[Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment

[Leandro Guillen]

Hi all,

I agree with the changes.

For the record, I removed a column in the assessment spreadsheet and 
adjusted the total score one to reflect the changes. That was just to 
help make sense of the sum of the points.

Regards,
Leandro

El 15/07/15 a las 11:14, Juanjo Hierro escribió:
> Dear all,
>
>   I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the 
> evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of 
> FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme.
>
>   I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the 
> assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard 
> (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 
> unless I hear any objections from you.    Therefore, please, take your 
> time to review it.   I would appreciate if you also response to this 
> email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both 
> tools and agree with the proposed changes.
>
>   I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire 
> and scorecard:
>
>   * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual"
>     usage (the app has already implemented the criteria).   Therefore,
>     the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1
>     (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not
>     plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already
>     implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B).  
>     My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but
>     it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers
>     with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4.
>   * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding
>     context information management so that 3-4 points are given when
>     integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources
>     is considered.  Previously, we were giving maximum points if
>     historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further
>     analysis.   In line with this change, I have modified the scoring
>     regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points
>     (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information
>     data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis.
>   * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of
>     Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points
>     (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points
>     (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context
>     information.
>   * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so
>     that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard.
>
>
>   I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE 
> Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard".   I 
> have also make sure both get aligned.
>
>   The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" 
> will be here:
>
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit#
>
>
>   The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be 
> here:
>
>     https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>   Cheers,
> -- Juanjo
>
> ______________________________________________________
>
> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform
> CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica
>
> email:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com
> twitter: @JuanjoHierro
>
> You can follow FIWARE at:
>    website:http://www.fiware.org
>    twitter:  @FIWARE
>    facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>    linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su 
> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y 
> es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es 
> usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, 
> utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar 
> prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este 
> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por 
> esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and 
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual 
> or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the 
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. 
> If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. 
> Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
> communication in error and then delete it.
>
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu 
> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é 
> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa 
> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, 
> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida 
> em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, 
> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
> proceda a sua destruição
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-coaches mailing list
> Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150716/25f0b4a3/attachment.html>