Hi, the table is now updated for our part of the 3DUI work and the company status slide is attached. Cheers, ~Toni On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:05, Christof Marti <mach at zhaw.ch> wrote: > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) > Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) > GE-Name: generic name of the GE > GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > Partner(s) involved: > Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, …, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.…) > Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > Current status: What is available at this moment > What’s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) > What’s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) > Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) > Demo-Links > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 > (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, … for the slide) > > I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, … > (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on > Examination plans > Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, …) > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It’s fastest if you add it to > > Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) > (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek <Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de>: > >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>> is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public >> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but >> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for >> this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general >> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the >> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to >> speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now >> and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain >> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the >> other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and >> examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I >> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by >> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and >> deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> <Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de <mailto:Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this — is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> <https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> <http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I’m afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) — would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es >>> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es >>> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>>> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu >>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>" >>> <fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu >>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telefónica’s office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es <http://www.tid.es> >>> email:jhierro at tid.es <mailto:email%3Ajhierro at tid.es> >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> <http://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> >>> <http://twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> <http://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>> >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 <http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> <http://twitter.com/FIware> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu >>> <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>> >>> To: <mcp at tid.es <mailto:mcp at tid.es>> >>> CC: <jhierro at tid.es >>> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>>,<CNECT-ICT-__285248 at ec.europa.eu >>> <mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA – unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo >>> electrónico >>> en el enlace situado más abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> <http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu >>> <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> <https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> <https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Geschäftsführung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com <mailto:jarkko at cyberlightning.com> >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de <http://www.cybersli.de/> and enrich your >>> presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com <http://www.cyberlightning.com/> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Geschäftsführung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> <slusallek.vcf>_______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > <FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_partnername.pptx> > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131217/16f2b192/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_Playsign.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168206 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131217/16f2b192/attachment.pptx> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131217/16f2b192/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy