Dear all, I completely reworked the Standardization section, which is now complete, rich and concise. Feel free however to enrich it if needed. I moved part of the content of the subsection on the exploitation plan into the introduction of Section 2. It enables to have the economic context in the intro and to better focus the subsection of the exploitation plan on how we will exploit the results of the project and create business and economic value with Synchronicity. I also added a few market figures in the intro. In the exploitation plan, I tried to highlight the various dimensions of our project in terms of exploitation, and left untouched part of the text brought by Nuria. It probably require other pairs of eyes than ours, to complete and enrich it. In particular, it would be useful to have better highlight what are our plans after the end of the project: - OASC strategy and commitment to maintain... - Standardization strategy (done) - EIP-SCC (to be strengthened and to ensure that it appears in section 1) - Economic impact expected from a European integrated ans interoperable IoT market for smart cities (to be provided by an industrial partner). Feel free to enrich both sections. We need to demonstrate that the project will have credible long term impact, including in terms of business opportunity for the IoT industry. The data management plan is also complete and concise and we can take the lead for the open data strategy for the research community. We just need someone to check and validate the conformity with the open data market. There are several subsections still empty, in particular for the communication. Best regards, Sébastien Le 09.04.2016 17:34, Ana Garcia a écrit : > Ok Thanks. I adapt it > > Best, > Ana García > Director > > /ENoLL ivzw | Pleinlaan 9// | 1050 Brussels | Belgium | > _www.openlivinglabs.eu <http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/>_/ > > /T: | F: +32 2 629 16 13 | M: +32 470 19 3118 / > > /@openlivinglabs //| @RoblesAG/ > > > > On 9 April 2016 at 16:02, Alex Gluhak <alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk > <mailto:alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk>> wrote: > > Anna > > Here the OrganiCity IPR section – please look for OrganiCity key > word and adapt > > Alex > > > .2.2 Management of Intellectual Property > > As with any joint endeavour with potential exploitation/commercial > impact, managing the IPR around the project will be critical. As > such the project handles this by looking at the general areas: > access rights, ownership and the instantiation of these aspects > through relevant agreements. > > *General:*For the success of the project it is essential that all > project partners agree on explicit rules concerning IP ownership, > access rights to any Background and Foreground IP for the > execution of the project and the protection of Intellectual > Property Rights (IPRs) and confidential information before the > project starts and it will ensure these are formalised in relevant > agreements. > > *Agreements:*The purpose of the Consortium Agreement is to > establish a legal framework for the project in order to minimise > any internal issues within the consortium related to the work, > IP-Ownership, Confidential Information, Access Rights to > Background and Foreground IP for the duration of the project and > any other matters of the consortium interest. > > *Access Rights:*In order to ensure smooth execution of the > project, the project partners agree to grant royalty-free access > to Background and Foreground IP for the execution of the project. > Therefore, all project partners determine any Background IP they > are willing to submit to the project within the Consortium > Agreement before the project starts. Any details concerning the > access rights to Background and Foreground IP for the duration of > the project will be defined in the Consortium Agreement. > > *IP Ownership*: Foreground IP shall be owned by the project > partner carrying out the work leading to such Foreground IP taking > into account the co-creators. If any Foreground IP is created > jointly by at least two parties and it is not possible to > distinguish between the contributions of each of the parties, such > work will be jointly owned by the contributing parties. The same > shall apply if, in the course of carrying out work on the project, > an invention is made having two or more contributing parties > contributing to it, and it is not possible to separate the > individual contributions. Any such joint inventions, all related > patent applications and patents shall be jointly owned by the > contributing parties. Any details concerning the exposure to > jointly owned Foreground IP, joint inventions and joint patent > applications will be addressed in the Consortium Agreement. See > further details in the management section (3.2.1). > > Access to OrganiCity developments will be made publically > available using open source licenses wherever this is appropriate. > > > From: Ana Garcia <ana.garcia at enoll.org <mailto:ana.garcia at enoll.org>> > Date: Saturday, 9 April 2016 14:36 > To: Mirko Presser <mirko.presser at alexandra.dk > <mailto:mirko.presser at alexandra.dk>> > Cc: Sebastien Ziegler <sziegler at mandint.org > <mailto:sziegler at mandint.org>>, Alex Gluhak > <alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk > <mailto:alex.gluhak at digicatapult.org.uk>>, > "Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org > <mailto:Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org>" > <Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org > <mailto:Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org>>, > "margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt > <mailto:margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt>" > <margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt > <mailto:margarida.campolargo at portodigital.pt>> > Subject: Re: [oasc-iot-lsp-cities] Section 2.1 update + 2.2 > > Status on section 2.2: > > - Nuria and Sebastien please lets work in a strong introductory > part as discussed I put the key words discussed today (half a > page) INPUT IN already, I need to harmonise it > > - Exploitation strategy (Nuria, half a page) DONE > > - Dissemination plan, actions and measures (Ana, 1 page)In progress > > - Impact through standardisation (Sebastien, Juanjo, 1/2 page)DONE > > - Knowledge management and IPR (Nadia/Adrienne, 1/2 based on > Organicity) Nothing IN so far > > - Data management plan (not clear to me who was going to write > this but Alex/Remco/Sergio/Juanjo mentioned in the call) (1/2 > page) Some text in/DONE > > - Communication (Ana, 1 page) DONE > > > A more consolidated version will be ready tonight and I will > inform of status then > > > Best, > > > Best, > Ana García > Director > > /ENoLL ivzw | Pleinlaan 9// | 1050 Brussels | Belgium | > _www.openlivinglabs.eu <http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/>_/ > > /T: | F: +32 2 629 16 13 <tel:%2B32%202%20629%2016%2013> | M: +32 > 470 19 3118 <tel:%2B32%20470%2019%203118> / > > /@openlivinglabs //| @RoblesAG/ > > > > On 9 April 2016 at 12:53, Mirko Presser > <mirko.presser at alexandra.dk <mailto:mirko.presser at alexandra.dk>> > wrote: > > Dear all, > > Here is a section 2.1 update. > > LUIS will look at the 2.1.1 points 4-9. > > Any VOLUNTEERS to look through 1-3? > > I am expecting inputs from MARGARIDA for the KPIs – she will > collect this form the cities. > > I need the Mexican City description. SERGIO > > I need ATOS - NURIA, TELEFONICA - SERGIO, PHILIPS - REMCO, > ENGINEERING - STEPHANO to look at 2.1.2.10 and shorten to 1-2 > pages. Each company gets 1/3 page max. > > MIRKO to write an intro to 2.1.2 based on the moved figure > (Arup Table) which sits now in section 1. > > We have 9 cities (including the Mexican city) - this means > that with 1 page per city we spend 50% on that. Most of the > content is boasting how great the cities already are. We don’t > need that in this section – that can be in section 4 – what we > need is how SynchroiCity will help you propel you even further > into becoming an even greater city. So – EACH CITY should > revise their inputs to focus on IMPACT and not how great they > are. 2/3 pages per city is max. > > Any VOLUNTEERS to check barriers and obstacles 2.1.3? - > shorten to 1.5 pages > > SERGIO – I need that standards table 2.1.4. > > I have deleted the section on other societal impact that > Pentti made based on PEST – it was too generic. > > MARTIN – please give me a first draft for 2.1.5 Quantifiable > Impact of the Project form a project perspective – cities will > be coming in from MARGARIDA’s work. > > Ana – could you give a status on 2.2? > > Finally we have a page limit problem. We need to cut this down > to 20 pages. Including 2.2! So we are not looking for volume. > > Thanks > > Mirko > > *____________________________________________* > *MIRKO PRESSER* > *INTERNET OF THINGS EXPERT AND TEAM LEADER* > DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING LAB > ALEXANDRA INSTITUTTET A/S > ÅBOGADE 34, 8200 AARHUS N > KONTOR: HOPPER-333 > + 45 30 49 09 76 <tel:%2B%2045%2030%2049%2009%2076> > mirko.presser at alexandra.dk <mailto:fornavn.efternavn at alexandra.dk> > alexandra.dk <http://www.alexandra.dk/> > linkedin.com/in/mirkopresser <http://linkedin.com/in/mirkopresser> > twitter.com/mirkopresser <http://twitter.com/mirkopresser> > *____________________________________________* > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities mailing list > Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org > <mailto:Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org> > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities > > > -- *Sébastien Ziegler Director, Mandat International* President, IoT Forum Vice Chairman, IEEE ComSoc Internet of Things TsC Rapporteur on Research and Emerging Technologies for the IoT and Smart Cities, ITU-T SG20 Coordinator IoT Lab, F-Interop and Privacy Flag European research projects Mandat International International Cooperation Foundation 3 ch. du Champ-Baron 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Phone: +41 79 750 53 83 sziegler at mandint.org <mailto:sziegler at mandint.org>www.mandint.org <http://www.mandint.org/> ********************************************* This e-mail may contain privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you are not one of its formal addressees, you are hereby notified that any reading, review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited and would constitute a breach of national and international laws, including the rights protecting privacy and communications. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities/attachments/20160409/25cfc2fd/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy