Dear all, I haven't gone through the contents of the wiki but I just want to make a remark. It's perfectly fine that you keep track of what you have tested, because we should be able to trace what has been tested (positively), but I want to stress that issues should be reported sending an email to fiware-tech-help at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-tech-help at lists.fi-ware.org> or fiware-lab-help at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-lab-help at lists.fi-ware.org> which are the channels through which we will are also receiving issues from other users. Those messages automatically create a ticket on a JIRA system so that we can assign tickets to the teams who can solve them and follow-up progress. Eventually, one idea that I put on the table is that we may create a JIRA system for the Friendly Testing Task Force. Then you may create a ticket whenever you start some concrete test (the more fine-grained, the best) or you may create a battery of tickets for a plan of tests. Then you close a ticket whenever the test has been passed correctly. Otherwise, you send an issue to some mailing list (who means a ticket is created in the HelpDesk JIRA system). You may even link the ticket you had initially created for running a test with the ticket you create because sending the issue. Once the issue is solved, you may redo the test that was blocked pending of solving the issue and, eventually, close it. What do you think? It may require creating a JIRA for Friendly Testing, but I guess this may be ready on Monday/Tuesday ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Telefonica - Product Development and Innovation (PDI) website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.org facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 10/10/14 11:44, Alvaro del Castillo wrote: Hi all! First report from Bitergia team. The goal of this email is not to talk about results, but about the methodology followed. During this week we have been working in the GEs assigned to our team, and also in the FIWARE Labs (filabs). We have defined a methodology that maybe could be useful for others. According to Juanjo email about how we should test the GEs there are five scenarios: local machine, own virtual machine in filabs, already exiting virtual machine with the GE in filabs, using Chef recipes and using blueprints. We have created a Wiki with a first table showing the state of each scenario for the GEs. For accesing: user: fiware password: fiware https://www.bitergia.net/redmine/projects/ficore-testing/wiki/TestingGEris For each GE we have created a Wiki page (linked from the summary table) with the description of the tests in each scenario. This description is standard for all the GEs. For example, for Orion Context Broker: https://www.bitergia.net/redmine/projects/ficore-testing/wiki/GE_Orion_Context The index we have defined for the templates are: GE Orion Context #4260 * Install process * From sources * Debian: Ubuntu 14.04, 64 bits * From packages * RPM: CentOS 6.5 * Debian * Test of available pre created images * Test of Chef Recipes * Test of Blue prints With this template (which is extensible), based on the experience for testing the 5 scenarios in the 4 GEs, we plan to deliver our work. So, any thoughts about that? Juanjo and the rest of Telefonica team, is it ok for you to deliver in this format our work? Probably we should move this Wiki to someplace in FICORE Mediawiki. Also, in the Wiki are the "clean" results. There are tickets linked with all the background work needed to reach the results. We are opening in stackoverflow and github some tickets. And we plan to start using the fiware mailing list to ask some specific issues we have for the GEs. Cheers ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-friendly-testing/attachments/20141010/eacf4456/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy