Just a brief note: we had some interesting preliminary discussion triggered by how the data schema that Ari O. presented for the POI system seemed at least partly similar to what the Real-Virtual interaction work had resulted in too -- and in fact about how the proposed POI schema was basically a version of the entity-component model which we’ve already been using for scenes in realXtend (it is inspired by / modeled after it, Ari told). So it can be much related to the Scene API work in the Synchronization GE too. As the action point we agreed that Ari will organize a specific work session on that. I was now thinking that it perhaps at least partly leads back to the question: how do we define (and implement) component types. I.e. what was mentioned in that entity-system post a few weeks back (with links to reX IComponent etc.). I mean: if functionality such as POIs and realworld interaction make sense as somehow resulting in custom data component types, does it mean that a key part of the framework is a way for those systems to declare their types .. so that it integrates nicely for the whole we want? I’m not sure, too tired to think it through now, but anyhow just wanted to mention that this was one topic that came up. I think Web Components is again something to check - as in XML terms reX Components are xml(3d) elements .. just ones that are usually in a group (according to the reX entity <-> xml3d group mapping). And Web Components are about defining & implementing new elements (as Erno pointed out in a different discussion about xml-html authoring in the session). BTW Thanks Kristian for the great comments in that entity system thread - was really good to learn about the alternative attribute access syntax and the validation in XML3D(.js). ~Toni P.S. for (Christof &) the DFKI folks: I’m sure you understand the rationale of these Oulu meets -- idea is ofc not to exclude you from the talks but just makes sense for us to meet live too as we are in the same city afterall etc -- naturally with the DFKI team you also talk there locally. Perhaps is a good idea that we make notes so that can post e.g. here then (I’m not volunteering though! 😜) . Also, the now agreed bi-weekly setup on Tuesdays luckily works so that we can then summarize fresh in the global Wed meetings and continue the talks etc. From: Erno Kuusela Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:57 AM To: Fiware-miwi Kari from CIE offered to host it this time, so see you there at 13:00. Erno _______________________________________________ Fiware-miwi mailing list Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20131022/a606dc90/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy