[Cossecco] R: [COSSECCO] Impact: secured disruptive technologies

[Luigi Romano]

> Anyway, I believe we have a consensus on considering as disruptive tech:
> 1 - IoT
> 2 - Cloud (maybe extend it to refer to "Cloud, Edge and Fog"
Fully agree.

> Maybe we can also mention we're contributing to securing 3 - AI & ML
I am not sure. It is not clear to me what are we going to do wrt AI & ML in the project. As to my research group, we use AI - e.g. for intrusion detection purposes - but we do not do research in AI (meaning, we do not plan to advance AI beyond current SoTA).

L.

Da: sfigueiredo at ipn.pt <sfigueiredo at ipn.pt>
Inviato: venerdì 27 ottobre 2023 12:44
A: Luigi Romano <luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it>; cossecco at lists.fiware.org
Oggetto: RE: [Cossecco] [COSSECCO] Impact: secured disruptive technologies

Hi Luigi,

Ok, Thanks for the clarification. I had put (too much) focus on the reference due to the importance of timeliness of the analysis (of whether a tech is disruptive or not).

Anyway, I believe we have a consensus on considering as disruptive tech:
1 - IoT
2 - Cloud (maybe extend it to refer to "Cloud, Edge and Fog"
Maybe we can also mention we're contributing to securing 3 - AI & ML, as long as AI takes an important role in the use cases / applications.

Best,
Sérgio

From: Luigi Romano <luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it<mailto:luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it>>
Sent: 27 de outubro de 2023 11:28
To: sfigueiredo at ipn.pt<mailto:sfigueiredo at ipn.pt>; cossecco at lists.fiware.org<mailto:cossecco at lists.fiware.org>
Cc: Luigi Romano <luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it<mailto:luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it>>
Subject: R: [Cossecco] [COSSECCO] Impact: secured disruptive technologies

Dear Sergio.

That was by no means meant to be "the" reference, rather it was an example (among the many possible). Any reference which can be used as evidence of condition 1 (There is wide consensus on considering the technology disruptive) can do. I do not even want to get into a discussion which reference is better. We can use multiple references. I am just saying we cannot claim a given technology is disruptive because Luigi Romano (or Sergio Figueiredo) think so.

L.

Da: sfigueiredo at ipn.pt<mailto:sfigueiredo at ipn.pt> <sfigueiredo at ipn.pt<mailto:sfigueiredo at ipn.pt>>
Inviato: venerdì 27 ottobre 2023 10:37
A: Luigi Romano <luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it<mailto:luigi.romano at uniparthenope.it>>; cossecco at lists.fiware.org<mailto:cossecco at lists.fiware.org>
Oggetto: RE: [Cossecco] [COSSECCO] Impact: secured disruptive technologies

Dear Luigi,

While I agree with the outcome of the analysis (which is still up-to-date), I believe we should base ourselves in a more recent reference, e.g.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wco-wto_e.pdf
or
https://professionalprograms.mit.edu/blog/technology/top-disruptive-technologies/.

Best regards,
Sérgio

From: cossecco-bounces at lists.fiware.org<mailto:cossecco-bounces at lists.fiware.org> <cossecco-bounces at lists.fiware.org<mailto:cossecco-bounces at lists.fiware.org>> On Behalf Of Luigi Romano
Sent: 27 de outubro de 2023 06:34
To: cossecco at lists.fiware.org<mailto:cossecco at lists.fiware.org>
Subject: [Cossecco] [COSSECCO] Impact: secured disruptive technologies

Dear all.

As discussed in the telco, to be credible when claiming that COSSECCO has an impact in terms of "secured disruptive technologies", the following two conditions must hold:

  1.  There is wide consensus on considering the technology disruptive
  2.  COSSECCO solutions improve the security of the technology

I uploaded to the "Reference documents" folder a report by McKynsey titled "Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy". The report classifies as disruptive the following technologies:
1. Mobile Internet
2. Automation of knowledge work
3. The Internet of Things
4. Cloud technology
5. Advanced robotics
6. Autonomous and near-autonomous vehicles
7. Next-generation genomics
8. Energy storage
9. 3D printing
10. Advanced materials
11. Advanced oil and gas exploration and recovery
12. Renewable energy

IMO, we can confidently claim that COSSESSO secures 3 and 4, and possibly claim that it also secures 1.

Best

Luigi R.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/cossecco/attachments/20231027/a7279383/attachment.html>