[Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

[Muryshkin, Peter]

Hi, all,


hope all of you are doing fine so far; I have the following question regarding understanding the evaluation of "Open spec/installation guide" and FIWARE academy; does the current evaluation scheme consider only a deployment information of a release, or as well for developers who wish to step into development of/contributing to respective GEs?


Because for example these (so far well rated, random examples) components do not provide an (easily) working instruction: Wilma; Kurento; while PDP and Orion even integrate with Travis CI which greatly reduces the effort to understand how the component gets compiled and tested (because of this process fully automated and laid open).


kind regards

Peter​


________________________________
Von: fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org <fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org> im Auftrag von Pasquale Vitale <pasquale.vitale at eng.it>
Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juli 2018 17:23
An: clara.pezuela at atos.net; fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org
Betreff: Re: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

Dear all,
I renamed and updated the functional test spreadsheet v13 (in attached) using the last version of GEs (in Failure Rate).

Please note that IoTAgent-JSON (1.6.2) and IoTAgent-UL (1.5.2) are included in the IoT Agents (old IDAS) sheet.

Best regards,
Pasquale


Il 25/06/2018 11:21, Pezuela, Clara ha scritto:
Dear all,

For the public link with QA data, I would like to add current list of labels, so the labels spreadsheet MUST be immediately updated.

For each GE tab, you will see a table like this one:

Attribute

Measure name

Gathered Value

Label (A+++/C)

Notes/Comments/ Objective Evidences (OE)

Usability

Completeness

Good

A+

The Open spec and the installation guide are complete.

Soundness

Good

A+

All expected information is available.

Reliability

Failure Rate

0,14

A++

TF/TE (17/119) for 5.4.0 version

Defects by Priority

1,75

A+

They were found major and minor errors (functional or documental)

Efficiency

Time to Taking charge

9,9

B

The taking charge time is a bit slow

Time to Fix

2,6

A++

The fixing time is very fast


I took Keyrock as example, because it is urgent to re-test this GE as new version has come up and it is essential to have updated results before meeting in Berlin (3-4 July).

But same exercise MUST be done for all GEs.

Davide, could you please be sure that the functional labels related to Reliability contained in the file are updated for all GEs? If not, could you please add accordingly?

Ariel/Carmen, please the same for labels about Usability.

Stefano, please the same for Efficiency, from the data which is collected by the Foundation in Jira system.

All label for non-functional aspects are already updated

DEADLINE: 3 of July Please mark the changes you did by coloring cells in yellow. I will calculate overall labels, I just need you to change the values per tab/GE

Thanks a lot

Clara Pezuela
Head of IT Market
Research and Innovation Group
ARI booklet<https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf>
Atos Spain SA
Clara.pezuela at atos.net<mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>
+34 675 62 9974

[cid:part9.91F97A2D.E379209B at eng.it]


This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional.
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje.
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes.
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus.


__________________________________________________________________________________________

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the following links:
- http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy
- http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE

Fiware-qualityassurance mailing list
Fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org<mailto:Fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org>
https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-qualityassurance



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180702/174ee935/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4796 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180702/174ee935/attachment-0001.jpg>