[Fiware-ngsi] "metadata" misspelling

Tobias Jacobs Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu
Thu Apr 4 13:15:16 CEST 2013


Hi Fermin,

I agree with your proposal. I think "metaData" is only there by mistake.

Best
Tobias

From: fiware-ngsi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ngsi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fermín Galán Márquez
Sent: Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 12:30
To: fiware-ngsi at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-ngsi] "metadata" misspelling

Hi,

We have found cases in the examples in which metadata is spelled "metatada" and "metaData":

  *   https://forge.fi-ware.eu/scmrepos/svn/iot/trunk/schemes/xml_examples/ngsi-9/registerContextRequest.xml : metaData
  *   https://forge.fi-ware.eu/scmrepos/svn/iot/trunk/schemes/xml_examples/ngsi-10/appendContextElementRequest.xml : metadata

On the other hand, OMA spec always used "metadata" which we understand in the correct one according to English syntax (http://oxforddictionaries.com/es/definicion/ingles/metadata).

So, in order to be coherent in all places and align with OMA spec, we propose to change the XSDs (and XML examples in the SVN) to use always "metadata".

What do you think?

Best regards,

------
Fermín

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-ngsi/attachments/20130404/cae37d6f/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-ngsi mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy