Dear all, First of all, thank you for the good work done against the clock. Especially to Juanjo for leadership and coordination but also to the other partners. I agree that the proposal meets all the conditions to be presented again and from MOVISAT we offer ourselves to continue the work for a re-submission Best wishes, El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 9:51, Juanjo Hierro (<juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>) escribió: > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the > threshold. > > Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR > (Evaluation Summary Report). > > Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in > terms of concept and many aspect of the approach. Our weak points: > > - Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters > - Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from > the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. > - As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain > pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: > - Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would > be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from > other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we > should have carried specific work > - Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' > trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have > tried to engage some partner specialized in > - Description of how selected use cases would contribute and > help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have > elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general > description about how we expected to achieve impact > - Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at > perfection: > - Not very good description of the relationship between WPs > - Too brief description of milestones > - More specific risk management > > Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects. I > feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert > on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover > those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal > with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to > re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. > > Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another > call. > > Cheers, > -- > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro > <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the > following links: > - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to > the information page of the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal/attachments/20190802/5a5d12c1/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal/attachments/20190802/5a5d12c1/attachment-0001.png>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy