From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Sep 10 09:42:24 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:42:24 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder Message-ID: <522ECD60.9090108@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... kind regards, Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Sep 10 10:14:53 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:14:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <522ECD60.9090108@eng.it> References: <522ECD60.9090108@eng.it> Message-ID: <522ED4FD.40901@eng.it> today ... sorry, D On 10/09/2013 09:42, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. > > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... > > kind regards, > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Sep 10 10:29:29 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:29:29 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <522ED4FD.40901@eng.it> References: <522ECD60.9090108@eng.it> <522ED4FD.40901@eng.it> Message-ID: <522ED869.5050907@eng.it> Dear all, here is the link to the minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18U0hyNu-Jo0y7q0FghJA6Jw68uLhf9rMon5_hUlyZ8E/edit?usp=sharing It sill is a copy of the previous call ... we'll update them directly during the call. kind regards, Davide On 10/09/2013 10:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > today ... > > sorry, > D > > On 10/09/2013 09:42, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear All, >> this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. >> >> link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... >> >> kind regards, >> Davide >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Sep 10 12:35:42 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:35:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] IMPORTANT - Re: Conference call Reminder In-Reply-To: <522ED869.5050907@eng.it> References: <522ECD60.9090108@eng.it> <522ED4FD.40901@eng.it> <522ED869.5050907@eng.it> Message-ID: <522EF5FE.6020608@eng.it> Dear Partners, due to the low participation to the today call and the importance of the topics that need your actions during the next weeks, I ask you to carefully look at the minutes (I attach an export for your convenience) and provide feedback in time if needed. Kind Regards, Davide On 10/09/2013 10:29, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear all, > here is the link to the minutes: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/18U0hyNu-Jo0y7q0FghJA6Jw68uLhf9rMon5_hUlyZ8E/edit?usp=sharing > > > It sill is a copy of the previous call ... we'll update them directly > during the call. > > kind regards, > Davide > > On 10/09/2013 10:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> today ... >> >> sorry, >> D >> >> On 10/09/2013 09:42, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. >>> >>> link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... >>> >>> kind regards, >>> Davide >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Wp9-2013.09.10.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 129024 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Sep 23 11:42:11 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:42:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder + Updates Message-ID: <52400CF3.4080707@eng.it> Dear All, this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... *Catalogue: Tools section* I've received some feedback from Juanjo regarding the publication of tools in the Catalogue. Here below in quotation Juanjo's comments and for each one, a proposal of mine. Any comment from your side is welcome. > The template (number of tabs, and how contents are structured in each > tab) was updated for the Campus Party Europe event. I believe that > entries for tools have to align now. Check the tab on "Terms and > Conditions" particularly. number/type of tabs ... see next point. T&C content: minor issue, we have to follow the structure that's now published. > I wonder whether the tab "Instances" makes sense for tools. In any > case, the text "There are no instances of this Generic Enabler yet." > seems not to be appropriate for this particular tool (nor anyone > else). I guess it was there because it is the default content for this > tab. Anyhow, consider dropping this tab for all tools. If not > feasible/easy, you should look for a standard text that may fit well > for tools in this standard tab. I'd definitely prefer to remove/hide "Instances" and "Creating Instances" tabs. If not possible we'll define the text to show. > I understand that "Tools" would become a "chapter" when you search for > entries in the Catalogue (e.g., page http://130.206.80.235/enablers"). As far as Tools are not Enablers, my proposal is to _not_ list "Tools" chapter in the drop-down menu. They are two different kind of objects and I've the feeling that's better to keep them separated. *Roadmap* The process is ongoing ... I remind you that starting from the third year, we have to replace the links to the tracker with wiki pages representing "Features" ... see what's already been done for some of them kind regards, Davide -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Tue Sep 24 10:19:42 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:19:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Conference call Reminder + Updates In-Reply-To: <52400CF3.4080707@eng.it> References: <52400CF3.4080707@eng.it> Message-ID: <52414B1E.5020507@eng.it> Dear all, minutes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TGtkjvRkXAVfmBbyFcUE6Eg4MFY8WvG5zdz-vwvxBnE/edit?usp=sharing talk to you later, BR Davide On 23/09/2013 11:42, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear All, > this is to remind you our conference call, tomorrow, at 11.00 CEST. > link to minutes to be circulated as soon as possible ... > > *Catalogue: Tools section* > I've received some feedback from Juanjo regarding the publication > of tools in the Catalogue. Here below in quotation Juanjo's comments > and for each one, a proposal of mine. > Any comment from your side is welcome. >> The template (number of tabs, and how contents are structured in each >> tab) was updated for the Campus Party Europe event. I believe that >> entries for tools have to align now. Check the tab on "Terms and >> Conditions" particularly. > number/type of tabs ... see next point. > T&C content: minor issue, we have to follow the structure that's now > published. >> I wonder whether the tab "Instances" makes sense for tools. In any >> case, the text "There are no instances of this Generic Enabler yet." >> seems not to be appropriate for this particular tool (nor anyone >> else). I guess it was there because it is the default content for >> this tab. Anyhow, consider dropping this tab for all tools. If >> not feasible/easy, you should look for a standard text that may fit >> well for tools in this standard tab. > I'd definitely prefer to remove/hide "Instances" and "Creating > Instances" tabs. > If not possible we'll define the text to show. >> I understand that "Tools" would become a "chapter" when you search >> for entries in the Catalogue (e.g., page >> http://130.206.80.235/enablers"). > As far as Tools are not Enablers, my proposal is to _not_ list "Tools" > chapter in the drop-down menu. > They are two different kind of objects and I've the feeling that's > better to keep them separated. > > > *Roadmap* > The process is ongoing ... > I remind you that starting from the third year, we have to replace the > links to the tracker > with wiki pages representing "Features" ... see what's already been > done for some of them > > > kind regards, > Davide > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Sep 27 09:53:43 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:53:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware] Fwd: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report In-Reply-To: <52443781.2060406@tid.es> References: <52443781.2060406@tid.es> Message-ID: <52453987.1060008@eng.it> Dear Partners, you should have received it already, but I forward it to our list anyway. Useless to say that I'm very surprised about the results and even more for the reasons. I'm going to report some comments to the project coordinator. I keep you updated. BR Davide -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware] Fwd: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:32:49 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear FI-WARE partners, Please find enclosed the report of the last review meeting. I haven't had time to review it in detail, just a very quick reading of the summary sections. Overall, I'm satisfied with the results and I tend to agree with some of the points about which the review establish we should implement remedies: * Improvement of the backlog management (this has led to rejection of the backlog deliverables and, most probably, the rejection of the Technical Roadmap deliverable). * Deep and carefully revision of contents in the FI-WARE Catalogue, overall regarding the all which has to do with terms and conditions of usage beyond the FI-PPP * Re-submission of Security Open Specifications. Apparently (at least considering those pieces I have read) this has to do with the IdM GE Open Specifications, so the good news is that we are already working to solve this issue. More kind of a surprise to me is the rejection of the following deliverables: * Deliverables linked the Tools chapter. * Report on validation by Use Case projects. * Exploitation Plan (given the fact that the consortium deliverable may be not satisfactory enough, but I was hoping that the individual exploitation plans shared in confidentiality with the EC had been more convincing ...) We will need to read the review more carefully to understand the reasons why those deliverables have been rejected. On the other hand, I'm happy to see that most of the chapter technical deliverables have been accepted. Unfortunately, the review could not incorporate results of the successful launch of FI-LAB at the Campus Party Europe event, because this took place after the review meeting. If so, I'm pretty sure that the analysis had been more favorable. This is a very raw analysis. Please don't consider it complete. We need more time to digest the whole report. Let's make a more close analysis and come back with a detailed action plan. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website:www.tid.es email:jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website:http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:56:19 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , , , , , Dear Mr Hierro, Please find attached a copy of the outcome letter and review report of project 285248 FI-WARE. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter. Many thanks in advance Best regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck *European Commission* DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Review 5 Report.docx.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 714317 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outcome FI-WARE review 5 report.docx.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 183517 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware mailing list Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Sep 27 12:24:13 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:24:13 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] Tools review report Message-ID: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more for the reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, as stated in the DoW. It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used to communicate where the software is available (access and/or download), and references to documentation. I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual WPL/WPA conf call. have a nice week end, BR Davide From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Sep 30 15:14:19 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:14:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> Message-ID: <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> Dear Partners, it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 thank you, BR Davide On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more > for the > reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. > > My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, as > stated in the DoW. > It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used to > communicate where > the software is available (access and/or download), and references to > documentation. > > I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual WPL/WPA > conf call. > > have a nice week end, > BR > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From MARCEL at il.ibm.com Mon Sep 30 15:24:15 2013 From: MARCEL at il.ibm.com (Marcel Zalmanovici) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:24:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> Message-ID: Wednesday at 11am is fine with me. Please notice that I won't be available Thursday 3-Oct to Tuesday 8-Oct. From: Davide Dalle Carbonare To: fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu, Date: 30/09/2013 04:14 PM Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report Sent by: fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Partners, it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 thank you, BR Davide On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more > for the > reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. > > My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, as > stated in the DoW. > It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used to > communicate where > the software is available (access and/or download), and references to > documentation. > > I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual WPL/WPA > conf call. > > have a nice week end, > BR > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > _______________________________________________ Fiware-tools mailing list Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net Mon Sep 30 15:42:27 2013 From: jesus.gorronogoitia at atos.net (Yosu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gorro=F1ogoitia?=) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:42:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> Message-ID: <1380548547.8393.13.camel@localhost> Ciao Davide, this wednesday, i cannot do it at 11:00pm, I can do it before or after (10:00 or 12:00) Sorry for the inconveniences. Yosu On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 15:14 +0200, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Partners, > it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. > > I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 > > thank you, > BR > Davide > > > On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > > Dear Juanjo, > > I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more > > for the > > reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. > > > > My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, as > > stated in the DoW. > > It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used to > > communicate where > > the software is available (access and/or download), and references to > > documentation. > > > > I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual WPL/WPA > > conf call. > > > > have a nice week end, > > BR > > Davide > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-tools mailing list > > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -- Jes?s Gorro?ogoitia Software Architect Service Engineering & IT Platforms Lab ATOS Research & Innovation Albarracin 25 28037 MADRID T +34 91 214 8175 F +34 91 754 3252 www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Sep 30 16:00:27 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:00:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> Message-ID: <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> let's try to find the best time slot http://doodle.com/6b3d6wdr2mdvntay BR Davide On 30/09/2013 15:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Partners, > it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. > > I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 > > thank you, > BR > Davide > > > On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear Juanjo, >> I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more >> for the >> reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. >> >> My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, as >> stated in the DoW. >> It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used to >> communicate where >> the software is available (access and/or download), and references to >> documentation. >> >> I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual >> WPL/WPA conf call. >> >> have a nice week end, >> BR >> Davide >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > > From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Sep 30 21:40:18 2013 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:40:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-tools] URGENT - Re: Tools review report In-Reply-To: <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> References: <52455CCD.5060908@eng.it> <5249792B.9040509@eng.it> <524983FB.9080504@eng.it> Message-ID: <5249D3A2.5020509@eng.it> The call for discussing about the review report is on Wednesday 2nd at 2PM CEST thank you for participating, BR Davide On 30/09/2013 16:00, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > let's try to find the best time slot > > http://doodle.com/6b3d6wdr2mdvntay > > BR > Davide > > On 30/09/2013 15:14, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >> Dear Partners, >> it's urgent to have a conf call on this topic. >> >> I suggest to have it Wednesday 2nd October at 11.00 >> >> thank you, >> BR >> Davide >> >> >> On 27/09/2013 12:24, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: >>> Dear Juanjo, >>> I'm very surprised from the review report result, and even more >>> for the >>> reasons why the deliverables have been rejected. >>> >>> My first comment is about the 3 software deliverables of nature P, >>> as stated in the DoW. >>> It seems they have evaluated only the paper that is basically used >>> to communicate where >>> the software is available (access and/or download), and references >>> to documentation. >>> >>> I guess we can discuss about this next Monday during the usual >>> WPL/WPA conf call. >>> >>> have a nice week end, >>> BR >>> Davide >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-tools mailing list > Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools > >