[Fiware-pcc] R: Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)

Yaron Wolfsthal WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com
Wed Feb 27 15:52:56 CET 2013


I will provide IBM's response within the next 45 minutes.



From:   "Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard" <burkhard.neidecker-lutz at sap.com>
To:     Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>, Garino Pierangelo 
<pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it>, 
Cc:     "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Date:   27/02/2013 04:48 PM
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-pcc] R: Minutes and very final URGENT checks 
prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)
Sent by:        fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu



Fine with me.
 
  Burkhard
 
From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] 
Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013 15:40
To: Garino Pierangelo
Cc: Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: Re: R: [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior 
sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)
 


On 27/02/13 15:29, Garino Pierangelo wrote:
 
 
Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [
mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro
Inviato: mercoledì 27 febbraio 2013 15:16
A: Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard
Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior 
sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)
 
On 27/02/13 13:42, Neidecker-Lutz, Burkhard wrote:
Hello everybody, here is the proposed text from SAP legal regarding the 
steering board mandates:
 
?Project Coordinators should discuss the proposals for the SB decisions in 
their project according to the processes laid down in the Collaboration 
Agreement and the individual projects Consortium Agreement with all 
project partners and get the necessary mandate together with the second 
representative of the sending FII project consortium to discuss, negotiate 
and decide about the content of the respective recommendation of the SB.?

  This is fine to me.   Unless I hear about any objection before 16:30, I 
will include this text as proposed text in the email to be sent to the EC. 
  

[PG]  didn?t we define in the call this morning, that the reference to the 
Consortium Agreement could be substituted by a wording like e.g. ?and the 
individual projects internal procedures? ?
 
 
 
   Good point Pier, you are right.   I'm happy with your proposed 
amendment ... What about you Burkhard ?

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar 
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace 
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and 
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-pcc mailing list
Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/4ad91b0e/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-pcc mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy