[Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting)

Arto Heikkinen arto.heikkinen at cie.fi
Tue Dec 17 09:30:48 CET 2013


Hi,

UOULU/CIE's slide attached to this message.

-Arto

On 16.12.2013 19:05, Christof Marti wrote:
> Dear WP13 GE owners and partners
>
> Sorry for coming back to you so late.
> It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the 
> review meeting on Wednesday.
> I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 
> 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the 
> content for the review.
> After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now.
>
> I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot 
> (max 5 min.)
> Therefore I would like to have *1 slide* with a short overview *per 
> GE*, in table-form with the following fields:
> (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not 
> commercial additions)
>
>   * GE-Name: generic name of the GE
>   * GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation
>   * Partner(s) involved:
>   * Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial
>     xxx, ..., Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,....)
>   * Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft,
>     preliminary, final), reason why and why available.
>   * Current status: What is available at this moment
>   * What's available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full
>     functionality)
>   * What's available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full
>     functionality)
>   * Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm
>     image, global instance, demo app)
>   * Demo-Links
>
> To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for 
> your GE.
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0
> (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, 
> columns, ... for the slide)
>
> I will add *a summary slide* of the WP13 status at all:
> Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ...
> (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me)
>
> Then I would like to prepare *1 slide per partner* where he can 
> elaborate on
>
>   * Examination plans
>   * Dissemination activities (executed, planned)
>   * Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why
>     something might get delayed, ...)
>
> Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can 
> select the slide and show it.
> Please use the attached template for your slide.
>
> I saw some of you sent already some content. It's fastest if you add 
> it to
>
> *Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00)*
> (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a 
> nice presentation)
>
> Thanks for your support.
>
> Best regards
> Christof
> ----
> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch
> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT
> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW
> School of Engineering
> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63
> Skype: christof-marti
>
> Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek 
> <Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de <mailto:Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de>>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila:
>>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information
>>> is already available!
>>
>> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail:
>>
>> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public
>> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but
>> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-).
>> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for
>> this.
>>
>> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general
>> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the
>> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to
>> speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now
>> and people keep asking for it.
>>
>> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at
>> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain
>> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the
>> other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and
>> examples to test things out, T&C, etc.
>>
>> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic
>> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I
>> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by
>> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and
>> deploying the SW and examples to it.
>>
>> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Philipp
>>
>>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they
>>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets,
>>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen
>>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor
>>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user
>>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and
>>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those
>>> guides already make a number of references to github source code
>>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos
>>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is
>>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from
>>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it.
>>>
>>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the
>>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is
>>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published
>>> somewhere in the Wiki.
>>>
>>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will
>>> come together with January release, in one form or another.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be
>>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which
>>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status.
>>>
>>> - jarkko
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek
>>> <Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de <mailto:Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de> 
>>> <mailto:Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hi Toni, all,
>>>
>>>    I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid
>>>    Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it.
>>>
>>>    Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is
>>>    not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian
>>>    is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is
>>>    little information on this available yet (as discussed before).
>>>
>>>
>>>    However, there are a few things that we should do:
>>>
>>>    -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January
>>>    release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe
>>>    we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the 
>>> information.
>>>
>>>    -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good
>>>    explanation.
>>>
>>>    -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review
>>>    on Tuesday) !!
>>>
>>>    -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being
>>>    made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the
>>>    FI-WARE Catalog as well.
>>>
>>>    -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be
>>>    accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to
>>>    make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least
>>>    for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean
>>>    Web server + JS libraries).
>>>
>>>
>>>    Best,
>>>
>>>             Philipp
>>>
>>>    Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo:
>>>
>>>        Was just wondering about this --- is this simply due to WP13 
>>> GEs not
>>>        having been part of any official fi-ware release yet?
>>>
>>>        Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of
>>>        them are
>>>        already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on
>>>        github. Just
>>>        wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering
>>>        MIWI GE
>>>        status, links to the source codes and info about commercial
>>>        exploitation
>>>        etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc.
>>>
>>>        For example, CIEs POI backend:
>>>        GE is available from
>>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi
>>>        <https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi>
>>>        and live demo at
>>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/
>>>        <http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/>
>>>
>>>        etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I'm afraid that info
>>>        is not
>>>        gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at
>>>        the F2F I
>>>        asked and got by private email) --- would be good to have in the
>>>        wiki in
>>>        any case I figure.
>>>
>>>        Cheers,
>>>        ~Toni
>>>
>>>        Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>            *From: *Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
>>>            <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es
>>>            <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>>>
>>>            *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to
>>>            discuss in
>>>            the review meeting*
>>>            *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2
>>>            *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu 
>>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>>            <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>>            <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu
>>>            <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>"
>>>            <fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
>>> <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>>            <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu
>>>            <mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>            Dear FI-WARE GEi owners,
>>>
>>>               We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian
>>>            Zweger, about
>>>            what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly
>>>            questioned during the month 30 project review next week.
>>>
>>>               Please react accordingly so that:
>>>
>>>               * you provide your WPL the necessary information that
>>>            will allow him
>>>
>>>                 to answer any potential question at the review; or
>>>               * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the 
>>> meeting
>>>
>>>                 personally, as to be able to respond any questions 
>>> directly
>>>
>>>               Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian
>>>            mentions that the
>>>            EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to
>>>            continue
>>>            funding development.
>>>
>>>               Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the
>>>            PO/reviewers make:
>>>
>>>               * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond
>>>            the FI-PPP ?
>>>               * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered 
>>> as open
>>>
>>>                 source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan
>>>            to deliver
>>>                 your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ?
>>>               * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on
>>>            continuation of
>>>
>>>                 the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan
>>>            to provide
>>>                 lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC
>>>            projects in
>>>                 phase 2 trials ?    How doy you plan to provide level 1
>>>            and 2
>>>                 support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ?
>>>
>>>               Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding
>>>            GEis in
>>>            several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response 
>>> for.
>>>
>>>               For those who didn't follow the details about the next
>>>            month 30
>>>            project review, these are the logistics:
>>>
>>>                 Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telefónica's office
>>>            (Avenue des
>>>                 Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on 
>>> Monday.
>>>                 Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 
>>> 0/S2
>>>
>>>                 agenda of the
>>>
>>>  review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0
>>>           
>>>  <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0>
>>>
>>>               Best regards,
>>>
>>>            -- Juanjo Hierro
>>>
>>>            P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA
>>>            GEi was in
>>>            the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue
>>>            (it was
>>>            mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open
>>>            source
>>>            while at the same time it was stated that it could be 
>>> used under
>>>            certain terms and conditions).   This has already been fixed.
>>>
>>>            -------------
>>>            Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
>>>            website:www.tid.es <http://www.tid.es>
>>>            email:jhierro at tid.es <http://tid.es> 
>>> <mailto:email%3Ajhierro at tid.es <mailto:3Ajhierro at tid.es>>
>>>            twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro
>>>            <http://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>
>>>              <http://twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro
>>>            <http://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>>
>>>
>>>
>>>            FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
>>>            and Chief Architect
>>>
>>>            FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman
>>>
>>>            You can follow FI-WARE at:
>>>                website:http://www.fi-ware.eu <http://www.fi-ware.eu>
>>>
>>>  facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242>
>>>                twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware 
>>> <http://twitter.com/__FIware>
>>>            <http://twitter.com/FIware>
>>>  linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>>>            <http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932>
>>>
>>>
>>>            -------- Original Message --------
>>>            Subject:        RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting
>>>            Date:   Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000
>>>            From:   <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu 
>>> <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
>>>            <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>>
>>>            To:     <mcp at tid.es <mailto:mcp at tid.es> <mailto:mcp at tid.es>>
>>>            CC:     <jhierro at tid.es <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
>>>            <mailto:jhierro at tid.es>>,<CNECT-ICT-__285248 at ec.europa.eu 
>>> <mailto:CNECT-ICT-__285248 at ec.europa.eu>
>>>            <mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>            Dear Miguel,
>>>
>>>            As requested, please find a list below.
>>>
>>>            The question for the first group is*whether it is 
>>> worthwhile to
>>>            continue funding development of:*
>>>
>>>            - Data Chapter
>>>                             - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan
>>>            / Siemens
>>>                             - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor
>>>            / Siemens
>>>                             - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker
>>>            / Siemens
>>>            - Apps Chapter
>>>                             - (Service Composition, Ericsson
>>>            Composition Editor
>>>            (ECE) / Ericsson)
>>>                             - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT
>>>                             - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia
>>>            - IoT Chapter
>>>                             - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT
>>>            Discovery - UNIS
>>>                             - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC
>>>                             - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA 
>>> - TID
>>>                             - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom
>>>            Italia /
>>>            EPCGE / Orange
>>>            - Security Chapter
>>>                             - Security Monitoring / Android 
>>> Vulnerability
>>>            Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria
>>>                             - Identity Management, GCP / DT
>>>                             - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN
>>>                             - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN
>>>                             - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus
>>>            / Inria
>>>            - I2ND Chapter
>>>                             - Cloud Proxy
>>>                             - (I2ND) Network Information and Control
>>>            (NetIC-VNP),
>>>            Altoclient/ALU-D
>>>                             - (I2ND) Network Information and Control
>>>            (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN
>>>                             - (I2ND) Network Information and Control
>>>            (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I
>>>                             - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability
>>>            and Control
>>>            (S3C), S3C / DT
>>>            - Tools
>>>                             - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel
>>>
>>>            Then there are*specific questions*for the second group:
>>>
>>>            - Cloud Chapter
>>>                             - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by
>>>            Intel? Differences?
>>>                             - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status?
>>>                             - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the
>>>            Catalogue?
>>>            - Data Chapter
>>>                             - UDA -- unstructured data analysis by
>>>            ATOS?? Status?
>>>            - Apps Chapter
>>>                             - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia
>>>            and SETHA2 by
>>>            Thales?
>>>            - IoT Chapter
>>>                             - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway 
>>> Device
>>>            Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue?
>>>                             - Test and evaluation server environment
>>>            for NGSI by
>>>            SAP?? Status?
>>>                             - Template Handler by SAP?? Status?
>>>            - Security Chapter
>>>                             - KeyRock by UPM?? Status?
>>>                             - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status?
>>>            - MiWi Chapter
>>>                             - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 
>>> 3D-UI,
>>>            Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, 
>>> GIS Data
>>>            Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented 
>>> Reality,
>>>            Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface
>>>            Designer? Status?
>>>
>>>            Best regards,
>>>            Arian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------
>>>
>>>
>>>            Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. 
>>> Puede
>>>            consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo
>>>            electrónico
>>>            en el enlace situado más abajo.
>>>            This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We
>>>            only send
>>>            and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
>>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx
>>>            <http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx>
>>>            _________________________________________________
>>>            Fiware mailing list
>>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
>>> <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>>            <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.__eu
>>>            <mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>
>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware
>>>            <https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        _________________________________________________
>>>        Fiware-miwi mailing list
>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
>>> <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi
>>>        <https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    --
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------__------------------------------__-------------
>>>    Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
>>>    Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>>>
>>>    Geschäftsführung:
>>>       Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
>>>       Dr. Walter Olthoff
>>>    Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
>>>       Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
>>>
>>>    Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
>>>    USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer:  19/673/0060/3
>>>  ------------------------------__------------------------------__---------------
>>>
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    Fiware-miwi mailing list
>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
>>> <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila
>>> VP, Technology
>>> Cyberlightning Ltd.
>>>
>>> mobile. +358 405245142
>>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com <mailto:jarkko at cyberlightning.com> 
>>> <mailto:jarkko at cyberlightning.com>
>>>
>>> Go to www.cybersli.de <http://www.cybersli.de> 
>>> <http://www.cybersli.de/> and enrich your
>>> presentations!
>>>
>>> www.cyberlightning.com <http://www.cyberlightning.com> 
>>> <http://www.cyberlightning.com/>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>>
>> Geschäftsführung:
>>   Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
>>   Dr. Walter Olthoff
>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
>>   Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
>>
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer:  19/673/0060/3
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> <slusallek.vcf>_______________________________________________
>> Fiware-miwi mailing list
>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-miwi mailing list
> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu
> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131217/ed7b4c63/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_UOULU-CIE.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 168391 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131217/ed7b4c63/attachment.pptx>


More information about the Fiware-miwi mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy