Dear all, I have a concern/question similar to Silvio’s. Some of the accelerator projects are about to complete their evaluation process soon, and adding this criterion now might be disruptive. For instance SmartAgriFood and FI-Adopt are about to complete their evaluation process in the next few days, without involvement from the FI-WARE coaches. At this point, do we still need to interrupt their process, and impose ourselves? (i.e. either by adding this criteria or by adding the step for us to approve their evaluations) Or do we let this round of evaluations go without interference from us, but set the ground rules for the next calls they might have? Best regards, ilknur From: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of silvio.cretti at create-net.org Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 AM To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides Dear Stefano, all thanks for the minutes and the criteria. Apologise but today I didn't attend the telco because I had another telco at the same time I had to chair. Regarding the criteria I am quited concerned about the 5th one. This appear to me to be "qualitative" with respect to the other ones related to the rapid screening: how can we measure the hidden value of FIWARE? Almost every proposal can provide a context where there is a hidden value of FIWARE but measuring it is quite difficult. How can we rank the proposals? As far as I know providing a FIWARE architecture is exactly what we asked in the first 4 criteria to the proposal writers. Why now changing the point of view? Moreover it appears that this criterium supersedes the others and this appears to me to be unfair with repsect to the proposal well written with already a good "FIWARE" architecture inside. Last but not least: in CreatiFI we are in the middle of the evaluation of the proposals so adding now this criterium is disruptive. As an alternative why don't say that the proposals should be evaluated first of all from the business idea/impact point of view and among the ones selected in this way we can apply the first four criteria just in order to rank them. It appears to me to be more quantitative and in line with what we did in the past. Best regards silvio On 12/02/14 20:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear all, as per subject. instead of this evening i'll send the spreadsheet tomorrow after having get all your comments on the criteria. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches Bu mesaj ve ekleri gönderilen kişiye özeldir ve gizli bilgiler içerebilir. Eğer mesajın gönderilmek istendiği kişi değilseniz lütfen kopyalamayınız, başkalarına göndermeyiniz ve göndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet üzerinden gönderilen mesajların güvenli ve hatasız olduğunun garantisi olmadığından Atos grubu mesajın içeriğinden sorumlu tutulamaz. Göndericinin bilgisayarı anti-virüs sistemleri tarafından taranmaktadır, ancak yine de mesajın virüs içermediği garanti edilemez ve gönderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20141210/ee806425/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy