I will provide IBM's response within the next 45 minutes. From: "Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard" <burkhard.neidecker-lutz at sap.com> To: Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>, Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it>, Cc: "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> Date: 27/02/2013 04:48 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] R: Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM) Sent by: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Fine with me. Burkhard From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013 15:40 To: Garino Pierangelo Cc: Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: R: [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM) On 27/02/13 15:29, Garino Pierangelo wrote: Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: mercoledì 27 febbraio 2013 15:16 A: Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM) On 27/02/13 13:42, Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard wrote: Hello everybody, here is the proposed text from SAP legal regarding the steering board mandates: ?Project Coordinators should discuss the proposals for the SB decisions in their project according to the processes laid down in the Collaboration Agreement and the individual projects Consortium Agreement with all project partners and get the necessary mandate together with the second representative of the sending FII project consortium to discuss, negotiate and decide about the content of the respective recommendation of the SB.? This is fine to me. Unless I hear about any objection before 16:30, I will include this text as proposed text in the email to be sent to the EC. [PG] didn?t we define in the call this morning, that the reference to the Consortium Agreement could be substituted by a wording like e.g. ?and the individual projects internal procedures? ? Good point Pier, you are right. I'm happy with your proposed amendment ... What about you Burkhard ? Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/4ad91b0e/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy