dear juanjo (only to you and pcc), he asked for the plan of future meetings of the pcc only while you reply with the overall strategy of the project coordination. this is also good, but i do not understand why you did that way. any specific reason we do not know and we should? ciao, stefano 2012/10/21 Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> > Dear all, > > Arian Zwegers asked us for meetings about the PCC in the following 3-4 > months ... therefore we have sent to him the attached response clarifying > how PCC activities (as described in the DoW) are organized and how the > different meetings for coordination of FI-WARE activities are organized. > We forward our response to you for overall alignment. > > Note that the PCC, as stated in the DoW, carry out activities that we > have split into two different kind of meetings (besides meetings linked to > Task Forces whenever they are created) for obvious practical reasons: > > - Global Technical Coordination Activities: these map to our weekly > joint WPLs/WPAs confcalls called and discussion driven through the > fiware-wpl and fiware-wpa mailing lists. > - Global Administrative/Strategic Coordination Activities: these map > to meetings called and discussion driven through the fiware-pcc mailing > list. > > All this is explained in detail in the email sent to Arian that I would > strongly recommend to read. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE PCC meetings Date: > Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:44:50 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es><jhierro at tid.es> To: > Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: jimenez at tid.es, mcp at tid.es, "jhierro >> > \"Juan J. Hierro\"" <jhierro at tid.es> <jhierro at tid.es> > > Dear Arian, > > Sorry for the delay in responding to this. Honestly speaking, it got > forgotten ... so thanks for the reminder. > > According to the DoW, the PCC takes care of the technical overall > management of the activities and in particular: > > 1. Approving major technical decisions and the definition of the > technical roadmap of the Project; > 2. reviewing plans and activities of each WP in the Project, together > with the corresponding WPLs; > 3. reviewing the overall quality of WP and deliverables; > 4. making proposals to the GA for allocating the Project's budget in > accordance with the CA, reviewing and proposing budget reallocations to the > Parties; > 5. making proposals to the GA about Defaults in obligations by any > Party so that the GA can take an informed decision; > 6. proposing to the General Assembly the plan for using and > disseminating the Foreground in accordance with the CA, including proposals > for IPR development; > 7. consideration of input from other PPP projects (CSA, UA) and > decision on implementation. It is recognized that input from the UA is > crucial for the technical work and every effort should be made to accept > those proposals. In the rare special cases when no clear technical decision > at the Architecture Board is achieved, the GA will re-consider those > special cases with due regard to the PPP programme’s overall success. > 8. proposing to the GA procedures and tools for the marking and > handling of information exchanged between Parties in the performance of the > Project; and evaluating opportunities for co-operation with other projects, > outside the PPP, and proposing to the General Assembly that it proposes to > the Parties that they enter into a Project Co-operation Agreement; > 9. generating, updating and distributing to the Parties, a schedule of > proposed meetings of committees of standards organisations relevant for the > potential submission of Foreground as standards proposals. > > > Besides, it is also mentioned in the DoW that the PCC holds two type of > meetings: > > - Global coordination meetings, to consider general project aspects. > - Specific meetings to follow-up progress of a specific WP. Those > meetings will not require the presence of the full PCC but will be attended > by the WPL and those people designated by the WPL. > > > The way in which all this is implemented in FI-WARE is that Global > Coordination meetings are splitted in two: > > - Global technical coordination meetings devoted to follow-up > technical process of the whole FI-WARE project systematically take place > every week or every two-weeks depending of the period. Since more or less > May, we are meeting every week. These meetings involve the WPLs and WPAs > of every WP and there, we take care of points 1, 2, 3, 7 and 9 of the list > above. Also Axel Fasse attends these meetings despite he is not a WPL as > such (Uwe Riss is the WPL of WP3). This is because his role supporting > overall coordination. > - Global administrative/strategic coordination meetings take place > whenever this is required. However experience demonstrates that there is > no more than one month and half time between two consecutive meetings, > sometimes several in one month. We take care of points 4, 5, 6 and 8 of > the list above. These meetings also involve the WPLs of every WP, despite > in this case we agreed that it would be companies leading a WP, instead of > the WPL who attend these meetings. This was to allow that a more senior > executive participates instead of the WPL himself. As an example, Axel > Fasse from SAP, Yaron Wolfsthal from IBM or Nuria de Lama from ATOS attend > this meeting (though Alex Glikson, WPL of Cloud uses to attend as well > these meetings). > > > Besides, specific meetings are derived from Global Technical > Coordination or Global Administrative/Strategic meetings, which do not > necessarily have to involve all WPLs/WPAs and many times requires > participation of some experts on the matter. We typically refer to them > as "Task Forces". Some examples are: > > - meetings to deal with a specific technical issue (e.g., how to > coordinate definition of NGSI-related issues) > - meetings to deal with specific coordination of some project activity > (e.g., meeting to coordinate/follow-up delivery of some concrete > deliverables) > - meetings to deal with some specific administrative/strategic > coordination activity (e.g., reaching consensus about a single FI-WARE > Legal Notice for FI-WARE Open Specifications) > > > Communication regarding the two types of Global Coordination meetings > take place through different mailing lists because people are not the same > (although many of them are in both). While communication regarding Global > Technical Coordination flows through the ordinary WPLs and WPAs mailing > lists, i.e., fiware-wpl and fiware-wpa mailing lists, communication > regarding Global Administrative/Strategic Coordination flows through a > mailing list named fiware-pcc. Very detailed minutes are derived from > each of these meetings. Recently, regarding minutes of the Global > Technical Coordination meetings, we have decided to send minutes directly > to the consortia the day after each of the joint WPLs/WPAs meeting to > accelerate communication and stimulate awareness about APs taken. > > > Some of these specific meetings become permanent and lead to creation of > a specific mailing list where discussion takes place at regular intervals > (e.g., there is a specific fiware-ngsi mailing list dealing with discussion > of NGSI-related topics, relevant to several WPs) > > Besides this, each WP has a weekly meeting and I attend some of them to > have a more close look at what is going on. > > Hope this summary helps. If you have further questions, don't hesitate > to ask. Of course, if you have any feedback, it will be rather welcome. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 20/10/12 16:04, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: > > Any response? > > > > > > *From:* Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es <mcp at tid.es>] > *Sent:* Monday, October 15, 2012 5:36 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *Subject:* Re: FI-WARE PCC meetings > > > > Dear Arian, > > I CC Juanjo and Jose who are the ones who best can answer this question > because they are part of the PCC. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > El 15/10/2012 16:05, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu escribió: > > Dear Miguel, > > > > Is there a schedule for the FI-WARE PCC meeting? > > According to the DoW, the PCC meets regularly every month, either > physically or virtually, and works continuously between the meetings via > e-mail, chat and audio/video conferences. > > What are the planned PCC meetings for the next 3-4 months? > > > > Thanks, > > Arian. > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telefónica Distrito Telefónica > > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigación y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicación S/N > > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > > > e-mail: mcp at tid.es > > > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > > > Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20121021/dcdf7327/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy