[Fiware-miwi] Epic naming. Splitting up Epics?

Marti Christof (mach) mach at zhaw.ch
Fri Jun 27 15:08:01 CEST 2014


Hi Antti

I can handle the tracker, and the roadmap/materializing pages, if you only update the wiki-pages.

If you want to keep it in one epic then you only need to rename the epic.
- Go to the page, select „move“ and modify the target name by extending it with the EpicId.

If you want to split it, the easiest way would be to create two new wiki pages:
- go to the page. open in edit mode. mark and copy the content to copy-buffer.
- leave edit mode and modify the name of the page in the url to your new page name, the wiki will offer you to create the page, if it does not exist.
- past the content into new page and modify it.
- repeat the same for the second epic.

Christof


Am 27.06.2014 um 14:07 schrieb Antti Kokko <antti.kokko at adminotech.com<mailto:antti.kokko at adminotech.com>>:

Hello,

I need some detailed fast instructions. How to split the epic. Does I need to put e.g. 2 epics in the tracker and how/where to split those in the wiki? These maybe stupid questions but I need to get this done. I ´m leaving for a 1 month summer holiday within an hour.

Thanks,

 - Antti


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Antti Kokko <antti.kokko at adminotech.com<mailto:antti.kokko at adminotech.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Has anyone succeeded in splitting already? It will affect so many places.

Thanks,

 - Antti


On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Marti Christof (mach) <mach at zhaw.ch<mailto:mach at zhaw.ch>> wrote:
Hi Antti, and all others having the same errors in the report.

The first error is what we are discussing about splitting up the current epics into 2 or more smaller entries.
The problem is, that an Epic name has to have the following schema:
FIWARE.Epic.Chapter.Enabler[.EpicId]*.EpicId

(Schema definitions are defined here: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_(convention_to_follow))

For 2D-UI this means we need an Epic name like:
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.X
(where X is a reasonable name for the current Epic; I still look for a better name than „Basic“, „Basis“, ...)

or to split the content of the epic in two parts:
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.X1
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.X2
(where X1 contains a part of the current epic and X2 the remaining part of the current epic; X1 and X2 would be reasonable names for these functionalities)

In 3D-UI we would then have for example:
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.3D-UI.HTMLModelExtension (new: previous FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.3D-UI; Is there a better name?)
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.3D-UI.DataFlowProcessing
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.3D-UI.HW-Support

Maybe there is a similar rename or split possible in 2D-UI (and all the other with this error)


For the second error it is simply a referencing issue.
- Any Epic and Feature can only be referenced in the Materializing page, if it is closed in the tracker.
- If it is still open it should have a reference in the roadmap (features in the left column, epics in the right column)

This is simple to fix, as soon the first (naming issue) is fixed.

Best regards
Christof


Am 27.06.2014 um 09:32 schrieb Antti Kokko <antti.kokko at adminotech.com<mailto:antti.kokko at adminotech.com>>:

Hello,

I need some guidance with these issues:
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI (<- adjust reference to pattern)
FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI (<-- provide reference in roadmap; provide reference in tracker; remove reference from materializing;)

What is the correct way of getting rid of these issues? There might have been already answers to these but seems pretty much every Ge still have the same issues.


For 2D-UI Epic I reduced the word count and added the rationale.

Thanks,

 - Antti




On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Marti Christof (mach) <mach at zhaw.ch<mailto:mach at zhaw.ch>> wrote:
Hi Philipp, Hi all

Epic- and Feature- descriptions are in the public wiki and are referenced from the Materializing page as soon they are closed or on the roadmap page as long they are worked on.
Renaming it in the Tracker is the minor part.

The problem is, that without extending the name the backlog report will show many errors, which will also be in a deliverable. Goal is to find a consistent and good way to remove the errors without putting to much work into it.

To fulfill the naming rules we need to extend the Epic names, either bei splitting large epics into two or by extending it with a generic term, representing the whole epic.

Here you find the links to all the epics available in the public wiki:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&from=FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.&namespace=0<https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php?title=Special:PrefixIndex&from=FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.&namespace=0>


@All: Please check the latest report „All issues tab":
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4230/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140626.xlsx

There are some Epics which have to much words in the description (>250)
- 2D-UI
- 3D-UI
- 3D-UI.DataflowProcessing
- DisplayAsAService

and all of the following are missing content in the Rational Field (>=20 words):
- 2D-UI
- 3D-UI
- 3D-UI.DataflowProcessing
- 3D-UI.HW-Support
- AugmentedReality
- CloudRendering
- DisplayAsAService
- InterfaceDesigner
- Synchronization
- Synchronization.SceneAPI
- VirtualCharacters

Would be nice if you can fix the content part also while looking into the naming.

Cheers
Christof


Am 26.06.2014 um 12:19 schrieb Philipp Slusallek <philipp.slusallek at dfki.de<mailto:philipp.slusallek at dfki.de>>:

> Hi,
>
> This is something that is only really visible internally, right?
> Externally people only care about the GE and its functionality.
>
> So please, lets do whatever minimizes the amount of work right now.
> Those names are really not very meaningful for most people.
>
>
> Best,
>
>       Philipp
>
>
> Am 26.06.2014 11<tel:26.06.2014%2011>:26, schrieb Marti Christof (mach):
>> Dear WP13 GEi owners
>>
>> The problem with the naming of the epics is, that we need to add an EpicId.
>> Schema: FIWARE.Epic.Chapter.Enabler[.EpicId]*.EpicId
>>
>> At the moment many WP13-epics are only named after the GE itself. e.g.
>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI
>> So we either need to add a generic EpicId (see below) or split up the
>> Epics in multiple meaningful peaces.
>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.FunctionalityX
>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.FunctionalityY
>> Because some of the Epic Description are also to long (see report „All
>> issues“) and need to be shortened, this might be a good possiblity  to
>> fix these issues too.
>>
>> Please let me know ASAP [today before EOB] if and how it would be
>> possible to split your current GEs Epic.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Christof
>>
>>
>>
>> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
>>
>>> *Von: *"Marti Christof (mach)" <mach at zhaw.ch<mailto:mach at zhaw.ch> <mailto:mach at zhaw.ch<mailto:mach at zhaw.ch>>>
>>> *Betreff: * *Aw: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content: updated reviews*
>>> *Datum: *26. Juni 2014 [26] 11:05:08 MESZ
>>> *An: *MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE <manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>
>>> <mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>>>
>>> *Kopie: *MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO <mcp at tid.es<mailto:mcp at tid.es> <mailto:mcp at tid.es<mailto:mcp at tid.es>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Manuel
>>>
>>> The problem is, that in OpenCall 2 more or less the WebUI GEs have
>>> been based on the defined Epics. So the epics where available before
>>> the GEs.
>>> The problem did not show up before, because they were named
>>> FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.2D-UI, but AdvWebUI is not a GE, so we got
>>> the error there and had to rename them to the correct GE-names.
>>>
>>> I do not care to rename the Epics, but is there a rule or a schema in
>>> other WPs how to extend the name in such a case?
>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.2D-UI  (repeating the GE name)
>>> or
>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.Basis  (for implementation of the basis)
>>> or
>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.Basic  (for basic functionality)
>>> or
>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI.BaseFunctionality
>>> or
>>> - …
>>>
>>> We can schedule a call to discuss this. I am available from 13:00 to
>>> 13:45 and then again from 16:00-...
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Christof
>>>
>>> Am 26.06.2014 um 10:44 schrieb MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
>>> <manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>
>>> <mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>>>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Christof,
>>>>
>>>> Rules haven’t  changed.
>>>> It doesn’t make sense to have an Epic named as the GEI. Epics are
>>>> organising items, it should add some organising value to the items
>>>> added below.
>>>> If you wish, we can do some research to the past to check how it was
>>>> at some definite time.
>>>> Let me know and we schedule a meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Manuel
>>>>
>>>> *From:*Marti Christof (mach) [mailto:mach at zhaw.ch<mailto:mach at zhaw.ch>]
>>>> *Sent:*jueves, 26 de junio de 2014 10:24
>>>> *To:*MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
>>>> *Cc:*MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO
>>>> *Subject:*Re: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content: updated reviews
>>>>
>>>> Hi Manuel
>>>>
>>>> I am working on fixing the problems with the backlog.
>>>> One point I have problems to fix is the Epic naming error, because
>>>> you expect an EpicId at the end, but most of our Epics are similar to
>>>> the GEs itself. So for the following GEs the Epics and the GE are
>>>> identical:
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.2D-UI
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.3D-UI
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AugmentedReality
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.CloudRendering
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.DisplayAsAService
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.GISDataProvider
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.POIDataProvider
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.InterfaceDesigner
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.RealVirtualInteraction
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.Synchronization
>>>> - FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.VirtualCharacters
>>>>
>>>> To accomplish the rules we would have to add some artificial EpicId
>>>> like .Basic oder .BaseFunctionality
>>>> Is this really intended?
>>>>
>>>> I also wonder, why this errors did not show up earlier, when we fixed
>>>> the last round of bugs.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Christof
>>>>
>>>> Am 26.06.2014 um 10:02 schrieb MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
>>>> <manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>
>>>> <mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com<mailto:manuel.escrichevicente at telefonica.com>>>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Dear Partners,
>>>>
>>>>    Please, find below updated reports.
>>>>
>>>>    REVIEWS:
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4224/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4225/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4226/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4227/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4228/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4229/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4230/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140626.xlsx
>>>>
>>>>    DASHBOARDS:
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4231/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4232/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4233/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4234/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4235/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4236/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>    https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/4237/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140626.xlsx
>>>>
>>>>    If any support were required, please, don’t hesitate to let me know.
>>>>
>>>>    Kind regards,
>>>>    Manuel
>>>>
>>>>    ----------------------------
>>>>    Manuel Escriche Vicente
>>>>    Agile Project Manager/Leader
>>>>    FI-WAREInitiative
>>>>    Telefónica Digital
>>>>    Parque Tecnológico
>>>>    C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
>>>>    47151 - Boecillo
>>>>    Valladolid - Spain
>>>>    Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72<tel:%2B34.91.312.99.72>
>>>>    Fax: +34.983.36.75.64<tel:%2B34.983.36.75.64>
>>>>    http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/> <http://www.tid.es/>
>>>>
>>>>    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>    Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su
>>>>    destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o
>>>>    confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de
>>>>    destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda
>>>>    notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia
>>>>    sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la
>>>>    legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le
>>>>    rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>>>>    proceda a su destrucción.
>>>>
>>>>    The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
>>>>    confidential information intended only for the use of the
>>>>    individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message
>>>>    is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>    dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
>>>>    strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
>>>>    error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender
>>>>    that you have received this communication in error and then
>>>>    delete it.
>>>>
>>>>    Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu
>>>>    destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial
>>>>    e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é
>>>>    vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a
>>>>    leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode
>>>>    estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta
>>>>    mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente
>>>>    por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    Fiware-ge-owners mailing list
>>>>    Fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org>
>>>>    <mailto:Fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org>>
>>>>    https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-ge-owners
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su
>>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial
>>>> y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es
>>>> usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura,
>>>> utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar
>>>> prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este
>>>> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por
>>>> esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
>>>>
>>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
>>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
>>>> or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the
>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>>> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
>>>> If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it.
>>>> Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this
>>>> communication in error and then delete it.
>>>>
>>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu
>>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é
>>>> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa
>>>> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura,
>>>> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida
>>>> em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro,
>>>> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e
>>>> proceda a sua destruição
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fiware-miwi mailing list
>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.org>
>> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-miwi
>>
>
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>
> Geschäftsführung:
>   Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
>   Dr. Walter Olthoff
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
>   Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer:  19/673/0060/3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <philipp_slusallek.vcf>

_______________________________________________
Fiware-miwi mailing list
Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.org>
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-miwi



--

Best regards,
Antti Kokko
Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd.
www.meshmoon.com<http://www.meshmoon.com/>




--

Best regards,
Antti Kokko
Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd.
www.meshmoon.com<http://www.meshmoon.com/>



--

Best regards,
Antti Kokko
Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd.
www.meshmoon.com<http://www.meshmoon.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-miwi/attachments/20140627/864bc2fb/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-miwi mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy