[Fiware-finodex-coaching] Fiware Finodex question

Pasquale Vitale pvitale at eng.it
Fri Mar 20 15:12:39 CET 2015


Hi Pablo,
your proposal will be still accepted because you are going to use the 
FIWARE technologies.
We can only drop a proposal from the accelerator if they do not use 
FIWARE at all.

But reducing the scope of what it is written in the proposal vs the 
reality will have an impact in the evaluations and that it will be the 
task of evaluators to measure this impact.

Regards,
Pasquale

Il 20/03/2015 09:27, Pablo Estrada ha scritto:
>
> Hi ! I'm Pablo, from GEEZAR Soluciones SL, nice to meet you.
>  Sorry I wrote previously with the wrong email account.
> We have a question:
> Our project is about monitoring air conditions on vegetables and fruit 
> transport, including temperature, humidity, GPS, and Ethilene. The 
> data is sent via GPRS.
> In our first project proposal for Finodex, we assumed we were going to 
> use this Fiware schema
> Orion Context Broker, IoT, Cosmos, Wirecloud, CEP, and OpenStreetMaps 
> as OpenData
> after the Fiware developers week I attended last week in Madrid, I met 
> Francisco Romero (big data expert) and talked about this schema with him
> The result of that conversation was this new schema
> Orion Context Broker, Cygnus subscribed to Orion and historical data 
> to a MySQL. Also using OpenStreetMaps. ¿and... CEP?
> Because, perhaps, we can make our sensors speak JSON and comunicate 
> directly with the Context Broker, so we dont need IoT
> Wirecloud is useful, but we just need to view a route in a map and 
> some graphics, not really need Wirecloud.
> Cygnus would be subscribed to Orion and injecting data to a MySQL 
> database where we save our data.
> Since we dont really need very deep data (just about 1 month of deep), 
> we can asume, we dont use Big Data, and our problem is solved with a 
> regular MySQL database
> CEP could be used to set the alarms when some context data is over a limit
> We would be very pleased to know your opinion about this new schema.
> So, the fact is that our schema has changed and we need to know if 
> that supposes a problem in terms of the Finodex evaluation
> Because I now know what I need, but is different than what we said before
> Thank you very much
> regards,
> -- 
> GEEZAR Soluciones SL
>
> Pablo Estrada León
> GEEZAR Soluciones SL    <http://www.geezar.es>
> *http://geezar.blogspot.es/*
> CEEI C/María de Luna 11, Nave 2, abajo derecha
> 50018 Zaragoza
> Teléfono: 976-960852
> E-mail:info at geezar.es  <mailto:info at geezar.es>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-finodex-coaching mailing list
> Fiware-finodex-coaching at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-finodex-coaching

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-finodex-coaching/attachments/20150320/f65b0b53/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-finodex-coaching mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy