[ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected

[Dolores]

Dear Juanjo and all,

Yes, it’s a pity this proposal was not approved. The score is good and with some more days more perhaps it would have been approved. 
Let’s try in a future call

Best regards 

M. Dolores Ordóñez

AnySolution S.L.

Palma de Mallorca (Spain)

M. (0034)619712806

Email: dom at anysolution.eu



This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. They are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee(s) you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments. Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please inform the sender immediately and delete it and all copies from your system and destroy any hard copies of it.


> El 2 ago 2019, a las 9:50, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> escribió:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
>   Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the threshold.
> 
>   Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR (Evaluation Summary Report).
> 
>   Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in terms of concept and many aspect of the approach.  Our weak points:
> 
> Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters
> Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful.
> As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR:
> Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we should have carried specific work
> Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have tried to engage some partner specialized in 
> Description of how selected use cases would contribute and help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may         have elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general description about how we expected to achieve impact
> Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at perfection:
> Not very good description of the relationship between WPs
> Too brief description of milestones
> More specific risk management
>   Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects.  I feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed.
>   Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another call.
> 
>   Cheers,
> -- 
> Juanjo Hierro
> Chief Technology Officer
> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org
> www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro
> Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro
> <foundation-logo.png>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <871904_DATAWORLD_ESR.pdf>
> <Rejection decision Information Letter.pdf>
> __________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the following links:
> - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy
> - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE
> 
> 
> Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list
> Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org
> 
> To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to the information page of the list at:
> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal/attachments/20190802/1c84bf64/attachment.html>