
Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the
indications from
the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama (as
responsible for
this deliverable) to express his opinion.
_*I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON*_
I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is
tomorrow,
otherwise we will send this proposal.
kind regards,
Davide
On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote:
>
> Dear Davide, dear all,
>
> following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension (and
> new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the situation
> is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of
> possible new plans for each WP9 partner.
>
> In particular, I'd like to share with you my doubts in postponing the
> deliverables deadlines to M36. I'll try to explain why below, so to
> have your precious feedbacks on that.
>
> As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30
> Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs
> will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should be
> true also for the Tools Chapter... BUT, given that the date of the
> review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project,
> there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that
> the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P)
> Deliverables will be submitted at M33.
>
> Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9
> deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers'
> decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If
> we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be
> difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release
> deliverables due in January.
>
> Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if:
>
> 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time
>
> 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking in
> these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those
> deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these
> plans now it's crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of
> a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter.
>
> Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns.
>
> With many thanks in advance for your attention.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Laura
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Scheibli, Daniel <mailto:daniel.scheibli at sap.com>
> *To:* Davide Dalle Carbonare <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>
> *Cc:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> <mailto:fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT:
> Extension of theproject duration
>
> Dear Davide,
>
> actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are
> currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo.
>
> Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would
> be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that
>
> extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will
> definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I
> see the
>
> danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation
> mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday.
>
> Best Regards,
> Daniel
>
> *From:*fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of
> *Davide Dalle Carbonare
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25
> *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Subject:* [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension
> of the project duration
>
> Dear Partners,
> please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension.
> I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done.
>
> We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf
> calls with all the partners are in favor of that.
> The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that
> sounds acceptable from my side.
> If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward
> them to Juanjo.
>
> kind regards,
> Davide
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> *Subject: *
>
>
>
> [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration
>
> *Date: *
>
>
>
> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200
>
> *From: *
>
>
>
> Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
>
> *To: *
>
>
>
> fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> <mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
> <mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> <mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>
> *CC: *
>
>
>
> fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested an
> extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4
> additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in
> the last review report.
>
> This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with the
> teams in your respective chapters.
>
> During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the
> project would mean a request to move the dates of those
> deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying
> documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33.
> Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the FI-PPP
> Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would also be
> delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I guess we
> would agree that some of the final reports to be produced should
> also be delayed from month 36 until month 40.
>
> So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be
> ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in
> deliverable dates are incorporated.
>
> With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the
> attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are
> highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your
> feedback is welcome.
>
> Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this
> Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC
> announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4
> months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we
> propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the
> attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate some
> additional changes you may consider necessary.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> -- Juanjo
>
>
>
> -------------
>
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
>
> website:www.tid.es <http://www.tid.es>
>
> email:jhierro at tid.es <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
>
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
>
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
>
> and Chief Architect
>
>
>
> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman
>
>
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>
> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu
>
> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>
> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware
>
> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede
> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo
> electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only
> send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-tools mailing list
> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu
> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20131024/303fae9a/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy