" Dear Juanjo and all Thank you for your e mail and to consider our arguments related to the " implicit patent grant" You propose to rename the heading of a paragraph as follows "Copyright and implicit patent license", but on the other hand the content of such paragraph states only a licence "under its respective copyrights incorporated in the Specification". Hence, there is no grant of any patent right in such paragraph, i.e. to make, have made, use, sell, import. So we do not think this solves the problem. In our opinion, the only notice which gives legal certainty is the legal Notice with explicit patent grant (with the modification we proposed - see our previous e-mail) and therefore it is safer for a potential implementer because the scope of the license related to patents is defined with precision in this case. Therefore we have a strong preference for the explicit patent grant, because a so called implicit patent grant is really risky in our opinion both for implementers and patents holders. Moreover we propose that the acceptance of the license should be executed by clicking on a download button. So, something along the following lines could be considered, as an alternative, in the legal notice with explicit patent grant , provided the definition of Essential Patent be adopted as proposed earlier: 2. Copyright and Essential Patent rights License The IPR Holders in this Specification hereby grant you, the individual or legal entity exercising permissions granted by this License by clicking on your acceptance of all of the terms and conditions below, a fully-paid up, non-exclusive, nontransferable, perpetual, worldwide, royalty free (without the right to sublicense) license under their respective copyrights and Essential Patent rights incorporated in the Specification, to copy this Specification, and to make, have made, sell, import and use a software implementation fully compliant with this Specification. IPR Holders: Intellectual Property Rights Holders of this FI-WARE <NAME OF SPECIFICATION> Open Specification are the Party or Parties identified as the copyright / Essential patent owners on the wiki page of this open specification Specification Essential Patent: "Specification Essential Patents" shall mean patents and patent applications, which are necessarily infringed by an implementation compliant with the Specification and which are owned by any of the IPR Holders of this Specification . "Necessarily infringed" shall mean that no technical alternative exists to avoid infringement. Best regards De : SARRAZIN Robert SG/DJ Envoyé : mercredi 22 mai 2013 18:19 À : RAES Serge OLNC/OLPS Objet : RE: [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE LEGAL NOTICE De : fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoyé : mercredi 22 mai 2013 08:18 À : fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE LEGAL NOTICE On 21/05/13 15:11, robert.sarrazin at orange.com<mailto:robert.sarrazin at orange.com> wrote: Dear Luis, Thank you Luis for your efforts and for your new proposal. However as pointed out earlier, with respect to the so called " implicit patent grant " we have serious doubts that this legal notice might indeed include any " implicit patent grant" as only a copyright license is defined and it is clearly stated in such legal notice that "For avoidance of doubt, the rights granted are only those expressly stated in this Section herein. No other rights of any kind are granted by implication, estoppel, waiver or otherwise ". The implicit patent grant is given because of the wording marked in bold: " ... the Copyright Holders in this Specification hereby grant you, the individual or legal entity exercising permissions granted by this License, a fully-paid up, non-exclusive, nontransferable, perpetual, worldwide, royalty free (without the right to sublicense) license under its respective copyrights incorporated in the Specification ... to create and distribute ... software that is an implementation of this Specification." In my honest opinion, very clear. A possibility, though, is to re-title the section where this paragraph is present to be titled "Copyright and implicit patent license" in the case of the "implicit patent grant" legal notice. Note that it is up to Orange to go for the "explicit patent grant" license if things are still unclear to you. I can tell you that Telefonica will push for the "implicit patent grant" license in the Open Specifications they are copyright owners because, in our honest opinion, that is the Legal Notice that gives more clear grants to the potential implementors of the specs. In my opinion, if I would be a potential implementor of a FI-WARE GE Open Specifications, I would feel more safe implementing products in compliance with the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications that are associated to the "implicit patent grant" license. But that is, of course, my personal opinion. As for regard the statement that says: For avoidance of doubt, the rights granted are only those expressly stated in this Section herein. No other rights of any kind are granted by implication, estoppel, waiver or otherwise I have proposed Luis to replace "Section" by "Legal Notice" to avoid misinterpretations: For avoidance of doubt, the rights granted are only those expressly stated in this Legal Notice herein. No other rights of any kind are granted by implication, estoppel, waiver or otherwise We haven't been the only ones that noticed that we had to fix this, so we will fix it. BTW, this is something to be fixed both in the "implicit patent grant" Legal Notice and the "explicit patent grant" Legal Notice. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-legal/attachments/20130522/666c3097/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy