[Fiware-wpa] Fwd: RE: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables

[Juanjo Hierro]

Dear all,

  As you know, I told you that I formulated a question to Arian regarding how cost reports will be managed when re-submitted deliverables are accepted.

  Please find below the response by Arian.

  My understanding is that, unless we report a cost for developing a deliverable that is much more than what was initially planned, the costs will be accepted.    Regarding how much cost a deliverable was planned, I guess that the EC should rely on information in NEF ...

  Therefore, I understand we shouldn't expect any bad surprise.

  Different story, I guess, has to do with deliverables for which re-submission was rejected ...

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo


-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        RE: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:51:42 +0000
From:   <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu><mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
To:     <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
CC:     <subsidies at tid.es><mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, <mcp at tid.es><mailto:mcp at tid.es>, <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu><mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>



Dear Juanjo,

Acceptance / rejection decisions about costs will only be made when financial and effort figures are present, so in this case at M24.

Regarding (temporarily) rejected costs in reporting period 1, and associated deliverables accepted in the M18 review report, such costs would under normal circumstances be accepted. Circumstances would not be normal if e.g. 3x the amount of efforts were spent on a deliverable than planned, without proper justification. Again, that will only be assessed at M24.

Best regards,
Arian.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:23 AM
To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT)
Cc: subsidies at tid.es<mailto:subsidies at tid.es>; Miguel Carrillo; CNECT-ICT-285248
Subject: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables

Dear Arian,

   Partners also want to know what are the implications, regarding
assessment of costs, of the rejection of re-submitted deliverables,
overall when no re-submission is requested (e.g., re-submission of
deliverable D.2.4.1)

   Thanks in advance,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
   website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
   twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932

On 19/03/13 07:34, Juanjo Hierro wrote:
> Dear Arian,
>
>   Several partners are asking whether it can be assumed that costs
> rejected in the 1st reporting period (M12) review report matching
> deliverables that have been re-submitted and accepted in the M18
> review will be then accepted in the 2nd reporting period.
>
>   Could you elaborate on what the official rules of FP7 projects state
> in this respect ?
>
>   Thanks in advance,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
> email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
> and Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>   website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>   twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
.





________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20130320/8406f84b/attachment.html>