[Fiware-sust-found] Fiware Community principles

stefano de panfilis stefano.depanfilis at eng.it
Mon May 25 00:14:18 CEST 2015


dear philipp,

last week during the sustainability ws all the uc projects where present
and represented by their coordinators.

we agreed to send them a calendar of actions which includes also providing
by them feedback on the fiware open source community governance model we
are drafting and which i presented at the workshop.

this calendar will be, at the very latest, communicated to them during the
fi-ppp sb this week (28 may). i hope it will be communicated, by juanjo
(?), monday after our wpl confcall.

ciao,
stefano

2015-05-24 22:53 GMT+02:00 Philipp Slusallek <philipp.slusallek at dfki.de>:

> Hi Juanjo,
>
> I am fully with you here, particularly also with respect to quality and
> support (to the same level as we are applying it to FIWARE, of course!).
> An yes, we have talked about this many time, what I am missing is some
> action :-).
>
> Why not send an official offer to the UCs right now. I know that there
> are some potential GEs that are more than willing to start working with
> FIWARE right away. We can collect a list, prioritize, and start with a
> few as guinea pigs to get the process of the ground and gather some
> experience instead of continue doing more "paper work" (some of that is
> required, do not get me wrong, but at the end "show me the code
> (results)" is a key motto in open source and we can still adapt as we go).
>
> The UCs will not be around much longer. Yes, ideally thing should just
> continue as is but we all know that a large disruption of no longer
> having a working relation ship will influence things. So setting up some
> other structure (not necessarily funded) is important to smooth the step
> and create bridges.
>
> I agree also that some of the content SEs are more suited as GEs (some
> of them could actually be integrated nicely into the existing GEs). I am
> not so sure about the separation of SEs from FIWARE. I actually believe
> that one of the biggest issues of the FI-PPP is exactly this separation.
> If  we had had a more tight integration between the UCs and FIWARE a lot
> more and better results would have been possible.
>
> Maybe this can be organized in other ways as well. But this is certainly
> something that can be discussed.
>
>
> Best,
>
>         Philipp
>
> Am 22.05.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Juanjo Hierro:
> >   Importing enablers developed in Use Case projects as FIWARE GEs
> > require that they enter the incubation process we are defining.    I
> > believe that we have talked about this many times.
> >
> >   The decision about the transition from an incubated GE to FIWARE GE
> > will be governed by the FIWARE TC although we plan to make it a
> > transparent process.   Note that we will introduce some assessment
> > regarding sustainability.   As an example, we were thinking in ideas
> > like integrating organizations committing to support incubated GEs in
> > the Help Desk system so that we can assess their performance responding
> > issues raised by the community.   We will also ask for publicly
> > available statements about  commitment as well as commercial plans.
> >
> >   It has been a big effort and depuration of the FIWARE GEs catalogue to
> > end with a comprehensive set of FIWARE GEs that have a relevant
> > commercial support.   We cannot lower the level of ambition/demand on
> > new GEs.
> >
> >   Of course, a different course of action can be taken for SEs.   There
> > I believe things can actually be more flexible.   My personal opinion
> > here is that development in specific domains should be placed in the
> > hands of organizations who can drive/lead the take up of FIWARE in the
> > domains.   In other words, implement some short of delegation.   Of
> > course, overall coherence should be monitored (e.g., avoid that enablers
> > that may be considered generic and even overlap with existing FIWARE
> > GEs, or even incubated GEs, start to be developed in a given domain
> > without doing anything).   A good example would be the CSC-OASC in the
> > domain of Smart Cities.   Note that I don't believe that some
> > content-related enablers should be considered SEs.  Enablers supporting
> > Content Management/Processing/Analysis can be mostly considered generic
> > enablers and I see then clear candidates for the incubation process.
> >
> >   A last work about SEs: they would be searchable in the FIWARE
> > Catalogue (you can see this has been taken into consideration in the
> > current version in production).   But they won't be FIWARE Generic
> > Enablers.   I wouldn't even use the label "FIWARE" to qualify them.   I
> > would use the name of the domain (e.g., "Smart Cities SE" or "eHealth
> SE")
> >
> >   I hope we are on the same page.
> >
> >   Cheers,
> >
> > -- Juanjo
> >
> > On 22/05/15 07:36, Philipp Slusallek wrote:
> >> Hi Stefano,
> >>
> >> Excellent, I am looking forward to it.
> >>
> >> BTW, sorry, if I am raising the topic of UC collaboration repeatedly.
> >> But from what I have seen, we are wasting a lot of potential by not
> >> integrating the already existing FI-PPP partners as well as we should
> >> (of course only where they are willing and prepared -- at least some of
> >> them really are!). Those that are interesting (from my perspective) had
> >> to (also) look for alternative strategies as there was no clear offer
> >> from FIWARE on the table.
> >>
> >> Instead of waiting to set up the overall structure for external
> >> partners, we should already be moving forward, trailblaze, and evaluate
> >> with the existing partners the processes we plan to set in place.
> >>
> >> Just for example FIcontent (as I am most familier with it): There is a
> >> lot of feedback and experience in FIcontent trying to set up their
> >> FIC2-Lab within the context of FIWARE-Lab (e.g. also including Docker).
> >> Both their Web-Based Developer Playground for real-time
> >> editing/running/sharing via social networks of GE/SE usage examples or
> >> their One-Click deployment of entire arrangements of GEs/SEs (via
> >> Docker) is something that would be very interesting also for FIWARE. We
> >> should -- at least -- be talking to them about that and planning if and
> >> how we can take on board the best of those ideas.
> >>
> >> I am missing this discussion being driven be FIWARE. However, we must
> >> ensure that any such integration is based on an equal playing field.
> >>
> >> FIcontent has sent to Juanjo an email requesting such closer
> >> collaboration, suggesting setting up some direkt links and discussion of
> >> the way forward. I very much hope that we as FIWARE will be engaging
> here.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >>      Philipp
> >>
> >> P.S.: For full disclosure, I am involved in FIcontent and (to a much
> >> lesser degree) in FITMAN and have co-signed the FIC2 letter to Juanjo.
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 21.05.2015 um 15:55 schrieb stefano de panfilis:
> >>> Dear philipp,
> >>>
> >>> sorry your email lost in the thread....
> >>>
> >>> as said by joel yesterday was the first interaction with uc projects
> >>> and, as an outcome of the meeting, it was agreed us to communicate the
> >>> plan we intend to follow to publish and launch the fiware oss
> community.
> >>>
> >>> this way they can contribute if they wish.
> >>> it is expected to communicate the plan at the very most tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> ciao,
> >>> stefano
> >>>
> >>> 2015-05-20 15:37 GMT+02:00 <joel.riga at orange.com
> >>> <mailto:joel.riga at orange.com>>:
> >>>
> >>>     Dear Philipp,
> >>>
> >>>     Yesterday was the first interaction with other projects (including
> >>>     usecase projects ? Stefano could tell us I think).
> >>>
> >>>     Joel
> >>>
> >>>     -----Message d'origine-----
> >>>     De : Philipp Slusallek [mailto:philipp.slusallek at dfki.de
> >>>     <mailto:philipp.slusallek at dfki.de>]
> >>>     Envoyé : mercredi 20 mai 2015 13:31
> >>>     À : RIGA Joel IMT/OLPS
> >>>     Cc : Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org
> >>>     <mailto:Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org>
> >>>     Objet : Re: [Fiware-sust-found] Fiware Community principles
> >>>
> >>>     Hi,
> >>>
> >>>     Quick question: To what degree has have these plans be communicated
> >>>     and coordinated with the use-case projects yet?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Best,
> >>>
> >>>             Philipp
> >>>
> >>>     Am 20.05.2015 um 11:36 schrieb joel.riga at orange.com
> >>>     <mailto:joel.riga at orange.com>:
> >>>     > Dear all,
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > Please find (finally) the document that have been showed
> yesterday in
> >>>     > Brussels during a meeting concerning Sustainability (cross
> projects).
> >>>     > The next coming phase is to take your remarks and expectation
> into
> >>>     > account so that we can be aligned before the creation of such a
> >>>     > community. The calendar for the launch of the Fiware community
> will be
> >>>     > distribute soon.
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > Now I will ask to the FIWARE Core Industry Group what method to
> use
> >>>     > for your contribution to enrich the basic elements that are
> mentioned
> >>>     > in the joined document, but also in the reference document that
> we are
> >>>     > still waiting for.
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > Joel
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > logo Orange <http://www.orange.com/>
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > *Joël RIGA *
> >>>     > Projets collaboratifs Europe Futur Internet Orange/IMT/OLPS/GS
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > mobile : 0679641748
> >>>     > <
> https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclic
> >>>     > voice.sso.francetelecom.fr
> >>>     <http://voice.sso.francetelecom.fr
> >%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefau
> >>>     > lt%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D0679641748>
> >>>     >
> >>>     > joel.riga at orange.com <mailto:joel.riga at orange.com>
> >>>     <mailto:joel.riga at orange.com <mailto:joel.riga at orange.com>>
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>>     > ___________________________________________________
> >>>     >
> >>>     > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
> informations
> >>>     > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
> diffuses,
> >>>     > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
> message
> >>>     > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire
> >>>     ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant
> >>>     susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si
> ce
> >>>     message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> >>>     >
> >>>     > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> >>>     > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should
> >>>     not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> >>>     > If you have received this email in error, please notify the
> sender
> >>>     and delete this message and its attachments.
> >>>     > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that
> >>>     have been modified, changed or falsified.
> >>>     > Thank you.
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     >
> >>>     > _______________________________________________
> >>>     > Fiware-sust-found mailing list
> >>>     > Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org
> >>>     <mailto:Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org>
> >>>     > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-sust-found
> >>>     >
> >>>
> >>>     --
> >>>
> >>>
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>     Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
> >>>     Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
> >>>
> >>>     Geschäftsführung:
> >>>       Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> >>>       Dr. Walter Olthoff
> >>>     Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
> >>>       Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
> >>>
> >>>     Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
> >>>     USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer:  19/673/0060/3
> >>>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
>  _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>     Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> >>>     confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> >>>     pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous
> >>>     avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> >>>     a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
> >>>     messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> >>>     Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
> >>>     deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> >>>
> >>>     This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> >>>     privileged information that may be protected by law;
> >>>     they should not be distributed, used or copied without
> authorisation.
> >>>     If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> >>>     and delete this message and its attachments.
> >>>     As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that
> >>>     have been modified, changed or falsified.
> >>>     Thank you.
> >>>
> >>>     _______________________________________________
> >>>     Fiware-sust-found mailing list
> >>>     Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org
> >>>     <mailto:Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org>
> >>>     https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-sust-found
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Stefano De Panfilis
> >>> Chief Innovation Officer
> >>> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> >>> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> >>> 00148 Roma
> >>> Italy
> >>>
> >>> tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253
> >>> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> >>> fax: +39-068307-4200
> >>> cell: +39-335-7542-567
> >>> skype: depa01
> >>> twitter: @depa01
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Fiware-sust-found mailing list
> >> Fiware-sust-found at lists.fi-ware.org
> >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-sust-found
> >
> > --
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> >
> > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform
> > CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica
> >
> > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com
> > twitter: @JuanjoHierro
> >
> > You can follow FIWARE at:
> >   website:  http://www.fiware.org
> >   twitter:  @FIWARE
> >   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
> >   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
> > puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
> > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
> > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
> > divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud
> > de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le
> > rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda
> > a su destrucción.
> >
> > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
> > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> > or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately
> > reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error
> > and then delete it.
> >
> > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu
> > destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é
> > para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa
> > senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura,
> > utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em
> > virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro,
> > rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e
> > proceda a sua destruição
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>
> Geschäftsführung:
>   Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
>   Dr. Walter Olthoff
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
>   Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer:  19/673/0060/3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
twitter: @depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-sust-found/attachments/20150525/71630ab4/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-sust-found mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy