[Fiware-oasc-etsi] Reminder confcall today

[Lindsay Frost]

sorry I have no skype account on this pc.
I suggest we use email, repy to all on Juanjo's email.

I think we should say:

win-win: ISG can draw in many stakeholders which for many reasons do not join big SDOs
method: proof of principle, with open source demonstrators
target: interworking with oneM2M (and other IoT platforms), after showing proof of principle

I sent a win-win.ppt in case we need something to show. But it is backup.

________________________________________
Dr. Lindsay Frost, Chief Standardization Eng.
frost at neclab.eu     Mobile +49.163.275.1734
NEC Laboratories Europe, Kurfürsten-Anlage 36,
D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. 

Reg. Headoffice: NEC Europe Ltd, VAT DE161569151
Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road, 
London HA4 6QE, Reg. in England 2832014


-----Original Message-----
From: fiware-oasc-etsi-bounces at lists.fiware.org [mailto:fiware-oasc-etsi-bounces at lists.fiware.org] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. September 2016 14:17
To: Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org
Subject: [Fiware-oasc-etsi] Reminder confcall today

Dear all,

   This is a reminder of the confcall we will have today.

   The link to the GoToMeeting was: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/439114557

   Since we don't have any idea about what people from OneM2M and Smart M2M are going to tell us, despite we asked, let's try to show a single front.  If they come with something rather strange, let's discuss that later among us.

   My major concern is that they try to establish some sort of dependency (or even worse, subordination) of the work in the CIM ISG 
with respect to the work in OneM2M.   That is something we should avoid, 
because may suppose that our success becomes dependent on theirs (and market is not giving it a great momentum, I'm afraid not because of the merits of OneM2M but probably because the IoT field is a world of wars 
and chaos where it's going to be difficult to see a winner).   However, 
if they come with any idea like that, let's state that while we have always agreed that we have to support that the work of the ISG should not overlap that of OneM2M, we believe that the CIM ISG should be 
independent, because indeed it is not IoT specific.   That as a general 
principle but declaring that, in any case, we would need to discuss their proposal among us before coming with a definitive response.

   In general, I believe we should listen to what they are going to tell us and then have a separated call afterwards, where we can discuss and agree on a common position.

   It would be nice if we could keep a chat line in parallel through 
Skype if you have a Skype account.  Mine is juanjose.hierro     
Otherwise, I guess we may use the private chat of GoToMeeting, but the issue then is that it doesn't allow us to chat in group.

   Cheers,


-- Juanjo

______________________________________________________

Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform IoT Unit, Telefónica

email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com
twitter: @JuanjoHierro

You can follow FIWARE at:
   website:  http://www.fiware.org
   twitter:  @FIWARE
   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932

_______________________________________________
Fiware-oasc-etsi mailing list
Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org
https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-oasc-etsi