Ok Thanks. I adapt it Best, Ana García Director *ENoLL ivzw | Pleinlaan 9** | 1050 Brussels | Belgium | www.openlivinglabs.eu <http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/>* *T: | F: +32 2 629 16 13 | M: +32 470 19 3118 * *@openlivinglabs **| @RoblesAG* On 9 April 2016 at 16:02, Alex Gluhak <alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk> wrote: > Anna > > Here the OrganiCity IPR section – please look for OrganiCity key word and > adapt > > Alex > > .2.2 Management of Intellectual Property > > As with any joint endeavour with potential exploitation/commercial impact, > managing the IPR around the project will be critical. As such the project > handles this by looking at the general areas: access rights, ownership and > the instantiation of these aspects through relevant agreements. > > * General:* For the success of the project it is essential > that all project partners agree on explicit rules concerning IP ownership, > access rights to any Background and Foreground IP for the execution of the > project and the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and > confidential information before the project starts and it will ensure these > are formalised in relevant agreements. > > * Agreements:* The purpose of the Consortium Agreement is to > establish a legal framework for the project in order to minimise any > internal issues within the consortium related to the work, IP-Ownership, > Confidential Information, Access Rights to Background and Foreground IP for > the duration of the project and any other matters of the consortium > interest. > > * Access Rights:* In order to ensure smooth execution of the > project, the project partners agree to grant royalty-free access to > Background and Foreground IP for the execution of the project. Therefore, > all project partners determine any Background IP they are willing to submit > to the project within the Consortium Agreement before the project starts. > Any details concerning the access rights to Background and Foreground IP > for the duration of the project will be defined in the Consortium Agreement. > > * IP Ownership*: Foreground IP shall be owned by the project > partner carrying out the work leading to such Foreground IP taking into > account the co-creators. If any Foreground IP is created jointly by at > least two parties and it is not possible to distinguish between the > contributions of each of the parties, such work will be jointly owned by > the contributing parties. The same shall apply if, in the course of > carrying out work on the project, an invention is made having two or more > contributing parties contributing to it, and it is not possible to separate > the individual contributions. Any such joint inventions, all related patent > applications and patents shall be jointly owned by the contributing > parties. Any details concerning the exposure to jointly owned Foreground > IP, joint inventions and joint patent applications will be addressed in the > Consortium Agreement. See further details in the management section (3.2.1). > > Access to OrganiCity developments will be made publically > available using open source licenses wherever this is appropriate. > > From: Ana Garcia <ana.garcia at enoll.org> > Date: Saturday, 9 April 2016 14:36 > To: Mirko Presser <mirko.presser at alexandra.dk> > Cc: Sebastien Ziegler <sziegler at mandint.org>, Alex Gluhak < > alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk>, " > Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org" < > Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org>, " > margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt" < > margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt> > Subject: Re: [oasc-iot-lsp-cities] Section 2.1 update + 2.2 > > Status on section 2.2: > > - Nuria and Sebastien please lets work in a strong introductory part as > discussed I put the key words discussed today (half a page) INPUT IN > already, I need to harmonise it > > - Exploitation strategy (Nuria, half a page) DONE > > - Dissemination plan, actions and measures (Ana, 1 page) In progress > > - Impact through standardisation (Sebastien, Juanjo, 1/2 page) DONE > > - Knowledge management and IPR (Nadia/Adrienne, 1/2 based on Organicity) Nothing > IN so far > > - Data management plan (not clear to me who was going to write this but > Alex/Remco/Sergio/Juanjo mentioned in the call) (1/2 page) Some text in/ > DONE > > - Communication (Ana, 1 page) DONE > > > A more consolidated version will be ready tonight and I will inform of > status then > > > Best, > > Best, > Ana García > Director > > *ENoLL ivzw | Pleinlaan 9** | 1050 Brussels | Belgium > | www.openlivinglabs.eu <http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/>* > > *T: | F: +32 2 629 16 13 <%2B32%202%20629%2016%2013> | M: +32 470 19 3118 > <%2B32%20470%2019%203118> * > > *@openlivinglabs **| @RoblesAG* > > > > On 9 April 2016 at 12:53, Mirko Presser <mirko.presser at alexandra.dk> > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Here is a section 2.1 update. >> >> LUIS will look at the 2.1.1 points 4-9. >> >> Any VOLUNTEERS to look through 1-3? >> >> I am expecting inputs from MARGARIDA for the KPIs – she will collect >> this form the cities. >> >> I need the Mexican City description. SERGIO >> >> I need ATOS - NURIA, TELEFONICA - SERGIO, PHILIPS - REMCO, ENGINEERING - >> STEPHANO to look at 2.1.2.10 and shorten to 1-2 pages. Each company gets >> 1/3 page max. >> >> MIRKO to write an intro to 2.1.2 based on the moved figure (Arup Table) >> which sits now in section 1. >> >> We have 9 cities (including the Mexican city) - this means that with 1 >> page per city we spend 50% on that. Most of the content is boasting how >> great the cities already are. We don’t need that in this section – that can >> be in section 4 – what we need is how SynchroiCity will help you propel you >> even further into becoming an even greater city. So – EACH CITY should >> revise their inputs to focus on IMPACT and not how great they are. 2/3 >> pages per city is max. >> >> Any VOLUNTEERS to check barriers and obstacles 2.1.3? - shorten to 1.5 >> pages >> >> SERGIO – I need that standards table 2.1.4. >> >> I have deleted the section on other societal impact that Pentti made >> based on PEST – it was too generic. >> >> MARTIN – please give me a first draft for 2.1.5 Quantifiable Impact of >> the Project form a project perspective – cities will be coming in from >> MARGARIDA’s work. >> >> Ana – could you give a status on 2.2? >> >> Finally we have a page limit problem. We need to cut this down to 20 >> pages. Including 2.2! So we are not looking for volume. >> >> Thanks >> >> Mirko >> >> *____________________________________________* >> *MIRKO PRESSER* >> *INTERNET OF THINGS EXPERT AND TEAM LEADER* >> DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING LAB >> >> ALEXANDRA INSTITUTTET A/S >> ÅBOGADE 34, 8200 AARHUS N >> KONTOR: HOPPER-333 >> >> + 45 30 49 09 76 >> mirko.presser at alexandra.dk <fornavn.efternavn at alexandra.dk> >> alexandra.dk <http://www.alexandra.dk/> >> linkedin.com/in/mirkopresser >> twitter.com/mirkopresser >> *____________________________________________* >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities mailing list >> Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org >> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities/attachments/20160409/9ada922c/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy