[Fiware-coaches] Fwd: RE: Evaluating FIWARE relevance in Accelerator open-calls

stefano de panfilis stefano.depanfilis at eng.it
Thu Oct 23 14:27:22 CEST 2014


dear manuel,

as per the email from franck, but also most of the others are in the same
situation, i'm here asking you to approve and create really asap a jira
account for each coach.
This is now rather urgenat as all the accelerators are quite active!

please notify my when done.
thank you in advance

ciao,
stefano

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com>
Date: 2014-10-23 9:53 GMT+02:00
Subject: RE: RE: [Fiware-coaches] Evaluating FIWARE relevance in
Accelerator open-calls
To: "depa at eng.it" <depa at eng.it>, Stefano De Panfilis <
Stefano.DePanfilis at eng.it>, "fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org" <
fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>
Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE <manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>


 Hello



Indeed, I explicitly asked FICHE to make use of the ML so to test the whole
process.



Nevertheless, I cannot yet access Jira as my account creation is still
pending. Manuel is on it



I will update the excel sheet when I have access to JIRA.



Kind regards

Franck



*De :* depa at eng.it [mailto:depa at eng.it]
*Envoyé :* mercredi 22 octobre 2014 15:12
*À :* Franck Le Gall; Stefano De Panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
*Cc :* Thomas Bhonert
*Objet :* R: RE: [Fiware-coaches] Evaluating FIWARE relevance in
Accelerator open-calls



Dear Frank,

As i guess the request from fiche generated a jira ticket, can you please
also feed the shared googledoc (excel) file conveniently?

Thank you in advance!
Stefano

Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone!
 ------------------------------

*From: *Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com>

*Date: *Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:38:23 +0000

*To: *stefano de panfilis<stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>;
fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>

*Cc: *Thomas Michael Bohnert<thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch>

*Subject: *RE: [Fiware-coaches] Evaluating FIWARE relevance in Accelerator
open-calls



Great. Thanks all for these contributions. I will feed back to FICHE
accelerator through the fiche mailing list







*De :* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it
<stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>]
*Envoyé :* mardi 21 octobre 2014 14:00
*À :* fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
*Cc :* Franck Le Gall; Thomas Michael Bohnert
*Objet :* Re: [Fiware-coaches] Evaluating FIWARE relevance in Accelerator
open-calls



dear all,



thank you for frank, thomas and thierry for providing some additional
points.



let me than summarise and make a coherent proposal.



Step 1 (pre-proposal submission or initial proposals screening)

This step is characterised by the fact proposers provide very few/draft
details. Also the time to

analyse each of the proposals will be kept minimum.

1.No enablers used > disqualified

2.One enabler used > acceptable but this must be strongly documented
2.1 The GE must be tightly integrated with the solution of the company, i.e
should implement a new functionality which is clearly value add for the
company business. If not, i.e. the functionality is there just to take
money from FIWARE, the proposal is disqualified

2.2 In addition, justification of why adding this GE rather than 3^rd party
solutions should be provided

3.Several GEIs used > acceptable and recommended

3.1 the proposal shall provide a draft architecture of the proposed
solution showing clearly interactions between the various GEIs and
eventually third party or owned software.
3.2 Use of several disconnected enablers is possible. Then each should be
justified as for case 2 above
3.3 Preferred solution is the use of several integrated enablers.



4. Application hosted by the FIWARE Cloud -> acceptable and recommended

4.1 SMEs should make use of this cloud, meaning that they host their
application in the cloud while at the same time using a number of GEs which
are hosted in the cloud too (or are deployed somewhere locally, e.g. in the
case of IoT/Sensors/Gateways).

4.2 The only deployment of the application in the FIWARE Cloud is
disqualified

Justification for the 2^nd step, we could start from the questionnaire
which was
proposed by Juanjo (https://www.fi-ware.org/fiware-usage-questionnaire/).



ciao,

stefano





-- 

Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567

skype: depa01

twitter: @depa01





-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
twitter: @depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20141023/7110d03a/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-coaches mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy