Hi Davide, Also fine with us. Kind regards, Osama > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Scheibli, Daniel > Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 11:29 > To: Davide Dalle Carbonare > Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > Hi Davide, > > > > fine with us. > > > > Best Regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-tools- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle Carbonare > Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 10:10 > To: Pedro Rodriguez > Cc: JuanQuemada; fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] VERY URGENT - Re: Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > > > Thank you Pedro, > > I have also received the agreement from Marcel (IBM) with regards this last > proposal. > > BR > Davide > > On 25/10/2013 10:04, Pedro Rodriguez wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide’s). As far as > the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until all the > deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense to delay the > deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. > > > > Best Regards > > -- > Pedro Rodriguez > > > > On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare > (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) wrote: > > Dear partner, > taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's > comments, I invite you > to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments > promptly ... > > D9.1 -> M36 > D9.2 -> M36 > D9.3 -> M33 > D9.4 -> M33 > > this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and > support on Catalogue, > eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as > originally planned. > Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to > incorporate the indications from > the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask > Osama (as responsible for > this deliverable) to express his opinion. > > I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON > > I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to > Juanjo is tomorrow, > otherwise we will send this proposal. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > > On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: > > Dear Davide, dear all, > > following the email coming by SAP, with respect to > the extension (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 > the situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the definition of > possible new plans for each WP9 partner. > > In particular, I’d like to share with you my doubts in > postponing the deliverables deadlines to M36. I’ll try to explain why below, > so to have your precious feedbacks on that. > > As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next > Review (M30 Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable > tools/GEs will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should > be true also for the Tools Chapter… BUT, given that the date of the review > will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, there will be really > few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that the Reviewers could freeze at > that moment, since all SW (P) Deliverables will be submitted at M33. > > Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move > all WP9 deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' > decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? If we keep > the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it will be difficult for > reviewers in January to stop an on-going work to release deliverables due in > January. > > Of course, these considerations could fit and make > sense only if: > > 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time > > 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing > and thinking in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of > those deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these plans > now it’s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility of a (possible) > extension also for the Tools Chapter. > > > > Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about > my concerns. > > > > With many thanks in advance for your attention. > > > > Kind regards > > Laura > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Scheibli, Daniel > <mailto:daniel.scheibli at sap.com> > > To: Davide Dalle Carbonare > <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> > > Cc: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > <mailto:fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of theproject duration > > > > Dear Davide, > > > > actually SAP has concerns regarding the > extension and they are currently being addresses with the consortium > management / Juanjo. > > > > Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to > M36, my question would be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we > really need that > > extra elapsed time? One down side will be, > that it will definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also I > see the > > danger that it further exposes the tools to > the situation mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. > > > > Best Regards, > Daniel > > > > > > > > From: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Davide Dalle > Carbonare > Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 > To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] > IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration > > > > Dear Partners, > please find below a main from Juanjo on > the project extension. > I also attach the list of deliverables with some > updates I've done. > > We already talked about the project > extension during our lasts conf > calls with all the partners are in favor of that. > The shift of the dates for our deliverable is > from M33 to M36 that > sounds acceptable from my side. > If you have some objection, please let me > know in time to forward > them to Juanjo. > > kind regards, > Davide > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: > > [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration > > Date: > > Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 > > From: > > Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> > > To: > > fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware- > wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware- > wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware- > wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> > > CC: > > fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware- > pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> > > > > Hi all, > > As we have discussed a couple of times, the > EC has suggested an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 > additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in the last > review report. > > This was a topic that I have encouraged you > to discuss with the teams in your respective chapters. > > During our meetings, it was also agreed that > extension of the project would mean a request to move the dates of those > deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying documentation > so that they change to be month 36 instead of 33. Those deliverables linked > to deployment of software on the FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were > planned for month 36 would also be delayed until month 40. We didn't > discuss this but I guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be > produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. > > So far, the only feedback I have got is that > partners would be ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned > changes in deliverable dates are incorporated. > > With all these considerations in mind, I have > produced the attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are > highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your feedback is > welcome. > > Unless I hear about any objection from your > side before this Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC > announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another 4 months > (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes we propose in the > deliverable dates are accepted. I will use the attached table as basis > although I'm happy to incorporate some additional changes you may consider > necessary. > > Best regards, > > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - > Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core > Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: > http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > ________________________________ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su > destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo > electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its > addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out > at: > > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > ________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > >
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy