Hello, I try to address your point about below: On 20.2.2014 20:32, Stefan Lemme wrote: > > Hello, > > after our workshop last week a few questions about the POI Data > Provider raised and hopefully you can provide some insights. > > * [...] Which ontology is used for the category of a POI? How to > handle POIs referring to multiple categories? And what about tags? > (All with regard to multi-lingual content) > > [...] I think support for different category ontologies would be good for generality of this generic system. One possibility for better category is e.g.:*"category": [</category/>, </category/>,...]* where </category/> is "</ontology code/>:</category name/>" or "</category name/>" . The latter would be for the default ontology (to be defined). Multilingual presentations of categories is different problem. Translations could reside with ontology definitions or in application specific servers. The same applies for possible icons for categories. Could you tell more about tags. * What kind of tags would be useful here? * How tags would be used? * Who defines tags for a POI? * etc. -- Ari Okkonen CIE, University of Oulu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20140423/4595b805/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy