dear juanjo, > Well ... come on :-) I believe this would be needed in just a few > cases ... Of course, by no means, we should invite more than one > additional people, let's say, by chapter. > :-) > > for what i understood from the previous review is that they would like > to see the impact of our choices. so it is important that we are able to > issue such message, and this will somehoe simple as it can be derived from > the educational weeks, justifying the choiches behind the ges (at least > why, what, to whom). > > > I agree this is an important piece of what we will present there. > Would be part of the technical presentations I was referring to. I agree > that we may gather some input from the educational sessions, but not just > them. As an example, we would have to elaborate on why we decided to go > for FI-WARE NGSI and the impact we expect to achieve. > agree, in fact there migth be other choices too that for sure the uc migth not be fully conscious about. in the end we are a project and a consortium with its own strategy too, isn't it? if we have just a technical review, not only it is boring (but this could > be a good way to have the reviwers sleeping), but also we could miss the > point that is already in the remarks: i.e. showing the impact of our > choices. of course we have to show our choices but not in the detail that > we need strong experts for each ge. > > of course i think we need to devote a pcc meeting and wlp/wpa meetings > to carefully design the review agenda. > > > I guess this is more a matter of a meeting among the WPLs/WPAs rather > than the PCC. We of course have to work on it as soon as we close a date > for the review. > well ... strategies should come from the pcc while wpl/wpa should implement them ... but of course what matters is that we have an agreed story to tell well before the review! ciao, stefano > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ciao, > stefano > > > 2012/4/24 Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for raising the question. >> >> I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the >> Architecture. And there will be technical presentations on each >> chapter. >> >> The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to >> cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he >> believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed >> question. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website: www.tid.es >> email: jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote: >> >> Dear Juanjo, >> I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the >> review. >> I do not know how the review will be organized and what the >> P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the >> responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL >> or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case >> of questions. >> >> My two cents >> >> Best, >> >> M. >> >> Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: >> >> Hi all, >> >> One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the >> dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. >> >> I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal >> to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I >> have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: >> >> http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s >> >> >> Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian >> comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle >> poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I >> will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about >> a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that >> have been cast clearly points to a given week. >> >> Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so >> that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. >> >> Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE >> chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. >> Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course >> Jose and me. >> >> Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational >> session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at >> least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we >> should prepare. >> >> Please cast your vote as soon as possible. >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website: www.tid.es >> email: jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace >> situado más abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing listFiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.euhttp://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace >> situado más abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing list >> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20120424/1263cd08/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy