[Token-all] Token Meeting Minutes and Wrap Up 13 Sept 2022

[Karen Vega]

Dear All

Thanks so much for your time today at the TOKEN Meeting, I think there were
a lot of good points and a lot of work ahead to close the year well with
TOKEN

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aIJzPqCzsW13-j1AeOYPu9Hd27nggQBzdbGBBjwh2ow/edit#heading=h.48bkna3m7a25

Here is the link to the minutes and the wrap up conclusions are highlighted
in this email. Feel free to add any other relevant points for the TOKEN
community

Kindest regards
K
Wrap-up and conclusions

   1.

   Reminder on Business Model Survey if it can be done by tomorrow COB 14
   October 2022  , what components are we  using or not using  and why : this
   is very important to be answered. Business Model Deliverable is in draft so
   FBR waiting for this input
   2.

   KPIs  to be completed please by October 21st. Hard deadline 30 October
   2022. UC needs this soonest.
   3.

   We haven't gotten at least 10 Early adopters so far so that is not good
   news.   NET Service, Federico Caiulo is working on the road map with input
   from IMEC.  Dont miss the upcoming  email please react when it comes out.
   4.

   The question is : what are they going to adopt if many things are not
   going to continue?

Option from Adnan, INFRACHAIN : Not all is adopted but the codes and  best
practices kind of services from the municipalities this would be a good
solution  to reach the result and have something as early adopters

Another new point ( mentioned outside meeting to WP6 via email)

   1.

   Important to highlight that for example FIWARE technology related to
   Blockchain, Digital Identity, Verifiable Credentials, Wallet and so on is
   aligned with EBSI.  So any application using Canis Major ( a component from
   FIWARE) is already blockchain-enabled in an EBSI-compatible way. FIWARE has
   also put them in line with the European Strategy as key for
   sustainability.
   2.

   Suggestion  If other components are not compatible and will not be
   compatible with EBSI , WP6 could create a section so that Consortium
   partners can mention their position regarding EBSI compatibility. If they
   are not compatible they can  argue the value of non-compatibility with EBSI
   which of course can have good reasons. This would help deal with
   sustainability. Action point INFRACHIAN, Adnan help us include a section on
   the draft and circulate for completion. Thanks
   3.

   Deliverables on WP3  have been sent  to FF for revision , they  have
   not  input the questions from the revision of privacy and security done by
   Uwe from LIST (Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology) We discussed
   that this will be included on the update of this same deliverables needed
   by December of course you could already work on those.
   4.

   Request of one month delay for the Communications deliverable from WP5
   Angeles FF on the basis of the upcoming important events on Dissemination
   in November ( German national event -please send us advertising material to
   circulate to german public-, Barcelona)
   5.

   Governance Deliverable is in draft questions raised about ISO will be
   followed up by INFRACHAIN, Adnan
   6.

   Dates for the Berlin final Project meeting will be confirmed by Monday,
   latest Tuesday COB , the date that was most voted was December 19,20 for a
   workshop meeting, TBD if the meeting with our TOKEN results with audience
   will also be included there or done separately.


   Kindest regards,


   Karen


-- 
Karen Vega, MPP
Senior Manager

karen.vega at fiware.org
www.fiware.org


<https://www.linkedin.com/in/karenvega/>
Linked-In/Karen Vega <https://www.linkedin.com/in/karenvega/>
 "The best preparation for tomorrow is doing your best today." H. Jackson
Brown, Jr. American Author

<https://nexus.lab.fiware.org/fiware.signature>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/token-all/attachments/20221013/27912650/attachment.html>